•   
  •   
  •   

Politics AOC and Schumer say 'all options are on the table' to stall nomination

12:45  21 september  2020
12:45  21 september  2020 Source:   dailymail.co.uk

Democrat senator calls on Republicans to 'live with the precedent they set' on Supreme Court confirmations

  Democrat senator calls on Republicans to 'live with the precedent they set' on Supreme Court confirmations Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) called on Senate Republicans on Sunday to "live with the precedent they set" and not rush a confirmation to the Supreme Court after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death.Coons, an ally of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, told "Fox News Sunday" that he plans to talk to GOP colleagues in the upper chamber this week to convince them to "respect tradition" and follow their 2016 precedent that a Supreme Court justice should not be confirmed during an election year. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Ruth Bader Ginsburg posing for the camera: MailOnline logo © Provided by Daily Mail MailOnline logo

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have united to blast Mitch McConnell's 'blatant, nasty hypocrisy' over the Supreme Court pick and to urge voters to pressure GOP senators into delaying Donald Trump's nominee until after the election.

Nearly 50 Percent of Americans Say They Oppose McConnell's Decision to Vote on Trump's SCOTUS Nominee

  Nearly 50 Percent of Americans Say They Oppose McConnell's Decision to Vote on Trump's SCOTUS Nominee In a statement issued on Monday, McConnell said that "President Trump's nominee for this vacancy will receive a vote on the floor of the Senate."Air Force veteran supports victims of gun violence in her community

AOC and Schumer joined forces for a press conference Sunday night outside James Madison High School in Brooklyn, that both Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Schumer attended.

Republicans have said they want to confirm Amy Coney Barrett before Election Day. Here's how long other confirmations took

  Republicans have said they want to confirm Amy Coney Barrett before Election Day. Here's how long other confirmations took Now that Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barret to the Supreme Court, the issue becomes whether the GOP-led Senate can confirm her before Election Day. Amy Coney Barrett named President Trump's third Supreme Court nominee USA TODAY See more videos SHARE SHARE TWEET SHARE EMAIL What to watch next Hear Amy Coney Barrett's tribute to Ruth Bader Ginsburg CNN Amy Coney Barrett speaks after Trump announces her nomination for Supreme Court CNBC Trump announces Amy Coney Barrett as Supreme Court nominee The Washington Post ‘A great Ameri

The two Democrats warned that the rights of Americans are at risk if Trump plows ahead with his plans to appoint a new justice before the election and urged people to call their Senators and demand they respect Ginsburg's dying wish.

They said 'all options are now on the table' to stall Trump's Supreme Court nomination, including pursuing the impeachment of the president and AG Bill Barr.

Ginsburg said her 'most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed' in the days leading up to her death Friday.

The president on Saturday urged the GOP-run Senate to consider 'without delay' his upcoming nomination to fill her seat.

The move comes just six weeks before the election and has sparked fierce debate, with many Democrats - as well as some Republicans - insisting the seat must not be filled until after the election.

Previewing acrimonious confirmation, Democrats coalesce around Amy Coney Barrett opposition

  Previewing acrimonious confirmation, Democrats coalesce around Amy Coney Barrett opposition Democrats objected to both process and the views of Trump's Supreme Court pick, with one senator saying he won't meet with her.One Democratic senator — Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal, who is a member of the Judiciary Committee — said he would not meet with Barrett, as is customary for members of the committee, in protest of Trump’s decision to rush ahead with the nomination so close to an election.

The crux of the debate centers around the move made by Republicans back in 2016 - and led by McConnell - to block then-President Barack Obama from appointing a new justice to the court nine months before the election.

Their argument at the time was that the position should not be filled until a new president was elected by the American people - a standard set by the Republicans that the Democrats now argue the party must continue to honor.

a couple of people that are talking to each other: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have united to say 'all options are now on the table' to stall Trump's Supreme Court nomination - including impeaching the president and AG Bill Barr - as they blast Senate Leader Mitch McConnell for his 'blatant, nasty hypocrisy' © Provided by Daily Mail Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have united to say 'all options are now on the table' to stall Trump's Supreme Court nomination - including impeaching the president and AG Bill Barr - as they blast Senate Leader Mitch McConnell for his 'blatant, nasty hypocrisy'

Democrats have put several options forward to stall or counteract Trump rushing through the appointment for Ginsburg's replacement, with several including Rep. Joe Kennedy III threatening to pack the Supreme Court while others such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have not ruled out pursuing impeachment charges.

Democrats eye expanding Supreme Court if Trump's nominee is confirmed

  Democrats eye expanding Supreme Court if Trump's nominee is confirmed Democrats are furious that Republicans may confirm a Supreme Court nominee ahead of the election.In 2016, Republicans in control of the Senate blocked President Obama's nominee to the court, Merrick Garland, from even receiving a hearing, leaving the Supreme Court with only eight justices for over a year. Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other Republicans argue that the court must have nine justices ahead of the November election.

AOC echoed the possibility of pursuing impeachment charges Sunday saying there has been 'an enormous amount of lawbreaking' under Trump's watch and branding Barr 'unfit for office'.

'I believe that certainly there has been an enormous amount of lawbreaking in the Trump administration,' she said, when asked about impeachment.

'I believe Attorney General Bill Barr is unfit for office and that he has pursued potentially law-breaking behaviors.'

She said America must 'use every tool at our disposal' and turn to 'unprecedented ways' to stall the appointment and that means putting all options 'on the table'.

'I believe that also we must consider again all the tools available to our disposal and all these options should be entertained and on the table,' she said.

An impeachment would force the US Senate to hold a trial, delaying its ability to appoint Ginsburg's successor.

AOC warned of the risks to the American public if Trump picks a replacement prior to the election.

'It's extraordinarily important that we understand the stakes of this vacancy,' she said.

Pelosi: Trump Supreme Court pick 'threatens' Affordable Care Act

  Pelosi: Trump Supreme Court pick 'threatens' Affordable Care Act House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) slammed President Trump's decision to nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court on Saturday, describing the pick as a threat to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). "For four years, President Trump has tried to crush the Affordable Care Act in the Congress and the Courts," Pelosi said in a statement."This nomination threatens the destruction of life-saving protections for 135 million Americans with pre-existing conditions together with every other benefit and protection of the Affordable Care Act.

'Our reproductive rights are on the line. Our labor rights are on the line. Our rights to healthcare are on the line. Labor and union protections are on the line. Our climate is on the line.

'With an early appointment all our rights, the rights that so many people died for... are at risk.'

The Representative for New York's 14th congressional district spoke of the need to 'buy ourselves some time' by using 'every procedural tool available'.

'We all need to be more courageous and we all must act in unprecedented ways to make sure our rights are stabilized' and that 'the American people have their say'.

a person posing for the camera: AOC (pictured) echoed the possibility of pursuing impeachment charges Sunday saying there has been 'an enormous amount of lawbreaking' under Trump's watch and branding Barr 'unfit for office' © Provided by Daily Mail AOC (pictured) echoed the possibility of pursuing impeachment charges Sunday saying there has been 'an enormous amount of lawbreaking' under Trump's watch and branding Barr 'unfit for office' a man wearing a suit and tie: Schumer said he was also willing to consider radical options including the possibility of packing the court © Provided by Daily Mail Schumer said he was also willing to consider radical options including the possibility of packing the court

She called on the public to contact US senators and demand they hold off an appointment.

'We need to make sure that we mobilize on an unprecedented scale to ensure that this vacancy is reserved for the next president and we must use every tool at our disposal,' Ocasio-Cortez said.

'Everyday people need to call on senators to hold this vacancy open.'

President Trump Could Become the Most Consequential President in History | Opinion

  President Trump Could Become the Most Consequential President in History | Opinion Conservatives are one vote away from guaranteeing that the rule of law prevails on the Supreme Court for generations to come. Judge Barrett's confirmation to the Supreme Court guarantees a true conservative majority—something for which we've waited more than a lifetime. Mike Davis is the founder and president of the Article III Project (A3P), an advocacy organization that fights for President Trump's judicial nominees.

AOC had stern words for McConnell over his aboutface on the process, saying 'we need to tel him that he is playing with fire'.

Schumer blasted McConnell's 'blatant, nasty hypocrisy' after he said Friday that Trump's nominee would be voted for by the Senate despite insisting in 2016 that a Supreme Court vacancy should not be filled until after the election.

Senate Dems ready tactics to muck up Supreme Court confirmation

  Senate Dems ready tactics to muck up Supreme Court confirmation Here's how Democrats can make life hard for Mitch McConnell. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has his caucus on board with an effort to disrupt and obstruct Senate Republicans, using a wide range of procedural tools to try to make it difficult for the Senate majority leader.

'If you want to get back at Mitch McConnell's blatant, nasty, hypocrisy call your senator and tell them not to listen to Mitch McConnell and not to be afraid of Mitch McConnell and to do the right thing - to stand up and do just what is fair and right and to adhere to RBG's final wish,' Schumer said at the press conference.

He pointed out the time difference between the Merrick Garland case in 2016 which came nine months before the election and today with just six weeks before election night.

'I quote Mitch McConnell what he said four years ago when Merrick Garland was nominated that when it is close to the election the next president should decide,' he said.

Mitch McConnell wearing a suit and tie: Schumer blasted McConnell's (pictured) 'blatant, nasty hypocrisy' after he said Friday that Trump's nominee would be voted for by the Senate despite insisting in 2016 that a Supreme Court vacancy should not be filled until after the election © Provided by Daily Mail Schumer blasted McConnell's (pictured) 'blatant, nasty hypocrisy' after he said Friday that Trump's nominee would be voted for by the Senate despite insisting in 2016 that a Supreme Court vacancy should not be filled until after the election

'People are already voting - it's just a few days away. We are not close to an election. We are in an election,' he said, pointing to the early voting already under way in Virginia.

'To try and decide this at this late moment is despicable and wrong and against democracy,' he continued.

'It's shoving the wishes of the hard right and the wishes of the Republicans that go along with them down Americans' throats.'

Schumer pointed to a Reuters poll that found 62 percent of Americans do not believe the seat should be filled until after the election, saying this was further proof the Trump administration would be going against the wishes of the public by pushing through the appointment.

'That's such a high number it has to mean Democrats, Republicans and independents have to agree that it is only right and only fair to abide by RBG's last wish that she be replaced when a new president is installed,' he said.

He reinforced AOC's calls on the public to pressure senators to keep to the standard set by Republicans in 2016, saying 'we only need two more senators to say they will abide by RBG's wish.'

Senators Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins have both publicly said the chamber should not vote before the election.

Schumer said he was also willing to consider radical options including the possibility of packing the court.

'It will be a decision that comes to the Senate. We first have to win the majority before that can happen... but everything is on the table,' Schumer said when asked by reporters.

Their comments come as several Democrats have vowed the party will expand the size of the court if they capture the Senate in November and Republicans have already pushed through a conservative successor to Ginsburg.

Joe Kennedy III, who represents Massachusetts' 4th Congressional District and is the grandson of Robert F. Kennedy, tweeted Sunday: 'If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021. It's that simple.'

a screenshot of a cell phone: Joe Kennedy III, who represents Massachusetts' 4th Congressional District and is the grandson of Robert F. Kennedy © Provided by Daily Mail Joe Kennedy III, who represents Massachusetts' 4th Congressional District and is the grandson of Robert F. Kennedy Joseph P. Kennedy III wearing a suit and tie: Kennedy III tweeted: 'If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021. It¿s that simple' © Provided by Daily Mail Kennedy III tweeted: 'If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021. It¿s that simple'

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler wrote on Twitter: 'If Sen. McConnell and @SenateGOP were to force through a nominee during the lame-duck session -- before a new Senate and President can take office - then the incoming Senate should immediately move to expand the Supreme Court.'

And Sen. Ed Markey tweeted Friday: 'Mitch McConnell set the precedent. No Supreme Court vacancies filled in an election year.

'If he violates it, when Democrats control the Senate in the next Congress, we must abolish the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court.'

Senator Elizabeth Warren, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris, as well as former Rep. Beto O'Rourke had already raised the possibility of adding as many as six seats to the nine-seat court, long before Ginberg's death.

While running as a Democrat presidential candidate against Biden, Buttigieg was one of the first to put the idea of a Supreme Court expansion back on the table last March.

He said he would restructure the Supreme Court, expanding it to 15 justices with five justices selected by the court itself through a unanimous vote in a move that would help 'de-politicize' it.

O'Rourke also called it 'an idea we should explore' at a campaign stop in Iowa around the same time.

'What if there were five justices selected by Democrats, five justices selected by Republicans and those 10 then pick five more justices independent of those who picked the first 10,' O'Rourke said.

'I think that's an idea we should explore.'

What is court packing?

Court packing is the move to appoint extra justices to the Supreme Court.

It is a move several Democrats have proposed if the party takes control of the Senate in order to increase the presence of liberal justices on the bench.

Franklin D. Roosevelt made attempts to pack the court back in 1937 when the Republican president wanted to pass his New Deal laws and needed more conservative justices in the court to vote in favor of them.

Roosevelt's attempts failed and he was criticized by both Democrats and Republicans for the move.

However Democrats argue court packing will be necessary to rebalance the court if President Trump does not wait until after the presidential inauguration to appoint Justice Ginsburg's replacement.

The issue in contention is that Republicans barred President Obama from appointing a justice in the election year in 2016.

Many Democrats say this meant the seat - finally filled by a Trump nominee after he entered the White house - was 'stolen' by Republicans and that if Republicans now do the very same thing they banned Democrats from doing in 2016 by rushing through an appointment, Democrats will then be within their rights to rebalance the court.

He also suggested putting term limits on justices rather than the current tenure until retirement or death.

'There's another idea of adding term limits on those justices so that there's a more regular rotation through there,' he said.

'We're a country of 320 million people. There's got to be the talent and the wisdom and the perspective and that court should be able to reflect the diversity that we are composed of.'

Harris, Biden's running mate, has also said she wouldn't rule out court packing in the past.

'We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,' she said in March 2019.

'We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.'

Warren said around the same time the focus should be on 'depoliticizing' the court and that adding more judges is 'a conversation that's worth having.'

Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden is yet to wade in on the fresh debate around packing the court since Ginsburg's death.

However, back in 2019, Biden spoke out against the practice.

'No, I'm not prepared to go on and try to pack the court, because we'll live to rue that day,' he told Iowa Starting Line in July 2019.

As long as the GOP holds a majority in the Senate, it's unlikely a Democratic president could add more justices.

Since 1869 nine justices have served on the nation's highest court.

However there is no set requirement on how many justices there should be in the Supreme Court, and Congress can change the number by passing an act signed by the president.

While there are nine now, George Washington had six and Abraham Lincoln had 10, for example.

a screenshot of a cell phone: Democrats have argued Republicans set a standard in 2016 by preventing an appointment during an election year and so the standard must now be maintained © Provided by Daily Mail Democrats have argued Republicans set a standard in 2016 by preventing an appointment during an election year and so the standard must now be maintained

That said, the concept of court packing is a controversial one.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt attempted to pack the court with 15 in 1937 after watching the high court deal setbacks to his New Deal initiatives.

He sought to expand the court to as many as 15 judges but many Republicans - as well as some Democrats - opposed his plan, slamming it as a move to enable him to appoint judges that would push through his laws.

The bill was unpopular and ultimately stalled.

Ginsburg herself also criticized the move prior to her death, telling NPR in an interview last year that it is a 'bad idea' and would 'make the court appear partisan'.

'Nine seems to be a good number. It's been that way for a long time,' she said.

'I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court.'

'Well, if anything would make the court appear partisan, it would be that.

'One side saying, 'When we're in power, we're going to enlarge the number of judges, so we would have more people who will vote the way we want them to.''

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is using his cell phone: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (pictured back in February) died Friday after a battle with cancer. Her dying wish was 'that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed' © Provided by Daily Mail Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (pictured back in February) died Friday after a battle with cancer. Her dying wish was 'that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed'

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not spoken about the option of court packing bu has refused to rule out pushing forward a privileged impeachment resolution that would have the effect of eating up Senate floor time and potentially stall the nomination.

'We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I'm not about to discuss right now but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country,' she told ABC's 'This Week' when asked about the prospect.

'This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election,' Pelosi continued.

'Our main goal would be to protect the integrity of the election as we protect the people from the coronavirus.'

When pressed on the option of expanding the size of the court, Pelosi was less forthcoming.

'Well let's just win the election. Let's hope that the president will see the light,' Pelosi said.

a room full of furniture: The high court's chamber and Justice Ginsburg's seat was draped in black in tribute to the legal pioneer and champion of women's rights © Provided by Daily Mail The high court's chamber and Justice Ginsburg's seat was draped in black in tribute to the legal pioneer and champion of women's rights a large building: Ginsburg's seat is draped in black. Several Democrats have vowed the party will expand the size of the court if they capture the Senate in November and Republicans have pushed through a conservative successor to Ginsburg © Provided by Daily Mail Ginsburg's seat is draped in black. Several Democrats have vowed the party will expand the size of the court if they capture the Senate in November and Republicans have pushed through a conservative successor to Ginsburg

Packing the Supreme Court: For and against?

For:

Against:

While court packing may be a divisive move, it comes as Democrats are scrambling to prevent Trump nominating Ginsburg's successor - something that would directly contradict the stance Republicans took back in 2016 when the shoe was on the other foot.

Justice Antonin Scalia died in February 2016 and then-President Barack Obama planned to appoint Merrick Garland to fill the position on the court.

Republicans refused to hold hearings or vote on a replacement until after a new president took office with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell saying: 'the American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice.

'Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.'

The seat was not filled and two weeks after taking office Trump appointed his own choice Neil Gorsuch to the court instead.

In 2016, the position was empty nine months before the election, while Ginsburg's death comes just six weeks before the nation heads to the polls.

Democrats argue Republicans set a standard in 2016 by preventing an appointment during an election year and so the standard must now be maintained.

They say Republicans 'stole' the seat that should have been filled by Obama, and so Democrats would be within their rights to add more seats to reset the balance.

However, McConnell issued a statement Friday after news of Ginsburg's death broke that appeared to backtrack on his stance in 2016, saying Trump's nominee would be voted for by the Senate.

'President Trump's nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the Unites States senate,' he said.

a person holding a baby: Nancy Pelosi and members of the public paid tribute to Ginsburg outside the Supreme Court. Pelosi on Sunday refused to rule out pushing forward a privileged impeachment resolution to stall the nomination of Ginsburg's successor © Provided by Daily Mail Nancy Pelosi and members of the public paid tribute to Ginsburg outside the Supreme Court. Pelosi on Sunday refused to rule out pushing forward a privileged impeachment resolution to stall the nomination of Ginsburg's successor

The next day, protesters gathered outside McConnell's home to demand he stop pushing forward with a new SCOTUS pick.

Several Democrats have said it would be hypocritical if the president filled Ginsburg's seat on the court before the election and have pointed out McConnell's aboutface on such a move.

'The Senate should not consider a Supreme Court nomination until after the presidential inauguration,' Senator Dianne Feinstein tweeted Sunday.

'Those aren't my words, they're the words of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham.'

Feinstein shared McConnell's pledge in 2016 to block the Democrats from appointing a new justice and also quoted comments made by Graham in 2018.

'If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump's term, and the primary process has started, we'll wait till the next election,' Graham said back in October 2018.

Obama on Friday penned a Medium blog paying tribute to Ginsburg and insisting Trump must not appoint a new justice until after the election because the Republicans refused to allow him to do the same thing back in 2016.

'Four and a half years ago, when Republicans refused to hold a hearing or an up-or-down vote on Merrick Garland, they invented the principle that the Senate shouldn't fill an open seat on the Supreme Court before a new president was sworn in,' he wrote.

'A basic principle of the law — and of everyday fairness — is that we apply rules with consistency, and not based on what's convenient or advantageous in the moment... As votes are already being cast in this election, Republican Senators are now called to apply that standard.'

Franklin D. Roosevelt's failed attempt to pack the court

The only other time court packing has been attempted was in 1937 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried and failed to make the major change to the Supreme Court.

Roosevelt's plan was seen as a move to pass his unpopular New Deal laws.

In 1935, the Supreme Court had struck down three of his New Deal laws.

The House, Senate and White House were all Democrat-controlled but the court was led by 75-year-old Republican Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes and many of the older appointees voted down the laws, because included in one of them was a cut in Supreme Court pensions.

When Roosevelt won a second term in 1936 and soon after he proposed a new bill called the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 to expand the bench from nine to 15 justices, saying there was a need for an 'infusion of new blood in the courts'.

The addition of six justices coincided with the number of justices over the age of 70 currently serving on the court.

Critics slammed the move, accusing Roosevelt of fixing the court with people likely to push through his laws.

Both Republicans and Democrats - even Roosevelt's vice president John Nance Garner - were largely opposed to the plan and the bill to shake-up the court ultimately failed.

However, by the end of his second term, three justices retired and two died, meaning Roosevelt was able to replace all five.

Throughout his White House tenure, the president had appointed nine justcies to the court.

Franklin D. Roosevelt sitting at a table in front of a curtain: President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried and failed to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 © Provided by Daily Mail President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried and failed to pack the Supreme Court in 1937
Read more

Video: Nadler proposes Senate expand number of SCOTUS justices if Dems win election (FOX News)

Senate Dems ready tactics to muck up Supreme Court confirmation .
Here's how Democrats can make life hard for Mitch McConnell. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has his caucus on board with an effort to disrupt and obstruct Senate Republicans, using a wide range of procedural tools to try to make it difficult for the Senate majority leader.

usr: 0
This is interesting!