Politics Let our public servants share their expertise

14:49  10 july  2021
14:49  10 july  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Why Chromebooks might still be your best laptop option

  Why Chromebooks might still be your best laptop option Jack Wallen has been a supporter of Chromebooks for years and believes they are more relevant than ever. Find out why.So where's the love for 7th-gen processors?

We have an army of specialized public servants, but the public debate is rarely informed by their expertise. Why not? The chief reason is that public servants don't answer to citizens, but rather to their elected representatives. In other words, politicians. As a result, their valuable information gets to the public only through political filters.

a car parked in front of a building: Let our public servants share their expertise © Getty Images Let our public servants share their expertise

If public servants provided direct reports to the public, people could - and maybe even would - hold their representatives accountable. But this doesn't happen, since politicians prefer to control the information that affects their reputation.

Progressives Don’t Need to Downplay Rising Homicides

  Progressives Don’t Need to Downplay Rising Homicides Victims of community violence deserve the left’s solidarity and policy solutions.In 2014, America recorded the lowest homicide rate in its history — and the highest homicide rate of any comparably prosperous country. That year, Americans were more than three times as likely as Western Europeans to die by murder. Like most things in the U.S., this aberrantly high risk of homicide was not distributed equally. Residents of Washington, D.C., were murdered at ten times the rate of those in Iowa. Within the District, as in virtually all major U.S.

Government workers have a simple reason to be careful with information that could affect politicians: that's who controls their budgets. Say that you're a state benefits administrator. Anger the wrong official, such as the governor or the chair of a budget committee, and you may find that your entire office falls to the cutting room floor.

Consider the recent debate surrounding the shutdown of the Line 5 pipeline, which Enbridge Inc. operates beneath the Straits of Mackinac in the Great Lakes. If the line is shut down, more fuel trucks likely would use the roads. And some Michigan legislators want to know whether this would add additional strain on the transportation system.

The state has expert engineers who can provide an answer. Yet legislators didn't ask them. Perhaps they think they wouldn't get an objective answer. That wouldn't be an unreasonable conclusion: The Department of Transportation is administered by the governor, and the governor wants the line shut down.

Fighting back against the age of manufactured ignorance: Resistance is still possible

  Fighting back against the age of manufactured ignorance: Resistance is still possible Republican attacks on "critical race theory" are part of a larger right-wing strategy. Resistance is crucial People hold up signs during a rally against "critical race theory" (CRT) being taught in schools at the Loudoun County Government center in Leesburg, Virginia on June 12, 2021. The term "critical race theory" defines a strand of thought that appeared in American law schools in the late 1970s and which looks at racism as a system, enabled by laws and institutions, rather than at the level of individual prejudices.

This puts state experts in a tricky position. If they are called to testify, they would be unlikely to lie, but they would have strong reasons to be guarded and uncomfortable. When testifying, they probably would face pressure to ensure that what they say paints the governor in the best light.

Journalist Charlie LeDuff encountered this problem when he tried to get answers to his questions about COVID-19 deaths in Michigan nursing homes. He saw the data being reported and wasn't sure how certain numbers were being presented. So, he submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to get the relevant information. The state denied it and he sued, represented by Mackinac Center Legal Foundation. The parties settled and, months later, LeDuff finally got an answer that any number of experts could have told him: The state does not have the information necessary to determine whether someone caught COVID-19 in a long-term care facility. The state wouldn't simply produce the information when asked; it took a FOIA request and a lawsuit.

Gina Raimondo's push to sell Biden's agenda: Lobsters, cruises and scotch

  Gina Raimondo's push to sell Biden's agenda: Lobsters, cruises and scotch Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo won't hesitate to make the hard ask. She wants to make that clear. © Paul Morigi/Getty Images Then-Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo speaks onstage during Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit - Day 2 at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in October 2015 in Washington, DC. There may be, after all, nothing less than the fate of President Joe Biden's sweeping $4 trillion economic agenda hanging in the balance in the weeks ahead.

Our public servants had the information LeDuff needed all along, and a phone call or email should have sufficed. But nursing home deaths are a huge political issue. It's little wonder that civil servants were reluctant to risk putting their boss in the same position as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who faced heavy criticism for nursing home deaths in that state.

Even though expert public servants were paid by the public purse for being able to answer this question, politics interfered.

Theoretically, civil service protections shield staff from political considerations. Civil service rules were created to change government employees from being unprofessional political lackeys who were hired because of their loyalty to a candidate into expert public servants removed from politics. And while the rules may have worked to get professionals into public service, they struggle to protect them from political realities.

Public servants should feel comfortable sharing their expertise, free of fear of political retribution. But no mere law will guarantee that. There are simply too many ways that elected officials can retaliate against public workers.

St. Paul Police Chief Demands Apology From State Rep for Accusing Sgt. of Racial Profiling

  St. Paul Police Chief Demands Apology From State Rep for Accusing Sgt. of Racial Profiling "The driver, an elected official who does not dispute driving without a front license plate, owes our sergeant an apology," Police Chief Todd Axtell said."On Sunday, July 4, one of our sergeants working a traffic safety detail stopped a state representative for driving without a front license plate on his vehicle, which is unlawful in the state of Minnesota," Axtell said in a Facebook post. "Two days later I was shocked to hear that driver accuse the sergeant of making the stop based on race.

What we need instead is a widespread public belief that retribution against public servants for informing the public is a moral problem - and any politician who retaliates is unfit for office. A strong cultural expectation that public servants should directly inform the public also would help. It's just a shame that it's hard to develop these norms.

Freeing civil servants to speak without fear won't fix all our problems. For one thing, technical advice isn't all that matters. There are fundamental differences in the views that people hold, and they can provide different interpretations about what experts report. It would be naive to think that public servants lose their self-interest or political views when they start working for the state.

Still, our public workers have important insight and experience that can inform the public debate. They ought to be free to share it, even - or, dare I say, especially - when it lets people judge the performance of their elected representatives.

James M. Hohman is the director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a research and educational institute in Midland, Mich. Follow him on Twitter @JamesHohman.

Opinion | The Secret to Defeating Covid Misinformation the White House Needs to Learn .
Hammering Tucker Carlson and other lie spreaders won’t keep people from sharing their conspiracies. Direct appeals to the public might.Abandoning its previous, more passive strategy, the administration has wrapped its critics in a clinch and commenced counterpunching. White House press secretary Jen Psaki lectured Facebook this week for allowing false claims about Covid and vaccines to run wild on the service and announced that the White House it was “flagging problematic posts” for the company’s attention.

usr: 1
This is interesting!