Politics Congress demands answers on Afghanistan withdrawal

20:45  28 april  2021
20:45  28 april  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Graham: 'I could not disagree more' with Trump support of Afghanistan troop withdrawal

  Graham: 'I could not disagree more' with Trump support of Afghanistan troop withdrawal Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday pushed back on former President Trump's support for removing all troops from Afghanistan, writing on Twitter that he "could not disagree more with former President Trump regarding his support for President Biden's withdrawal of all forces from Afghanistan against sound military advice."Earlier on Sunday, Trump released a statement criticizing Biden's goal for all troops to be pulled out of Afghanistan by Sept. 11, but saying that "Getting out of Afghanistan is a wonderful and positive thing to do.""I planned to withdraw on May 1st, and we should keep as close to that schedule as possible," Trump wrote.

President Biden announced on April 14 that the United States will withdraw all remaining forces from Afghanistan before Sept. 11, 2021. Given the persistent terrorist threats there and in neighboring Pakistan, the degradation of U.S. counterterrorism capability associated with the withdrawal, and the likelihood that the country once again could generate threats to the U.S. homeland, there are serious questions about the Biden administration's decision.

a close up of Lloyd Austin wearing glasses and looking at the camera: Congress demands answers on Afghanistan withdrawal © Greg Nash Congress demands answers on Afghanistan withdrawal

It appears administration briefings to key committee members in the House and Senate last week did not go well, raising more questions than the briefings answered. If Biden proceeds to withdraw from Afghanistan based on a timeline rather than conditions on the ground, the administration will have another chance to attempt to answer questions - this time in writing.

'It's an impossible situation': Democrats link arms with Biden on Afghanistan -- and brace for the worst

  'It's an impossible situation': Democrats link arms with Biden on Afghanistan -- and brace for the worst Most congressional Democrats are backing President Joe Biden's decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan this year, though many harbor nagging concerns that the gains won over the last 20 years will be erased and the Taliban will retake control after American troops are no longer there. © Thomas Watkins/AFP/Getty Images In this photo taken on June 6, 2019, US soldiers look out over hillsides during a visit of the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan General Scott Miller at the Afghan National Army (ANA) checkpoint in Nerkh district of Wardak province.

That's because the withdrawal will trigger a statutory requirement from Section 1215 of the fiscal year 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and require the administration to submit a detailed report to Congress regarding the effects of withdrawal on key U.S. interests. Under the law, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin is required to submit the report when the total number of forces in Afghanistan drops below 2,000 troops.

The United States is likely to hit that mark quite soon. There are roughly 2,500 service members in Afghanistan now - and that number may come down quickly. A senior Biden administration official said the drawdown will begin before May 1 and conclude "no later than the 20th anniversary of 9/11, but potentially a meaningful amount of time before then."

US orders big drawdown at Kabul embassy as troops leave

  US orders big drawdown at Kabul embassy as troops leave WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department on Tuesday ordered a significant number of its remaining staff at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul to leave Afghanistan as the military steps up the pullout of American troops from the country. The order came as the U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan told lawmakers that it no longer made sense to continue the 20-year deployment of American troops there. At the same time, Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said he shared lawmakers' concerns that the rights of women and minorities could be jeopardized after the withdrawal is complete.

The statute requires the administration's report to address a wide range of topics. Perhaps most notably, Section 1215 (b)(1) requires the administration to provide an assessment of how the force reduction will affect: counterterrorism operations; U.S. force protection; efforts to deny international terrorists safe haven; the threat posed by the Taliban and other terrorists to the U.S. and its allies and partners; and the capacity of Afghan forces to operate and conduct effective counterterrorism and security operations.

Those are exactly the right questions for Congress to be asking. Initial indications suggest the Biden administration does not have satisfying answers.

As the commander of U.S. Central Command, Gen. Frank McKenzie, testified before the House Armed Services Committee on April 20, "That there has not been another 9/11 is not an accident." Indeed, it is the presence of U.S. and coalition forces that enable effective operations to root out terror threats and disrupt potential attacks.

EXPLAINER: What remains as US ends Afghan 'forever war'

  EXPLAINER: What remains as US ends Afghan 'forever war' KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — After 20 years, America is ending its “forever war” in Afghanistan. Announcing a firm withdrawal deadline, President Joe Biden cut through the long debate, even within the U.S. military, over whether the time was right. Starting Saturday, the last remaining 2,500 to 3,5000 American troops will begin leaving, to be fully out by Sept. 11 at the latest. Another debate will likely go on far longer: Was it worth it? Since 2001, tens of thousands of Afghans and 2,442 American soldiers have been killed, millions of Afghans driven from their homes, and billions of dollars spent on war and reconstruction.

"When the time comes for the U.S. military to withdraw, the U.S. government's ability to collect and act on threats will diminish," CIA Director William J. Burns said the same day as Biden's speech. "That's simply a fact."

It is undeniable that removing those forces will make the mission of defending against jihadists more difficult.

Perhaps that fact, coupled with lessons learned from the 2011 withdrawal from Iraq, is why the military chain of command advised Biden against his timeline-based withdrawal.

This reduced ability to detect and respond to terror threats is a problem given realities on the ground. The Taliban, as FDD's Long War Journal has detailed for years, has remained closely aligned with al Qaeda and its broader network. It is now poised to expand its already significant operational presence and influence throughout Afghanistan. That could invite an all-out civil war, endanger the Afghan government, and create new opportunities for international terror attacks.

That is why Section 1215 and earlier versions of the reporting requirement enjoy bipartisan support. Lawmakers of both parties have expressed concern regarding a precipitous American withdrawal from Afghanistan and what that might mean for Afghans and Americans alike.

U.S. troops are leaving Afghanistan, but Al Qaeda remains

  U.S. troops are leaving Afghanistan, but Al Qaeda remains As U.S. troops leave Afghanistan, efforts against a diminished Al Qaeda are in flux. Officials say the terrorist group could threaten the U.S. again.It was a tableau often seen in years past, but on this recent afternoon there was a crucial difference: The Afghans were alone, without the American forces that have backed them in a 20-year war.

In a resounding 45-11 bipartisan vote in July 2020, the House Armed Services Committee voted to include in the defense bill a similar but tougher provision led by Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) that would have imposed even more requirements on the administration. Following negotiations between the Senate and House, Section 1215 was included in the final bill, which passed the Senate and House by votes of 84-13 and 335-78, respectively.

Thankfully, Congress required that the report be both written and unclassified, enabling members of Congress to share it with the American people.

But the provision does permit a classified annex. If past behavior is any indication, the executive branch may attempt to move unclassified information into the classified annex because that information may be unhelpful or inconvenient to their policy. Congress should make clear that would be unacceptable.

It is important to note that Section 1215 also includes a waiver that Biden could use to avoid submitting the report. To exercise that waiver, the president would need to certify in writing that not providing the information is in the "national security interests of the United States" - and would need to provide a detailed explanation justifying that assertion.

Formal start of final phase of Afghan pullout by US, NATO

  Formal start of final phase of Afghan pullout by US, NATO KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — The final phase of ending America's “forever war” in Afghanistan after 20 years formally began Saturday, with the withdrawal of the last U.S. and NATO troops by the end of summer. President Joe Biden had set May 1 as the official start of the withdrawal of the remaining forces — about 2,500-3,500 U.S. troops and about 7,000 NATO soldiers.

That would be a difficult argument for the Biden administration to make. After all, if a withdrawal by September that ignores conditions on the ground and the advice of commanders is in the national security interest, the Biden administration should be able to answer tough questions and defend the decision in the light of day.

If the Biden administration is unable or unwilling to do so, that sends a disturbing signal regarding the merit of the rationale for the withdrawal. Regardless, in the coming weeks and months, Congress should utilize all of its oversight and legislative powers to push the administration to minimize the damage to American national security that Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal is about to inflict.

Brad Bowman is senior director of the Center on Military and Political Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). He was a national security advisor to two members of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees and served as a U.S. Army officer in Afghanistan. Follow him on Twitter @Brad_L_Bowman.

Maseh Zarif is director of congressional relations at FDD Action. He previously served as a professional staff member on the House Homeland Security Committee. Follow him on Twitter @masehz.

Overnight Defense: Afghanistan withdrawal process 2 to 6 percent complete | Wisconsin National Guard member charged in Capitol riot .
Happy Tuesday and welcome to Overnight Defense. I'm Ellen Mitchell, and here's your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. CLICK HERE to subscribe to the newsletter.THE TOPLINE: The U.S. military has completed about 2 percent to 6 percent of the process of entirely withdrawing from Afghanistan, U.S. Central Command (Centcom) said Tuesday.Moving out: Progress on the withdrawal includes moving about 60 C-17 cargo planes worth of material out of Afghanistan, Centcom said in a news release.In addition, about 1,300 pieces of equipment have been given to the Defense Logistics Agency for destruction and the U.S.

usr: 2
This is interesting!