Politics A fresh future for Medicaid

01:05  02 october  2020
01:05  02 october  2020 Source:   thehill.com

Opinion: Mitch McConnell is going to turn me into a socialist

  Opinion: Mitch McConnell is going to turn me into a socialist Issac Bailey, who has voted for Republicans in the past, writes that he is now prepared to politically do whatever is necessary to save this nation's fast-fading democracy if Senate Republicans move forward with quickly replacing the recently-deceased Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is about to turn me into a socialist or whatever is necessary to save this nation's fast-fading democracy. If he and Senate Republicans move forward with quickly replacing the recently-deceased Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, I would have lost all faith in what I believed this democratic experiment to be.

Search Medicaid ’s Future Resources: Your Selections: Refine Results. Medicaid , the provider of health insurance coverage for about one in five Americans and the largest payer for long-term care services in the community and nursing homes, continues to be a key part of health policy debates at

Trends and technologies that will shape the future of medical practices and the delivery of care.

The coronavirus started as a medical crisis, but quickly produced an unemployment crisis and a state fiscal crisis. Medicaid, the state-operated health care entitlement that covers 67 million low-income Americans, has been strained by all three. As unemployment increases, so does eligibility for the program and the costs that it imposes on states - just as their revenues come under strain. To fill this gap, Congress in March provided $50 billion in extra funding for the program, bailing out states as it did when they faced economic headwinds in 2001, 2003 and 2009.

Ending the Hyde Amendment is no longer on the backburner

  Ending the Hyde Amendment is no longer on the backburner The Hyde Amendment reminds us, the right to legal abortion has never been enough, especially for communities of color. As we face the threat of an even further dismantling of abortion access, women of color are meeting this moment with bold action and unity. We are stepping into our power unapologetically, and we are demanding control of our bodies, lives, and futures - including ending Hyde.Destiny Lopez is the co-director of All* Above All, which unites organizations and individuals, including 130 partner organizations, to build support for lifting bans that deny abortion coverage, including the Hyde Amendment.

The goal of health reform is to get Coloradans the coverage and services they need. By responsibly expanding Medicaid and providing access to tax credits

MGMC Physician Grand Rounds, 11/29/17 Michael Kitchell, MD, Neurology McFarland Clinic.

A fresh future for Medicaid © iStock A fresh future for Medicaid

Yet, Medicaid's finances are problematic not just in economic downturns. While the economy is growing, states may claim federal funds in proportion to their own expenditures on the program - encouraging them to spend as much as they can. This has led the program's funds to be distributed in a manner that is neither accountable, focused nor fair. A program supposed to assist the poorest Americans has proven disproportionately lucrative for the wealthiest states.

Congress can get more value out of Medicaid by aligning financial and operational responsibility within the program - so that the federal government would directly provide benefits that it determines are of greatest national importance, while states should be required to pay for further expansions of benefits that they choose to make by themselves.

Condensed season puts more pressure on goaltending

  Condensed season puts more pressure on goaltending Even those teams with outstanding starters will be looking for legitimate backup options as we head towards the condensed 2020-21 season. It may not even end up needing the “2020” part, given the regular season is now not expected to start until January.If that’s the case and the league continues to remain steadfast on playing the full 82-game schedule, next season will be extremely difficult on starting goaltenders. Back-to-back situations will come up much more frequently, with three-in-four-nights often also becoming the norm.

Investopedia Video: Medicare Vs. Medicaid - Продолжительность: 2:08 Investopedia 41 887 просмотров. Medicaid Expansion under the Affordable Care Act - Продолжительность: 1:05 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 43 457 просмотров.

The Medical Futurist Magazine: Exciting news and analysis on the future of healthcare and medicine. Each week I share the most exciting news and analyses from digital health . 38,500 people interested in the future of healthcare read it.

To qualify for federal funds, states currently must cover Americans with disabilities, children, the elderly and parents with incomes below federally-defined eligibility thresholds, while they may choose to expand the program's eligibility beyond this floor. For each of their enrollees, states must pay for hospital care, physician services, nursing facility care and home health - but also may choose to cover additional services such as dental care and rehabilitation.

Traditionally the federal government gave the poorest states $3 for every $1 they spent on Medicaid; the wealthiest states could claim $1 for every dollar they spent. For spending on beneficiaries made eligible by the Affordable Care Act, the federal government provides $9 for every $1 that states spend. This makes spending on the program very attractive for states, relative to spending on non-Medicaid activities (for which they receive no money from the federal government for every $1 they spend).

What's at stake if the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare

  What's at stake if the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare Just one week after the Nov. 3 elections, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a lawsuit backed by President Trump that seeks to overturn the Affordable Care Act (ACA).The death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, whose confirmation would shift the balance of the court significantly to the right, has put the 2010 law in greater danger.While the ACA's fate is still uncertain - many legal experts in both parties think the lawsuit's arguments are so weak that even conservative justices would uphold the law - the consequences of it being struck down would reverberate through almost every corner of the health care system.

Fresh Future will close our office for the time being. In light of the current health pandemic we feel we have a public responsibility to practice social distancing and do our part to keep the disease from spreading in our community. Dr. Sharon will continue to have appointments with patients via

Amazon Hot New Releases Our best-selling new and future releases. Updated hourly. New Releases in Medicaid & Medicare.

Video: Tens of thousands of airline workers are facing furloughs and loss of their health insurance (CBS News)

Such arrangements have done a poor job of distributing resources to where they are most needed. Some of the program's recent expansions have done more to crowd-out private insurance than to reduce the number of Americans uninsured, and allocating funds according to how much states themselves are able to put in allows the wealthiest states with the largest tax bases to claim most. In 2018, Massachusetts received $15,482 in Medicaid funds from the federal government per resident under the poverty line, while Louisiana received only $9,474 - even though both were "expansion" states and Massachusetts collected a lower share of personal income (9.7 percent) in state taxes than Louisiana (9.9 percent).

All 50 states currently impose taxes on hospitals and other medical providers to inflate costs, for which they can claim reimbursement from the federal government - sharing the proceeds with providers. Though Congress has sought to limit this and similar scams, political push-back from states allows much manipulation to remain unchecked. If states are creative in inflating claims for federal reimbursements with a web of indirect payments, tax preferences, managed-care rules and favorable regulatory provisions, it is nearly impossible for the federal government to track and stop.

Factbox: Trump, Biden healthcare differences in spotlight amid pandemic, Supreme Court fight

  Factbox: Trump, Biden healthcare differences in spotlight amid pandemic, Supreme Court fight Factbox: Trump, Biden healthcare differences in spotlight amid pandemic, Supreme Court fight(Reuters) - Healthcare, always a top concern for U.S. voters, has taken on even greater importance amid a coronavirus pandemic that has killed more than 205,000 Americans and cost millions more their jobs.

Checkout our Most Recent Upload(Video) Its still Fresh and Clean.

The future ! It's either going to be really, really amazing, or really, really awful. Will we be commuting to work on flying bicycles on air-conditioned highways, or replaced by robots and hiding in our homes because antibiotics have stopped working?

For the past four decades, Republicans have sought to address these problems by turning Medicaid into a system of block grants or capped allotments. Yet, Democrats have been concerned that fixed federal assistance would simply lead to the erosion of benefits over time, and so have tended to be resolute in their opposition. Nor would such a reform address the vulnerability of the program to the business cycle - and its consistent need for bail-outs in recessions.

As a new Manhattan Institute report explains, though it remains necessary to eliminate the incentives to shift costs and responsibility between states and federal governments, a fresh approach is required.

First, the federal government should take full financial and operational responsibility for core medical care services to Medicaid beneficiaries that states are required to cover. This would protect states from costs that are prone to fluctuate in line with the business cycle, against their fiscal capacity. Second, the federal government should provide a capped allotment to assist each state with the provision of long-term-care services to enrollees. Third, states should be free to expand eligibility and benefits beyond the coverage provided by the federal government - but they should be expected to fully fund it themselves.

In 2018, Medicaid cost taxpayers $593 billion, but the program is poorly-focused on filling unmet needs and remains a constant source of headaches for both state and federal officials. A clearer assignment of responsibilities is needed to make Medicaid fair, focused and accountable.

Chris Pope is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Follow him on Twitter @CPopeHC.

Promises kept? On health care, Trump’s claims of "monumental steps" don’t add up .
A brief breakdown of what Trump has done — and has not done — on some key health issues . Affordable Care Act Trump has not managed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, despite his claims that the law is dead. But his administration, and Republicans in Congress, have made changes to weaken the law while not dramatically affecting enrollment in marketplace plans. Congress failed to rewrite the law in summer 2017, but Republicans who controlled both the House and Senate at the time included in their year-end tax cut bill a provision that reduced the penalty for failing to have health insurance to zero.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 1
This is interesting!