Politics House Democrats ask Biden to surrender unilateral nuclear launch powers
Time to Pull Back on Emergency Powers for Governors
State executives have become too powerful during coronavirus emergency declarations. It’s time to rein both in.Mannion isn’t the only state lawmaker in the country looking to restore the proper balance between the legislative and executive branches after close to one year of unilateral rule by most U.S. governors under emergencies declared in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Indeed, the battle to rein in runaway emergency authority is being waged across the country. As it should be. The last year has left the power balance dangerously out of whack, and it’s past time to fix that.
are asking President Biden to share his unilateral ability to launch .
In a letter to the president, Reps. Ted Lieu and Jimmy Panetta, accompanied by nearly 30 colleagues, argued that "vesting one person with this authority entails real risks."
"While any president would presumably consult with advisors before ordering a nuclear attack, there is no requirement to do so," read the letter dated Monday. "The military is obligated to carry out the order if they assess it is legal under the laws of war. Under the current posture of U.S. nuclear forces, that attack would happen in minutes."
The Daily 202: Biden builds back boring in town hall. That’s not a bad thing
Let’s come out and say it: An absence of incendiary tweets doesn’t make a young presidency boring when the administration is facing a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, the resulting economic devastation, the climate crisis and a host of other problems. A running seven-day average of deaths from the virus stood at 2,455. Whatever the assessment of whether Biden is meeting those challenges, these are not boring times. On the substance, the Delaware Democrat probably disappointed progressives on several fronts.
The letter singled out former President Donald Trump for criticism, citing his Twitter feud with North Korea'sand conduct during the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot as "behavior that caused other officials to express concern about the president's judgment."
The lawmakers proposed several alternatives to the current protocol, such as requiring approval from additional members in the presidential line of succession, a congressional declaration of war, or certification from the secretary of defense.
No one person should have the ability to start a nuclear war. We led a letter withto urging him to modify the decision-making process the U.S. uses in its command and control of nuclear forces. Our letter :
Israel's Politicians Are Divided—But Not on Iran | Opinion
Although Israel is in the midst of an election campaign, Netanyahu's challengers are toeing his line on the nuclear deal.Whatever the reason, one item discussed on the call has become urgent: what to do about Iran's nuclear program, and whether or not the U.S. should rejoin the current agreement. The imperativeness of the conversation between the two leaders is underscored by Iran's announcement that as of February 23rd it would stop the voluntary implementation of the Additional Protocol that allowed for snap inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities.— Rep. Ted Lieu (@RepTedLieu)
The letter prompted outcry from congressional Republicans, with Reps., Mike Rogers, and Michael Turner condemning the proposal in a released Wednesday.
“The President of the United States must have the exclusive ability to command and control our nuclear deterrent. Democrats’ dangerous efforts suggesting a restructuring of our nuclear command and control process will undermine American security, as well as the security of our allies," they said. "These proposals, if enacted, would leave Americans vulnerable, destabilize the nuclear balance, and shake our allies’ confidence in the nuclear umbrella."
The Democrats' letter celebrated Biden's "distinguished record and leadership on nuclear arms control and nonproliferation as senator and vice president." Having campaigned vigorously on a pledge to return the United States to international agreements aimed at reducing nuclear proliferation, particularly the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, better known as the, Biden has begun laying the groundwork for a U.S. return to the agreement.
Iran's New Nuclear 'Understanding' with World Atomic Agency Explained
"What we have is a technical understanding that provides some breathing space for the political actors to find a political solution," Laura Rockwood, who authored the Additional Protocol being abandoned by Iran, told a press call attended by Newsweek.While the details of the new compromise remain murky, Laura Rockwood, director of the One Earth Future think tank's Open Nuclear Network program and the principal author of the document that served as the basis of the IAEA's Model Additional Protocol, explained on Monday how this could move could potentially save the accord by giving a temporary off-ramp to rising tensions surrounding the deal.
A senior State Department officialon Feb. 18 that the U.S. is ready "to sit down [with the European Union high representative] and to start what could be a prolonged path of trying to get back to a situation where both the U.S. and Iran were back into compliance."
Representatives for the White House did not immediately reply to the Washington Examiner's request for comment.
Tags:, , , , ,
Is This the Week Biden Returned to ‘the Blob’? .
President Biden’s foreign policy has shown some encouraging early signs for those invested in breaking with America’s disastrous, decades-old geopolitical trajectory. As The Daily Beast first reported, Biden is extricating the U.S. from the Saudi-led war in Yemen and has placed counterterrorism strikes under review. America is back in the Paris climate accord and the United Nations Human Rights Council. Biden extended the nuclear arms-control framework with Russia. And on Friday, the White House told Politico that it’s embracing a congressional push to repeal certain post-9/11 war powers.