Politics House Republican proposes constitutional amendment to prevent Supreme Court expansion

02:50  16 april  2021
02:50  16 april  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Supreme Court weighs entering gun debate amid calls for stricter rules

  Supreme Court weighs entering gun debate amid calls for stricter rules With the Supreme Court now boasting a 6-3 conservative majority, the question has become which case involving gun rights the justices are likely to take up.But amid the public outcry over gun violence, the Supreme Court's nine members are meeting behind closed doors to discuss whether to add to next term's docket disputes over gun regulations, with a ruling from the justices potentially having far-reaching implications for firearms restrictions at the federal and state levels.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), the head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, introduced a proposed constitutional amendment on Thursday to maintain the size of the Supreme Court at nine justices.

Andy Biggs wearing a suit and tie: Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) © Greg Nash Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.)

The amendment, which has no path to succeed with Democrats controlling both chambers of Congress, is a response to a bill introduced by Democrats that proposes expanding the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13.

"The Supreme Court must faithfully interpret the Constitution. We cannot allow it to fall victim to partisan attempts to pack it with far-left radicals," Biggs said in a statement. "This desperate power-grab by Democrats will only further divide our Nation. I will not stand for a 'Supreme Coup' of our highest court."

Fact check: Justice Clarence Thomas didn't say Section 230 is unconstitutional

  Fact check: Justice Clarence Thomas didn't say Section 230 is unconstitutional Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did not say Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is unconstitutional in a recent concurring opinion.In a 12-page concurring opinion on the court’s dismissal of a case alleging then-President Donald Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking Twitter users, Thomas wrote of the “enormous control over speech” that large social media platforms hold. He compared them to communications utilities regulated by the government.

The amendment, a copy of which was obtained by The Hill, would state: "The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine justices consisting of one chief justice and eight associate justices."

For a constitutional amendment to succeed, two-thirds of both chambers of Congress must approve the language. Two-thirds of state legislatures would have to support holding a constitutional convention, and three-fourths of state legislatures would have to ratify the amendment.

While Biggs's proposal won't go anywhere in Congress, it underscores the degree to which conservatives may try and hit Democrats over discussions on whether to expand the size of the Supreme Court.

Democratic Sen. Ed Markey (Mass.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (N.Y.) and Reps. Hank Johnson (Ga.) and Mondaire Jones (N.Y.) earlier Thursday unveiled legislation that would increase the size of the high court to 13 seats. There are currently nine justices, with six appointed by Republican presidents and three appointed by Democratic presidents.

Techies give an old fashioned Supreme Court decent marks in coding case

  Techies give an old fashioned Supreme Court decent marks in coding case Programmers say the Supreme Court, often teased for its ambivalence toward technology, got it (mostly) right in describing some nuances of software.Often teased for their ambivalence toward technology – Chief Justice John Roberts once asked a lawyer in 2010 to explain the difference between an email and a pager – the justices this week were forced to grapple with complicated programming concepts in a multi-billion-dollar copyright dispute between tech giants Google and Oracle.

"We are here today because the United States Supreme Court is broken, it is out of balance and it needs to be fixed. Too many Americans view our highest court in the land as a partisan, political institution, not our impartial judicial branch of government," Markey said at a press conference.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has said she does not plan to bring the bill up for a vote in the House, reflecting that the bill is unlikely to garner support even from all Democrats.

Supreme Court expansion, or court packing, became a topic of debate during the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, with candidates floating various ideas to try and restore balance to the court.

President Biden earlier this week announced the creation of a commission to study the issue of court expansion, but he has not weighed in explicitly on whether he supports the idea.

Supreme Court passes on Second Amendment cases challenging lifetime gun ownership ban .
The Supreme Court declined to hear three Second Amendment cases challenging a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes.By not taking the appeals, the nation's highest court let stand a series of lower court rulings that prohibited people convicted of driving under the influence, making false statements on tax returns and selling counterfeit cassette tapes from owning a gun.

usr: 0
This is interesting!