Politics The US must engage with China — even when countering China
This was one of the worst weeks for China on the world stage in a while
The worst thing for China is for America and its allies to get their act together. Biden is doing that in Europe and the Senate is backing him up.In Washington, Democrats and Republicans in the Senate set aside their differences to pass a $250 billion industrial policy bill aimed at preparing US commerce and government for competition with Beijing. And while on a diplomatic trip to Europe, President Joe Biden is reinvigorating our ties to our allies in Europe, the G7 group of nations, and NATO. On the top of the agenda in these meetings is the question of how to counter an aggressive, totalitarian China on the rise.
A policy statement heard around the world is that U.S. engagement with China "." It suggests that the Biden administration is taking a hawkish approach toward China. That stance seemed clear as the U.S. worked the to confront China with an " ."
Yet, peeling the layers, one comes to the necessity for a much more complex U.S. approach to China. Rather than ending engagement, the U.S. should be thinking about engagement's different dimensions. Indeed, Kurt Campbell, coordinator for Indo-Pacific affairs on the National Security Council, who made the remark, implicitly addressed three necessary forms of engagement that have been lacking.
EU-China investment deal is still possible — but not before 2023, analyst says
The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment has "lopsided benefits" for Europe, said Neil Thomas, an analyst at Eurasia Group.The EU and China agreed on the deal in December after seven years of negotiations. But tensions between the two — which saw both sides imposing sanctions on each other — led the European Parliament to freeze the deal until Beijing lifts sanctions on EU politicians.
First, even when the United States aims to counter China, engagement remains essential. The U.S. will most effectively counter Chinese actions in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, along the border with India, and against, if the U.S. works closely with others. The Trump administration was notoriously unreliable and antagonistic towards allies. The United States and its allies will bolster their position in relation to China if they coordinate - an approach underscored at the recent G7 and summits.
Yet, even in high-conflict situations, diplomacy and bargaining with China also will be important. Trade and technology policies are rife with rivalry and competition. These policies can trigger harmful tit-for-tat escalations if they are not. These risks become particularly salient when economic and financial crises strike. Third-party institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) can help parties manage their conflicts so that they are not mutually destructive. China will be indispensable in any U.S. effort to update and "reform" .
NATO pivots toward China as it seeks to avoid repeat of mistakes on Russia
NATO’s new strategic concept will incorporate the threat from China in a way that seeks to learn from failures to counter Russia’s influence, security analysts told the Washington Examiner, noting China is watching Russia’s techniques to drive wedges and weaken the alliance. © Provided by Washington Examiner NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters Tuesday that a 2010 alliance strategy document that spoke of Russia in terms of a “strategic partnership” needs to be scrapped as Russia continues hybrid warfare on the eastern flank.
Second, the United States needs to work with China to effectively address common global, existential challenges. Campbell mentioned three: climate change, global pandemics, and nuclear proliferation. A signal success of the Obama administration was getting China to make commitments for the first time on emissions, which gave rise to the. The U.S. also worked with China to stem Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons under the . It needs to do the same regarding North Korea's nuclear program.
Even in these areas of mutual concern, competition and rivalry are present. Yet such competition also can lead to mutually beneficial outcomes, such as to provide vaccines globally and to develop green technologies.
Third, Campbell stressed the critical importance of bipartisan engagement within the U.S. As politics in America degrades, the U.S. position against China weakens - and China knows this. The U.S. domestic inability to cooperate bolsters Chinese claims that the U.S. is declining and China is rising because China's authoritarian model is superior to U.S. democracy. Unfortunately, bipartisan engagement to productively respond to China's challenge - from the building of infrastructure, the support of science and education, and the defense of democracy - might be the most difficult to achieve. But it is critical.
China's maritime fleet uses predatory fishing practices to feast on smaller countries
China has spent decades overfishing its waters and decimating its sea life. Now, with nowhere left to go, the country's massive fishing fleet has pushed itself into international waters and at times resorted to predatory (and illegal) fishing practices in other countries' coastal domains.China typically targets small nations that can't defend themselves or lack the resources to put up much of a fight.
There are additional reasons why engagement with China matters that Campbell did not mention. In particular, China is not monolithic, just as the U.S. is not monolithic. China has become more aggressive under President Xi Jinping, but different factions in China remain. A purely hawkish relationship with China has served to empower neo-Maoist,within China. When asked what is the greatest challenge that officials face regarding the WTO, a high-level Chinese diplomat told me it is managing "Chinese nationalism." Under Xi, nationalist forces have been unleashed. When the next crisis hits, they will not be easy to rein in.
China's economic and geopolitical rise has changed the strategic environment globally. Engagement, not disengagement, becomes critical - with allies, with China, and with each other at home.
Gregory Shaffer is Chancellor's Professor at the University of California, Irvine, and author of the forthcoming book, "."
Biden issued a curious domestic terrorism strategy — the FBI should proceed with caution .
FBI policy purposefully focuses terrorism investigations on the criminality of violent acts and not what motivates them. This wise policy allowed the FBI to follow violence wherever it was found, freed from the influences of powerful interest groups. It allowed Lady Liberty to remain blindfolded. The president's new domestic terrorism strategy wants her to peek in only one direction.Kevin R. Brock, former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI, was an FBI special agent for 24 years and principal deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).