•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Hug or heresy? The left's attack on Dianne Feinstein is a sad sign of our times

19:41  20 october  2020
19:41  20 october  2020 Source:   thehill.com

India: Hundreds of thousands of tea pickers in Assam on indefinite strike

 India: Hundreds of thousands of tea pickers in Assam on indefinite strike © Biju BORO / AFP Tea pickers joined farmers in protesting the liberalization of the sale of fruits and vegetables. The strike began this Friday, October 9 to demand wage increases. These workers joined the farmers, who have been protesting for two weeks now against the new selling prices for fruit and vegetables. With our correspondent in Bangalore, Côme Bastin The State of Assam produces nearly 50% of India's tea, and it is found on many tables around the world.

At the conclusion of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) approached Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and exchanged words of respect for the way in which the hearing was conducted. Their exchange ended in a mutual hug of friendship and collegiality.

a man and a woman standing on a chair: Hug or heresy? The left's attack on Dianne Feinstein is a sad sign of our times © Greg Nash Hug or heresy? The left's attack on Dianne Feinstein is a sad sign of our times

No sooner did the embrace end than the storm began.

Some Democrats decried Feinstein's show of respect as a sign of weakness and heresy. There was no stauncher opponent to the hearings and to the probable confirmation of Judge Barrett than Sen. Feinstein - yet, when the battle was over, the combatants sought to beat their swords into plowshares and agree to fight another day.

Dianne Feinstein Thanks Lindsey Graham for ‘One of the Best Set of Hearings That I’ve Participated In’

  Dianne Feinstein Thanks Lindsey Graham for ‘One of the Best Set of Hearings That I’ve Participated In’ The moment of bipartisanship comes after weeks of Democrats decrying the hearings and criticizing Republicans for moving forward with the confirmation process.“I just want to thank you, this has been one of the best set of hearings that I’ve participated in and I want to thank you for your fairness and the opportunity of going back and forth,” the Democrat told the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The hysteria over one senator's act of kindness and mutual respect for another was proof positive of the venomous hyper-partisanship that exists today, mainly from the political left. Just take a look at the headlines that appeared within hours of the now infamous hug:

The Guardian: "'She represents the past': a Senate hug symbolizes California's Dianne Feinstein fatigue."

Slate: "Oh good, Dianne Feinstein concluded the Barrett hearings by giving a maskless Lindsey Graham a hug."

Fox News: "NARAL becomes latest group to slam Feinstein after Graham hug."

The Hill: "Feinstein's hug of Lindsey Graham sparks outrage on the left."

Republicans did not rise up in outrage over the hugging episode. In fact, no one gave it a second thought because that kind of behavior should be expected and applauded, not demonized. The hug was not a surrender or a sign of weakness on Sen. Feinstein's part; it was a sign of strength and decorum by her. Legislators live to fight another day; that is how statesmen should comport themselves.

Pro-abortion rights group rescinds support of Dianne Feinstein and calls for her replacement

  Pro-abortion rights group rescinds support of Dianne Feinstein and calls for her replacement Following the conclusion of the Senate Judiciary Committee's confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue denounced committee ranking member Dianne Feinstein. © Provided by Washington Examiner Hogue wrote that Feinstein failed to acknowledge the opinions of majorities that "have said unequivocally that they want to choose the next President" to fill the absence created by the death of Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September.

What has happened to civility in our society? For the answer, look no further than to the example that is set by those who lead our country. When it becomes out-of-bounds to compromise, to show respect or to behave with manners, then we can only blame ourselves for the debasement of social norms and decency.

Compromise has become a four-letter word on Capitol Hill and in party politics - and civility has become a sign of weakness.

Think about it: Life demands compromise, and we all do it every day. We do it at work, we do it with our families, we do it with our neighbors, we do it with the choices we make daily. Civility is a requirement of daily living as well. Mutual respect is the cornerstone for success in America. So, if we must compromise in our daily lives and we must conduct our affairs with civility and mutual respect for one another, why then are government and party politics the exception? It does not make sense.

Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court hearings lacked the drama that Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings had. Here's why.

  Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court hearings lacked the drama that Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings had. Here's why. Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings lacked the drama of Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings. Here's why.Democrats warned of the precedent set if Republicans rushed through a nominee in the middle of a pandemic and presidential election, arguing no nominee should be considered until after voters cast ballots. They rattled off threats to slow the process, teasing a host of tools that could bog down the hearings, with some lawmakers even publicly suggesting launching impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

Now is the time for citizens to demand a return to civility, compromise and mutual respect in our elected officials, regardless of party affiliation. The challenges America faces are not exclusively Republican or Democratic problems - they are America's challenges. And the solutions for many of our problems are not exclusively Republican or Democratic, either. It is about time that we followed the Constitution as written and not try to amend it by tradition. When we stray from the Constitution, that is where our problems begin.

Democrats know full well that, had the shoe been on the other foot with regard to a vacancy on the Supreme Court, they would have done exactly the same thing that Republicans have done and that is to fill the seat as soon as possible. The president is fully within his constitutional authority to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, and Democrats know it. Democrats' hatred for this president is so pervasive, corrosive and divisive that even a hug can be seen as a surrender.

Government needs to lead by example. We need to play by the rules, to fight for what we believe, to respect each other's opinions and, when the battle is over, to unite with a common purpose.

I say: More hugs and fewer thugs.

Bradley A. Blakeman was a deputy assistant to President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2004. He is a principal of the 1600 Group, a strategic communications firm.

GOP Senator Chuck Grassley Slams 'Sexist' and 'Ageist' Democrats for Calling on Dianne Feinstein to Step Down .
"Attacks on Senator Feinstein are totally unjustified.""Democrats calling for Senator Feinstein to step down from Judiciary Ranking Member should think twice abt [sic] their sexist & ageist motivations against an outstanding legislator & icon in her own right," Grassley tweeted on Wednesday. "Attacks on Senator Feinstein are totally unjustified.

usr: 13
This is interesting!