•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Court packing legislation straight out of Maduro's playbook

00:55  20 april  2021
00:55  20 april  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Techies give an old fashioned Supreme Court decent marks in coding case

  Techies give an old fashioned Supreme Court decent marks in coding case Programmers say the Supreme Court, often teased for its ambivalence toward technology, got it (mostly) right in describing some nuances of software.Often teased for their ambivalence toward technology – Chief Justice John Roberts once asked a lawyer in 2010 to explain the difference between an email and a pager – the justices this week were forced to grapple with complicated programming concepts in a multi-billion-dollar copyright dispute between tech giants Google and Oracle.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Thursday said legislation designed to expand the Supreme Court is “not out of the question.” A reporter asked Pelosi during her weekly press conference if she supported Rep. Jerry Nadler’ s (D-NY) bill to expand the Supreme Court by four seats and inquired “We must expand the Court and we must abolish the filibuster to do it,” Markey added, concluding the Court expansion would “ensure equal justice is dispensed to all Americans.” As Breitbart News previously detailed, Democrats have attempted to pack the Court when President Franklin Roosevelt

The legislation would almost certainly lack the votes in the House — with Pelosi able to lose just two Democrats on any single bill — let alone the even more narrowly divided Senate. Expanding the Supreme Court became a rallying cry for progressive lawmakers and groups following the death of Ruth And the legislation has already spurred some attacks from Republicans, who during the 2020 elections warned that Democrats would expand the court if they won back the White House and Senate last fall. POLITICO Dispatch: April 16. POLITICO’ s Holly Otterbein reports on how Pennsylvania Lt.

Since the start of this new Congress, Democrats have introduced several pieces of legislation that threaten our freedom and Democracy. The supposedly "moderate" Democrats who promised to "reach across the aisle" and work in a "bipartisan" manner are shutting down debate, introducing measures that exert unrelenting government control over private business, extending the federal government's reach further into our wallets and gradually introducing their socialist ideology into our everyday lives in the dead of night.

a large building with United States Supreme Court Building in the background: Court packing legislation straight out of Maduro's playbook © Greg Nash Court packing legislation straight out of Maduro's playbook

Although radical, these policies pale in comparison to their latest push: packing the U.S. Supreme Court.

Did Joe Biden pack the Supreme Court commission to simply fail?

  Did Joe Biden pack the Supreme Court commission to simply fail? The institution cannot be reinvented in a matter of months.Today, Biden and others seem to think the court needs to be "canceled" for its failure to yield to the demands of our age of rage. Many of us were surprised when he pandered to court packing calls during the 2020 Democratic primaries. Some of us previously called for expanding the court over a long transitional period, but commentators and some Democratic candidates called for an immediate infusion of new justices to give liberals a controlling majority. Unhappy with conservative rulings, Democrats demanded that the court be replaced by an expanded, reliably liberal body.

Progressive activists Thursday rallied around new court - packing legislation and pledged to do the grassroots work to convince the Democratic-led Congress to pass the legislation to create a 13-member Supreme Court . Sean Eldridge, founder and president of Stand Up America The legislation has long-odds of passing Congress because unless Democrats abolish the filibuster, it would require 60 votes for passage in the Senate. And key Democrats have not embraced the idea of the court expansion legislation , notably President Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Thursday said legislation designed to expand the Supreme Court is “not out of the question.” A reporter asked Pelosi during her weekly press conference if she supported Rep. Jerry Nadler’ s (D-NY) bill to expand the Supreme Court by four seats and inquired whether she would commit to bringing the bill, the Judiciary Act Of 2021, to the floor of the House.

The American people elected us to uphold the freedoms we love and sound the alarm on dangerous policies that may come to pass. Take it from us - members of Congress who have seen the oppression of socialism firsthand. We understand that increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court would fundamentally change our republic as we currently know it.

Look no further than Venezuela. Once a wealthy and prosperous regional power, the South American country is now on the brink of complete and total destruction due to the socialist and authoritarian policies of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro. Venezuelans are left to scavenge for basic necessities such as food and medicine. Those who dare to publicly criticize the government are incarcerated, tortured and in some cases executed.

Supreme Court leaves major conservative cases waiting in the wings, from abortion to guns

  Supreme Court leaves major conservative cases waiting in the wings, from abortion to guns Rather than handing conservatives a string of wins, the Supreme Court has left advocates on the right grasping for answers about high-profile cases.But rather than handing conservatives a string of victories, the justices have – so far – left advocates on the right grasping for answers about why a number of pending challenges dealing with some of the nation's biggest controversies have languished.

Largely seen as a political ploy to change the court for favorable rulings on New Deal legislation , the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, commonly referred to as the “ court - packing plan,” was Roosevelt’ s attempt to appoint up to six additional justices to the Supreme Court for every justice older than 70 Congress, however, does have the prerogative to change the make-up of the Court , Woolner points out , and past leaders have called for similar actions, including President Theodore Roosevelt, in his famous 1910 “New Nationalism” speech. “So for Roosevelt to engage in court reform is not

drop-boxes-are- straight - out - of -the-democrat- playbook /. Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health. CNN’ s Don Lemon Chimes In On The Court - Packing Question And It’ s About As Dumb As You’d Expect.

After Chavez took power in 1999, he immediately began to dismantle the constitutional order in Venezuela, one that closely mirrored our own federal government. After a number of unfavorable rulings against his administration by the independent judiciary, Chavez took executive action in 2004 to expand the number of justices on Venezuela's highest court from 20 to 32. He packed the courts with judges loyal to his regime, and in return, they ruled in his favor 45,000 times.

Chavez's undemocratic decision to pack the courts destroyed his people's last hope for a checked and balanced government. He used the courts as a tool of the regime, effectively stealing the power of the Venezuelan Parliament and silencing the voices of his people.

Chavez's hand-picked successor, Nicolas Maduro, replaced 13 Justices who continued to rule with unfettered loyalty towards the regime. This only further destroyed the nation, decayed judicial independence and the courts' ability to carry out their duties without influence. The legacy of socialism in Venezuela was cemented.

Three Supreme Court justices tackle U.S. partisan divisions in public remarks

  Three Supreme Court justices tackle U.S. partisan divisions in public remarks Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer addressed a virtual conference Wednesday, avoiding speculation about whether he plans to retire this year.Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, making his second public address in as many weeks, brushed aside divisive political rancor in Washington and discussed how the justices work through ideological differences to build majorities in controversial cases.

Presidential efforts to pack the Court are only partially successful, for a number of reasons: • Longevity of appointees, or untimely deaths may frustrate presidential expectations. • Once the nominee is confirmed, he or she is free to change ideological positions without having to worry about re-elected. If USSC rules that something is constitutional and must be implemented; the executive branch doesn't have to execute it, legislature doesn't have to pass necessary legislation to implement it. •

Even though I totally disagree with the outcome of the election, and the facts bear me out , nevertheless there will be an orderly transition on January 20th. I have always said we would continue our fight to ensure that only legal votes were counted. While this represents the end of the greatest first term in Trump must now activate a military option to defend the republic, either via the Insurrection Act or other military authority. He has put everything in place for this very moment. Importantly, Trump patiently attempted to defend the Republic through the courts and through Congress, watching as each option

Venezuela today is the antithesis of democracy. It is not freedom, it is socialism at its ugliest. The same socialism that took the economic envy of Latin America and turned it into a landscape of unemployment, crime, and extreme poverty. The same socialism Democrats in our Congress are proposing today.

Any effort to pack our Supreme Court is an outrage. It would permanently end our separate but equal branches of government by ceding complete control of the judiciary to the legislative and executive branches. Not only should this legislation be opposed, but it should also be condemned to the fullest extent. In fact, it has. The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg vehemently opposed attempts to expand the court, claiming, "If anything [expanding the court] would make the court appear partisan...So I am not at all in favor of that solution to what I see as a temporary situation."

To pile on, in 1983, then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) called President Roosevelt's plan to expand the Supreme Court a "bonehead idea," admitting it would put into question "the independence of the most significant body," in the United States of America. Now 38 years later, President Biden has unveiled a commission charged with studying the possible expansion of the Supreme Court. It's ironic how our president's opinion on the court has changed now when he must answer to the progressive faction of his party that's at the wheel.

Proposals made in socialist or communist regimes have no place in America, but today it's as if some in Congress are looking at Maduro as a role model. We cannot allow radical ideologues to transform our courts in desperate attempts to serve their political agenda. Centralizing power is something dictators do, and we will fight tooth and nail against any power grab that attempts to change our government in such a militant manner.

Carlos Gimenez represents Florida's 26th District and Nicole Malliotakis represents New York's 11th District.

Americans agree: Court packing is dangerous .
If Biden and Congress move ahead with expanding the Supreme Court, most Americans will not be on their side.So said Joe Biden in 1983. He was denouncing Franklin D. Roosevelt's "court packing" plan, which would have empowered the president to appoint up to six new justices to the nation's highest court. But fast forward to 2021, and President Biden is singing a different tune.

usr: 2
This is interesting!