Politics Facebook Oversight co-chair slams rules as 'inconsistent, a SHAMBLES'

18:25  09 may  2021
18:25  09 may  2021 Source:   dailymail.co.uk

Fact check: A viral image of restaurant diners does not depict the Facebook content policy team

  Fact check: A viral image of restaurant diners does not depict the Facebook content policy team A post falsely claims to show the Facebook team that sets the platform's rules. The image has been shared many times claiming to show various groups.“Facebook community standards team,” it claims. “This is literally who bans us.

Mark Zuckerberg wearing a suit and tie: MailOnline logo © Provided by Daily Mail MailOnline logo

Facebook's oversight board co-chair said Sunday that the platform's rules are in 'shambles' as he explained the panel decided to temporarily maintain the ban on Donald Trump so the site can fix issues before making a permanent ruling.

Michael McConnell, who co-chairs the board assigned to look at Facebook's content moderation decisions, told 'Fox News Sunday': 'We gave them a certain amount of time to get their house in order. They needed some time because their rules are a shambles.'

'They are not transparent, they are unclear, they are internally inconsistent,' McConnell said of the platform's rules.

EXPLAINER: Will Donald Trump return to Facebook?

  EXPLAINER: Will Donald Trump return to Facebook? Former President Donald Trump will find out whether he gets to return to Facebook on Wednesday, when the social network’s quasi-independent Oversight Board plans to announce its ruling in the high-profile case. The decision likely to stir up strong feelings no matter which way it goes. If the board rules in Trump's favor, Facebook has 30 days to reinstate his account. If it upholds Facebook’s decision, Trump will remain “indefinitely suspended.” That means he’ll remain banned from the platform for as long as Facebook sees fit. Here’s how the process works and what might happen after Wednesday’s announcement.

'So we made a series of recommendations about how to make their rules clearer and more consistent,' he added. 'And the hope is that they will use the next few months to do that and then when they come back and look at this they will be able to apply those rules in a straightforward way.'

McConnell assured Fox host Chris Wallace that former President Trump 'is held to the same rules as everyone else.'

a man wearing a suit and tie: ( © Provided by Daily Mail ( Chris Wallace wearing a suit and tie: ( © Provided by Daily Mail (

Despite this claim, conservatives insist they are unfairly targeted online by social media sites with left-leaning values and CEOs.

On Wednesday, the board released its decision to uphold the ban on Trump's account for the next six months, in which time it will be reevaluated by CEO Mark Zuckeberg's team.

Trump's Facebook ban upheld by Oversight Board

  Trump's Facebook ban upheld by Oversight Board The board said that Facebook was "justified in suspending Mr. Trump’s accounts," but that the company should reassess its decision to ban him "indefinitely."The decision to uphold the ban is a blow to Trump's hopes to post again to Facebook or Instagram anytime soon, but it opens the door to him eventually returning to the platforms. Facebook must complete a review of the length of the suspension within six months, the board said.

Trump was banned from Facebook – and most other social media sites – after the January 6 Capitol attack, for which Democrats blame the former president for inciting. The events ultimately led to Trump's second impeachment trial, which like the first did not result in conviction.

McConnell said Wednesday that Facebook's content moderators will ultimately have to decide whether to restore Trump's account, permanently restrict it or give a set amount of time for a suspension.

Keeping him in limbo or relying on the panel to make a decision is not an option McConnell laid out.

'Facebook must make its decision and be held accountable for what it decides,' the oversight panel co-chair said.

McConnell, 65, is a constitutional law scholar who was a Republican-appointed judge for the Tenth Circuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals. Since ending his tenure with the court in 2009, he has been a professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School.

Facebook board decision on Trump ban pleases no one

  Facebook board decision on Trump ban pleases no one Facebook's Oversight Board's long-awaited ruling on former President Trump's account ban pushed the decision back to the Silicon Valley giant, fueling calls for government regulation and oversight from both sides of the aisle. Democrats and advocates have criticized the process and the board's decision to leave open the ability for Trump to return, while Republicans have centered their criticism around accusations that Facebook is censoring conservatives through the ban. Trump, unsurprisingly, also slammed the decision - lumping together Facebook, Twitter and Google.

In May 2020, he was appointed to Facebook's content oversight board.

Trump released a statement Wednesday claiming the decision by the board to uphold its ban on his accounts is a 'total disgrace' and claimed Big Tech will pay a 'political price' for taking away his free speech.

'What Facebook, Twitter, and Google have done is a total disgrace and an embarrassment to our Country,' Trump fumed in a statement Wednesday.

'Free Speech has been taken away from the President of the United States because the Radical Left Lunatics are afraid of the truth, but the truth will come out anyway, bigger and stronger than ever before,' he added.

'The People of our Country will not stand for it! These corrupt social media companies must pay a political price, and must never again be allowed to destroy and decimate our Electoral Process.'

In a Thursday statement, Trump said Big Tech companies banning him are just another way to dismiss and stifles his claims of widespread voter fraud and a 'rigged' 2020 election.

The Facebook and Twitter ban on Trump earlier this year – while he was still president – was an unprecedented move of censorship on a world leader. The move sparked a global debate over how much control social media and big tech should have over free speech online.

Trump is Facebook’s problem, again

  Trump is Facebook’s problem, again Your move, Mark.

Mark Zuckerberg wearing a suit and tie: ( © Provided by Daily Mail (

The Facebook Oversight Board was set up by the platform as an apparent self-check mechanism amid growing calls for it to be split up because it is too powerful.

The board is funded by Facebook, and all of its 20 left-leaning members are paid six figures for approximately 15 hours of work a week.

The sole purpose of the oversight board is to rule on issues that are too big for Facebook or to make decisions it simply doesn't want to make.

But in their decision on Wednesday, the five deciding board members refused to rule either way, instead upholding Facebook's ban and telling the site it would need to decide for itself whether to ban the former president.

Republicans – and even many Democrats – have said the ban on Trump proves Big Tech has too much power.

Progressive Senator Elizabeth Warren said Wednesday the move exhibits Big Tech needs to be broken up.

'I'm glad that Donald Trump is not going to be on Facebook,' the Massachusetts senator clarified to Yahoo Finance. 'Suits me.'

'But part two is that this is just further demonstration that these giant tech companies are way, way, way too powerful,' Warren asserted.

'They need to be broken up in order to keep commerce flourishing,' she said, echoing her calls made during her 2020 bid to be the Democratic nominee for president.

Of Zuckerberg calling the Oversight Board the 'Supreme Court' of Facebook, Warren said: 'Listen to the arrogance of it.'

'The name of the group that made the decision is called the Supreme Court,' the Democrat congresswoman bemoaned. 'I missed the part where those people had hearings in front of Congress, and were voted on before they were made decision makers with this kind of authority.'

Read more

Can the Oversight Board force Facebook to follow its own rules? .
Facebook’s Oversight Board finally handed down its most consequential decision to date: whether or not Facebook’s “indefinite” suspension of Donald Trump should be permanent. Except, it only sort of made a decision. In an unexpected twist, the board said that, while it agreed with Facebook’s initial call to suspend Trump, it disagreed with its handling of the situation, and that the company should be the ones to decide whether Trump should be able to return to the platform. So, once again, the fate of Donald Trump’s Facebook account is up in the air. The social network, led by Nick Clegg, has six months to make up its mind.

usr: 3
This is interesting!