Politics Margaret Sanger Was Not a Racist

12:25  26 april  2021
12:25  26 april  2021 Source:   realclearpolitics.com

Stacey Abrams: Intent of new Georgia voting law 'racist'

  Stacey Abrams: Intent of new Georgia voting law 'racist' Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams and GOP Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) got into a heated exchange during a Senate hearing on Tuesday when discussing the recently passed Georgia voting law, with Abrams saying the "intent" of the reform package is racist.During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Cornyn asked Abrams if the law is "a racist piece of legislation.""I think there are components of it that are indeed racist because they use racial animus as a means of targeting the behaviors of certain voters to eliminate their participant and limit their participation in elections," Abrams responded.

And a Margaret Sanger statue stands in the Old South Meeting House in Boston, which ironically enough is on the Freedom Trail commemorating the Revolutionary War. How a woman who advocated for the selective breeding of her fellow citizens came to be memorialized with those who built a country is hard to understand Students for Life of America is launching an SOS: Strike Out Sanger campaign calling on pro-life people nationwide to demand the removal of Sanger ’s statues and symbols, which represent a racist who actively targeted minority communities because she did not value their lives.

PIP: Margaret Sanger , as a young public health nurse, witnessed the sickness, disease and poverty caused by unwanted pregnancies. She spent the rest of her life trying to alleviate these conditions by bringing birth control to America. In theory, the movement was not racist --its message intended to cross race barriers for the overall advancement of mankind. Most eugenicists agreed that birth control would be a detriment to the human race and were opposed to it. Charges that Sanger 's motives for promoting birth control were eugenic are not supported.

The president of Planned Parenthood, Alexis McGill Johnson, last week announced in a New York Times op-ed a change in the organization’s treatment of its founder, the pioneering birth control advocate Margaret Sanger. “We have defended Sanger as a protector of bodily autonomy and self-determination, while excusing her association with white supremacist groups and eugenics as an unfortunate ‘product of her time,’” wrote Johnson, but now, “[w]e will no longer make excuses or apologize for Margaret Sanger’s actions.” Johnson stops just short of labeling Sanger a racist, saying it’s “not a simple yes or no question” and we “don’t know what was in Sanger’s heart,” but concludes that “we don’t need to in order to condemn her harmful choices.”

Premier League, English soccer announce social media boycott in response to racist abuse

  Premier League, English soccer announce social media boycott in response to racist abuse The boycott shows "English football coming together," with groups and clubs from across England.The Football Association and Premier League are among the soccer organizations who announced they will suspend their use of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram from 3 p.m. BST (10 a.m. ET) on Friday, April 30 until 11:59 p.m. BST (6:59 p.m, ET) on Monday, May 3.

When I write about Margaret Sanger ’s May 1926 speech to the women’s chapter of the KKK in Silverlake, New Jersey— as I did again recently —liberals get upset. They accuse me of distortion and even making up the whole thing. Many of them cannot find it within themselves to condemn this sordid moment. Well, maybe or maybe not, but it was still a rather hideous group. Can we not agree on that? This unending desire by the left to defend utterly everything about Planned Parenthood and its founder, Sanger , no matter how ugly, really is quite astonishing. This same person who read my

Sanger became not merely racist (which she actual became) yet became bigoted in protecting with faith, ethnicity, and disability. She became a strong recommend of eugenics, and fairly a lot a jerk. besides the undeniable fact that, the first answer listed, from toonistcar, is going way overboard in its Margaret Sanger was indeed a racist . There are a ton of racist quotes to prove this, but even more telling is the fact that she spoke at a Ku Klux Klan rally in Silverlake, New Jersey. And after speaking at the KKK rally, she received 12 more invitations to speak at KKK rallies. She really must have spewed

Margaret Sanger sitting on a table © AP Photo Margaret Sanger

But this is a simple question. Sanger was not a racist.

In 1945, Sanger made her beliefs on race plain in an interview with the African American newspaper the Chicago Defender. “Discrimination is a worldwide thing. It has to be opposed everywhere. That is why I feel the Negro’s plight here is linked with that of the oppressed around the globe,” said Sanger. “The big answer, as I see it, is the education of the white man. The white man is the problem. It is the same as with the Nazis. We must change the white attitudes.”

Asked of her impression of the South from her travels, she said, “What hangs over the South is that the Negro has been in servitude. The white southerner is slow to forget this. His attitude is the archaic in this age. Supremacist thinking belongs in the museum.”

EXCLUSIVE: San Diego critical race theory training depicts GOP as racist

  EXCLUSIVE: San Diego critical race theory training depicts GOP as racist SAN DIEGO — San Diego County subjected hundreds of staff to race relations training that depicted the Republican Party as racist. © Provided by Washington Examiner More than 400 healthcare workers participated in a three-day online critical race theory class that depicted the United States as a racist nation with “white supremacy codified into our nation.” The Washington Examiner reviewed the 82-slide PowerPoint presentation along with the contract that paid $25,050 to instructor Reginald Caldwell, described in the document as “an experienced facilitator with expertise in this area.

A couple of years ago, Margaret Sanger was named one of Time magazine's "20 Most Influential Americans of All Time." Given her enduring influence, it's worth considering what the woman who founded Planned Parenthood contributed to the eugenics movement. In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members" ( Margaret Sanger commenting on the 'Negro Project' in a letter to Gamble, Dec.

Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger advocated racist eugenic measures and did not shy from addressing a KKK rally. Yet she’s honored by a bust in the National Portrait Gallery’s civil rights exhibit, of all places. She would not have liked the look of New York City today, where there is a Margaret Sanger Square not far from Washington Square Park, a site of recent Black Lives Matter protests. If She Were Alive Today. Sanger died in 1966.

In assessing Sanger’s legacy, Johnson finds “a history of focusing on white womanhood relentlessly.” But in Sanger’s view, “Negro participation in Planned Parenthood means democratic participation in a democratic idea.” Sanger had long sought to back up such words with action. For example, she opened a birth control clinic in Harlem aided by a 15-member African American advisory council and — after a nudge from an African American social worker — included an African American doctor on its staff. According to Sanger biographer Jean Baker, at the time the waiting room was one of the only integrated spaces in “daytime New York.” Sanger hoped that increased use of contraception by African Americans would serve to “reduce their high infant and maternal death rate, to maintain better standards of health and living for those already born, and to create better opportunities for those who will be born.”

Harris says, "I don't think America is a racist country," finds backlash across political spectrum

  Harris says, "But we also do have to speak truth about the history of racism in our country and its existence today" Kamala Harris and George Stephanopoulos ABC

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

( Natural News ) The CEO of the biggest abortion business in America finally came out and owned up to the dark past of its founder, Margaret Sanger . (Article by Alexa Moutevelis republished from NewsBusters.org ). Planned Parenthood “must fully take responsibility for the harm that Sanger caused to generations of people with disabilities and Black, Latino, Asian-American, and Indigenous people,” Alexis McGill Johnson wrote in the New York Times on Saturday, finally acknowledging Sanger ’s “association with white supremacist groups and eugenics.” “But was she, or was she not, racist ?”

Johnson cites three aspects of Sanger’s record to suggest she had racist tendencies. One, she “spoke to the women’s auxiliary of the Ku Klux Klan at a rally in New Jersey to generate support for birth control.” Two, “she endorsed the Supreme Court’s 1927 decision in Buck v. Bell, which allowed states to sterilize people deemed ‘unfit’ without their consent and sometimes without their knowledge[.]” And three, the “first human trials of the birth control pill — a project that was Sanger’s passion later in her life — were conducted with her backing in Puerto Rico, where as many as 1,500 women were not told that the drug was experimental or that they might experience dangerous side effects.” All these examples lack significant context.

Sanger spoke at a Silver Lake, N.J., Klan meeting (not a rally) in 1926 because she was invited. She wanted to spread the word about birth control to any interested party, not because she wanted to spread the word about white supremacy. When she wrote about the experience in her autobiography, she called it “one of the weirdest experiences I had in lecturing.” And she did not think much of her audience: “Never before had I looked into a sea of faces like these. I was sure that if I uttered one word, such as abortion, outside the usual vocabulary of these women they would go off into hysteria. And so my address that night had to be in the most elementary terms, as though I were trying to make children understand. In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose.”

Biden: 'I don't think the American people are racist'

  Biden: 'I don't think the American people are racist' President Biden agreed with Sen. Tim Scott's (R-S.C.) claim that America is not a racist country, but says that a legacy of Jim Crow laws and slavery have left Black Americans lagging in opportunity. In an interview that aired Friday on NBC's "Today," Biden was asked about Scott's comments and was specifically pressed on if he felt Americans are racist. "No, I don't think the American people are racist," Biden said. "But I think after 400In an interview that aired Friday on NBC's "Today," Biden was asked about Scott's comments and was specifically pressed on if he felt Americans are racist.

One can certainly criticize the principle Sanger was guided by to justify speaking to any group, even a racist group, interested in birth control. As Sanger put it, “Always to me any aroused group was a good group[.]” Counters Johnson: Speaking to a hate group “devalued and dehumanized people of color.” Still, one speech shouldn’t overshadow a long career of trying to overcome racial barriers to improve the health and quality of life of African American women.

As for Puerto Rico, it wasn’t selected for the human trials on racist grounds. Sanger’s team, led by obstetrician and gynecologist John Rock, had already been conducting tests on a handful of people in Massachusetts. But they were taking a legal risk in doing so; in the mid-1950s, distributing birth control information in Massachusetts was a felony. For large-scale testing, they had to go elsewhere. As Baker recounts, “Puerto Rico, with its clinics already in place, a sympathetic administration, no laws against contraception, and a poor population with large families, was an obvious choice[.]”

More than 1,000 women volunteered for the experiment and, according to Baker, the women were “advised informally of various risks.” If they weren’t given a thorough explanation of the potential side effects, it wasn’t because they were Puerto Rican. It was because scientific experiments in the 1950s didn’t have the same standards as today. As Margaret Marsh and Wanda Ronner explain in their biography of Rock, “Without denying that the conduct of the pill trials would not be compatible with our present-day conduct of clinical trials, we do not believe they were either immoral or unethical according to accepted standards of the era. Rock and [his colleague Dr. Celso-Ramon] Garcia designed the same protocols for the women of Puerto Rick as Rock had used for his own patients in Brookline.”

Leftists silent as Biden, Harris agree with Sen. Tim Scott that America is not a racist country

  Leftists silent as Biden, Harris agree with Sen. Tim Scott that America is not a racist country Democrats and liberal activists were furious this week after Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina asserted “America is not a racist country.” © Provided by Washington Examiner Curiously, many of the same people who raged against Scott for this had no similar reaction when President Joe Biden said exactly the same thing in an interview that aired Friday. “I don't think America is racist,” said Biden. They also had nothing to say after Vice President Kamala Harris said Thursday, “I don’t think America is a racist country.

Sanger did endorse the Buck v. Bell ruling. But this made Sanger an ableist, not a racist. As can be seen in Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ majority opinion, the particular strain of eugenics that anchored the ruling supported “sterilization of mental defectives” on the assumption that “heredity plays an important part in the transmission of insanity, imbecility, etc.” Race played no role in the decision. The sterilized plaintiff, Carrie Buck, was white. She, her mother, and her daughter were assumed (perhaps wrongly) to have been “feeble-minded,” leaving Holmes to jarringly conclude in his ruling, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

After the ruling, according to Baker, “Sanger became an outspoken supporter of involuntary sterilization.” But such support for eugenics was widespread in the 1920s. Historian Thomas C. Leonard wrote that “eugenics was, in actual fact, the broadest of churches. Eugenics was not aberrant; it was not seen as a pseudoscience. … Eugenics was mainstream; it was popular to the point of faddishness; it was supported by leading figures in the still-emerging science of genetics; it appealed to an extraordinary range of political ideologies, not least to the progressives.”

Some eugenicists were also racists, but Sanger challenged them. In fact, as Baker wrote, “When John Harvey Kellogg, of cereal fame and a staunch supporter of the Race Betterment Foundation, argued in Literary Digest that high fertility rates among blacks proved the futility of birth control, Sanger used her Harlem case studies to refute the point.”

Cam Newton Appears To React To The Mac Jones Pick

  Cam Newton Appears To React To The Mac Jones Pick Despite getting a new contract with the New England Patriots, Cam Newton will be getting competition instead of job security this training camp in the form of rookie QB Mac Jones. But Cam appears ready to face the adversity. Taking to Instagram on Friday, he posted a cryptic message in the form of Kendrick Lamar […] The post Cam Newton Appears To React To The Mac Jones Pick appeared first on The Spun.

Still, Sanger was unquestionably an ableist. And even though ableism was widespread in her time, Planned Parenthood would certainly be justified to distance itself and the reproductive rights movement from Sanger to send an anti-ableist message.

Planned Parenthood has no obligation to glorify Sanger and keep her name on buildings. But abandoning its past efforts to correct misperceptions about Sanger’s views on racial equality may have repercussions. For decades, opponents of Planned Parenthood have tried to not only brand Sanger a racist, but to falsely claim she pioneered the movement for legal birth control and abortion in order to eliminate the black race.

Such smears don’t just happen on fringe websites. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas — in an opinion written two years ago regarding a case involving a law banning women from getting abortions on the basis of the fetus’ race, sex or potential disability — wrote an extended critique of Sanger and eugenics that heavily suggested she had racist intent. Thomas included a 1939 statement from Sanger that is often quoted out of context: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

When she wrote that in a letter to a colleague, Sanger was embarking on an effort to promote birth control in southern African American communities, and she was expressing worry that if the effort didn’t include black doctors, their project would inadvertently feed unfounded fears. (As described in Planned Parenthood’s new online history of itself, “Sanger lost control of the project, and Black women were sent to white doctors for birth control and follow-up appointments, deepening the racist and paternalistic problems of health care in the South.”) In fact, Sanger once rejected money from a racist who did want to stop African American reproduction. “When we first started out an anti-Negro white man offered me $10,000 if I started in Harlem first,” Sanger told the Chicago Defender. “His idea was simply to cut down the number of Negroes. ‘Spread it as far as you can among them,’ he said. That is, of course, not our idea. I turned him down.”

When you see all the evidence that Sanger rejected white supremacy, opposed discrimination and worked to overcome segregation, it’s easier to show how such statements are taken out of context. But when Planned Parenthood inaccurately suggests Sanger was a racist, putting statements in context becomes much harder. That doesn’t just damage Sanger’s reputation, it damages the efforts to prove the past and present goals of the reproductive rights movement are not intrinsically racist.

Tim Scott declaring ‘America is not a racist country’ is key to fighting real racism .
When Sen. Tim Scott said that “America is not a racist country” in his Republican rebuttal to President Joe Biden’s address to Congress last week, the Left exploded in anger over the black senator’s supposed denial of racism in the United States. © Provided by Washington Examiner When Scott on CBS News’s Face the Nation on Sunday that there was a “lingering effect” of a “couple of centuries of racism and discrimination in this nation,” some right-leaning people and outlets characterized this as a “” of what the Republican had said about race prior. Both camps are wrong.

usr: 0
This is interesting!