Politics Supreme Court declines suit alleging male-only military draft is discriminatory
Overnight Defense: Supreme Court declines to hear suit challenging male-only draft | Drone refuels Navy fighter jet for the first time | NATO chief meets with Austin, Biden
Happy Monday and welcome to Overnight Defense. I'm Rebecca Kheel, and here's your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. CLICK HERE to subscribe to the newsletter.THE TOPLINE: The Supreme Court won't be weighing in on whether the all-male draft is constitutional, at least for now.The high court declined Monday to hear a lawsuit brought by a men's rights group that alleged only requiring men to register for the draft amounts to discrimination based on sex. Background: The U.S.
The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a lawsuit alleging that the United States' all-male military draft amounts to unconstitutional discrimination on the basis of sex.
The challenge, brought by a men's rights group, claimed that the male-only draft is unlawful in light of a 2013 policy shift by the Defense Department that opened up combat roles to women.
The Biden administration had asked justices to turn away the bid since lawmakers are actively considering the scope of the national registration requirement, and noted that the court previously said the issue was better suited to Congress than judges.
Fact check: Breaking down Mitch McConnell's spin on the John Lewis voting rights bill
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was asked Tuesday where he stands on the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, a Democratic bill that aims to prevent states from implementing racially discriminatory voting laws. © Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), joined by Senate Assistant Minority Leader John Thune (R-SD) (L) and Senate Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-MO), speaks following a Senate Republican Policy luncheon at the Russell Senate Office Building on May 18, 2021 in Washington, DC.
Three justices wrote to express agreement with the court's decision to decline the case. They cited the Biden administration's rationale, but seemed to indicate that they would be open to hearing the case if Congress fails to act.
"It remains to be seen, of course, whether Congress will end gender-based registration under the Military Selective Service Act. But at least for now, the Court's longstanding deference to Congress on matters of national defense and military affairs cautions against granting review while Congress actively weighs the issue," wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh.
Military conditions have changed dramatically since the court upheld the draft law in a 1981 decision in the case of Rostker v. Goldberg. The court at the time ruled 6-3 that the Military Selective Service Act's male-only requirement was justified because of women's exclusion from combat roles.
SCOTUS Rejects Military Draft Sex Discrimination Case, Cites Congress Weighing Changes to Law
Three U.S. Supreme Court justices said on Monday that Congress will consider changes to the Military Selective Service Act that currently requires only men to register for the draft when they reach age 18. Hadthe Supreme Court accepted the case, it would have had to decide if the government's registration requirement for men is sex discrimination. "It remains to be seen, of course, whether Congress will end gender-based registration under the Military Selective Act," Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in a statement representing herself, Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The challengers in the new case, backed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), had argued that the elimination of sex-based barriers in the military without a concurrent broadening of the draft to include women created unjustified sex-based discrimination against men.
The ACLU expressed disappointment over the court's move on Monday.
"Requiring only men to register for the draft reflects the outdated and sexist notion that women are less fit to serve in the military and that men are less able to stay home as caregivers in the event of an armed conflict," said Ria Tabacco Mar, director of the ACLU Women's Rights Project. "Such stereotypes demean both men and women."
A federal judge in Houston ruled in 2019 for the challengers, including two men and a group called the National Coalition for Men. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed that ruling last year, which prompted the challengers' unsuccessful appeal to the Supreme Court.
The case is National Coalition For Men v. Selective Service System, No. 20-928.
--Updated at 10:28 a.m.
Supreme Court's final month: Obamacare, voting laws and LGBTQ rights in play .
The Supreme Court is staring at its self-imposed end of June deadline, but the justices have not yet released some of the most significant opinions of the term, including a challenge to the Affordable Care Act, the Voting Rights Act and a case on religious liberty involving a Philadelphia foster agency. © Will Mullery/CNN Recent weeks have seen justices clear their desks of those opinions that produce fewer divisions, as the tension grows for the big-ticket cases. At the same time, eyes are on any retirement plans of Justice Stephen Breyer, 82.