Politics Progressives threaten to block bipartisan infrastructure proposal
After 1st round fails, where do infrastructure talks stand?
Almost as soon as infrastructure talks died, they were resurrected under new leadership. © Samuel Corum/Getty Images While President Joe Biden jets off to Europe to attend to international matters, a coalition of Senate Democrats and Republicans are huddled up at the Capitol charting what they hope will be a new path forward on infrastructure. New negotiations bring a whole new host of questions about how a deal on what has become a politically divisive package might be struck and what that deal might look like. Wait. Aren't infrastructure talks over? Think again.
A growing number of Senate progressives say they will not support a scaled-down infrastructure package on its own, arguing it must be part of a broader agreement to spend trillions of dollars.
At least four members of the Democratic caucus said a $974 billion infrastructure proposal -- backed by five Republicans and five Democrats last week -- will not get their votes.
They are insisting that any bipartisan package advanced by Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) under regular order must be accompanied by an agreement to pass a much larger infrastructure measure through the budget reconciliation process, which would allow Democrats to sidestep a GOP filibuster if all 50 caucus members stick together.
Bipartisan talks sow division among Democrats
Democratic lawmakers are splitting apart over whether it makes sense to continue negotiating with Republicans on a scaled-down infrastructure package after President Biden ended talks with Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), the lead Republican negotiator on infrastructure. A new group of Senate negotiators is looking to pick up where Biden and Capito left off, but that's not welcome news to progressive Democrats, who think too much time has already been spent trying to reach an elusive bipartisan infrastructure deal.
The demand from progressives would significantly complicate the prospect of getting 60 votes a slimmed-down compromise bill.
"I'm confident that there's only one deal that's out there, and that's one deal that covers all the pieces we need in infrastructure. There's no half a deal or a quarter of a deal that I can support, and I think I have a lot of Democratic colleagues who feel the same," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) before a Tuesday caucus meeting.
"I'm a no on half a deal," she said when asked specifically on the bipartisan proposal. "We need a whole deal and a whole deal means there's child care, there's green energy and there's a reform of the tax code that makes the rich and the powerful pay their fair share."
Three other progressives have voiced similar demands, which means any standalone bipartisan infrastructure deal would likely need at least 15 or 20 Republican votes to get through the Senate.
On The Money: Democrats wary of emerging bipartisan infrastructure deal, warn of time crunch
Happy Friday and welcome back to On The Money, where we're getting FOMO from Mike Pence's gorgeous new house. I'm Sylvan Lane, and here's your nightly guide to everything affecting your bills, bank account and bottom line.See something I missed? Let me know at email@example.com or tweet me @SylvanLane. And if you like your newsletter, you can subscribe to it here: http://bit.ly/1NxxW2N.Write us with tips, suggestions and news: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org. Follow us on Twitter: @SylvanLane, @NJagoda and @NivElis.
The dimming prospects for any bipartisan package means there's more pressure on President Biden, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Schumer to accelerate negotiations on an infrastructure bill that can pass the Senate and House with only Democratic votes under the budget reconciliation process.
Members of the House Democratic Caucus were briefed by Steve Ricchetti, a top adviser to Biden, and Shalanda Young, the deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, who said they would give Senate negotiators seven to 10 days to reach a bipartisan agreement,. If no deal is reached during that period, the officials said, Democrats will gauge the progress of those talks and charge ahead with a partisan package if need be.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Monday that he would not vote for the bipartisan proposal unveiled last week because it would not be paid for by raising taxes on the wealthy.
Senators face roadblocks to passing bipartisan infrastructure plan as opposition mounts
Ten senators are trying to sell their colleagues on a bipartisan infrastructure plan, but they are facing skepticism from some Democrats.The bipartisan proposal crafted by 10 senators would focus on transportation, broadband and water, and would not raise taxes to offset costs. A handful of Democrats who seek a broader plan that addresses climate change and social programs, paid for by increasing taxes on corporations or the wealthy, have opposed the framework.
"I wouldn't vote for it," Sanders said Monday evening. "The bottom line is there are needs facing this country. Now is the time to address those needs and it has to be paid for in a progressive way given the fact that we have massive income, wealth inequality in America."
Two other progressives -- Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) -- on Tuesday signaled they would not support any scaled-down bipartisan infrastructure unless there's also agreement from all 50 members of the Democratic caucus to also move a larger bill under budget reconciliation, and that the details of the bigger package are spelled out in advance.
Asked if he could vote for the bipartisan proposal unveiled last week if promised that a broader reconciliation bill will come to the Senate floor soon after, Markey said, "I could not."
"We're saying that there absolutely has to be a guaranteed deal that climate is built into these infrastructure bills and that it matches the problem that has to be solved. We can't have dessert before the main course. The main course is a climate infrastructure bill," he added. "We can't leave the climate behind. We have to have a guarantee that it will be included in a bill that has the votes to be put ultimately on the desk of President Biden."
Senate progressives threaten to tank bipartisan infrastructure deal
Some progressives want a guarantee that Dems would unite behind the use of a fast-track budget tool known as reconciliation that allows them to bypass some GOP objections Those progressives want a guarantee that Democrats would unite behind the use of a fast-track budget tool known as reconciliation that allows them to bypass GOP objections with a party-line vote on a package including, climate, elder and child care and housing.
Merkley explained that progressives want "two tracks welded together."
"And before the infrastructure bill, the bipartisan bill, ever goes to the floor, we have the 50 votes - hopefully a lot of Republicans joining us - the 50 votes to make sure a reconciliation process is guaranteed," he said.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), another outspoken climate advocate, voiced a similar demand on Tuesday.
"I think there are obviously going to be details that are going to be in play until the very end. But I'd want a pretty damn clear approach to an open runway that I could have personal confidence in would provide us with the climate legislation we need," he said.
Asked what he thought about the climate-related provisions in the $974 billion bipartisan proposal, Whitehouse answered: "Meh."
The growing opposition among progressives poses a serious challenge to picking up Republican support for the smaller bipartisan package. If Republicans know that passing a bipartisan standalone bill will be part of a larger, guaranteed agreement to pass a second multi-trillion infrastructure investment package with only Democratic votes, it will diminish their desire to cooperate at all.
"More of our members will jump ship," a senior Republican aide predicted, if they see passage of the bipartisan proposal as smoothing the way for centrist Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) to later back a larger reconciliation bill.
Biden risks break with progressives on infrastructure .
President Biden's relationship with his party's liberal base is being tested by a bipartisan framework on infrastructure spending, which has sparked a revolt from progressives such as Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).The big question is whether Biden will endorse the bipartisan plan, even though many Democrats are disappointed it leaves out many of their priorities.If BidenThe big question is whether Biden will endorse the bipartisan plan, even though many Democrats are disappointed it leaves out many of their priorities.