Politics The Special Tool Dems Aren't Using to Nuke Trump Regulations

13:05  30 march  2021
13:05  30 march  2021 Source:   thedailybeast.com

Conservative group says polling shows Dems' voting rights bill 'out of sync with American voters'

  Conservative group says polling shows Dems' voting rights bill 'out of sync with American voters' The Honest Elections Project, a conservative group that advocates for more restrictive voting laws, is releasing polling on Tuesday arguing that H.R. 1, Democrats' sweeping election reform and voting rights bill passed by the House earlier this month, is "out of sync with American voters."The group's memo, which will be sent to members of Congress and state legislators on Tuesday ahead of a critical Senate hearing on the bill, cites polling it commissioned in which a majority of respondents support voter identification laws and agree that "strong safeguards and ballot protections inspire confidence by making it harder to hide fraud." "H.R.

President Trump on Sunday sought to pin blame on Democrats for what lawmakers described as faltering negotiati. "I don’ t think the Dems on the Border Committee are being allowed by their leaders to make a deal," Trump tweeted. "They are offering very little money for the desperately needed Border Wall & now, out of the blue, want a cap on convicted violent felons to be held in detention!"

President Donald Trump has said several times the US will bring power greater than a nuclear bomb to bear on US enemies. During his 9/11 memorial address outside the Pentagon on Wednesday, Trump threatened the Taliban, with whom he recently canceled peace negotiations, with "power the likes of which the United States has never used before." "That's why they are called special weapons," John Pike, founder of GlobalSecurity.org, told Insider, explaining that with a low-yield nuclear weapon, where you "can get a yield that would be a fraction of a kiloton, it would still be a couple hundreds tons."

Protections for cleaner air and water, habitats for endangered birds, workplace protections for truckers—those were just a few of the federal regulations eroded in the twilight of the Trump administration.

a man wearing a blue shirt: Drew Angerer © Provided by The Daily Beast Drew Angerer

For the first months of 2021, Democrats in Congress had the power, theirs alone, to realize those goals by repealing a flurry of rules enacted in the twilight of the Trump administration. But largely, they haven’t. With time running out, they’re not especially worried about it.

Under the Congressional Review Act, a complex and controversial Clinton-era law, the legislative branch has the authority to reject proposed executive branch rules within a given timeframe. When the new Democratic-controlled Congress met on Jan. 3, the clock began ticking—60 legislative days—on their ability to nix Trump administration policies issued in the final days of his presidency.

Sanders, Warren and AOC can lift Dems in 2022 midterms

  Sanders, Warren and AOC can lift Dems in 2022 midterms Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) have the brainpower, the people power and the small-donor fundraising power to have enormous impact in 2022. On the morning after the 2022 elections, it is very possible, indeed likely, that either Democrats or Republicans will have won control of both the Senate and House of Representatives.If Democrats maintain control of the Senate and pick up new seats, Senate Democrats will no longer be at the mercy of the least progressive Democratic senator.

The Trump administration has carried out sweeping changes atop the Defense Department's civilian leadership structure, removing several of its most senior officials and replacing them with perceived loyalists to the President.

The purpose of the public charge rule is to require prospective immigrants to demonstrate their ability to support themselves in a financial sense without relying on government welfare programs, and it was effectively reinstated by the Trump administration last February. In early March, the Biden administration announced that it would no longer defend the Trump -era rule in pending legal challenges, including one before the U.S. Supreme Court, saying that doing so “is neither in the public interest nor an efficient use of limited government resources,” the Associated Press reported.

In the House, the buzzer sounds on April 2. Senate Democrats beat the deadline last week by going after four regulations on employment discrimination, banking, and the environment.

Even if House Democrats manage to file a few more CRA challenges before Friday, Democrats will still fall far short of how much Republicans used the CRA in the first days of the Trump administration.

Immediately after taking power four years ago, GOP majorities in Congress moved to repeal 16 eleventh-hour regulations from the Obama administration. In the past, the CRA was a sparingly used authority, and Republicans’ aggressive use of it raised eyebrows and tough questions at the time.

But President Joe Biden and Democrats took over in Washington facing numerous crises, from the COVID-19 pandemic to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, as well as the need to confirm a presidential cabinet. Because of the immediate needs, Democrats say time on the House and Senate floors was a valuable commodity. With slim majorities in both chambers, it was no guarantee that repeals of Trump regulations would pass during required votes on the floor.

'A painful, painful process': Dems' new budget gambit comes with big risk

  'A painful, painful process': Dems' new budget gambit comes with big risk Winning the green light for a second reconciliation run could embolden the Democratic majority to muscle its priorities past partisan roadblocks.Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer wants to quickly revisit the complex budgetary maneuver known as reconciliation that was used to pass President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package, unlocking a second attempt to pass major legislation without Republican votes. If Schumer gets permission to proceed, Democrats could pass Biden’s multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure agenda without GOP support, while keeping another shot at muscling through major priorities that are now stuck on the back burner.

While Trump ’s campaign is denying that he posed the questions during the briefing, his positions on nuclear policy have deviated from the mainstream on several counts. For one, Trump has openly suggested that major powers such as Japan, South Korea and Saudi Arabia obtain nuclear weapons, in Trump later appeared to walk the statement back, though his position has been hard to pin down. Separately, the GOP nominee has refused to rule out using nuclear weapons in Europe or against extremists such as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, something practically unheard of in modern

Donald Trump ’s “fire and fury” presidency has exposed all too clearly the intellectual fallacy at the heart of the nation’s nuclear plans: that the commander-in-chief will always be the most sober, rational, and conservative person in the room. Many people assume, wrongly, that some other official has to agree with a presidential order to launch nuclear weapons; surely the White House chief of staff, the secretary of defense, the vice president, or maybe the general in charge of the nation’s nuclear forces has to concur with a presidential launch order, right?

“The CRA is hard to do,” Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) told The Daily Beast. “Margins are slim. It’s a big investment in our floor time and our bandwidth to move something, only to have Joe Manchin give it the thumbs-down.”

Outside the Capitol, the reluctance of Democrats to use this power has drawn criticism. The party spent the Trump years vowing to undo his policies however they could, and outside progressive advocates watched with concern, wondering why they would leave this tool untouched now that it is in their grasp.

“I’m disappointed by the passivity of Democrats,” said Jeff Hauser, founder of the Revolving Door Project, a group that scrutinizes executive branch functioning. “It’s low hanging fruit for Democrats to accomplish.”

Others feel the CRA is an imperfect tool that should be used sparingly, given the other avenues for overturning regulations, such as the courts. Biden’s new appointees can do it, too, but internal abolition of federal rules can take a long time. The CRA may be a forceful way to nuke a bad rule, some Democrats say, but some read the law with concern; using it could effectively salt the earth for future rulemaking from Biden in that particular issue area.

The return of fans: Here's what every MLB ballpark is allowing to open the 2021 season

  The return of fans: Here's what every MLB ballpark is allowing to open the 2021 season The return of fans: Here's what every MLB ballpark is allowing to open the 2021 seasonHowever, with the COVID-19 pandemic still raging, the stadiums won't be at full capacity. According to a poll, half of Americans aren't ready to attend games anyway.

‘Don’ t come over,’ downplays own DHS chief’s warning of biggest immigration surge in 2 decades & blames Trump . Do you repeat what Trump did? Take them from their mothers, hold them in cells, et cetera? as Boris dresses up Downing Street like a pound-shop White House and splurges on nukes .

In fact, Trump ’s statement seems to be designed to disarm those calling for his immediate removal under the 25th Amendment so that Trump can continue to work the military solution that would seek mass arrests of the traitors who attempted to pull off their criminal coup against America. Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time. That is exactly what Trump did yesterday.

“There are all sorts of terrible Trump rules we want to get rid of,” explained a senior Democratic aide. “The CRA is not necessarily the right tool to do that.”

For at least four Trump rules, however, Democrats have decided the CRA will get the job done.

Democrats are targeting a regulation that limited the power of the Department of Labor’s internal workplace discrimination watchdog, and another one to reinstate an Obama-era rule—which itself was repealed through the CRA—restricting methane emissions from the oil and gas industry, a major driver of climate change. They are also going after a pair of financial regulations approved at the end of Trump’s term: one seen as rolling back shareholder rights, and another making it easier for lenders to charge sky-high interest rates.

Amit Narang, an expert on federal government rules at advocacy group Public Citizen, told The Daily Beast that a “dam broke” in the final week the Senate had CRA power. “If we had had this conversation exactly a week ago, I’d very much agree the Democrats are not using the CRA as much as they should,” he said.

Supreme Court refuses to take up Trump suit about Wisconsin election results

  Supreme Court refuses to take up Trump suit about Wisconsin election results Donald Trump argued Wisconsin illegally allowed voters to submit their mail ballots via drop boxes because of the coronavirus pandemic.Without explanation, the justices declined to hear Trump's challenge to more than 221,000 Wisconsin ballots that Republican attorneys said were counted only because of voting procedures implemented for the pandemic.

Republicans, said Narang, seemed to use the CRA in 2017 just to show that they could. “Democrats, on the other hand, are being much more disciplined and judicious in their use of the CRA,” he said. “They’re not going to use it just to use it, or use it in instances where it’ll be a waste of time.”

Nevertheless, many of the Trump administration’s final acts will likely make it out of the CRA window intact. As the outgoing president clung to power, his administration was busy making use of their last days, producing an estimated 1,500 rules that are now subject to the CRA, according to the Regulatory Studies Center at George Washington University. Notable last-minute additions to the federal rulebook include limits on protections for spotted owl habitats, lowering environmental efficiency standards for washing machines, and revoking a state-level labor protection for truckers.

Ironically, many of these rules could be doomed due to poor due diligence. Democrats say the Trump administration never bothered to submit many of its last-minute rules to Congress as required by the CRA—meaning they could get another chance to undo them after these deadlines pass. Biden might even be able to ice them himself.

In a March 19 letter to the Office of Management and Budget, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said a last-minute Trump administration rule allowing federal inmates to be executed by firing squad or electrocution, for example, had not been submitted to Congress, making it vulnerable to repeal. He requested that the OMB provide a list of all the other rules Trump had failed to send to Capitol Hill.

AOC Says Only 'Two Options' to Pass $15 Minimum Wage: Override Parliamentarian or End Filibuster

  AOC Says Only 'Two Options' to Pass $15 Minimum Wage: Override Parliamentarian or End Filibuster Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Democrats "have a responsibility" to raise the minimum wage after promising voters they would.The Senate's parliamentarian ruled last week that the minimum wage hike would not be eligible to pass through the complicated budget reconciliation process. Democrats have turned to that process to push through President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan.

It’s not exactly clear if this blunder will translate into opportunities for Democrats, however.

Bridget Dooling, a professor at GWU’s Regulatory Studies Center, said it’s uncertain what might happen if many of the final Trump regulations didn’t go through the proper procedure. She also said it’s up in the air whether using the CRA now would prevent Biden from issuing new rules in the same space.

That hinges on a phrase in the law that said future administrations cannot issue rules that are “substantially the same” as a rule that was repealed by Congress. That standard has never really been tested in court, but advocates and experts like Hauser and Dooling cast doubt on the idea that Biden, for example, might be prohibited from issuing his own rules on capital punishment.

Few observers are surprised that Democrats have been less aggressive about using the CRA than Republicans. “This seems like about what I expected,” said Dooling. “Some folks were hoping for more resolutions, and some were hoping for none.”

Many in the party would like to get rid of the CRA altogether. Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) has in the past introduced legislation to repeal it. But the party’s former longtime leader, Sen. Harry Reid—never one to shy away from using Congress’ unique powers—sang the law’s praises when he left the Senate in 2016.

“What [the CRA] said is the President promulgates a regulation and Congress has a chance to look it over to see if it is too burdensome, too costly, too unfair,” Reid said that year. “We have done that quite a few times.”

Reid continued that the CRA might be a bit painful when Republicans use it against Democrats. “But it was fair,” he said.

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Shell endorses Democrats' move to cancel Trump rollback of methane regulations .
Oil and gas giant Shell lent its support Wednesday to an effort by Democrats to use a procedural tool to cancel a Trump administration action that would essentially block the Environmental Protection Agency from controlling methane emissions from fossil fuel production. © Provided by Washington Examiner European-based Shell became the first oil major to endorse a resolution introduced by Democratic Sen. Martin Heinrich and Independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with Democrats, to use the Congressional Review Act to scrap the Trump administration methane rollback.

usr: 0
This is interesting!