Politics Supreme Court unanimously rules certain crack offenders not eligible for resentencing
Supreme Court: Immigrant who entered country illegally can't get a green card because of TPS program
Some 400,000 people, most from El Salvador, live in the U.S. with Temporary Protected Status.Some 400,000 people, most from El Salvador, live in the U.S. with Temporary Protected Status, which permits them to remain as long as the government determines they cannot safely return. At issue in the case was whether those immigrants could apply for lawful permanent residency, or green cards, if they entered the United States illegally.
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled unanimously that certain low-level crack cocaine offenders are not eligible to be resentenced under a 2018 criminal justice reform law.
The decision, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, shuts the door on hundreds of inmates who might have been eligible for leniency had the court reached a different conclusion.
The defendant in the case was Tarahrick Terry, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to possession with intent to distribute just under 4 grams of crack. Terry, who had two prior drug convictions, was sentenced to more than 15 years.
Senators ask Marshals Service for information on past Supreme Court justice travel
Supreme Court justices have to disclose some travel, but groups seeking more transparency say there are large loopholes in the law."The justices of our highest court are subject to the lowest standards of transparency of any senior officials across the federal government," wrote Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and John Kennedy, R-La., in a June 4 letter made public Tuesday.
He was backed by the Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) in arguing that he was eligible for a reduced sentence.
But the court flatly rejected that position, calling it a faulty reading of federal law. Thomas wrote that Congress had not sought to retroactively relax the penalty associated with Terry's crime.
"To avoid this straightforward result," Thomas wrote, "petitioner and the United States offer a sleight of hand."
Justice Sonia Sotomayor joined the judgment. But she wrote separately to express concerns that even as lawmakers have undertaken criminal justice reform efforts, "some people have been left behind."
Terry's argument for leniency traced back to a Reagan-era law that ushered in the so-called 100-1 rule - which applied vastly different penalties for crack versus powder cocaine possession - and Congress' subsequent efforts to remedy the racial disparities in sentencing that followed.
What Is Loving Day? Anniversary of Interracial Marriage Legalization
Many states had so-called "anti-miscegenation" laws that forbade white people and non-white people from marrying.On June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court justices ruled unanimously in the case of Loving v. Virginia, striking down the state's "anti-miscegenation" law and bringing an end to race-based restrictions on marriage throughout the nation.
Under the 1986 law, for example, trafficking 500 grams of powder cocaine carried the same mandatory minimum sentence as trafficking only five grams of crack, which led to stiffer punishments for Black offenders.
Congress responded decades later by passing the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which reduced the crack-to-powder sentencing disparity. In 2018, Congress passed the First Step Act, which applied that earlier law retroactively to offenses committed before 2010.
Terry sought to have his sentence reduced under the new legal framework. After losing in the lower courts, he appealed to the Supreme Court where he was backed by the Biden administration.
The court ultimately rejected Terry and the DOJ's argument that the overlapping criminal justice reform statutes should be read broadly to encompass crimes like Terry's.
Although former President Trump signed the First Step Act of 2018, his administration asked the justices to side against Terry.
Biden's position in the case marked not only a reversal from Trump, but also a dramatic break with the tough-on-crime ethos behind a 1986 crime bill he crafted while serving in the Senate.
The Reagan-era measure initially enjoyed broad congressional support. It was also embraced by Black lawmakers, with legislative discussion playing out against a backdrop of fear over a perceived crack epidemic in inner city America. But gross disparities in sentencing to the detriment of Black Americans later emerged, prompting the legislative reforms decades later.
Lawmakers react to Supreme Court decision upholding Obamacare .
President Joe Biden and Democratic lawmakers praised the Supreme Court decision Thursday to uphold the Affordable Care Act in a case challenging its individual mandate. Your browser does not support this video Former President Barack Obama made a point to emphasize that this isn't the first time the high court has upheld his presidency's landmark legislation, which Republicans have sought to dismantle for years. "Today, the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act. Again," Obama wrote. "This ruling reaffirms what we have long known to be true: the Affordable Care Act is here to stay." © J.