•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Alito to far-right litigants: The buffet is open

22:05  21 november  2020
22:05  21 november  2020 Source:   thehill.com

Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage

  Critics decry Supreme Court Justice Alito's 'nakedly partisan' speech on COVID-19 measures, gay marriage "Supreme Court Justices aren't supposed to be political hacks.," tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. "This right-wing speech is nakedly partisan."Alito said the restrictions imposed by political leaders in order to contain the coronavirus pandemic have "resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty" and denounced recent Supreme Court decisions holding up orders he believed discriminated against religious groups. He argued the pandemic highlighted a wider assault on religious freedom as conservative views are increasing equated with "bigotry.

LGBTQ rights under the Civil Rights Act. Alito accused Gorsuch of misreading Scalia. Alito repeatedly pressed a lawyer for abortion clinics on what he suggested was a conflict of interest between the clinics and state laws meant to regulate the doctors.

That ’s why, in the weeks ahead, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is going to rule in favor of Trump. Let’s wind the clock back about a Let’s explain what that is, and what’s at stake, and why Trump is going to follow up. A writ of certiorari orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case

In more than 40 years of watching Supreme Court justices, I have never seen a speech like Justice Samuel Alito's recent address before the Federalist Society. Descriptions of Alito's 30-minute oration have included phrases like ultrapartisan, incendiary, unusually political, tendentious and the judicial equivalent of a Trump rally. These things are all true. Even more ominously, it was also an engraved invitation from Alito to far-right litigants who can hardly wait to take advantage of the Court's strengthened right-wing majority to pursue such pet projects as overturning LGBTQ and reproductive rights.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito suggests religious liberty is under threat by same-sex marriage and COVID-19 restrictions

  Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito suggests religious liberty is under threat by same-sex marriage and COVID-19 restrictions Conservatives have a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court, but Alito's remarks implied that they're a marginalized group.Conservatives have a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court, but Alito's remarks implied that they're a marginalized group.

My Youtube channel offers a growing number of free accounting lectures and accounting courses that cover college level Accounting courses including Financial Accounting, Managerial Accounting, Intermediate Accounting, Advanced Accounting, Taxation, Auditing, Cost Accounting and CPA prep

Open to all litigants , whether "arrested" or "in custody", these remedies are available at all stages in the handling of cases. The Committee is further concerned that legal assistance is not accessible to all litigants and that the number of judges, magistrates and lawyers remain insufficient in the State

Samuel Alito wearing a suit and tie smiling and looking at the camera: Alito to far-right litigants: The buffet is open © UPI Photo Alito to far-right litigants: The buffet is open

And that should make all of us sit up and take notice.

High on Alito's list in his speech were what he called "sweeping restrictions" on "individual liberty" imposed by governors and others to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. He specifically censured restrictions on religious assembly, like limits on the number of people who can an attend in-person service, even though a challenge was filed on the very day of his speech to such a restriction in New York and is now before the Court.

Alito claimed that there has been an "unrelenting attack" and a "protracted campaign against the Little Sisters of the Poor," even though it was that organization that chose to file lawsuits against compromises on contraceptive coverage by the Obama administration.

Alito takes aim at gay marriage in 'politically charged speech'

  Alito takes aim at gay marriage in 'politically charged speech' In a speech to the conservative Federalist Society, Justice Samuel Alito lamented that opposing same-sex marriage is now "considered bigotry."In a virtual address Thursday to the conservative Federalist Society, Alito took aim the landmark 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision that guaranteed gay marriage rights across the country, as well as restrictions aimed at reducing the spread of the coronavirus and talk of restructuring the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary more broadly.

Types of Buffets . If you've decided that you want to open a buffet , your first step is to choose a concept for your Company Overview: Your overview should further develop the information in your executive summary The final step in opening a buffet restaurant is opening the buffet to the public.

Litigants synonyms, Litigants pronunciation, Litigants translation, English dictionary definition of Litigants . n. A party engaged in a lawsuit. adj. The court shall direct to him, either at its own discretion or at the request of the litigants , the questions that it deems appropriate in the lawsuit.

He condemned a friend-of-the-court brief filed by five Democratic senators in a gun safety case as "an affront to the Constitution and the rule of law."

He disparaged reliance on "experts" and "scientific expertise" by "executive officials," the Court's Obergefell decision recognizing equal marriage rights and the alleged censorship it has caused of people who object to it, Plan B contraception, the purported "danger" that religious liberty will become a "second class right," and more.

To far-right advocates, this is akin to saying the buffet is open.

Just how far the Court goes will, of course, depend on Chief Justice Roberts and Trump's latest Supreme Court justice, Amy Coney Barrett.

But Alito, at least, has publicly forecast his vote in the pending challenge to COVID-19 restrictions on in-person religious gatherings in New York, and at least Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas are likely to agree.

Justice Alito says pandemic has resulted in ‘unimaginable’ restrictions on individual liberty

  Justice Alito says pandemic has resulted in ‘unimaginable’ restrictions on individual liberty Alito said he was not criticizing officials for their policy decisions—“I’m a judge, not a policymaker”—and said before launching into the speech that he hoped his remarks would not be “twisted or misunderstood.” Alito, one of the court’s most conservative members, said it would be hard to imagine before the pandemic that speeches and concerts would be off-limits and that churches would be empty on Easter and synagogues vacant on sacred holidays. The Supreme Court itself has been closed to the public since March, and the justices hold their meetings and hear oral arguments via teleconference.

Joseph Stalin Was Right ! — While America Slept Democrats Swept in and Took the Lead in GA, NV Determine who made the call to keep a few select precincts open and why and the number of ballots BREAKING: Justice Alito Orders Any Ballots Received After 8pm on Election Day in Pennsylvania be

Hundreds of people with clashing ideologies have descended on Portland, Oregon. As far - right groups faced off with far-left counter protesters, President

Those four will also probably vote to grant an exemption from civil rights rules to a religious adoption group in a pending Philadelphia case, and will generally try to provide government funding to religious groups even as they are subject to fewer rules that apply to other organizations. Rulings against LGBTQ and reproductive rights are also likely. Decisions questioning or even overruling future Biden administration rules relying on "scientific expertise" are quite possible as well.

So, what's to be done?

At a minimum, all this should ratchet up pressure on the Biden administration to prioritize the filling of forthcoming judicial vacancies. Although there are no vacancies on the Supreme Court at the moment - as a result of Republicans' rush to put Justice Barrett on the court after the recent death of Justice Ginsburg - the court hears only a small number of cases each year. For most people, federal courts of appeal are the courts of last resort. Although there are more than 50 Trump judges on those courts, appointing fair-minded judges to help counteract their views is critical.

Churches, synagogues ask Supreme Court to end coronavirus worship limits

  Churches, synagogues ask Supreme Court to end coronavirus worship limits Houses of worship from Nevada to New York, chafing at coronavirus restrictions, want the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene as a matter of religious liberty. Two Orthodox Jewish synagogues in New York this week joined the Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn in asking the justices to suspend Gov. Andrew Cuomo's order limiting church services to just 10 people in the highest-risk areas of the city.

Also critical is ethics reform for the Supreme Court. No judge on any other federal court would have given the speech Alito did - because they would have known that it likely would violate ethics rules that require judges to refrain from political activity and to avoid even the appearance of impropriety or bias. As Senator Elizabeth Warren has already noted, such "nakedly partisan" acts by justices could be avoided by legislation such as a bill she has proposed to require justices to "follow the ethics rules other federal judges follow."

Whether other action is appropriate, and what that action should be, are questions that future decisions and conduct by members of the Supreme Court will help answer.

At the very least, Justice Alito's Federalist Society speech is a stark reminder that the Court's newly empowered right-wing majority is feeling its oats - and we should brace ourselves for what comes next.

Elliot Mincberg is a senior fellow at People For the American Way and a former chief oversight counsel for the House Judiciary Committee.

No thank you, Dr. Fauci .
As a pandemic covers the globe, hypocritical bureaucrats impose far-reaching restrictions while barely pretending to abide by their own rules. "Trust the experts," we are told. Yet most Americans are skeptical of being governed by unelected technocrats. We know full well the perils of government by expert and the threat it poses to our individual liberty. Expert rule is an elitist political philosophy that has rapidly metastasized during the pandemic.

usr: 7
This is interesting!