•   
  •   
  •   

Politics The Democrats’ Appalling Vote to Kill the Hyde Amendment

15:06  31 july  2021
15:06  31 july  2021 Source:   nationalreview.com

Without the Hyde Amendment, Our Tax Dollars Will Directly Fund Abortions | Opinion

  Without the Hyde Amendment, Our Tax Dollars Will Directly Fund Abortions | Opinion For the first time in 40 years, the House Labor and Health and Human Services Subcommittee approved a spending bill that doesn't include the Hyde Amendment.The Hyde Amendment has ensured that our tax dollars do not directly fund abortions since 1980. Now, this key protection for pro-life Americans is in danger—and will likely not be renewed for the upcoming fiscal term.

House Democrats voted this week to kill longstanding measures that prevent federal funding of elective abortions, and they did so with an appalling unanimity.

Nancy Pelosi looking at the camera: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) takes questions at her weekly news conference with Capitol Hill reporters at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., July 22, 2021. © Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) takes questions at her weekly news conference with Capitol Hill reporters at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., July 22, 2021.

From 1976 to 2020, regardless of partisan control of Congress, every appropriations bill funding Medicaid included the Hyde amendment, which prohibits federal funding of abortions for enrollees except in rare circumstances. From 1973 to 2020, the Helms amendment — a similar prohibition on direct taxpayer funding of abortions in international-aid programs — was attached to every appropriations bill funding the State Department.

This Court Has Abandoned the Most Essential Element in American Democracy: Voters

  This Court Has Abandoned the Most Essential Element in American Democracy: Voters Two recent decisions capture perfectly just how distorted the Court’s approach is.In two cases decided on the same day, the Court signaled its side. In Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, a 6–3 majority watered down what’s left of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 on the rationale that voters showed insufficient harm to overcome Arizona’s reasons for limiting access to the ballot box. In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v.

But this week, not a single House Democrat voted against either appropriations bill on the grounds that the legislation would force American taxpayers to fund the deliberate destruction of innocent human lives at home and abroad.

The House Democrats’ unanimous support for taxpayer funding of abortion is atrocious. As common sense and multiple studies tell us, government subsidies for abortion result in more abortions. A report published in 2020 by the Charlotte Lozier Institute, a nonprofit affiliated with the Susan B. Anthony List, estimated that the Hyde amendment had spared the lives of more than 2,400,000 human beings since 1976. Studies by the Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood offshoot, have also found that Medicaid funding of abortion causes Medicaid recipients to procure abortions at a much higher rate.

Democrats poised to repeal prohibition on funding abortions abroad

  Democrats poised to repeal prohibition on funding abortions abroad House Democrats on Wednesday are poised to pass for the first time in more than half a century a State Department and foreign assistance spending bill that does not include the Helms amendment, a provision that blocks U.S. funding for women's health services related to abortions.The State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Bill, an annual appropriations package that lays out U.S. foreign funding priorities, excludes text from the Helms Amendment for the first time since it was introduced in 1973. The bill is set for a vote on Wednesday evening.

The good news is that appropriations bills are still subject to a filibuster in the Senate. That means Senate Republicans certainly will, as they must, block passage of any appropriations bill lacking the Hyde amendment, the Helms amendment, and other traditional, to this point largely uncontroversial, pro-life measures. Strong majorities of American voters still oppose taxpayer funding of abortion.

The terrible news is that the action in the House this week proves that Democrats are deadly serious about enacting a policy of unlimited taxpayer funding of abortion, and they are dangerously close to having the votes to make that policy the law of the land.

Democrats could enact their radical plans to fund abortion on demand in one of two ways.

If they hold the House and pick up two or three seats in the Senate in 2022, Democrats could have the votes to kill the filibuster, and the Senate minority would lose power to block any legislation.

Micah Hyde: When I left Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers told me how frustrated he was

  Micah Hyde: When I left Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers told me how frustrated he was When Aaron Rodgers addressed reporters for the first time after reporting to Packers training camp, he conducted an airing of grievances that included listing several good players who left the Packers, whom Rodgers says the team should have kept. One of those players was Micah Hyde, who was drafted by the Packers in 2013, played [more]Hyde said on Thursday in Buffalo that he considered an honor “To hear him say something like that, a Hall of Fame player, one of the best quarterbacks of all time.

The other avenue by which congressional Democrats may fund abortion is a budget-reconciliation bill — legislation that can pass the Senate by a simple majority but is subject to complex rules. Some Senate Democrats are trying to create a new “Medicaid-like” program that would fund elective abortions in the upcoming $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill. The program would serve lower-income populations, at first, in the twelve states that rejected Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.

It could ultimately fall to Senator Joe Manchin, the self-described pro-life Democrat from West Virginia, to stop Democratic plans to expand taxpayer funding of abortion in the next reconciliation bill. Manchin went along with the Democrats’ $1.9 trillion “COVID relief” reconciliation bill in March of this year, despite the fact that the bill did not apply the Hyde amendment to various slush funds that could be used to fund abortion. But Manchin said in June: “I’m going to support Hyde in every way possible.”

If Manchin meant what he said, he needs to tell his Democratic colleagues that he will vote against the passage of any reconciliation bill that forces American taxpayers to fund abortion on demand.

More on National Review

  • A ‘Reparations’ Plan Designed to Help the Activist Left, Not Minorities
  • J. D. Vance and the American Dream
  • When ‘Terrorists’ Aren’t Terrorists: The Danger of Twisting Words to Suit Our Politics

Was Antonin Scalia Wrong about the Second Amendment? .
A new, dubious linguistic tool joins the debate.A new case, New York State Pistol & Rifle Association v. Bruen, seeks to cash that check. It’s a challenge to New York’s requirement that applicants for concealed-carry licenses show “good cause,” or a non-speculative need to carry a gun for self-defense, with local officials in charge of making the determination. Especially in the state’s most left-leaning areas, it’s incredibly difficult for the average person to get a permit.

usr: 9
This is interesting!