•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Dems Can’t Block Barrett—So They’ll Use Her as 2020 Cudgel

10:36  28 september  2020
10:36  28 september  2020 Source:   thedailybeast.com

Fact check: 'Kingdom of God' comment by SCOTUS contender Amy Coney Barrett is missing context in meme

  Fact check: 'Kingdom of God' comment by SCOTUS contender Amy Coney Barrett is missing context in meme A 2006 remark about the "Kingdom of God" is missing context in a meme that also falsely attributes views on ending separation of church and state. The widely cited reference to Barrett encouraging a “Kingdom of God” is taken out of context. Fact check: No guarantee Obama would've replaced Ginsburg with a progressive justice Amy Coney Barrett’s religious and judicial views Barrett is a conservative and a favorite among the religious right. Trump appointed Barrett to a be a federal appeals court judge in 2017, and she has since ruled in over 100 cases.

Democrat political operatives went so far as to suggest that Barrett and her husband had abused or kidnapped their two adopted children from Haiti. The globalists want you to be run down and unhealthy so they can dominate your life. Fight back with one of nature's greatest essentials.

That way, Barrett would be confirmed to the Supreme Court even quicker. "Excellent idea! Unfortunately for Cruz, Democrats, despite not having enough votes in the Senate to block Barrett 's So if you're going to use the process to try to steal an election, then we're going to use the process to

When the last U.S. Supreme Court seat opened up, Democrats held out hope that they could stop President Donald Trump’s nominee and force the GOP to compromise.

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie: Chip Somodevilla/Getty © Provided by The Daily Beast Chip Somodevilla/Getty

“If we can successfully block this nomination,” said Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) upon Brett Kavanaugh’s selection in 2018, “it could lead to a more independent, moderate selection that both parties could support.”

Barrett Could Be Most Conservative Justice Since Clarence Thomas

  Barrett Could Be Most Conservative Justice Since Clarence Thomas Amy Coney Barrett brings a resume that could make her the most conservative new justice since Clarence Thomas and a dream addition for Republicans looking to remake the U.S. Supreme Court. © Bloomberg Amy Coney Barrett, U.S. President Donald Trump’s nominee for associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, right, listens as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement ceremony in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Saturday, Sept. 26, 2020.

“ They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological Attacking Barrett for adopting Black children is an interesting response for leftists but apparently they ’ve decided to run with it.

Emily Santiago tweeted: ‘So many white people adopt BIack children and use them as props on social media. This is the Dem gameplan. Nothing but raw bigotry and hate. I promise you, this will not stand Barrett 's strong Christian ideology makes her a favorite of the right but her involvement in a

That, of course, did not happen. Two years later, any shred of hope that Democrats might have to block another Trump pick to the high court has been completely crushed.

Few on either side doubt that Judge Amy Coney Barrett has enough votes in Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) Senate to fill the seat left by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died less than two weeks ago. Aside from dissenters like Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), the GOP has enthusiastically gotten behind the obvious opportunity to tilt the balance of the high court in a conservative direction for years to come, despite their 2016 insistence that voters should have a say in how vacancies are filled.

Top Democrats Quickly Criticize SC Nominee Amy Coney Barrett As Trump Warns Against Getting Personal

  Top Democrats Quickly Criticize SC Nominee Amy Coney Barrett As Trump Warns Against Getting Personal "Millions of families' health care will be ripped away in the middle of a pandemic," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said."Today it is my honor to nominate one of our nation's most brilliant and gifted legal minds to the Supreme Court," Trump said in the Rose Garden on Saturday afternoon. "She is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the Constitution—Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

2020 She was accused of using her identity as a cudgel to castigate the Black Lives Matter movement and resist calls to take meaningful action against police brutality. — Dominic Fracassa, SFChronicle.com, "London Breed: Black mayor. Raised in poverty, surrounded by violence.

It can sound great in a meeting, but sometimes a campaign lands in all the wrong ways. Learn from the mistakes of others, and avoid these marketing fails. Whether it’s true or not, the impression is there, and Facebook can ’ t put the toothpaste back in the tube. Don’t make these marketing fails.

“We can slow it down perhaps a matter of hours, maybe days at the most,” said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the number two Senate Democrat, on ABC’s This Week on Sunday. “But we can't stop the outcome.”

The battle lines of Barrett’s confirmation, then, are forming not around whether she’s actually confirmed—but instead over which party will pay the biggest political price in November for their moves now, as the Senate barrels toward a vote before Election Day.

Tellingly, Schumer’s public statement on Barrett’s nomination was devoid of any hopes for Trump to reconsider. It was instead framed around what Democrats believe to be their biggest political weapon in this fight: the Nov. 10 case before the high court that could strike down the Affordable Care Act, and the possibility that Barrett could be a decisive vote to overturn it.

“The American people should make no mistake,” said Schumer. “A vote by any Senator for Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a vote to strike down the Affordable Care Act and eliminate protections for millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions.”

Previewing acrimonious confirmation, Democrats coalesce around Amy Coney Barrett opposition

  Previewing acrimonious confirmation, Democrats coalesce around Amy Coney Barrett opposition Democrats objected to both process and the views of Trump's Supreme Court pick, with one senator saying he won't meet with her.One Democratic senator — Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal, who is a member of the Judiciary Committee — said he would not meet with Barrett, as is customary for members of the committee, in protest of Trump’s decision to rush ahead with the nomination so close to an election.

The Barrett Nomination Means Literally Nothing. CNN Indicates They Will Refuse to Accept the Results of the Election, Promoting Violent Transfer of Power. Finland Now Using Dogs to Sniff Out Coronavirus Infected Persons.

They can surprise you. Dogs, cats, and birds are probably most known for having distinct personalities. However, one snake owner says that her snake had his D. One of the challenges for implantable tech is delivering power to devices which are inside human bodies. You can ’ t plug them in as you do with

What is at stake for Democrats is the Senate majority, which is within reach as several GOP incumbents trail their Democratic challengers in the polls. The party recaptured the U.S. House in 2018 by centering GOP attempts to repeal the health care law, and they believe they can replicate that playbook for the Senate and the presidential race. The fact that Barrett was the only jurist on Trump’s shortlist to be on record criticizing past decisions to uphold the ACA only makes Democrats’ job easier, many believe.

Obamacare, once the central target of the GOP’s political messaging, is more popular than it has ever been since it became law a decade ago. A July poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 57 percent of voters opposed the current case before the court to overturn the ACA. A majority of voters, and a majority of independent voters, support keeping the law. Recent polling has consistently found that voters trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle health care issues; a recent KFF poll gave Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden a seven to nine point lead over Trump on health care issues.

Amy Coney Barrett: Talented judge, popular professor brings solid conservative credentials

  Amy Coney Barrett: Talented judge, popular professor brings solid conservative credentials Her nomination to the seat held for 27 years by liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg makes Barrett's nomination the most contentious in decades.HHS secretary spotted without mask at Rose Garden event

Can ' t Read Superblock. Hi Lads and Lasses, I've been toying with Ubuntu on and off for a while now but still know very little about what I'm doing, I can use I would use Windows to reformat the drive however, I would like to keep the data on the drive if possible. Error Message: Error mounting: mount

I'm trying to use the diffReps.pl script and have install it using the cpanm method with all the dependencies. But when I am tryoing to run it I keep getting the error message Can ' t use 'defined(@array)' (Maybe you should just omit the d

In typical fashion, Trump attempted to take a sledgehammer to Democratic messaging via Twitter. “Obamacare will be replaced with a MUCH better, and FAR cheaper, alternative if it is terminated in the Supreme Court,” tweeted Trump on Sunday, even though he and his party repeatedly failed to implement such a plan even with unified control of government. “Would be a big WIN for the USA!”

Trump has repeatedly promised to unveil a plan to replace Obamacare—as recently as a few weeks ago—but none has emerged. The White House has sought to attack the problem through Trump’s pen: last week, the president signed a largely toothless executive order last week, which he claimed would protect people with pre-existing health conditions.

Most Republicans understand the weakness, even if the president seemingly does not. Last week, no GOP senator asked by The Daily Beast said it was a priority for them to see a Trump name a nominee who would be poised to strike down the ACA. Many have, to this point, acknowledged that most, if not all, of the sweeping health care law is here to stay.

“We do risk that once—say it’s due to constitutional reasons, and she’s part of it—it’s declared unconstitutional, we better be ready to go with a clear, effective plan,” Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN), told The Daily Beast of Barrett’s nomination. “Or else we’ll pay the price politically.”

Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. What happens next in Senate confirmation process

  Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. What happens next in Senate confirmation process Now that Trump has named Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee to the Supreme Court, the Senate can start its nomination process.How will President Trump's Supreme Court nomination impact Ohio voters?

Broadly, Democrats see their base mobilizing thanks to the enormous stakes of Barrett’s confirmation, which could help usher in rulings that liberals believe would be disastrous, not only on health care but on voting rights, abortion, and other issues central to their coalition. If fundraising numbers are any indication, that mobilization has been swift and massive: in the 28 hours after Ginsburg’s death, the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue reported processing $91 million in donations to candidates.

But in the short term, Republicans see the high court fight as a powerful way to motivate their base ahead of a key election, and at a time where many conservatives increasingly perceive Chief Justice John Roberts as a disappointment who ushered in liberal rulings on immigration, religious rights, and gay rights.

Braun said he was very encouraged by Barrett’s record and cast her as a course-correction for Roberts—someone who’d be in the mold of Antonin Scalia, the late archconservative justice revered on the right. “You could count on them at least not drifting in a way that surprises you,” said Braun.

A confirmation fight that emphasizes the issues conservatives most care about has political upside for the GOP. Republicans feel good, for example, that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)—the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman who is being badly outraised by Democratic challenger Jaime Harrison—will benefit, as could other vulnerable Senate Republicans running in states Trump is set to win.

President Trump Could Become the Most Consequential President in History | Opinion

  President Trump Could Become the Most Consequential President in History | Opinion Conservatives are one vote away from guaranteeing that the rule of law prevails on the Supreme Court for generations to come. Judge Barrett's confirmation to the Supreme Court guarantees a true conservative majority—something for which we've waited more than a lifetime. Mike Davis is the founder and president of the Article III Project (A3P), an advocacy organization that fights for President Trump's judicial nominees.

And many Republicans believe the last court battle, which happened on the eve of the 2018 midterm election, sealed defeat for several Democratic incumbents and expanded the GOP’s Senate majority. But if that year’s explosive debate—sparked by the allegations of sexual assault against Kavanaugh—gave the GOP a rallying cry for a culture war campaign, that possibility is less clear this time around.

That’s not for lack of trying by Republicans, however. Even before Barrett was officially named as the nominee, conservatives quickly sought to claim that she would become the victim of a sustained anti-Catholic smear campaign. That prediction leans heavily on Barrett’s first confirmation hearing to the federal bench in 2017, during which Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) questioned the devout Catholic and Notre Dame professor over her faith. “The dogma lives loudly within you,” said Feinstein, inadvertently giving birth to a popular slogan among conservatives.

Last week, the conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt asked every one of the numerous GOP senators he interviewed what they would do to combat return of anti-Catholic bias, which Hewitt presented as an inevitability. A press release sent out by McConnell’s office on Saturday asked, “will Democrats continue to attack Judge Barrett’s religion?” and listed Feinstein’s comments in 2017 along with two other Democrats who raised her religious beliefs.

Democrats view these efforts quizzically, saying the GOP is aiming to create a fight that they were planning to avoid anyway. “They don’t want to talk about the record unemployment, their failed response to the pandemic, or the protests across the country against systemic racism,” a Democratic aide told The Daily Beast. “This is all they have.”

But it’s not as if Democrats are clear of pitfalls as they work to make the court fight into an anchor that will sink the GOP in November. They face immense pressure from the party’s liberal base to go to extraordinary lengths to resist Barrett’s confirmation, both because of the fight’s immense stakes on the balance of the court and because of the lengths the GOP went to block President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland in 2016.

Beijing passes law to protect medical whistleblowers

  Beijing passes law to protect medical whistleblowers Beijing's city government will protect "non-malicious" medical whistleblowers under a new law, passed months after a Chinese doctor was punished for sounding the alarm at the very beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. The new legislation is similar to a public health emergency law passed by Shenzhen municipal government in August, which also vows to protect "non-malicious" whistleblowers from legal consequences -- the first of its kind in China. Since the initial outbreak in January, Chinese authorities have waged a crackdown on Covid-19 rumour-mongering, investigating and detaining hundreds across the country.

McConnell and the GOP did not consider Garland on the basis that the voters should choose in the November election who would get to fill the seat left by Scalia, who died in February 2016. At the time, Republicans such as Graham defended themselves by saying they’d surely argue the same if a vacancy opened up at the end of Trump’s first term. Now that has happened, of course, nearly all Republicans are saying differently, with only a few hewing to their old standard.

Livid Democrats have responded by saying the flip-flop means Republicans have invited total war and ruthless tactics. Progressives have encouraged lawmakers to back up that rhetoric by using every procedural tool in the book to gum up Barrett’s confirmation, to refuse meeting with her and to even not show up to her hearings at all, which are scheduled for the week of Oct. 12. Some Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, such as Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), have agreed to meet with Barrett as she does the customary rounds of private meetings with lawmakers, though Schumer has said he’ll refuse.

Booker told NBC’s Chuck Todd on Sunday that he wanted to ask Barrett if she would recuse herself from any potential high court case involving the 2020 presidential election, which is set to be rife with legal challenges over the results. Republicans, like Braun, have said that Barrett should be confirmed in time to hear any such cases to prevent a deadlocked court of eight—though Barrett would be a decisive fifth or additional sixth vote with a conservative majority.

On that issue, it is hard for Democrats to avoid the implications of the seeming inevitability of Barrett’s elevation to the high court. “My broader hope,” said the famously optimistic Booker, “is that the Republican Party realizes they are undermining their legitimacy, the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, and they stop what they're doing and wait until the American public has spoken in this election.”

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Beijing passes law to protect medical whistleblowers .
Beijing's city government will protect "non-malicious" medical whistleblowers under a new law, passed months after a Chinese doctor was punished for sounding the alarm at the very beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. The new legislation is similar to a public health emergency law passed by Shenzhen municipal government in August, which also vows to protect "non-malicious" whistleblowers from legal consequences -- the first of its kind in China. Since the initial outbreak in January, Chinese authorities have waged a crackdown on Covid-19 rumour-mongering, investigating and detaining hundreds across the country.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 0
This is interesting!