•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Politicians once again prioritize silencing those who disagree with them

22:26  21 january  2021
22:26  21 january  2021 Source:   thehill.com

WHO Team Arrives in Wuhan, But Will We Ever Know the Origin of Coronavirus?

  WHO Team Arrives in Wuhan, But Will We Ever Know the Origin of Coronavirus? Nearly a year into the pandemic, the world still doesn't know where the new coronavirus originated from and experts are warning we may never have a full picture of how the pandemic began. © Nicolas Asfouri/AFP/Getty A team from the World Health Organization arrived in Wuhan on Thursday to investigate the origin of the new coronavirus but experts warned we may never know the origin.

We've learned again that democracy is precious, democracy is fragile and, at this hour my friends, democracy has prevailed. So now on this hallowed They said that while supporting employment was key in the short run, reforms to help fatten ordinary people's wallets were needed to boost domestic

Scholars should speak out against those who have weaponized the language of “safety,” “security,” “acknowledgment” and “inclusion” to silence anyone who disagrees with them , argues Otherwise the Kims of academe will succeed in shutting up everyone who disagrees with them -- and ensure

Exactly at the moment members of Congress should be focused on working with each other to solve the biggest problems, they find that it's much easier instead to focus on silencing you.

text: Politicians once again prioritize silencing those who disagree with them © Greg Nash Politicians once again prioritize silencing those who disagree with them

As it did in 2019, the House of Representatives is giving priority consideration to a bill that would make it harder for ordinary Americans to speak out on the issues that matter most to them.

The latest version of the improperly named "For the People Act" purports to protect democracy and enhance transparency. It would do the opposite: protect incumbent politicians and suppress speech.

Cynthia Bailey Says Relationship with Dad Is 'Strained' After Appearance in Domestic Violence PSA

  Cynthia Bailey Says Relationship with Dad Is 'Strained' After Appearance in Domestic Violence PSA "After my mom did Kenya's domestic violence PSA, it caused a huge rift in my relationship with my dad," Cynthia Bailey said on Sunday's episode of The Real Housewives of Atlanta While going over her guest list with Mike, Cynthia, 53, said that all of her family members were confirmed for the wedding — except for her dad, who lived in Alabama and whom Cynthia hadn't seen in "a couple years." When Mike asked about the status of her dad's attendance, Cynthia said that she still needed to talk to her mother, Barbara Ford Morris, about it. "It's like, complicated," she told Mike.

That doesn't sound right considering the current circumstances. It is well known, specially in the military, that you decapitate the problem, in other words, take the leaders out first or concurrently with some people in the structure in order to disrupt operations towards retaliation.

Who needs this ?! For the ethnic dance of root cultures, beginning their epoch-making self-affirmation, all this historical rubbish is useless. An outburst of a newly perceived identity knocks in the subconscious, and people who yesterday lived in harmony with their neighbors suddenly begin to

Our country benefits when we have a diversity of voices participating in public life. Each American should be able to amplify their individual voice alongside like-minded fellow citizens. H.R. 1 would make this harder to do by, among other things:

  • Regulating more ways people can communicate about issues, forcing groups that engage in nonpartisan issue advocacy to, often falsely, declare that they support or oppose any candidate whose name appears in their materials.
  • Compelling nonprofits that then make "campaign-related disbursements" of the above kind to disclose the names and addresses of donors who donate above a certain threshold, subjecting them to potential retaliation from those who would harass them, an all too real possibility in today's partisan climate.
  • Requiring nonprofits to disclose their own donors, even if those donors would normally have been kept anonymous, if an organization they give money to spends dollars on the redefined "campaign-related disbursements" above a certain amount. This would make it much harder for burgeoning social entrepreneurs to find the funding and partnerships to grow. It also falsely implies that those donors funded a particular ad or issue.

These proposals would deepen divisions in the body politic that have stymied our ability to solve big problems.

The most important line in Joe Biden's inaugural address

  The most important line in Joe Biden's inaugural address About halfway through his inauguration speech, President Joe Biden said something very important about the work of Washington -- and how he envisions his presidency. © Alex Wong/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: Joe Biden is sworn in as U.S. President during his inauguration on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2021 in Washington, DC. During today's inauguration ceremony Joe Biden becomes the 46th president of the United States. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) "Politics doesn't have to be a raging fire destroying everything in its path," Biden insisted.

For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click here to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically.

While some believe Covid-19 was deliberately unleashed to usher in the Great Reset, others think the WEF and the ruling classes have merely seized on the pandemic as the perfect opportunity to impose their plan on populations unlikely to embrace it if they had a choice.

They would exacerbate the problems in our civic life by closing off even further what many people already see as a rigged system in which politicians and special interests team up at the expense of everyone else.

We need a more vibrant civil society, not a stifled one.

Just as Americans have the right to cast ballots in private, we have the right to support causes, join groups, and make donations without being monitored by the government. History shows that the choice to engage privately - free from the gaze of those in power - helps protect all voices, especially the marginalized.

The 1958 landmark Supreme Court decision in NAACP v. Alabama barred the state's attorney general from demanding the civil rights organization hand over its list of supporters. It doesn't take much imagination to figure out what state officials would have done with that list.

The single largest givers to LGBTQ causes between 1970 and 2010 were "anonymous funders." Does anyone doubt that the cause would have grown as it did if its funders were not allowed anonymity?

Beijing Must Come Clean About COVID-19 Origins | Opinion

  Beijing Must Come Clean About COVID-19 Origins | Opinion For all of our sakes, the time has come for an impartial and thorough investigation into how this terrible crisis began. Although the failures of many governments and international organizations during the pandemic must all be analyzed and addressed, knowing how this crisis started is the essential foundation for prioritizing next steps.If sloppy biolab security or reckless military experimentation followed by a coverup were the proximate cause, we need to prioritize developing rules and safeguards to make a global pandemic less likely to happen again.

They shouted and waved pro-Trump, US and Confederate flags as they roamed the halls, demanding the results of the presidential election be overturned. Members of Congress scrambled for cover under their seats as tear gas was fired.

I don’t disagree . That ’s why I walked it back from being an across the board absolute statement. Overall, I think that most conservative politicians forget this aspect of the job as they fall over themselves to fellate their corporate overlords. Are the usual responses. Or silence , I guess.

Gigi Brienza donated to John Edwards' presidential campaign, yet found herself and her address on a "target list" from an animal rights-oriented domestic terror organization thanks to donor disclosure requirements.

Margie Christoffersen donated money to oppose a ballot initiative in California. Her restaurant was boycotted, she was harassed, and police in riot gear had to be called to disperse a mob assembled outside her business.

How one feels about the causes espoused by any of these Americans is not the point. Their causes span the range of public debates. But the principle is the same. Whatever cause you support, you should be able to do it free of the prying eyes of politicians and bureaucrats, and without the threat of intimidation.

The ability to choose how, when, or even if to share your beliefs is especially critical in the age of digital mobs.

Members of Congress and other public officials have an obligation to ensure that everyone can exercise their rights. Foundational freedoms erode when we protect them for one set of people but not another. Our rights are bound together. If we protect them for me but not for thee, we risk forfeiting the robust liberties that are the foundation of the American experiment.

Congress should not rewrite the rules of engagement in a way that chills free speech. Americans must be free to speak and associate freely, without politicians holding a veto on who gets to participate and who does not. Accountability is for politicians, transparency is for government, and privacy is for people.

Ted Ellis is director of coalitions at Americans for Prosperity.

Despite attempts at equity, white Americans are being vaccinated at higher rate than Blacks, Latinos .
Health officials are alarmed at the vaccine roll-out's uneven distribution in spite of political efforts at equity Patients wait and are observed for an adverse reactions following their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine at the Amazon Meeting Center in downtown Seattle, Washington on January 24, 2021. - Amazon is partnering with Virginia Mason for a one-day pop-up clinic on January 24. 2021 that aims to vaccinate 2,000 people at the companys Meeting Center near downtown Seattle. Virginia Mason is handling vaccine administration, while Amazon is providing the location and help with logistics.

usr: 0
This is interesting!