•   
  •   
  •   

Politics President Trump's defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal, policy lawsuits

12:40  18 november  2020
12:40  18 november  2020 Source:   usatoday.com

Ballots arriving late in the mail won't save Trump

  Ballots arriving late in the mail won't save Trump President Donald Trump's big legal effort over election results hinges on mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania. Here's why the fight is hopeless.They would go to the courts, they said, hoping to swing the election their way.

Trump may , with this in mind, have filled the supreme court with conservative appointees, but things aren’t so straightforward. The Wisconsin decision was delivered before Trump ’ s third pick for the supreme court , Amy Coney Barrett, formally joined the bench last week, giving conservatives a 6-3

President -elect says he has not spoken to Trump since Saturday, and says refusal to concede ‘will not help his legacy’ – follow all the latest. The US supreme court justices signaled that they are unlikely to strike down the entire Obamacare healthcare law.

WASHINGTON – From the earliest days of his travel ban against predominantly Muslim countries to his latest efforts at reversing the results of the 2020 election, President Donald Trump has dominated much of the Supreme Court's docket.

Even in the autumn of his presidency, little has changed. The administration came before the justices the week after Election Day in hopes of dismantling the Affordable Care Act, perhaps the most celebrated achievement of his predecessor. Later this month, it will defend its plan to exclude noncitizens from the census count used to apportion seats in the House of Representatives.

Supreme Court appears unlikely to topple Affordable Care Act in latest challenge by Republicans

  Supreme Court appears unlikely to topple Affordable Care Act in latest challenge by Republicans The fate of the law dominated much of Justice Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearing last month. Two other justices appear ready to save the ACA.After upholding the health care law in 2012 and 2015, the court was faced with a new Republican challenge stemming from Congress' elimination in 2017 of the tax imposed on consumers who refuse to buy health insurance. Since the law originally was upheld as a tax, challengers argued it became unconstitutional without one.

Senate Republicans voted to confirm President Donald Trump ' s Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Monday, a major victory for the President and his party just days before November 3, that could push the high court in a more conservative direction for generations to come.

The Pennsylvania supreme court delivered another defeat to the Trump campaign, as the president ’ s legal efforts struggle to gain traction. Reversing a lower court ’ s decision, the state supreme court ruled that Philadelphia election officials did not improperly block the Trump campaign from observing the

a man wearing a suit and hat: (FILES) In this file photo US President Donald Trump leaves after speaking during a Make America Great Again rally at Fayetteville Regional Airport November 2, 2020, in Fayetteville, North Carolina. - Two months before he is due to leave office, President Donald Trump asked top aides about the possibility of striking Iran's nuclear facilities, The New York Times reported on November 16, 2020. During a meeting at the Oval Office last November 12, 2020, the outgoing Republican leader asked several top aides, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, © BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI, AFP via Getty Images (FILES) In this file photo US President Donald Trump leaves after speaking during a Make America Great Again rally at Fayetteville Regional Airport November 2, 2020, in Fayetteville, North Carolina. - Two months before he is due to leave office, President Donald Trump asked top aides about the possibility of striking Iran's nuclear facilities, The New York Times reported on November 16, 2020. During a meeting at the Oval Office last November 12, 2020, the outgoing Republican leader asked several top aides, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, "whether he had options to take action against Iran's main nuclear site in the coming weeks," the newspaper said. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) ORG XMIT: 0 ORIG FILE ID: AFP_8VC9RC.jpg

The list of Trump-related cases heading the high court's way remains long even as the president's days grow short. He wants a rematch with New York City prosecutors seeking access to his tax returns and financial records. He wants to continue building  the wall along the southern border while keeping migrants seeking asylum on the Mexican side.

Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage

  Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage "Supreme Court Justices aren't supposed to be political hacks.," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. "This right-wing speech is nakedly partisan."Alito said the restrictions imposed by political leaders in order to contain the coronavirus pandemic have "resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty" and denounced recent Supreme Court decisions holding up orders he believed discriminated against religious groups. He argued the pandemic highlighted a wider assault on religious freedom as conservative views are increasing equated with "bigotry.

The president and other Republicans have filed a series of lawsuits in different states that several judges have already dismissed.

President Donald Trump expressed confidence he will win the election but noted his campaign will sue in Biden campaign accused Trump team of delaying tactics. Trump taking action in Nevada And the result may not be known until Thursday November 12, officials said, when all provisional ballots

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

But all that could change after Jan. 20, when President-elect Joe Biden takes office. Many of the cases tied to Trump's policies and personal entanglements are likely to become moot or, at least, undeserving of the Supreme Court's time and attention.

"I think that the president has tested the boundaries of what was expected in ways that have generated a lot of litigation,” said Ian Gershengorn, who served as the Justice Department's acting solicitor general during the waning days of the Obama administration. "I would just think the court would want to take a deep breath."

The justices appear to be doing just that. For the past month, they have been sitting on a petition from Trump's lawyers that seeks to block the New York subpoena for his tax and financial documents. For two weeks, they have left unanswered his lawyers' request to intervene in Pennsylvania Republicans' effort to disallow absentee ballots received for three days after Election Day.

How Trump’s erratic behavior and failure on coronavirus doomed his reelection

  How Trump’s erratic behavior and failure on coronavirus doomed his reelection The same impulses that helped lift the president to victory in 2016 contributed to his undoing just four years later, and the exhausted voters who once gave Trump a shot turned on him.[This story has been optimized for offline reading on our apps. For a richer experience, you can find the full version of this story here. An Internet connection is required.

As President Donald Trump continues to sow uncertainty about the November election, he will announce his third Supreme Court nominee Saturday, the capstone of his promise to name a long line of conservative judges who will reshape the courts for generations.

On the same day that a Democratic-led US House committee voted for articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump , the Supreme Court made its own momentous decision to intervene in Trump ' s effort to keep his tax returns and other financial records secret.

And in the latest sign of the upcoming political transition, the House Judiciary Committee asked the high court Tuesday to postpone the Dec. 2 oral argument in its battle to gain access to grand jury information that was redacted from former special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The court recently agreed to hear the Justice Department's defense of Trump's border wall and asylum policies, which are among a bevy of immigration crackdowns challenged by immigrant rights groups. But neither case has been set for oral argument yet, leaving time for the incoming Biden administration to change the policies.

More: President Trump's immigration crackdown inundates Supreme Court

Several other immigration cases are headed to the high court, including the Trump administration's defense of its policy denying residency and green cards to some legal immigrants who rely on public benefits. In many of the cases, policies implemented by one president can be reversed by the next without requiring action by Congress – or intervention by the nation's highest court.

President Trump stays mostly out of view after election but is working, taking steps to, in part, poke Biden

  President Trump stays mostly out of view after election but is working, taking steps to, in part, poke Biden Trump has been mostly out of view since Election Day but is working: He is purging staff and pursuing actions designed in part to irk Joe Biden.President Donald Trump has stayed mostly out of public view in the two weeks since his election loss to Democrat Joe Biden. On nine of the 14 days since the Nov. 3 election, his daily schedule has been summed up in a single sentence: “The president has no public events scheduled" – the longest he has been out of public view since taking office in January 2017.

"It underscores that elections have consequences, especially when more and more of our most important federal policies are made through executive action," said Stephen Vladeck, who specializes in national security law at the University of Texas School of Law.

Taxes and tweets

What makes Trump's legal battles particularly unusual compared to past presidents is the number of cases affecting him personally. Both Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance and New York Attorney General Letitia James are seeking his financial records for signs of hush-money payments or tax fraud. Lawsuits in New York and Washington, D.C., target the president's business dealings with foreign and domestic governments.

Trump even has been sued by followers of his Twitter account who contend the president blocked them in an effort to "suppress dissent." The Justice Department's request that the high court review two lower court rulings against him has been pending for several weeks.

While federal district and circuit courts have rejected most of Trump's arguments in cases seeking access to his financial records and some redacted parts of the Mueller report, appeals by the Justice Department or his personal lawyers have let him run out the clock and prevent disclosure while in office, said Brianne Gorod, chief counsel at the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center. If the cases remain live, Trump will be a private citizen, and issues related to his status as president will be moot.

Fact check: Trump's campaign page has control over his designation as 'political candidate'

  Fact check: Trump's campaign page has control over his designation as 'political candidate' Trump has been designated as a political candidate long before the election and Facebook is not in charge of determining a page's titleMany supporters are criticizing Facebook, claiming the platform removed Trump's title of "President" on what many describe as his "official" Facebook page and downgraded it to "Political Candidate.

Since Day One, Trump has operated as president in much the same way he did as a luxury developer and reality TV host: by suing those who get in his way. If imitation is flattery, he has been rewarded by his many challengers.

The so-called "Muslim ban" he announced a week into his presidency initially was blocked, but in June 2018 the Supreme Court upheld a ban against travelers from five majority-Muslim countries. The 5-4 ruling required the vote of Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump named to the court the previous year after Senate Republicans spent most of 2016 blocking President Barack Obama's nominee.

But if Trump expected the Supreme Court to be friendly territory throughout his time in office, he was mistaken.

John Roberts sitting at a desk: Chief Justice John Roberts presiding in January during the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. © Handout, Senate Television via Getty Imag Chief Justice John Roberts presiding in January during the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

Chief Justice John Roberts, with whom the president has tangled repeatedly, sided with liberals in two recent major immigration cases. One struck down Trump's effort to add a question on citizenship to the 2020 census. The other blocked his plan to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, that protects some 650,000 undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Now the court appears likely to upholdPresident Barack Obama's health care law, dubbed Obamacare, for the third time in nine years. The challenge was brought by Texas and other states led by Republicans, but with the Trump administration's support.

Fact check: Amy Coney Barrett ruled that police did not knowingly violate Black teen's rights

  Fact check: Amy Coney Barrett ruled that police did not knowingly violate Black teen's rights Text appearing next to Barrett's face on an Instagram post makes a serious claim, which we've rated false.Harriot offers a scathing critique of Barrett’s background centered on a case where she  ruled in favor of qualified immunity for two police officers after a Black teenager died in their custody.

More: Supreme Court appears unlikely to topple Affordable Care Act in latest challenge by Republicans

With a change in administration, immigrant rights advocates are hoping the court's conservative majority will delay hearing and deciding upcoming cases – and eventually dismiss them or declare them moot.

Biden and his aides "have made clear that they are planning to discontinue many of the Trump administration’s policies, particularly with respect to asylum and the border," said Omar Jadwat, director of the immigrant rights project at the American Civil Liberties Union. “There’s every reason to hope and expect that the Biden administration will follow through on what it’s said."

That could sidetrack other Trump immigration policies still working their way through federal appeals courts, including those that deny asylum to migrants who do not seek protection first from a country they pass through or who do not enter the country at a designated crossing.

Census dispute remains

One contentious Trump policy will be considered by the justices on Nov. 30, the first day of their next two-week sitting. That's because the administration is pressing to exclude millions of undocumented immigrants from census calculations used to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among states for the next decade.

Excluding undocumented immigrants likely would reduce the number of House seats in Democrat-leaning areas of California, Texas, Florida and New York, to the benefit of Republican-majority states with few immigrant communities.

It's also possible that even after Trump has left the White House, the court will find reason to clear up challenges that could arise again in the future.

a person wearing a costume: A county official in Pennsylvania checks ballots that arrived after polls closed on Election Day. © Mary Altaffer, AP A county official in Pennsylvania checks ballots that arrived after polls closed on Election Day.

For instance, even though the dispute over absentee ballots received after Election Day in Pennsylvania would not upend Biden's victory there, four conservative justices have expressed interest in deciding whether the state's Supreme Court had the authority to change the state Legislature's Nov. 3 deadline.

Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false

  Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false Partly false posts claim Joe Biden tried to destroy reputation of Clarence Thomas, who is 'in control' of Supreme Court, which will decide election.In fact, amid the confirmation fight over Justice Amy Coney Barrett in September, Trump told reporters, "I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it's very important that we have nine justices," per USA TODAY.

After the court refused Republicans' request last month to restore the earlier mail deadline, Associate Justice Samuel Alito called it an "important constitutional issue" that "has needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious post-election problems."

What's more, the results of this month's elections will mean that the House and Senate will be even more closely divided for the next two years, a formula that often leads to government gridlock. Once in office, that could lead Biden to resort to new executive actions when legislation proves elusive – and, inevitably, prompt another round of court challenges.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: President Trump's defeat may give Supreme Court a rest from personal, policy lawsuits

Fact check: Claims on Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court and role in election are partly false .
Partly false posts claim Joe Biden tried to destroy reputation of Clarence Thomas, who is 'in control' of Supreme Court, which will decide election.In fact, amid the confirmation fight over Justice Amy Coney Barrett in September, Trump told reporters, "I think this will end up in the Supreme Court, and I think it's very important that we have nine justices," per USA TODAY.

usr: 12
This is interesting!