Politics Scott: 'There is hope' for police reform bill
Democrats launch immigration reform Hail Mary
The party has a prime opportunity to go around Republicans, but it involves another battle with the Senate rulebook.Top Democrats, with the support of the White House, are planning to tuck a handful of immigration measures into their forthcoming $3.5 trillion spending bill. The tactic — which just months ago seemed like a long shot even to liberals — is now widely seen as President Joe Biden’s best shot at confronting one of Washington’s policy leviathans and delivering on a decades-long party promise.
Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), the lead Republican negotiator on police reform, said on Sunday that "there is hope for the bill," as the end of July nears and lawmakers prepare to leave Washington, D.C. for the August recess.
"I think there is hope for the bill, without any question. We worked on it yesterday. We'll have it in the conversation today. We'll be meeting tomorrow. I will be talking with law enforcement leaders tomorrow as well," Scott told host Martha MacCallum on "Fox News Sunday."
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have been working toward an agreement on police reform legislation since last year, following the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police.
Post-court ruling, Democrats face pressure to deliver on immigration
Democrats are under growing pressure to pass long-stalled immigration reform after a federal judge poured new fuel onto the years-long fight by blocking new Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals applicants. With bipartisan talks making little progress, Democrats are poised to use what was viewed as their back-up plan: Trying to get immigration reform passed as part of a sweeping spending package that they will pass via reconciliation, which allows them to bypass the Senate's 60-vote filibuster. Democrats are still sorting out the details, but want to get a pathway to citizenship for at least "dreamers" into their $3.
The chief negotiators for the package -- Scott, Sen. Cory Booker (R-N.J.) and Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.) -- that they had "reached an agreement on framework addressing the major issues for bipartisan police reform."
Negotiations, however, have since stalled, as the two parties remain at odds over a number of issues.
One of the main sticking points since the start of discussions has been qualified immunity, the doctrine that protects state and local government officials, including law enforcement, from liability in civil suits unless they violate a person's clearly established constitutional rights.
Democrats do not want the legal principle to be included in the police reform bill, while Republicans hope it remains intact.
FiveThirtyEight gets it wrong on primary reform
Geoffrey Skelley at FiveThirtyEight recently wrote an article challenging the premise that primary elections reform will make politics less divisive. Skelley draws heavily on a new report from New America’s Lee Drutman. © Provided by Washington Examiner To be sure, Skelley gets a number of points right. Our politics is suffering from highly partisan electorates as a result of partisan sorting. This means there is often no meaningful ideological gap between primary and general election voters.
Scott earlier this month for police reform legislation to pass, telling reporters "I don't think we can do this, after this month, if we're not finished."
When asked at the time if the Senate needs to have the bill passed with bipartisan support by the end of July, Scott responded: "That's what I would hope."
Scott said on Sunday that any police reform legislation cannot "leave the impression that somehow we're going to demonize police officers," adding, "That is dead stop, not going to happen, can't happen."
"When you demonize police officers, when you defund the police and you start talking about this war on police and prosecution and not on crime, you're going to have a reduction of forces, and if you tell officers that their personal liability is on the line, it is a bad decision," Scott said.
He added that is "one of the reasons why we've never been negotiating on qualified immunity for the individual officer."
"It's just bad policy. I won't support it," he continued.
Scott has, however, looked to negotiate on a different form of qualified immunity. He previously proposed keeping qualified immunity for individual officers, but allowing civil suits to be filed against departments.
House moderates may oppose budget without infrastructure vote .
Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s plan to link the Senate’s $550 billion bipartisan infrastructure plan to a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation package is starting to backfire, as moderate Democrats warn they may not vote for a budget resolution needed to begin the reconciliation process unless it’s paired with a vote on the Senate bill. Rep. Ed Case […] The post House moderates may oppose budget without infrastructure vote appeared first on Roll Call.