•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Analysis: U.S. Supreme Court nominee Barrett often rules for police in excessive force cases

12:50  25 october  2020
12:50  25 october  2020 Source:   reuters.com

Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett moves closer to Senate confirmation as hearing ends

  Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett moves closer to Senate confirmation as hearing ends Republicans brushed aside Democrats' complaints about the partisan process leading to Barrett's expected confirmation during a pandemic and election.Republicans brushed aside Democrats' complaints about the process leading to Barrett's expected confirmation in the midst of a pandemic and a presidential race that the committee chairman acknowledged the GOP may lose.

The Supreme Court building in Washington.Credit Jonathan Ernst/Reuters.

Supreme Court nominees who never served on the Court . The Supreme Court : Controversies, Cases , and Characters from John Jay to John Roberts [4 Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights: Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico.

By Andrew Chung and Lawrence Hurley

a person wearing a suit and tie: FILE PHOTO: Barrett meets with U.S. senators ahead of vote on her nomination © Reuters/POOL FILE PHOTO: Barrett meets with U.S. senators ahead of vote on her nomination

(Reuters) - In her three years as a federal appeals court judge, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett has consistently sided with police or prison guards accused of using excessive force, a Reuters review of cases she was involved in shows.

Barrett, Republican President Donald Trump's third nominee to the high court, has written opinions or been a part of three-judge panels that have ruled in favor of defendants in 11 of 12 cases in which law enforcement was accused of using excessive force in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Merriam-Webster dictionary updates 'sexual preference' entry after Amy Coney Barrett hearing

  Merriam-Webster dictionary updates 'sexual preference' entry after Amy Coney Barrett hearing Merriam-Webster added the word "offensive" to its usage guidance of "preference" and "sexual preference" when referring to sexual orientation.During the hearing Tuesday, Barrett was asked whether she agrees with the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s criticism of the same-sex marriage ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges – the landmark case which legalized gay marriage in the United States and which advocates worry Barrett would not support if confirmed to the nation's highest court.

The decision Barrett wrote for the U . S . Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in John Doe v. Purdue University is the “single The Supreme Court has not ruled on a Title IX campus sexual assault case in the past decade, experts said. But Ginsburg, a feminist icon, surprised some victim’ s advocates in a

Judge Amy Coney Barrett will likely be the next nominee to the Supreme Court . This has upset those on the left who take issue with her Catholicism Mrs Barrett has been a long-time judge and teacher, is a mother of seven, a devout Catholic, and a constitutional originalist. There was even a point when

The Republican-controlled Senate is expected to vote to confirm Barrett, a judge on the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, to the lifetime position on Monday, cementing a 6-3 conservative majority.

While her Senate confirmation hearings https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2771B6 focused attention on how she might rule on cases related to abortion, Obamacare and elections, the Reuters review illustrates Barrett's record on police use of force at a time of reckoning in the United States.

There has been a wave of protests nationwide - and abroad - since May 25 when a Black man George Floyd died at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer, just one in a long string of killings that civil rights advocates say are evidence of racial bias in the criminal justice system.

Fact check: True claim about Harris failing bar exam on first try and Barrett's law school rank

  Fact check: True claim about Harris failing bar exam on first try and Barrett's law school rank A post compares the early career qualifications of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Sen. Kamala Harris. We rate this claim true.One user took to Facebook to compare the qualifications of the conservative Supreme Court nominee and the Democratic vice presidential nominee.

Start studying Supreme Court Cases . Learn vocabulary, terms and more with flashcards, games and other study tools. is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In it the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U . S

The Supreme Court under Marshall practiced judicial nationalism; its decisions favored the federal government at the expense of the states. Because Supreme Court justices serve for life and their decisions have a major impact on American society, their appointments are probably the most

"Her record also makes clear she is predisposed to side with law enforcement in the context of excessive force cases," said Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which opposes Barrett's confirmation.

Other groups that advocate for reform of the criminal justice system say she has written some encouraging rulings, with an overall record that is mixed. Barrett could not be reached for comment.

SUPPORT FOR QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

In five cases, the panel on which Barrett took part considered a request by police or corrections officers to be shielded from the lawsuits alleging excessive force through a controversial legal defense known as qualified immunity. The court granted those requests in four of the five cases.

A Reuters investigation published two weeks before Floyd’s death found that the immunity defense, created by the Supreme Court 50 years ago, has been making it easier for cops to kill or injure civilians with impunity. The report showed that federal appellate courts have been granting police immunity at increasing rates in recent years. Read the Reuters reporting here: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-police-immunity-variations

Biden-Trump debate, Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS nomination: 5 things to know Thursday

  Biden-Trump debate, Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS nomination: 5 things to know Thursday Trump and Biden face-off in the final presidential debate, Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination and more things to start your Thursday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

US President Donald Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett , a favourite of social conservatives, to be the new Supreme Court justice. Speaking by her side at the White House Rose Garden, Mr Trump described her as a "woman of unparalleled achievement". If confirmed by senators, Judge Barrett will

The Judicial Process Criminal cases differ from civil cases . At the beginning of a federal criminal Allegations of criminal behavior should be brought to the local police , the FBI, or another The U . S . Attorney represents the United States in most court proceedings, including all criminal prosecutions.

Barrett, who was appointed to the appeals court by Trump in 2017, wrote a ruling in July that said Green Bay, Wisconsin officers who shot and killed a suicidal man who had threatened them with a knife did not use excessive force in violation of the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which prohibits illegal searches and seizures.

She was also part of rulings that overturned lower court decisions against Indianapolis police officers. In one, a federal judge had denied qualified immunity to officers in the case of shoplifting suspect Terrell Day, who died while handcuffed after telling officers he was having trouble breathing.

Barrett dissented from a 7th Circuit panel decision in 2019 to revive a lawsuit against prison guards at an Illinois prison for firing warning shots over a dining hall to help break up a fight, injuring several inmates.

She has also handled requests for qualified immunity outside of the excessive force context.

Barrett last year threw out a lawsuit by three Black men who sued Chicago cops for pulling them over while investigating a drive-by shooting near a school. The men, who had nothing to do with the shooting, said they were targeted because of their race, citing the "racialized nature of the mockery and threats" made by one of the officers. The driver, Marcus Torry, told the cops that he was complying because he feared police brutality.

Senate committee OKs Amy Coney Barrett. Here's what happens next in her Supreme Court confirmation

  Senate committee OKs Amy Coney Barrett. Here's what happens next in her Supreme Court confirmation The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court. Here's what happens next.The Senate Judiciary Committee's 12 Republican members approved her nomination in a 12-0 vote, setting up a final vote Monday before the full Senate.

Justia › US Law › US Case Law › US Supreme Court › Volume 392 › Terry v. Ohio. Under the Fourth Amendment of the U . S . Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest ranking judicial body in the United States. Its membership, as set by the Judiciary Act of 1869

Barrett granted the officers qualified immunity because it was not "clearly established" that the officers' actions were unreasonable, noting that the plaintiffs matched the description of the suspects "in number, race and car color."

In other cases, she has shown a willingness to side with plaintiffs.

In 2019, she wrote a ruling rejecting immunity for a police officer who used false statements in making the case against a murder suspect. She also joined a ruling denying immunity for officers who were accused of falsifying evidence that caused a man to be jailed for two years.

"I don't think we can draw definite conclusions about how Judge Barrett would approach qualified immunity once she's on the Supreme Court," said Jay Schweikert, a policy analyst with the libertarian Cato Institute, which is campaigning against qualified immunity. "Her decisions all look like reasonable applications of existing precedent."

(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York and Lawrence Hurley in Washington; Editing by Scott Malone and Grant McCool)

Fact check: There is no Sen. Rob Donaldson, so posts of his speech about Barrett are fake .
A post on new Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett originated as a hypothetical. It took off, with many people assuming it was from a real senator.Several Facebook posts shared in the wake of those hearings include a long comment appearing to be a transcript of a speech made by a Sen. Rob Donaldson before the committee.

usr: 3
This is interesting!