Politics 5G nationalization will leave America behind
Full text: Pence says "the choice is clear" in RNC speech
The vice president closed the third night of the Republican National Convention with remarks delivered from Fort McHenry in Baltimore."On November 3rd, you need to ask yourself: Who do you trust to rebuild this economy? A career politician who presided over the slowest economic recovery since the Great Depression? Or a proven leader who created the greatest economy in the world," he said. "The choice is clear: To bring America all the way back, we need four more years of President Donald Trump in the White House.
The Department of Defense (DOD) is currentlythat'll effectively nationalize 5G technology and networks in the United States. By abandoning the market-driven strategy that for the nation, America would merely be undermining its own progress - and losing to China.
This is especially concerning sinceas a rival to U.S. hegemony and is increasingly exerting its and influence in a brazen way. It has launched and sensitive military secrets and intelligence. It has already made in the 5G race and key 5G patents. Its flagship telecommunications giant is propped-up by in subsidies and was slated to build the UK's 5G network this year. The British government after U.S. diplomatic .
Luis Arce: Bolivia's new president credited for its socialist growth 'miracle'
Luis Arce: Bolivia's new president credited for its socialist growth 'miracle'LA PAZ (Reuters) - Luis Arce, the quiet economist who will take over as Bolivia's president next month after a landslide election win, knew where he stood in the political spectrum as a young teenager in La Paz, when he picked up the writings of German philosopher Karl Marx.
Concerningly, Chinese lawsHuawei to hand over user data and to assist it in industrial espionage and state surveillance. If the world becomes increasingly reliant on Chinese government-controlled and operated telecommunications infrastructure, then that will leave U.S. manufacturers and innovators at an ever-increasing disadvantage. With 5G technology expected to contribute , roughly 5 percent of global GDP, to the world economy within 15 years, this is a race America must win.
Troublingly enough, the DOD suggests a move that mirrors China in many ways. It'd replace the existing Federal Communications Commission (FCC)to auction off frequency ranges within the mid-band spectrum to private companies who can then develop the necessary infrastructure networks, which is ideal for 5G development. Instead, a network built and deployed by the U.S. government would act as a wholesaler to telecommunications companies who could turn around and sell 5G plans to retail consumers.
China, WHO Could Have Prevented COVID Pandemic, Congressional Report Concludes
The WHO accepted Chinese propaganda regarding the outbreak, effectively misinforming other nations on the spread of coronavirus. Additionally, China nationalized various production lines of medical equipment, seizing control of the medical supply chains of other nations. “According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), [the] nationalized control of the medical supply chain included ‘commandeer[ing] medical manufacturing and logistics down to the factory level,'” the report states.
But national 5G networks are already being built across the country with private investment totaling. Why would taxpayers pay such a hefty sum for something that American companies are already developing? Conversely, government agencies have already compromised the nation's position in the 5G race by allocating mainly low-band and high-band frequencies for 5G development. Unlike the mid-band spectrum that the U.S. military largely monopolizes, low-band frequencies mean slow connections. High-band frequencies are localized and require significantly more infrastructure investment to cover the same range. By contrast, China has utilized its mid-band spectrum for 5G deployment.
This is whyChinese cellular tower now covers the same range as 100 high-speed American towers.
The U.S. should be auctioning frequency ranges within the mid-band spectrum to companies that are already equipped to build infrastructure. If the U.S. wants to "catch-up" with China, then it should be taking advantage of the already robust American private sector instead of adopting China's strategy of state control, debt-funded subsidies and loans.
South Africa Moves to Soothe Investor Fears Over Land Grabs
As South Africa revises its legal framework to make it easier to take property without paying for it, the nation’s land minister has given assurances that the contentious process won’t degenerate into a free-for-all. © Bloomberg A worker uses a forklift to load bags of animal feed into a truck on the Ehlerskroon farm, outside Delmas in the Mpumalanga province, South Africa on Thursday, Sept. 13, 2018.
A federal government 5G network could take decades to build and could be replete with setbacks - at the expense of consumers and taxpayers.
Take a look atand for proof. Those are two countries where nationalized telecommunications networks failed.
Or look to Australia, where the "National Broadband Network" turned into a. Originally projected to cost $29.5 billion in 2013, it was completed , with the final cost running past $51 billion. And that's not counting a recently announced upgrade since the technology is out of date already. But it's not politicians and bureaucrats' own money they're playing around with. It's taxpayers' dollars on the line.
Conversely, proponents of a nationalized 5G networkauctioning off spectrum to private network builders could leave consumers worse off, since there's theoretically nothing stopping them from charging high prices once they own the network. After all, American mobile services are relatively more expensive than those in many .
Trump's ex-national security adviser H.R. McMaster warns Afghan peace talks will fail, leave US vulnerable
H.R. McMaster says he disagreed with some of Trump's decisions and doesn't understand others, such as praise for Putin: "I can't really explain it."The U.S. is "in many ways more at risk today than we were on Sept. 10, 2001," McMaster told USA TODAY in the first print interview for his new book, "Battlegrounds: The Fight to Defend the Free World.
Yet, this can hardly be blamed on privately owned network infrastructure when infrastructure in European countries with significantly cheaper mobile service is also. After all, American prices are influenced by the relatively higher costs of extending coverage across a nation that's so vast, unevenly populated and geographically diverse.
Moreover, European regulations that are designed to lower prices for consumers by boosting retail competition (such as the UK rule requiring network owners to sell access to competitors) come at the expense of decreased network investment that left Europe the United States in 4G development. This trade-off may be undesirable, given how important fast, reliable and expansive 5G networks are for keeping innovative companies and industries in the United States competitive.
Nationalization also won't uphold security since a single nationwide network, government-owned or otherwise, is even more vulnerable to hacking. Furthermore, infrastructure builders and equipment providers who raise nationalare already prohibited from purchasing spectrum licenses.
America needs a national strategy that focuses on leveraging private investment to foster leadership and innovation in the 5G race. That the DOD continues to hoard invaluable mid-band spectrum for no commercial or national defense benefit, while considering a costly, nationalized 5G network model, shows how far we have to go. This nation should and could be a world leader in secure, cutting-edge telecommunications technology, and can get there before China. But if the government gets in the way, then America's chances at that are slim-to-none.Satya Marar is a policy analyst at Reason Foundation and a Young Voices tech policy fellow. Follow him on Twitter
USA TODAY/Suffolk Poll: Joe Biden leading Donald Trump by 7 points in pivotal Pennsylvania .
A majority of likely Pennsylvania voters also said they do not support adding justices to the Supreme Court. "You start creating more justices to get the opinions you want," he said. "It's almost like 'well I gotta win and I'm just gonna create new facts.' " But Laws said that she supports adding justices to the Supreme Court, adding that it shouldn't be called court packing. "I believe it should be called court evening," Laws said. She said that she believes that the "minority shouldn't be ruling the majority," adding that the "the majority of the country is pro choice.