•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Trump administration taps mainstream climate scientist to run key climate review

01:40  05 november  2020
01:40  05 november  2020 Source:   washingtonpost.com

Donald Trump made many promises in 2016 and early in his term. Which has he kept and what is he still working on?

  Donald Trump made many promises in 2016 and early in his term. Which has he kept and what is he still working on? Trump has kept a number of pledges, including tax cuts and conservative judges. But not on others such as bringing back coal and replacing Obamacare."Unlike so many who came before me, I keep my promises," Trump said during his State of the Union speech this year.

The next National Climate Assessment, the federal government’s most definitive and comprehensive report on climate change and its consequences for the United States, will be directed by atmospheric scientist Betsy Weatherhead, currently a senior scientist at Jupiter Intelligence, a company that helps businesses and governments prepare for the impacts of climate change.

a stack of pancakes on a track with smoke coming out of a car: Traffic is diverted off of the 71 freeway during the Blue Ridge Fire on Oct. 27 in Chino Hills, Calif. (David McNew/Getty Images) © David Mcnew/Getty Images Traffic is diverted off of the 71 freeway during the Blue Ridge Fire on Oct. 27 in Chino Hills, Calif. (David McNew/Getty Images)

Weatherhead, who has decades of experience as a climate scientist in the academic and private sectors, accepts human-induced climate change is happening and is a serious physical, ecological and economic threat.

Opinion: MLB's season of sacrifice amid pandemic ends with galling breach of protocol by Justin Turner

  Opinion: MLB's season of sacrifice amid pandemic ends with galling breach of protocol by Justin Turner Justin Turner was removed from Game 6 of World Series because of a positive COVID-19 test. Then, he returned to field to celebrate the championship.For 58 days, Major League Baseball avoided a positive coronavirus test among its hundreds of players. As the playoffs unfolded, the player pool shrank and its teams were shuffled into luxe isolation, the protocols and the logistics and the myriad sacrifices that went into staging this unprecedented season built a kind of momentum that made the whole operation seem invulnerable.

Her appointment stands in sharp contrast to two recent high-level political hires at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), David Legates and Ryan Maue, who are on the record challenging the seriousness of climate change. It also is in contrast to the climate change views of President Trump, who downplays humans’ role in causing global warming, despite the scientific consensus on the topic.

Weatherhead’s appointment was verified by one current and one former senior official at NOAA. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity, because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

Unlike several past climate assessment directors, she has not previously held a position in the federal government but has worked extensively with scientists and programs in different agencies.

Trump's EPA rewrote the rules on air, water energy. Now voters face a choice on climate change issues

  Trump's EPA rewrote the rules on air, water energy. Now voters face a choice on climate change issues Election Day will be a decision between deregulation or re-regulation. A look at Trump's rollbacks and their long term effects nationwide.The teen’s asthma attacks occurred more frequently, Harris said, and she started carrying an inhaler with her at all times.

Major Trump administration climate report says damage is ‘intensifying across the country’

Picked by Kelvin Droegemeier, director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy and a Trump appointee, Weatherhead is to be formally brought into the government as part of the career civil service, based within the U.S. Geological Survey and placed on a detail to the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Given the timing, her selection would not be affected by the outcome of the presidential election, since her first day on the job is Monday.

NOAA is the lead agency for the Climate Assessment, but at least 13 federal agencies, from NASA to the Energy Department, as well as dozens of outside scientists contribute to it.

The next assessment, under Weatherhead’s leadership, is due out in 2022 and will mark the fifth iteration. Reports are mandated every four years under the Global Change Research Act of 1990.

The Daily 202: Despite GDP growth, polls suggest Trump’s advantage on economic stewardship is narrowing

  The Daily 202: Despite GDP growth, polls suggest Trump’s advantage on economic stewardship is narrowing Three-quarters of a million Americans filed jobless claims last week. President Trump’s failure to negotiate a coronavirus relief deal with Congress before the election, record-breaking surges in new covid-19 infections, a tanking stock market, declining consumer confidence in battleground states and ominous layoff announcements appear to have taken at least a marginal toll on what has been his biggest polling advantage amid the pandemic: perceived competency at managing the economy.

In her new role, Weatherhead could have significant influence in guiding the government’s highest-profile climate report. The process of creating the report, including peer review by the National Academy of Sciences and comment periods to allow scientists and members of the public to provide feedback on drafts, are set by law and precedent.

Selection may calm fears of a more politicized fifth assessment

chart: Global average surface temperature anomalies during the month of September from 1880 to 2020. (NOAA) © NOAA Global average surface temperature anomalies during the month of September from 1880 to 2020. (NOAA)

Outside scientists have expressed the fear that climate change contrarians within the Trump administration, like Legates, could be inserted into and interfere with the assessment process and contents. However, the current senior NOAA official said Legates has not been tasked with any climate assessment-related work.

The congressionally mandated report that Weatherhead is charged with overseeing is intended to inform federal climate policy. The report’s primary audiences are Congress, the president, and state and local government leaders. It’s also meant to inform and engage every American affected by climate change.

How Joe Biden May Have Outmaneuvered Donald Trump On Energy, Climate, and the Economic Recovery

  How Joe Biden May Have Outmaneuvered Donald Trump On Energy, Climate, and the Economic Recovery How Joe Biden May Have Outmaneuvered Donald Trump On Energy, Climate, and the Economic Recovery“Oh, that’s a big statement,” Trump said. “He’s going to destroy the oil industry.

Its findings have also been cited in climate change litigation, and could shape court cases in the years to come.

Since 2000, the report has been released roughly every four years but has been a political lightning rod in Republican administrations. The George W. Bush administration suppressed release of the inaugural report in 2000 and the second report, due in 2004, was delayed and delivered late. Trump distanced himself from the fourth report, produced largely under the Obama administration and released in November 2018.

The 2018 assessment concluded the climate is “changing is faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization” and that its impacts “are projected to intensify.”

The Trump administration sought to bury that report by releasing it on the day after Thanksgiving, and Trump distanced himself from its findings, stating, “we’re not necessarily such believers.” Federal outreach and communication efforts were scrubbed. Environmental Protection Agency administrator Andrew Wheeler said in 2018 that the report relied too much on worst case scenarios, though it included a wide range of global warming emissions and warming cases.


Video: Judge Overseeing Consent Decree Praises BPD's Stable Leadership Despite Frustrations Over Results (CBS Baltimore)

The US just left the Paris climate agreement

  The US just left the Paris climate agreement Why the presidential election matters so much for global action on climate changePulling out of the accord was one of Donald Trump’s signature campaign promises in 2016. He announced on June 1, 2017, that the US would begin the exit process. But because of the way the agreement works, the US is not able to officially withdraw from the accord until this week, the day after the election.

Weatherhead is being brought into the government through the U.S. Geological Survey. Before serving as a senior scientist at Jupiter Intelligence, she was a senior scientist at the University of Colorado for nearly 25 years while also contributing to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, among others. She holds expertise in Earth observations, ozone depletion and the intersection of weather and climate, and currently serves on NOAA’s Science Advisory Board.

In a series of position papers obtained by The Washington Post articulating Weatherhead’s vision for the assessment, she placed an emphasis engaging private industry in the process, such as renewable energy companies, which she characterized as a departure from the past. She also recommended the report provide information on the cost of climate change on different economic sectors.

She stressed the importance of incorporating the viewpoints of a diverse set of scientists and reflecting the broad range of perspectives while communicating uncertainties. She contended this approach would make the report’s results more defensible and help highlight what areas require improved understanding.

Rich Sorkin, chief executive at Jupiter Intelligence and Weatherhead’s previous boss, called her “one of the world’s experts on uncertainty,” which he believes resonated with the current administration.

“[I]t’s clear they wanted a climate assessment that focused on impacts, specific time horizons, and a scientifically valid approach to uncertainty,” Sorkin said. “My concern is that other appointments made by this administration indicate that there is another strong constituency that wants to derail high quality evidence-based science generally and in the National Climate Assessment. And that’s something to be very wary of.”

How Biden aims to amp up the government’s fight against climate change

  How Biden aims to amp up the government’s fight against climate change President-elect Joe Biden is poised to embed action on climate change across the breadth of the federal government, from the departments of Agriculture to Treasury and State— releasing it from the confines of environmental agencies to speed up U.S. action on global warming and acknowledge that the problem touches many aspects of American life. Then-Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden walks outside of the Delaware Museum of Natural History in Wilmington to present his plans to address the climate crisis in September.

The possibility of a second Trump term hangs over the next assessment

Donald Trump standing in front of a flag: Trump speaks during an election night event in the East Room at the White House early in the morning on Wednesday. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post) © Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post Trump speaks during an election night event in the East Room at the White House early in the morning on Wednesday. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

Leading up to the 2022 assessment, concerns have been raised that the Trump administration is intentionally delaying it, but the two directors of the previous assessment say such fears are unfounded.

The assessment “is moving along as expected, anticipated, and desired,” said David Reidmiller, who directed the fourth assessment.

Don Wuebbles, a climate scientist at the University of Illinois who preceded Reidmiller, credited the White House’s Droegemeier, and Michael Kuperberg, a career official who runs the Global Change Research Program, for keeping the assessment process on track. “They’re honorable people, aiming to do the right thing,” said Wuebbles.

While Wuebbles expressed confidence in Droegemeier’s motivations, he worries that if Trump wins a second term, his administration might aim to remove career officials like Kuperberg or even Weatherhead and derail the process.

“I’m fearful that if President Trump wins, the National Climate Assessment won’t look like it has in the past,” he said.

There’s more confidence that a Biden administration would run a process similar to the fourth assessment, which largely kept politics out of the scientific work.

Wuebbles said he also has concerns about the current leadership of USGS, which is funding Weatherhead’s position.

Current USGS Administrator James Reilly, a former astronaut and petroleum geologist, has interfered with the publication of the agency’s scientific research on climate change. In October, Reilly intervened to delay a new analysis of the population of polar bears living on the coast of the southern Beaufort Sea. The study notes that shrinking sea ice in the Arctic threatens the survival of polar bears while enhancing the opportunity for oil and gas development in the region.

Trump administration official who questions global warming to run key climate program

  Trump administration official who questions global warming to run key climate program A meteorologist who questions the seriousness of global warming is taking over a key climate science program. Legates, a controversial figure who joined the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in September, will move into a new slot as head of the U.S. Global Change Research Program as early as Thursday, according to two people familiar with the move who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.

Reilly has sought to limit how far out agency scientists would project future climate conditions to mid-century, according to two Interior Department officials, which would minimize the full impact of planet-warming pollution such as carbon dioxide. These officials, who spoke on the conditions of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said Reilly dropped the effort after USGS scientists reviewed the proposal.

The director — a former astronaut and geologist — has repeatedly questioned scientific models that predict dire climate impacts, according to current and former USGS officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. He has excised references to climate change from news releases on multiple occasions, they added.

“I would very concerned about coming in through USGS if I were taking a position,” said Wuebbles.

Scientists, including Wuebbles, as well as climate advocates have raised alarms that the White House may attempt to insert Legates, NOAA’s deputy assistant secretary of commerce for observation and prediction, into the assessment process.

“First, he is not a quality scientist and secondly we need to have people that will represent the science community, not someone who’s a denier of climate change,” Wuebbles said.

Reidmiller said the climate assessment process was designed to insulate itself from political interference.

“There are a number processes and procedures to ensure the ultimate project does not go off the rails and reflects the best available science,” Reidmiller said.

Wuebbles praised Weatherhead’s qualifications for the role, saying: “She’s bright and accomplished.... she’s certainly a reasonable choice for this. I think what she’s done since retiring from the University of Colorado is probably giving her more insights into climate issues than she’s had previously.

Katharine Hayhoe, a climate scientist at Texas Tech University who served as a lead author of the fourth assessment, said Reidmiller and Wuebbles approached their jobs as facilitators and delegated considerable authority to chapter authors to determine the findings to be highlighted and covered.

However, she worries that if Trump were to win the election, the next leader of the assessment director would come under pressure from the White House to skew the report’s findings, and be more prescriptive in their approach.

“The key challenge the next director would face in a Trump administration will differ, depending on their goal: if it’s to continue to be, their primary challenge would be the administration’s pushback,” she said in an interview. “If their goal is to be prescriptive of the science and content, then the challenge would be the pushback they’d receive from the authors and scientists.”

Juliet Eilperin contributed to this report.

Trump administration official who questions global warming to run key climate program .
A meteorologist who questions the seriousness of global warming is taking over a key climate science program. Legates, a controversial figure who joined the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in September, will move into a new slot as head of the U.S. Global Change Research Program as early as Thursday, according to two people familiar with the move who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.

usr: 1
This is interesting!