Politics How Congress can improve laws on land conservation
The American Government Gave Up on Reality
Over the past 50 years, the three branches have lost their capacity to analyze and act on independent, nonpartisan information.“Whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice” was, Hamilton wrote, entirely uncertain. People are prone to tribalism and irrationality, easy targets for leaders who traffic in demagoguery and corruption. Hamilton doubted that it was even “seriously to be expected” that “We the People” would be able to set aside existing passions and prejudices long enough to debate the ratification of the Constitution itself solely on its merits.
With summer coming to a close, Americans will soon be renewing the traditions of autumn. Fall is my absolute favorite season for outdoor recreation. It is well known that spending time outside provides so many benefits for our health and general well-being while allowing us to respect social distancing guidelines.
Thankfully Congress has already taken action this year that will ensure more land is saved from development and available for recreational pursuits, but more remains to be done. Specifically, in July, Congress passed thewith bipartisan support, fully funding the Land and Water Conservation Fund. This provides federal agencies and state and local governments with the resources they need to protect valuable natural habitats and keep them open to the public. This was a win for all Americans who want to see more land conserved in its natural state.
Amazon land grabbers assail ecotourism paradise in Brazil
ALTER DO CHAO, Brazil (AP) — Brazil’s Alter do Chao, a sleepy village that blends rainforest and beaches, bet on tourism and scored big. Visitors flocked here to eat Amazonian river fish while gazing out over the water, and to take day trips offering the chance to meet Indigenous people and see pink dolphins. But this once pristine place is discovering that the perils of becoming a can’t-miss destination extend beyond hordes of weekend warriors sapping the unspoiled place of its charm.
Although the federal, state and local governments have a critical role to play when it comes to preserving open spaces for current and future generations, the private sector is equally important. Given that most land in the United States is privately owned, Congress should also do as much as possible to encourage private land conservation.
One critical tool designed to encourage private land conservation is the tax deduction available to those who protect their land through conservation easements - restrictions that run with the land forever protecting it from development. Many private landowners who want to conserve their land face a difficult choice. On the one hand is their desire to protect natural habitats, open spaces or working lands for their children and future generations. On the other hand, placing a conservation easement on their property impairs its value and is too often a serious financial burden that most simply cannot afford.
GOP senators buff green credentials as Election Day nears
All politics are local, Senate Republicans’ environmental politics included. In the South, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., favors a ban on offshore oil and gas drilling. In the West, Sens. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., and Steve Daines, R-Mont., highlight their work on a new law that permanently funds the Land and Water Conservation Fund, a federal pool of money from oil and […] The post GOP senators buff green credentials as Election Day nears appeared first on Roll Call.
Congress recognized this dilemma when it first created the tax incentive for private land conservation more than 40 years ago. Since then the tax incentive has been updated by Congress to encourage more Americans to participate in land conservation.
The most recent example came in 2015 when Congress made permanent the enhanced tax incentive, increasing the value of the deduction for donations, called Section 170(h). By increasing the value of the tax benefit permanently, Congress intended to encourage more conservation by more Americans. And it worked - there are currently more than 50 million acres nationwide protected by conservation easements.
When a landowner wants to conserve land and take advantage of the tax incentive, one of the first things they do is hire a qualified appraiser to assess the value of the donation. Typically, this is calculated by comparing the value of the land prior to the conservation easement and then after, keeping in mind the property's "highest and best use."
What happens to the law in a world without Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
Sloppy, purely partisan arguments are likely to prevail.Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) has signaled he intends to back his party’s plan to swiftly confirm a yet-to-be-named replacement for Justice Ruth Bade Ginsburg — and it’s exceedingly unlikely that Democrats can block Trump’s nominee without Romney’s vote.
For over a year, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee has been reviewing this tax incentive over concerns about potential abuse. Last month the, to the tax incentive and identifying valuation of donations as the major source of concern. The next step should be for Congress to take action to address valuation concerns. In addition, Congress should provide greater clarity on the conservation easement rules so landowners won't risk loss of deductions because of easement drafting issues. Recently the IRS has been challenging a once-standard easement clause and denying easement deductions in dozens of cases.
The Land Trust Alliance's (LTA)notes that "the IRS continues to focus on innocent donor documentation mistakes." While the LTA has called on the IRS to crack down on some conservation easements, it has only recently recognized the importance of reining in the IRS approach to conservation easements. I appreciate that LTA now acknowledges that there is far too much uncertainty in this space and that important conservation easements are being needlessly challenged.
Disclosure Doesn’t Work on a Shameless President
A new package of reforms aims to patch a gaping hole in the guardrails of American government.Courts have sometimes checked the Trump presidency, but not always. But court decisions take years to decide and longer to enforce. In July, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress and New York State prosecutors could legally subpoena Trump’s accountants and bankers for his financial records—a ruling that was followed by yet more Trump litigation seeking to challenge, or at least delay, the subpoenas. Even impeachment did not restrain Trump. His strong grip on his party—and on a sufficient minority of the American public—protected him from the Constitution’s ultimate remedy.
Fortunately, there are common sense ways for Congress to address valuation issues without limiting the ability of Americans to conserve land. Congress should put in place reforms that strengthen appraisal standards. This could include requiring proper vetting of all appraisers and mandating that any appraiser working on a conservation easement must have taken a specific educational course on conservation easement appraisals.
In addition, appraisals should be independently verified. This could include hiring a second appraiser to review the initial assessment. As the National Taxpayers Union has, an IRS easement valuation advisory panel could also be useful to help resolve audit disputes.
With a few straightforward improvements such as these focused on the issue of valuation and appraisal, the system can be improved, Americans can have the clarity they deserve, and regulators will have bright lines to follow. What should not be done is anything that would limit the ability of landowners to conserve land.
Now is the time for Congress to get back to work and build on earlier progress. Our natural resources are important, and American citizens want to help protect them. Congress should help them.
Robert Ramsay is a lifelong conservationist and is the president of the Partnership for Conservation ().
Judge removes Trump public lands boss for serving unlawfully
A judge ruled a President Trump appointee was serving unlawfully because he hadn't been confirmed by the Senate.U.S. Interior Department Bureau of Land Management acting director William Perry Pendley served unlawfully for 424 days without being confirmed to the post by the Senate as required under the Constitution, U.S. District Judge Brian Morris determined.
Video: Some companies impose moratorium on fire insurance (ABC 7 San Francisco)
Fact check: It's true. Ginsburg and Scalia were close friends despite ideological differences .
The "odd couple" of the Supreme Court disagreed on the bench but spent every New Year's Eve together.GPS Web Extra: Zarif on negotiating with US