Politics Democrats agonize over game theory on Biden’s $2T-plus spending plan
Derek Chauvin trial, COVID-19 vaccine side effects, FLOTUS agenda: 5 things to know Wednesday
The Derek Chauvin trial will continue with more expert testimony, a study on COVID-19 vaccine side effects is out and more news to start your Wednesday.Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
Joe Biden is rolling out his multitrillion-dollar spending package in two parts, hoping to market its sweeping scope as infrastructure both concrete and human. Now Republicans have to decide if they’ll buy it.
One of the president’s closest allies, Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), is trying to sell the GOP on a strategy that involves two separate votes on the massive White House proposal: one infrastructure bill on a bipartisan basis, and the second dealing only with Democratic priorities. And he says he has Republicans' ear on it.
The strategy Biden needs to pass his infrastructure plan
Joe Biden can achieve a historic restructuring of American priorities — well worth it, even if it costs him politically.As a mayor and governor, I learned the important role that infrastructure plays on quality of life and public safety, as well as economic competitiveness. It is perhaps the best creator of well-paying blue-collar jobs. Although former President Trump often talked about his infrastructure plan, he never submitted a proposal to Congress for repairing America's crumbling infrastructure. So of course I looked forward to President Biden's infrastructure plan, and I'm generally pleased with his proposal as part of the "American Jobs Plan.
“Let’s just say, notionally: The president and our caucus, we are trying to get $2 trillion worth of infrastructure and job investments moving ahead,” Coons said Thursday afternoon. “Why wouldn’t you do $800 billion of it in a bipartisan way and do the other $1.2 trillion Dems-only through reconciliation. Why wouldn’t you do that?”
But as much as Republicans trust Coons is acting in good faith, his idea doesn’t address the divisive political question of how to pay for the package. And that leaves them reason to be wary, since Democrats are likely to turn around and pay for the rest of the infrastructure proposal by raising the corporate tax rate. Still, the GOP has reasons to go along — chiefly, the fact that a massive bipartisan bill would demonstrate the Senate can still legislate under the constraints of a filibuster that greatly empowers the minority party.
Biden's infrastructure plan is huge; his political margins are minuscule
“It’s not a plan that tinkers around the edges,” Biden said. The plan broadens the meaning of the term “infrastructure,” as it seeks to accelerate a move away from a coal economy and reverse decades of systemic racism, two central themes of the Biden administration. But it is political horse-trading, not visionary thinking, that will decide the fate of this no-tinkering-around-the-edges proposal. The sweeping proposal will succeed or fail based on the whims of just a few legislators — perhaps few enough to fit into a Capitol elevator in the pre-social distancing days.
Across the Capitol, House Transportation Committee Chair Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) has endorsed a similar strategy to Coons', noting that the GOP counteroffer is “not an insignificant amount of money” and could help Democrats escape the restrictions that come with a party-line vote. “There are myriad things you can't do" while steering an infrastructure bill through the budget process to avoid a filibuster, DeFazio said.
Democrats are clearly at a crossroads on the critical decision of whether or not to work with their GOP colleagues. And the clock is ticking. During private conversations with members of both parties in recent days, White House chief of staff Ron Klain has signaled there’s still time to wait for Republican buy-in, but that the party shouldn't take forever, according to several people familiar with the discussions.
Members of the so-called G-20, a group of moderate senators in both parties, were divided over whether to work together on a smaller package during a call Thursday afternoon. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) expressed a desire to collaborate with Republicans but acknowledged that at some point Democrats may end up going their own way, according to a source familiar with the call. The group ended with no decision and plans to speak again next week.
‘It can’t just be a coincidence’: How Biden is using artwork to underscore his message to America
When President Joe Biden speaks to Americans, he communicates not only with words but through artwork visible in the background.Sometimes the art is the message. And it’s often hiding in plain sight.
As committees begin to craft the language for the bill, Democrats say they’re looking for policies that have bipartisan support. But they’re also signaling that they’re ready to go at it alone if Republicans low-ball them or drag things out.
“The wise thing to do is to work in two lanes. One is the reconciliation lane, which I don’t think would be wise to forgo, and the second is the bipartisan lane,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.).
But Whitehouse offered a warning to Democratic colleagues: “If they know that we’ve committed to the bipartisan lane, there’s a very strong incentive for them to make that a fake and to use it simply to slow down.”
Meanwhile, Republicans — who privately suspect that Democrats will once again use reconciliation — are eyeing a potential counteroffer.
“If we don’t move forward with a plan, if we don’t have some concepts, some ideas out on the table, then they’re going to say: ‘You’re not dealing, you don’t care, you’re not in it,’” said West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, the top Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee. She’s suggested spending as much as $800 billion and paying for it with user fees but conceded there’s no agreement yet on an actual proposal.
Five takeaways from Biden's first budget proposal
President Biden's budget proposal on Friday kicked off what's likely to be a long, drawn-out fight in Congress over how to fund the federal government starting Oct. 1.Biden's first budget request as president calls for raising annual discretionary spending to $1.52 trillion. That amount includes a 15.7 percent increase in domestic spending and a 1.7 percent boost in defense.Although the spending plan omitted details on taxes and mandatory spending programs, as well as the usual 10-year projection for spending and revenues, it nonetheless offers valuable insights into Biden's priorities.Here are five key takeaways from the Biden budget proposal.
Coons’ plan is similar to what some Republicans suggested Biden do on coronavirus relief: pick the areas that are bipartisan and do the rest under the protections of the budget reconciliation process, which evades the Senate’s 60-vote threshold to pass most bills. But infrastructure is a more challenging vehicle for that route than Covid aid was.
And Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said Thursday that Republicans are willing to negotiate only with the “implicit understanding that this would not lead to a second bill.”
Some Democrats privately argue that they shouldn’t allow Republicans to throw their weight behind a popular infrastructure bill without requiring their engagement on the more divisive debate over how to pay for it.
Adding to the complexity of the entire situation is that Congress has no explicit deadline for the infrastructure bill. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is eyeing July for House passage, but the real deadline for the full package may be the end of September, when current surface transportation policy expires.
Some in her caucus are already suggesting that Democrats should delay if Republicans signal serious interest in working on the bill.
“Infrastructure’s different. It’s not time-sensitive, we don’t need to set up an artificial deadline, and it opens up the opportunity to, at least, give cooperation a chance,” said Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.), who belongs to the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus that is pushing for a bill with GOP support.
Roads, bridges ... and caregivers? Why Biden is pushing a ‘radical shift’ to redefine infrastructure
Caregiving is the most glaring example of how Biden expanded the traditional definition of infrastructure in his $2 trillion jobs plan."Caregivers – we're the maintainers of life," an impassioned Williams, 34, said during a zoom call with frontline health care workers hosted by the soon-to-be president.
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), a member of the G-20 group of moderates, said he is in the early stages of developing a bipartisan infrastructure proposal but acknowledged that “this is a more difficult setting to reach common bipartisan ground, because of the pay-for element.”
“We can probably come to a meeting of minds of what things need to be done. Then the question is: Who needs to pay for it?” he said. “Republicans are not going to want to raise taxes, and Democrats are not going to want to have users pick up additional costs. That’s going to be the challenge.”
The White House and Senate Democrats, meanwhile, are looking to avoid a repeat of the Obama administration’s effort to pass the Affordable Care Act in 2010, which ultimately passed along party lines despite extensive efforts to woo the GOP — a concern at least one Democratic senator raised at Tuesday’s caucus lunch.
Times have changed, but some Democrats still pride themselves on their bipartisan brands. That group is bigger than Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), the Senate majority's most well-known centrists. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said he's thinking of the man who formerly held his seat as he advocates for a bipartisan deal.
“I’m hopeful we can come to an agreement where we can do this through what ... John McCain, would call regular order,” he said.
Biden on Afghanistan withdrawal: 'It's time to end America’s longest war' .
The president announced the withdrawal in the same room where former President George W. Bush announced the war in Afghanistan's start. "We went to Afghanistan because of a horrific attack that happened 20 years ago," Biden said. "That cannot explain why we should remain there in 2021.