Politics Democrats plan crackdown on rising drug costs

14:27  21 february  2021
14:27  21 february  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Is a supersized agenda the key to Democrats’ 2022 success — or their demise?

  Is a supersized agenda the key to Democrats’ 2022 success — or their demise? How can the party best limit backlash from voters?The progressive wing of the party has a long and varied list of things they want to get done with their newfound congressional majorities — tackling areas ranging from climate change to immigration to health care to voting rights to even adding states, among many others. Scrapping or otherwise reforming the Senate filibuster would likely be necessary to get many of these done. And some argue that, if Democrats want to keep their narrow congressional majorities in 2022, they need to get as much of this done as possible.

Democrats are hoping 2021 will be the year they accomplish their long-held goal of reigning in rising prescription drug costs by allowing the government to negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies.

a large building: Democrats plan crackdown on rising drug costs © Greg Nash, illustration Democrats plan crackdown on rising drug costs

The proposal is largely opposed by Republicans and loathed by the pharmaceutical industry, but Democrats think they have a chance of getting it done with control of the White House and Congress.

Price negotiations could be included later this year in a reconciliation bill, a fast-track budgetary move that only needs 51 votes to pass the Senate and can't be filibustered.

The $15 minimum wage could be the first major test of Democratic unity

  The $15 minimum wage could be the first major test of Democratic unity Democrats may soon have to confront divides in their caucus on the minimum wage.On the procedural front, Democrats need to convince the Senate parliamentarian — an in-house expert who advises on the rules of the upper chamber — that the $15 minimum wage has a significant enough effect on the budget that it can be part of the reconciliation process. Because of a practice known as the Byrd Rule, any policy that’s not seen as sufficiently budget-related can be flagged for removal by the parliamentarian. (Democrats don’t have to abide by this decision, but there have been few breaks with such guidance in the past.

The party is already using reconciliation to move President Biden's COVID-19 relief measure through Congress while sidestepping a GOP filibuster.

The new effort could be part of a second package later this year.

"I think first of all we should get as much done through reconciliation as we can," said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who introduced a bill with Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) this week that would establish a public option health insurance plan and allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices.

"We'll do our very, very best to get as much of it as we can, with the Biden team, in bill two," Kaine said, referring to the second reconciliation bill that Democrats hope to pass later this year.

Public anger over the rising costs of insulin and other life-saving drugs has grown in recent years, but Congress has not been able to accomplish significant legislative reform to the convoluted drug pricing system.

George Shultz was among the first to understand drug policy and prohibition

  George Shultz was among the first to understand drug policy and prohibition Decades ago, Shultz acknowledged that attempts to prohibit drugs do not and will not work. It took decades more for the U.S. House of Representatives to reach his conclusion and legislate, in December 2020, to decriminalize cannabis through the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement Act (MORE Act). The legislation is limited to one substance and is yet to be passed by the Senate. To Shultz, the impacts of drug policies in the Western Hemisphere, supported politically, financially and militarily by the U.S., "outsourced the violence, in effect, to Mexico and Guatemala and Honduras.

While bipartisan proposal from Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) gained support in the Senate last year, it did not include price negotiation, and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who at that point was majority leader, refused to bring the bill to the floor in an election year.

With reconciliation, Democrats don't have to contend with Republicans, so they're hoping to go much bigger than the Grassley-Wyden bill, which would limit out-of-pocket costs for seniors and cap price increases to the rate of inflation, but not allow government price negotiation.

"It just defies common sense to not let the government do that," Wyden recently told reporters.

The proposal would upend the pharmaceutical industry, which has spent billions of dollars over the past several years on lobbying and campaign contributions.

"Do I think this will be easy? No. Pharma will fight anything that curves its unilateral power to set prices on brand name drugs," said David Mitchell, co-founder of Patients for Affordable Drugs. "But I think we are looking at the best environment we have seen in many, many years for the enactment of meaningful reform to lower drug prices."

Stimulus bill: When will Congress pass Covid relief?

  Stimulus bill: When will Congress pass Covid relief? The major order of business for President Joe Biden and Congress is to pass a $1.9 trillion Covid relief package before the round of unemployment benefits and other aid approved in December lapse, again leaving millions of Americans short of help. © Eric Baradat/AFP/Getty Images The Capitol is seen on a cold winter evening in Washington, DC, on February 18, 2021. What's riding on this negotiation is the $1,400 stimulus checks proposed by Biden even before he took office, as well as that extra federal unemployment money. Democrats have said they will get a bill signed by mid-March.

Democrats are likely to return to some version of HR3, a bill that passed the House last year with the support of every single member of the caucus but received few votes from Republicans. It did not receive consideration from any Senate committee or a vote on the Senate floor.

The main component of that bill has been pushed by Democrats for decades. It would allow the government to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies for lower prices on drugs covered by Medicare, the federal health program for seniors. Drug companies would have to then extend those prices to private insurers.

It would completely change the way the U.S. pays for drugs, saving the federal government more than $456 billion over 10 years, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

The bill has been fiercely opposed by Republicans and the branded pharmaceutical industry, which would likely lose revenue if the bill passed, leading to 40 fewer new drugs coming to the market in the U.S. over the next two decades, according to the CBO estimate.

But Democrats arguing for the change are pointing to rising costs of brand-name drugs and insurance plans that increasingly require patients pay more money toward their own care, forcing them to ration insulin and other drugs. They also note that HR 3 includes $10 billion for biomedical research.

Democrats sought to impeach conservative populism instead of Trump

  Democrats sought to impeach conservative populism instead of Trump Democrats must have conservative populism end with Trump; the best way to ensure it does is discredit it by linking it exclusively to him. To understand the threat, look again at the last two presidential contests.In 2016, Trump pried key states out of Democrats' Midwestern blue wall, allowing him to overcome a significant popular vote deficit. In 2020, Trump came close to doing so again despite impeachment, a pandemic, an economic crash worthy of the Depression and being seen by many as unacceptably divisive. Even facing those obstacles, Trump increased his vote percentage (from 45.9 to 46.

Reconciliation is a tricky process that Democrats used in 2010 to pass the Affordable Care Act, and that Republicans used to approve their tax-cut bill in 2017. The legislation must meet strict rules or risk being thrown out by the nonpartisan Senate parliamentarian, though Kaine said he thinks his bill can past muster.

Democrats must also contend with differences within the caucus. While Democrats broadly agree on allowing Medicare to negotiate for lower drug prices, negotiations over the scope of HR 3 took about a year, with moderate and progressive members butting heads.

The bill that eventually passed authorized the government to negotiate the prices of between 50 and 250 drugs per year. Progressives questioned why there should be a maximum number of negotiated drugs at all and signaled they will carry that fight into this year.

"In this moment of a pandemic, it is more important than ever that we have the strongest possible drug pricing bill passed by the House, the Senate and the White House, and we are definitely going to use HR 3 as a baseline," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC.)

A list of policy recommendations agreed to by Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) "unity task force," which Jayapal served on, did not include a maximum of how many drugs could be negotiated. The task force also recommended that generic drugs be included in negotiations. HR3 only applied to drugs that have no generic competition since those tend to be the most expensive.

LIVE COVERAGE: Democrats focus on Trump remarks before attack on Capitol

  LIVE COVERAGE: Democrats focus on Trump remarks before attack on Capitol The Senate kicks off day two of the second impeachment trial of former President Trump on Wednesday.While the first day focused on the constitutional question of whether the Senate could hold a trial for a former president, the actual oral arguments begin today.The historic trial centers on whether Trump incited a mob that attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, sending lawmakers fleeing for safety and temporarily halting Congress's certification ofWhile the first day focused on the constitutional question of whether the Senate could hold a trial for a former president, the actual oral arguments begin today.

Democratic leadership argued at the time the federal government doesn't have the capacity to negotiate prices for an unlimited number of drugs, and it wouldn't be a good use of time or money to negotiate prices that are already low or reasonable compared to other countries.

Another obstacle is fierce opposition from the drug companies, which argues other sectors of the health care industry are not being held accountable for their role in rising costs.

A report issued by the Senate Finance Committee last month faulted a "broken" drug pricing system that incentivizes drug companies to raise list prices to ensure their products are covered by insurance companies.

The report places a lot of blame on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), middlemen that negotiate with drug companies on the behalf of insurance plans, large employers and other payers for discounts, also referred to rebates, on a drug's list price. PBMs charge fees and are paid a percentage of the rebate.

This arrangement also translated into higher sales volumes and revenue for drugmakers, according to the report.

Drug companies have pushed for rebate reform that would require that those savings be passed down to patients. Insurers argue they already do this by lowering premiums.

Drug companies also support capping out-of-pocket costs for seniors. Language doing so is in HR3 and other drug pricing bills.

Still, some Medicare patients must pay a percentage of a drug's list price at the pharmacy counter, so they are affected when prices go up.

Regardless of lobbying by the drug industry, Democrats appear intent on following through on their years-long promise to allow Medicaid to negotiate drug prices.

Even Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), one of the most moderate members of the Senate, whom Democrats know they must win over to pass their priorities, has backed drug pricing negotiation legislation in the past.

Negotiation has been part of the Democratic playbook for almost 20 years, said one Democratic aid.

"I wouldn't expect all of a sudden the caucus as a whole to say, let's go do something else."

One of Trump’s greatest tricks: Making Democrats like a Cheney .
It's about her willingness to rebuke Trump, not her policies, but it’s also a significant window into the two parties as they exist right now. During Trump’s tenure, Democrats found themselves approving of the previous three Republican presidential nominees they had overwhelmingly voted against. Mitt Romney and John McCain, the two GOP nominees who preceded Trump, both saw their approval ratings among Democrats exceed that of Republicans, with clear majorities of Democrats backing them in both cases. Even George W.

usr: 1
This is interesting!