Politics Trump's mark on federal courts could last decades

15:50  30 june  2020
15:50  30 june  2020 Source:   thehill.com

Federal prosecutor who led Cohen probe now atop NY office

  Federal prosecutor who led Cohen probe now atop NY office NEW YORK (AP) — A federal prosecutor who held a key role in the case against President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney worked Monday to restore calm to the Manhattan prosecutor’s office, following the abrupt ouster of her predecessor. Audrey Strauss, the newly appointed acting U.S. attorney, sent an email to the staff Saturday night within hours of the announcement by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman that he would leave his position and would be replaced by her.

President Donald Trump will leave a decades -long imprint on the federal judiciary in Texas, no matter if he Trump -appointed judges now make up a plurality on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals While it’s not unusual for a president to leave a mark on the federal judiciary, Trump ’ s machine-like

Trump ' s legacy: conservative judges who will dominate US law for decades . Trump ’ s nominees are also notably young, meaning their lifetime appointments could be good for another 40 And recently Trump accelerated further, following a Senate rules change McConnell put into effect last month that

President Trump's impact on the federal judiciary will be felt for decades, regardless of whether he wins reelection in November.

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie: Trump's mark on federal courts could last decades © Getty Images Trump's mark on federal courts could last decades

Trump last week saw the Senate confirm his 200th judicial appointment, marking a significant milestone for the administration, the conservative legal movement and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who has worked furiously to remake the courts. Not since Jimmy Carter has a president appointed as many federal judges at this point in his first term.

Trump has appointed 53 judges to the influential Courts of Appeals, the last stop for cases before the Supreme Court, filling 30 percent of its seats with hand-picked conservatives.

Justices rule for Trump administration in deportation case

  Justices rule for Trump administration in deportation case The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can deport some people seeking asylum without allowing them to make their case to a federal judge. © Provided by Associated Press The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, early Monday, June 15, 2020. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) The high court's 7-2 ruling applies to people who fail their initial asylum screenings, making them eligible for quick deportation, or expedited removal. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

President Donald Trump ' s 200th judicial nominee was confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate on Wednesday, marking a significant milestone in a presidency that has tilted the federal judiciary in a conservative direction for decades to come. Analysis: This will be Trump ' s longest lasting legacy.

"What Trump is doing will be detrimental to millions of people." Cited as evidence that Mr. Trump ' s judges will dismantle progressive policies is a December Aided by the Republican-controlled Senate, Mr. Trump prioritized filling vacancies on the appellate courts during his first three years in office.

Those judges have already made an impact with rulings and dissents on the Affordable Care Act, abortion and executive power, and will be shaping the law long after Trump leaves office. Many of Trump's appointees have been young and federal judges serve lifetime appointments.

The average age of Trump's judges at the time they were appointed is 48 years old, compared with 57 for Barack Obama's appointees, 51 for George W. Bush's and 50 for Bill Clinton's, according to an analysis by the Brookings Institution from late February.

Trump's appointees are also whiter and overwhelmingly male when compared to those tapped for the federal judiciary under his predecessor.

Stephen Burbank, a University of Pennsylvania law professor, said Trump has broken with a trend set by prior administrations of seeking to appoint a diverse group of judges to the federal bench.

The five people (not named Trump or Biden) who loom large over the 2020 presidential race

  The five people (not named Trump or Biden) who loom large over the 2020 presidential race When Americans vote for president this fall, they basically face a choice between two men: President Trump and Joe Biden. But there are others who factor into the 2020 campaign's stakes and outcomes.But other people will shape the 2020 election as well. Here’s a quick look at five.

While Trump ’ s supreme court picks, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch, have received a lion’s share of the public’s attention, his appeals and district court picks could have more influence over the life of the nation, because of the relatively limited number of cases the US supreme court hears.

If Mr. Trump prevails in court , future presidents could potentially use an executive order to shrink any of the dozens of monuments created by their predecessors or similarly revoke presidential decisions to protect federal waters. For more news on climate and the environment, follow @NYTClimate on Twitter.

Many of the appointees have ties to a conservative legal movement opposed to abortion, environmental and labor protections and restrictions on presidential power. Daniel Goldberg, the legal director of the progressive Alliance for Justice, described the appointees as "committed to advancing a partisan ideological agenda on the bench that Republicans cannot achieve in Congress."

Trump's allies view his mark on the courts as a signature accomplishment and one that can help the president galvanize his base of supporters ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

Trump often touts his judicial appointments in campaign speeches and official addresses, doing so at a recent rally in Tulsa, Okla., as he warned that Democrats would appoint justices to the Supreme Court who "utterly obliterate your Constitution."

Carrie Severino, president of the conservative Judicial Crisis Network and former law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, argued Trump has selected nominees who are not afraid of handing down unpopular opinions in order to remain faithful to the Constitution.

Judge Blocks Trump Admin. Rule on Third-Country Asylum Seekers

  Judge Blocks Trump Admin. Rule on Third-Country Asylum Seekers U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly said that the administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act when adopting the policy. The APA requires that the federal government allow time for Americans to weigh in on certain proposed federal policy changes. “There are many circumstances in which courts appropriately defer to the national security judgments of the Executive,” Kelly wrote in his opinion. “But determining the scope of an APA exception is not one of them.

Mr. Trump could soon find himself responsible for appointing a greater share of federal court judges than any first-term president in 40 years. There are 870 Article III federal court judgeships, the vast majority on district courts or appeals courts like the one that recently upheld a halt on Mr. Trump ’ s

The third version of Trump ' s immigration and visitor policies includes a ban on travel into the U.S. from six mostly Muslim countries. Other pending court challenges where Republicans on Capitol Hill and the White House could face court setbacks include gun control, gerrymandering, religious freedom

"These judicial appointments are incredibly important and no less so now when there are so many voices looking for the end of constitutional structure," Severino said.

At the same time, the 200-judge milestone comes as conservatives are grappling with a string of recent unexpected losses at the Supreme Court.

Earlier this month, Neil Gorsuch, Trump's first nominee to the bench, sided with Chief Justice John Roberts and the liberal justices to guarantee LGBT individuals protection from workplace discrimination in a landmark ruling.

Roberts on Monday joined with the liberal justices in striking down a Louisiana abortion law that would have closed abortion clinics in the state. And he also sided with the liberal wing this month to block Trump's plan to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

The decisions have incensed conservatives and even prompted some to question the enormously successful right-wing movement propelling Trump's judicial confirmations project. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) called the LGBT decision a major blow to social conservatives who had helped champion Gorsuch and other nominees.

Immigration judges sue DOJ over restrictions on speaking publicly

  Immigration judges sue DOJ over restrictions on speaking publicly A coalition of federal immigration judges is suing the Justice Department, claiming they have been unfairly prevented from speaking to the public about their concerns over the coronavirus pandemic’s impact on immigrants in custody. © Provided by FOX News The complaint, filed Wednesday in the Eastern District of Virginia, was brought on behalf of approximately 460 immigration judges by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. It alleges that the Trump administration has imposed new rules blocking judges from speaking out in their personal capacity.

Trump has been a fervent proponent of discredited claims of voter fraud, and of measures purported to counter that fraud. But even in his statement disbanding the commission last week, Trump declined to adopt that Trump ’ s campaign faced multiple lawsuits over its poll-watching and “ballot security”

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Monday to reverse a lower court ruling and allow a series of federal executions to begin But attorneys for the inmates last week accused the Justice Department of trying to "side-step judicial review" by seeking a way around the injunction.

"It represents the end of the conservative legal movement, or the conservative legal project, as we know it," Hawley said in a Senate floor speech two weeks ago. "If we've been fighting for originalism and textualism and this is the result of that, then I have to say that we haven't been fighting for very much."

In response to the high-profile decisions, Trump is again campaigning on a promise to elevate more conservatives to the Supreme Court and other federal benches. Meanwhile, the president is trailing presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden nationally and in key swing states, according to recent surveys.

Trump said earlier this month that he planned to release an updated list of potential Supreme Court nominees following the DACA decision.

A source with knowledge of the judicial selection process said the administration is still in the early stages of revising the shortlist and would likely release it in September. The administration is expected to consider some judges that Trump has placed on the appellate bench as candidates for the list.

Trump first released his list of potential Supreme Court nominees in May 2016, shortly after being dubbed the presumptive GOP nominee. The list was created with the input of the Federalist Society, an influential network of conservative lawyers and judges that advocates an originalist approach to interpreting the law.

Debt relief is now harder for students of for-profit colleges

  Debt relief is now harder for students of for-profit colleges For-profit colleges are accused of deceiving students across the nation and leaving them with a legacy of student debt. Predatory schools allegedly targeted veterans for their GI benefits and also set their sights on lower-income communities and communities of color.Now, new, controversial rules will make it more difficult for deceived student borrowers to get relief from their loans. The rules went into effect Wednesday (July 1), after President Trump - ignoring veterans and consumer groups - vetoed a resolution that would have stopped them. More than 300,000 student borrowers have applied to the Department of Education for loan relief.

Despite the recent losses at the Supreme Court, many observers see an undeniable rightward shift in the judiciary in recent decades that Trump has helped accelerate.

"I suspect once we have enough decisions to analyze that you're going to see the Trump appointees are hewing much more conservatively than the appointees of other Republican presidents," said Russell Wheeler, a fellow at the Brookings Institution who's been closely tracking Trump's record on judicial nominations.

Wheeler believes that the Federalist Society's influence in the Trump White House prompted the president to pick nominees with conservative bona fides.

Judge Neomi Rao, who was confirmed to her seat on the influential D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2019, has consistently sided with the Trump administration in cases involving immigration, death penalty challenges and congressional investigations into the president. Last week, she wrote a decision ordering a lower court judge to dismiss criminal charges against Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his communications with a Russian diplomat.

Trump's ten appointees to the California-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have helped shift the balance of a court that had been known as one of the more liberal in the country. That paid off last year when two of those judges joined a 7-4 majority siding with the administration's rule restricting federally-funded healthcare providers from discussing abortion with patients.

And Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's second Supreme Court pick, have already joined sweeping decisions restricting public sector unions and legal challenges to gerrymandering.

"Most judicial decisions are pretty cut and dry. There's really no doubt how the decision should come out and that's the reason you have a high number of unanimous decisions among court of appeals panels. But there are some cases in which the precedents aren't clear, the statute is ambiguous and in that situation judges give more play to their own ideological policy choice," Wheeler said.

"And when those cases arise, I think you've got the Trump judges - people who are pretty consistently going to come down on the 'conservative' side of it."

Trump says 'may cut off funding' if U.S. schools do not open .
Trump says 'may cut off funding' if U.S. schools do not open"The Dems think it would be bad for them politically if U.S. schools open before the November Election, but is important for the children & families. May cut off funding if not open!" Trump said on Twitter, pointing to schools reopening in some European countries with no problems.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 0
This is interesting!