•   
  •   
  •   

Politics President Trump's defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal, policy lawsuits

12:40  18 november  2020
12:40  18 november  2020 Source:   usatoday.com

Ballots arriving late in the mail won't save Trump

  Ballots arriving late in the mail won't save Trump President Donald Trump's big legal effort over election results hinges on mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania. Here's why the fight is hopeless.They would go to the courts, they said, hoping to swing the election their way.

The list of Trump -related cases heading the high court 's way remains long even as the president 's days grow short. He wants a rematch with New York City prosecutors seeking access to his tax returns and financial records. He wants to continue building the wall along the southern border while keeping migrants seeking asylum on the Mexican side. But all that could change after Jan. 20, when President -elect Joe Biden takes office. Many of the cases tied to Trump ' s policies and personal entanglements are likely to become moot or, at least, undeserving of the Supreme Court 's time and

A lawsuit by the Trump campaign alleging some of these irregularities was tossed by a federal judge in Pennsylvania on Saturday, with the judge saying that the president ’s legal team failed to present “compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption.” The suit had argued that Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, Trump ’ s attorneys, wrote that they would seek an “expedited appeal” with 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, which has a conservative majority. Should the 3rd Circuit fail them, Giuliani and Ellis still have options, with Giuliani writing on Saturday that the Pennsylvania

WASHINGTON – From the earliest days of his travel ban against predominantly Muslim countries to his latest efforts at reversing the results of the 2020 election, President Donald Trump has dominated much of the Supreme Court's docket.

Even in the autumn of his presidency, little has changed. The administration came before the justices the week after Election Day in hopes of dismantling the Affordable Care Act, perhaps the most celebrated achievement of his predecessor. Later this month, it will defend its plan to exclude noncitizens from the census count used to apportion seats in the House of Representatives.

Supreme Court appears unlikely to topple Affordable Care Act in latest challenge by Republicans

  Supreme Court appears unlikely to topple Affordable Care Act in latest challenge by Republicans The fate of the law dominated much of Justice Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearing last month. Two other justices appear ready to save the ACA.After upholding the health care law in 2012 and 2015, the court was faced with a new Republican challenge stemming from Congress' elimination in 2017 of the tax imposed on consumers who refuse to buy health insurance. Since the law originally was upheld as a tax, challengers argued it became unconstitutional without one.

More: President Trump ’ s immigration crackdown inundates Supreme Court . Several other immigration cases are headed to the high court , including the Trump administration’s defense of its policy denying residency and green cards to some legal immigrants who rely on public benefits. In many of the cases, policies implemented by one president can be reversed by the next without requiring action by Congress – or intervention by the nation’s highest court . “It underscores that elections have consequences, especially when more and more of our most important federal policies are made

More: Trump ' s defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal , policy lawsuits . Trump is waging what could be his final Supreme Court battle without some traditional allies: Catholics, conservatives and constitutional experts have opposed the policy . After three losses in lower courts Led by New York, a coalition of 22 states and 15 cities filed suit , and a federal district court ruled in September that Trump ' s plan was unlawful. The three-judge panel said it served to deter immigrant households from responding to the census count. Two other federal courts in California and Maryland

a man wearing a suit and hat: (FILES) In this file photo US President Donald Trump leaves after speaking during a Make America Great Again rally at Fayetteville Regional Airport November 2, 2020, in Fayetteville, North Carolina. - Two months before he is due to leave office, President Donald Trump asked top aides about the possibility of striking Iran's nuclear facilities, The New York Times reported on November 16, 2020. During a meeting at the Oval Office last November 12, 2020, the outgoing Republican leader asked several top aides, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, © BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI, AFP via Getty Images (FILES) In this file photo US President Donald Trump leaves after speaking during a Make America Great Again rally at Fayetteville Regional Airport November 2, 2020, in Fayetteville, North Carolina. - Two months before he is due to leave office, President Donald Trump asked top aides about the possibility of striking Iran's nuclear facilities, The New York Times reported on November 16, 2020. During a meeting at the Oval Office last November 12, 2020, the outgoing Republican leader asked several top aides, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, "whether he had options to take action against Iran's main nuclear site in the coming weeks," the newspaper said. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) ORG XMIT: 0 ORIG FILE ID: AFP_8VC9RC.jpg

The list of Trump-related cases heading the high court's way remains long even as the president's days grow short. He wants a rematch with New York City prosecutors seeking access to his tax returns and financial records. He wants to continue building  the wall along the southern border while keeping migrants seeking asylum on the Mexican side.

Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage

  Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage "Supreme Court Justices aren't supposed to be political hacks.," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. "This right-wing speech is nakedly partisan."Alito said the restrictions imposed by political leaders in order to contain the coronavirus pandemic have "resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty" and denounced recent Supreme Court decisions holding up orders he believed discriminated against religious groups. He argued the pandemic highlighted a wider assault on religious freedom as conservative views are increasing equated with "bigotry.

WASHINGTON – Former President Donald Trump had about 89 million followers on Twitter before the platform suspended his account earlier this year, but the Supreme Court signaled Monday it isn't interested in how he got along –or didn't–with some of them. More: Trump ' s defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal , policy lawsuits . One of the seven Twitter users who brought the case in 2017 was Rebecca Buckwalter of Washington, D.C. After Trump tweeted, "Sorry folks, but if I would have relied on the Fake News of CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS washpost or nytimes, I would have

Trump petitioned the Supreme Court in August 2020 to hear his appeal of the Second Circuit's decision to uphold Judge Buchwald's opinion. Trump ' s petition requested the Supreme Court to answer the question "Whether the First Amendment deprives a government official of his right to control his personal Twitter account by blocking third-party accounts if he uses that personal account in part to announce official actions and policies ."[33] Following the election, in which Joe Biden was elected " President Trump ' s defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal , policy lawsuits ".

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

But all that could change after Jan. 20, when President-elect Joe Biden takes office. Many of the cases tied to Trump's policies and personal entanglements are likely to become moot or, at least, undeserving of the Supreme Court's time and attention.

"I think that the president has tested the boundaries of what was expected in ways that have generated a lot of litigation,” said Ian Gershengorn, who served as the Justice Department's acting solicitor general during the waning days of the Obama administration. "I would just think the court would want to take a deep breath."

The justices appear to be doing just that. For the past month, they have been sitting on a petition from Trump's lawyers that seeks to block the New York subpoena for his tax and financial documents. For two weeks, they have left unanswered his lawyers' request to intervene in Pennsylvania Republicans' effort to disallow absentee ballots received for three days after Election Day.

How Trump’s erratic behavior and failure on coronavirus doomed his reelection

  How Trump’s erratic behavior and failure on coronavirus doomed his reelection The same impulses that helped lift the president to victory in 2016 contributed to his undoing just four years later, and the exhausted voters who once gave Trump a shot turned on him.[This story has been optimized for offline reading on our apps. For a richer experience, you can find the full version of this story here. An Internet connection is required.

Trump wrote that the Supreme Court had rejected the lawsuit filed by Texas "within a flash," and "without even looking at the many reasons it was brought." "A Rigged Election, fight on!" he wrote. Twitter flagged Trump ’ s allegation of fraud as "disputed" and attached a link to a news story saying The Texas v. Pennsylvania lawsuit was a last-ditch effort by Trump ’ s allies to contest the election before Electoral College delegates formally cast their votes for the president on December 14. Texas sought to invalidate the election results in four battleground states – Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan

President Trump said Saturday his Supreme Court nominee is most likely to be a woman. On Sunday he tweeted about Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Trump says his nomination for Supreme Court 'will be a very talented'. And now, in a raw political move – this president and the Republican leader have decided to jam a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court through the United States Senate. It’ s the last thing we need in this moment. Voters have already begun casting ballots in this country. In just a few weeks, we are going to know who the voters of this nation have chosen to be their next president .

And in the latest sign of the upcoming political transition, the House Judiciary Committee asked the high court Tuesday to postpone the Dec. 2 oral argument in its battle to gain access to grand jury information that was redacted from former special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The court recently agreed to hear the Justice Department's defense of Trump's border wall and asylum policies, which are among a bevy of immigration crackdowns challenged by immigrant rights groups. But neither case has been set for oral argument yet, leaving time for the incoming Biden administration to change the policies.

More: President Trump's immigration crackdown inundates Supreme Court

Several other immigration cases are headed to the high court, including the Trump administration's defense of its policy denying residency and green cards to some legal immigrants who rely on public benefits. In many of the cases, policies implemented by one president can be reversed by the next without requiring action by Congress – or intervention by the nation's highest court.

Trump campaign sees election lawsuits fizzle

  Trump campaign sees election lawsuits fizzle The Trump campaign and its allies on Monday remained engaged in numerous election-related lawsuits more than a week after former Vice President Joe Biden was projected to win the race, even as the scattershot legal effort has fallen far short of its goal of changing the election result.To date, the litigation has produced very little for the Trump campaign in terms of court wins, and it has unearthed no credible evidence that systematic fraud or ballot tampering tainted the election, as President Trump continues to baselessly claim.

"It underscores that elections have consequences, especially when more and more of our most important federal policies are made through executive action," said Stephen Vladeck, who specializes in national security law at the University of Texas School of Law.

Taxes and tweets

What makes Trump's legal battles particularly unusual compared to past presidents is the number of cases affecting him personally. Both Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance and New York Attorney General Letitia James are seeking his financial records for signs of hush-money payments or tax fraud. Lawsuits in New York and Washington, D.C., target the president's business dealings with foreign and domestic governments.

Trump even has been sued by followers of his Twitter account who contend the president blocked them in an effort to "suppress dissent." The Justice Department's request that the high court review two lower court rulings against him has been pending for several weeks.

While federal district and circuit courts have rejected most of Trump's arguments in cases seeking access to his financial records and some redacted parts of the Mueller report, appeals by the Justice Department or his personal lawyers have let him run out the clock and prevent disclosure while in office, said Brianne Gorod, chief counsel at the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center. If the cases remain live, Trump will be a private citizen, and issues related to his status as president will be moot.

Fact check: Fake Trump tweet echoing Halsey song lyrics originally began as a joke

  Fact check: Fake Trump tweet echoing Halsey song lyrics originally began as a joke A doctored image shows Trump tweeted Halsey lyrics about losing the election. This fake tweet, which doesn't appear on his profile, was a joke.“I was red… and you liked him cause he was blue.. then you touched me.. and i was a lilac sky.. but then you all decided that purple just wasn’t for you,” reads an Instagram post containing what appears to be a quote of a tweet from Trump.

Since Day One, Trump has operated as president in much the same way he did as a luxury developer and reality TV host: by suing those who get in his way. If imitation is flattery, he has been rewarded by his many challengers.

The so-called "Muslim ban" he announced a week into his presidency initially was blocked, but in June 2018 the Supreme Court upheld a ban against travelers from five majority-Muslim countries. The 5-4 ruling required the vote of Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump named to the court the previous year after Senate Republicans spent most of 2016 blocking President Barack Obama's nominee.

But if Trump expected the Supreme Court to be friendly territory throughout his time in office, he was mistaken.

John Roberts sitting at a desk: Chief Justice John Roberts presiding in January during the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. © Handout, Senate Television via Getty Imag Chief Justice John Roberts presiding in January during the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts, with whom the president has tangled repeatedly, sided with liberals in two recent major immigration cases. One struck down Trump's effort to add a question on citizenship to the 2020 census. The other blocked his plan to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, that protects some 650,000 undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Now the court appears likely to upholdPresident Barack Obama's health care law, dubbed Obamacare, for the third time in nine years. The challenge was brought by Texas and other states led by Republicans, but with the Trump administration's support.

The Supreme Court is running the clock on Trump's election lawsuits, experts say

  The Supreme Court is running the clock on Trump's election lawsuits, experts say The Supreme Court has shown little interest in taking up President Donald Trump's numerous legal challenges against the election results.And in his speech on election night falsely declaring victory, he said "we'll be going to the US Supreme Court" to address the "major fraud in our nation.

More: Supreme Court appears unlikely to topple Affordable Care Act in latest challenge by Republicans

With a change in administration, immigrant rights advocates are hoping the court's conservative majority will delay hearing and deciding upcoming cases – and eventually dismiss them or declare them moot.

Biden and his aides "have made clear that they are planning to discontinue many of the Trump administration’s policies, particularly with respect to asylum and the border," said Omar Jadwat, director of the immigrant rights project at the American Civil Liberties Union. “There’s every reason to hope and expect that the Biden administration will follow through on what it’s said."

That could sidetrack other Trump immigration policies still working their way through federal appeals courts, including those that deny asylum to migrants who do not seek protection first from a country they pass through or who do not enter the country at a designated crossing.

Census dispute remains

One contentious Trump policy will be considered by the justices on Nov. 30, the first day of their next two-week sitting. That's because the administration is pressing to exclude millions of undocumented immigrants from census calculations used to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among states for the next decade.

Excluding undocumented immigrants likely would reduce the number of House seats in Democrat-leaning areas of California, Texas, Florida and New York, to the benefit of Republican-majority states with few immigrant communities.

It's also possible that even after Trump has left the White House, the court will find reason to clear up challenges that could arise again in the future.

a person wearing a costume: A county official in Pennsylvania checks ballots that arrived after polls closed on Election Day. © Mary Altaffer, AP A county official in Pennsylvania checks ballots that arrived after polls closed on Election Day.

For instance, even though the dispute over absentee ballots received after Election Day in Pennsylvania would not upend Biden's victory there, four conservative justices have expressed interest in deciding whether the state's Supreme Court had the authority to change the state Legislature's Nov. 3 deadline.

Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false

  Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false Partly false posts claim Joe Biden tried to destroy reputation of Clarence Thomas, who is 'in control' of Supreme Court, which will decide election.In fact, amid the confirmation fight over Justice Amy Coney Barrett in September, Trump told reporters, "I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it's very important that we have nine justices," per USA TODAY.

After the court refused Republicans' request last month to restore the earlier mail deadline, Associate Justice Samuel Alito called it an "important constitutional issue" that "has needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious post-election problems."

What's more, the results of this month's elections will mean that the House and Senate will be even more closely divided for the next two years, a formula that often leads to government gridlock. Once in office, that could lead Biden to resort to new executive actions when legislation proves elusive – and, inevitably, prompt another round of court challenges.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: President Trump's defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal, policy lawsuits

Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false .
Partly false posts claim Joe Biden tried to destroy reputation of Clarence Thomas, who is 'in control' of Supreme Court, which will decide election.In fact, amid the confirmation fight over Justice Amy Coney Barrett in September, Trump told reporters, "I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it's very important that we have nine justices," per USA TODAY.

usr: 1
This is interesting!