•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Amy Coney Barrett joins the Supreme Court in unprecedented times

12:06  27 october  2020
12:06  27 october  2020 Source:   cnn.com

Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court hearings lacked the drama that Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings had. Here's why.

  Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court hearings lacked the drama that Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings had. Here's why. Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings lacked the drama of Brett Kavanaugh's proceedings. Here's why.Democrats warned of the precedent set if Republicans rushed through a nominee in the middle of a pandemic and presidential election, arguing no nominee should be considered until after voters cast ballots. They rattled off threats to slow the process, teasing a host of tools that could bog down the hearings, with some lawmakers even publicly suggesting launching impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

The US Senate has confirmed Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court in a victory for President Donald Trump a week before the general election. Mr Trump's fellow Republicans voted 52-48 to approve the judge, overcoming the unified opposition of Democrats.

The Senate confirmed Amy Coney Barrett to the supreme court . Lawmakers voted along party lines, with Republican This time , most attendees wore masks and kept social distance. The rushed and unprecedented confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett as Associate Justice to the Supreme Court , in

She is only 48 and could easily serve more than three decades on the Supreme Court. But no matter how long Justice Amy Coney Barrett sits on the bench, the conditions under which she started are not likely to fade soon from the nation's memory.

a person talking on a cell phone: Judge Amy Coney Barrett holds her hand on the Holy Bible as she is sworn in as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, U.S., October 26, 2020.  REUTERS/Tom Brenner © Tom Brenner/Reuters Judge Amy Coney Barrett holds her hand on the Holy Bible as she is sworn in as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, U.S., October 26, 2020. REUTERS/Tom Brenner

Barrett begins her Supreme Court tenure one week before Election Day after a rushed appointment and amid controversy from risky White House ceremonies. She faces a raft of voting-related appeals, along with a notable absence of bond-building rituals with colleagues because of Covid-19.

Supreme Court will decide future of President Trump's border wall with Mexico

  Supreme Court will decide future of President Trump's border wall with Mexico The case is unlikely to be heard before Jan. 20, and if Trump loses re-election next month, a Democratic administration could stop construction.But the case is unlikely to be heard before Jan. 20 next year, and if President Donald Trump loses re-election next month, a Democratic administration headed by former vice president Joe Biden could stop construction on its own.

Amy Coney Barrett has now taken her seat on the Supreme Court . Thus, even if we assume that Joe Biden wins the presidency on November 3 and that the Democrats control Congress, the United States will have a Supreme Court that may be the most dangerous to civil rights since the Dred Scott court

Justice Amy Coney Barrett joins a court dangerously out of sync with the country. The nation is roughly evenly divided politically and has been for decades. The last time the Supreme Court had six Republican-nominated justices, that roster included Stevens, a liberal, and Kennedy, a swing vote.

That complex dynamic is likely to shape Barrett's immediate image in the public eye and perhaps influence how she approaches cases and the eight other justices.

Her Senate vote of 52-48 was one of the closest in history and her benefactor, Donald Trump, is one of the most divisive presidents ever. Barrett's appointment, to succeed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was pushed through the Republican-controlled Senate in a mere month.

Her sheer presence on a new 6-3, conservative-liberal bench could transform the law in America for a generation, affecting abortion and religious rights, LGBTQ protections, and the scope of federal regulatory control over the environment, workplace safety and consumer protection.

And Trump made it plain that he wanted Barrett in place quickly because the high court could decide a crucial case or cases that would affect the outcome of the election between him and former vice president Joe Biden. Already, several challenges to voting rules in key states such as Pennsylvania and North Carolina are pending before the court.

Supreme Court lets Alabama ban curbside voting in November election

  Supreme Court lets Alabama ban curbside voting in November election The unsuccessful challengers had pointed out the CDC recommends the practice "as a means of reducing the risk of spreading COVID-19 at the polls."Shorthanded following Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, the court ruled 5-3, with the remaining three liberal justices dissenting.

Amy Coney Barrett ’s confirmation by the Senate Monday night was a touchstone accomplishment for President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans that solidifies a 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court just eight days before the U.S. election. The Senate confirmed Barrett on a

Amy Coney Barrett is pledging to carry out her duties as a Supreme Court justice “without any fear or favor” toward government or her own beliefs. Barrett spoke after taking the first of two oaths that will allow her to join the high court .

On Monday night, Trump praised Barrett's "sterling character" and "impeccable credentials."

"Justice Barrett made clear she will issue rulings based solely upon a faithful reading of the law and the Constitution as written not legislate from the bench," Trump said.

In turn, Barrett vowed to be fair and independent. "The oath that I have solemnly taken tonight means at its core that I will do my job without any fear or favor and that I will do so independently of both the political branches and of my own preferences,"

Beyond election disputes in upcoming days, Barrett will confront immediate cases over the future of the Affordable Care Act and 2020 census practices that would affect the allocation of congressional seats.

Guests at Monday night's investiture were required to wear masks to help protect against the coronavirus. A month earlier, as Trump first unveiled the Barrett nomination in a Rose Garden ceremony, such precautions were absent, and at least a dozen attendees were infected by the virus.

Republicans on Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination as Democrats boycott hearing

  Republicans on Senate panel to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination as Democrats boycott hearing The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation to the Supreme Court on Thursday, setting up a full Senate vote Monday.The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet at 9 a.m. EDT. Barrett is expected to be approved by Republicans who hold the majority on the panel, with Democrats saying they will boycott the day's proceedings. The full Senate is expected to take a final vote on Barrett's confirmation on Monday, eight days before Election Day.

President Trump plans to announce on Saturday that Judge Amy Coney Barrett is his choice for the Supreme Court .Credit Samuel Corum for The New York Times .

Amy Coney Barrett confirmed to Supreme Court as Susan Collins is lone Republican to oppose. Amy Coney Barrett Will Upend American Life as We Know It: Her confirmation on Monday marked the end of an uneasy era in the Supreme Court 's history and the beginning of a tempestuous one.

Justice Clarence Thomas, a fellow conservative, administered the constitutional oath of office to Barrett. And his appearance without Chief Justice John Roberts and the full contingent of associate justices marked a contrast from 2018 when all sitting justices attended the White House investiture for the newly confirmed Brett Kavanaugh.

The optics of appearing with a president during an election

Trump's remarks throughout the Kavanaugh investiture stoked some justices' usual resistance to participate in such White House-organized investitures. Trump began that October 2018 event by boasting of the full court's presence and then publicly apologizing "on behalf of our nation" to Kavanaugh for "terrible pain and suffering you have been forced to endure." Trump was referring to the accusations from Christine Blasey Ford that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her when they were both teenagers in suburban Maryland. Kavanaugh denied the accusations.

Traditionally, justices' swearings-in were held at the Supreme Court, and in recent decades the justices struggled with how to respond to presidential invitations. They are loath to be props for a president but do not want to appear to insult a new colleague.

Fact check: Post online misquotes Biden on court-packing amid debate over size of Supreme Court

  Fact check: Post online misquotes Biden on court-packing amid debate over size of Supreme Court Joe Biden never said the “day after” he’s elected, people will “know what he stands for.” A Google search of the exact quote turned up no results. He did make a similar comment on Oct. 8 regarding the topic of court-packing, which is the idea of expanding the size of the Supreme Court. It was most famously suggested by President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the 1930s, according to the New York Times.

NOW PLAYING: Video. Amy Coney Barrett Confirmed for U.S. Supreme Court . How Justice Amy Coney Barrett could influence the Supreme Court .

Amy Coney Barrett was confirmed by the Senate by 52 to 48 votes, filling Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat and transforming the Supreme Court . Donald Trump's third nominee was not in the chamber to watch the roll call vote, which allows her to join the eight justices on Tuesday morning, and potentially


Video: Election law expert: Barrett should recuse herself (CNN)

Justice John Paul Stevens, who died last year, wrote in his 2011 book, Five Chiefs, that he was particularly put off at the Ronald Reagan White House ceremony for Anthony Kennedy in 1988. "(T)he president participated with remarks that welcomed his new appointee as a judge who would follow the law rather than make it up. I thought the president's remarks were both offensive and inappropriate and therefore decided not to attend similar ceremonies at the White House in the future."

But Stevens said he overcame his unwillingness in 2005 to swear in Roberts as chief justice at the George W. Bush White House. Stevens was the senior justice at the time, and he "concluded that a refusal to participate would have been widely misinterpreted as manifesting disapproval of his appointment."

Mixing with the President and his supporters could be especially fraught on the eve of the election.

Filings in state ballot disputes have been arriving daily on the justices' doorstep, as Republicans and Democrats jockey for advantage in the November 3 election, largely over state measures related to the pandemic, for example, extending deadlines for mail-in ballots.

'Totally irresponsible': Dems criticize Pence presiding over Amy Coney Barrett vote after aides contract COVID-19

  'Totally irresponsible': Dems criticize Pence presiding over Amy Coney Barrett vote after aides contract COVID-19 "As vice president, I’m president of the Senate. And I’m gonna be in the chair because I wouldn’t miss that vote for the world," Pence said Saturday.News broke Saturday evening that Pence's Chief of Staff, Marc Short, had tested positive for the disease. The New York Times and CNN reported that four other people in Pence's orbit had tested positive for the virus, bringing the total to at least five.

The cases have exposed deep fissures among the justices. Shortly before the White House investiture began, in fact, the (still) eight-member Supreme Court ruled along bitter ideological lines in a Wisconsin election case. The justices by a 5-3 vote rejected a lower court order, supported by Wisconsin Democrats, to allow mail-in ballots to be received and counted up to six days after the election.

In the majority were Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh and Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch. They faulted the district court judge who extended the deadline for intervening as Roberts wrote, "in the thick of election season."

Dissenting were liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Writing for those dissenters and referring to other Supreme Court action rejecting pandemic-related measures, Kagan said, "As the COVID pandemic rages, the Court has failed to adequately protect the Nation's voters."

Still pending, and likely to be reviewed by a new Justice Barrett, are cases from other battleground states, Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Last week, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on an emergency request from Pennsylvania Republicans related to deadline extensions for mail-in ballots. As the case returns, the possibility exists that Barrett could break that tie to side with the GOP challengers.

Covid means skipping familiar rituals for joining the court

Barrett will be able to assume her duties on cases Tuesday after Roberts administers the judicial oath, a private event scheduled to occur at the Supreme Court. (The constitutional oath, administered by Thomas on Monday, is taken by all federal officials.)

Supreme Court rules Wisconsin mail-in ballots must be received by Nov. 3

  Supreme Court rules Wisconsin mail-in ballots must be received by Nov. 3 The Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin's voting laws, rejecting an effort to require the counting of absentee ballots arriving after Election Day.The court's 5-3 ruling means that absentee ballots will be counted only if they are in the hands of municipal clerks by the time polls close Nov. 3.

Under the text of the judicial oath, a new member of the bench promises to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich."

A court spokeswoman said on Monday that the usual courtroom ceremonies for a new appointee would occur at a future date. The building has been closed to the public since March, and most justices have been working remotely, some far from Washington.

For the newest justice, the atmosphere surrounding Covid-19 will likely mean postponement of the other rituals and personal gestures within the columned structure that usually foster relationships among the nine.

Roberts, for example, took new Justice Kagan on a private tour of the court's inner chambers in 2010. He began with the robing room, where the nameplate of Kagan's predecessor (Justice Stevens) was still on one of the nine individual wooden lockers. When they returned, Roberts had made sure her nameplate was affixed to her new locker.

The justices usually hold a "welcome" dinner for their newest member: in 1991, when Thomas joined, it was a black-tie affair, with Justice Antonin Scalia taking charge of the details; in 2006, when Alito came on, colleagues arranged an appearance by Phillie Phanatic, mascot of Alito's favorite baseball team.

Postponement of such customs may be no small thing in an institution that runs on tradition and bonds of community and that retired justice once described as having its own "language and ethic and etiquette."

Yet whatever loss Barrett may feel, her colleagues would share it. Some justices said through this spring and summer that they missed the structured routines, the handshakes before their conference sessions and the lunches together after morning oral arguments.

They have been hearing cases via teleconference. They have been also holding their private justices-only sessions, where they decide which appeals to take up and vote on cases already heard, by telephone, too.

That alone eliminates one notable role of the junior justice. By tradition, the newest associate justice is responsible for opening the conference-room door when someone knocks to deliver a requested reference book or a forgotten pair of reading glasses.

The junior justice is also responsible for taking notes of court business at these sessions. It is not known whether Barrett will be initially absolved from such note-taking duties during the telephone conferences.

She will, however, win a reprieve of one of the traditional junior-justice tasks until the pandemic subsides, membership on the cafeteria committee.

The cafeteria is closed.

a group of people standing next to a person in a suit and tie: Judge John Roberts is sworn in as US Supreme Court Chief Justice in September 2005 at the White House by US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. © Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images Judge John Roberts is sworn in as US Supreme Court Chief Justice in September 2005 at the White House by US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.

Fact check: There is no Sen. Rob Donaldson, so posts of his speech about Barrett are fake .
A post on new Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett originated as a hypothetical. It took off, with many people assuming it was from a real senator.Several Facebook posts shared in the wake of those hearings include a long comment appearing to be a transcript of a speech made by a Sen. Rob Donaldson before the committee.

usr: 3
This is interesting!