•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Cryptocurrency industry fears big tax hit in infrastructure bill

03:48  01 august  2021
03:48  01 august  2021 Source:   politico.com

Lawmakers can't reconcile weakening the SALT cap with progressive goals

  Lawmakers can't reconcile weakening the SALT cap with progressive goals Any effort to weaken or repeal the cap would simply be a pointless giveaway to the rich. Democrats should reject this regressive tax cut that would draw critical resources away from needed public investments. "No SALT, no deal," said Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), who are just some of the lawmakers demanding that Congress repeal or weaken the SALT cap in their reconciliation bill, the legislative vehicle that will let Democrats pass their budget agreement without any Republican votes.

Mark Warner, Rob Portman are posing for a picture: Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), left, accompanied by Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), walk for a closed door talks about infrastructure on Capitol Hill in Washington Thursday, July 15, 2021. © (Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo) Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), left, accompanied by Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), walk for a closed door talks about infrastructure on Capitol Hill in Washington Thursday, July 15, 2021.

Buried in the still-unreleased bipartisan infrastructure package is a sweeping crackdown on cryptocurrency transactions that could generate significant tax revenue for the government and major anxiety in a financial technology industry that thrived during the coronavirus pandemic.

Lawmakers want people facilitating trades in Bitcoin and other digital assets to be subject to reporting rules similar to those governing the sale of stocks and other securities: Brokers would be required to report things like how much people paid for cryptocurrencies.

What is Biden talking about?

  What is Biden talking about? Democrats have expanded the meaning of infrastructure to cover their entire policy wish list.Jesus preached about the wise man and the foolish man who built houses. Both houses were buffeted by storms or floods. The difference: The wise man “dug deep and laid the foundation on the rock” while the foolish man “built his house on the sand.” The house built on stone stood strong, and the one built on a foundation of sand collapsed.

The proposal is alarming many in the industry, who are expressing fear of being ambushed with a host of new rules they could be stuck with for years.

They see the new reporting requirements as potentially damaging the economic viability of cryptocurrency markets, which have seen a rapid expansion in new users during the pandemic.

Given how much new tax revenue could be at stake and the amount of progress that has been made on the bill, many doubt the language will be eliminated, so they are focused on efforts to make what they see as improvements.

Industry groups including the Blockchain Association, Coin Center and the Association for Digital Asset Markets outlined their opposition to the requirements in statements on Thursday, taking particular note of provisions in the draft version that could lead to targeting of individual users.

5 Reasons Biden Got His Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

  5 Reasons Biden Got His Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal Mitch McConnell is poised to hand the president a big win. Here’s why.Biden had campaigned on his (putative) gifts for brokering compromise. But savvy observers knew that the candidate was singing paeans to a long-dead deity: The God of Bipartisanship had forsaken Congress shortly after Barack Obama took office. As the ideological gap between the parties widened, the scope for common cause narrowed. Meanwhile, McConnell had discerned that the voting public blames the president’s party for government dysfunction, even if that dysfunction emanates from the opposition.

Perianne Boring, founder and president of the Chamber of Digital Commerce, said in an interview on Friday that her group proposed amending the bill language to “tighten the definition” of what constitutes brokering activity to exclude cryptocurrency miners and the operators of decentralized finance platforms.

“The idea of shoving this into a congressional mandate or as a as a revenue-generator for something completely unrelated, is not the preferred way or the right way to get the best policy,” Boring said, noting that ADAM and others have repeatedly asked for more guidance from the IRS on how to enforce existing laws.

ADAM's CEO, Michelle Bond, said “it is critically important for the industry to be at the table to provide technical assistance for proposals of this magnitude."

Tax compliance is considered a major problem with cryptocurrencies, and lawmakers are hungry for the $28 billion their proposals are said to raise to help finance their big-ticket spending plans.

Daily on Energy: Infrastructure nuclear aid too late for Illinois’ at-risk plants

  Daily on Energy: Infrastructure nuclear aid too late for Illinois’ at-risk plants Subscribe today to the Washington Examiner magazine and get Washington Briefing: politics and policy stories that will keep you up to date with what's going on in Washington. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $1.00 an issue! © Provided by Washington Examiner DOE Default Image - July 2021 TIME IS TIGHT FOR ILLINOIS NUCLEAR PLANTS: The bipartisan Senate infrastructure bill, officially out last night, strives to save economically struggling nuclear plants from closing, but it’s very likely too late for a pair of plants in Illinois at greatest risk.

The issue is complicated, potentially affecting banking and securities law. It also crosses jurisdictions in Congress, from the tax committees to banking panels.

The move to boost cryptocurrency reporting requirements comes after Republicans killed a plan to boost IRS enforcement by greatly expanding the agency’s budget — something Democrats are expected to tackle in a separate tax-reconciliation package.

IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig has repeatedly asked lawmakers for more power to improve tax compliance in the cryptocurrency industry, where many market participants are unaware of their obligations or are outright cheating.


Video: Should you invest in a cryptocurrency? (CNBC)

Though industry officials vow to fight the proposals, they’ll likely face an uphill battle.

The plan is headed for a quick vote in the Senate, and lawmakers will be loath to blow a hole in the infrastructure proposal after struggling for weeks over how to defray its cost of the plan.

The fact that few lawmakers understand cryptocurrencies and their relationship to taxes means that any lobbying effort will require a major educational campaign. Congress’s most expert member on the issue, Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), happens to be one of the main authors of the broader infrastructure package.

The bipartisan infrastructure bill gives taxpayers a good bang for their buck

  The bipartisan infrastructure bill gives taxpayers a good bang for their buck The bipartisan infrastructure bill makes a transformative investment in the foundation of our economy and the future of American infrastructure.One of the reasons infrastructure projects cost significantly more in the United States than similar ones in other countries is our byzantine permitting process. The bill directs permitting agencies to cut average approval times to less than two years for major projects and includes several provisions to help make that happen without sacrificing important social and environmental protections.

Portman spokesperson Drew Nirenberg said in a statement: "This legislative language does not redefine digital assets or cryptocurrency as a ‘security’ for tax purposes, impugn on the privacy of individual crypto holders or force non-brokers, such as software developers and crypto miners, to comply with IRS reporting obligations. It simply clarifies that any person or entity acting as a broker by facilitating trades for clients and receiving cash must comply with a standard information reporting obligation."

Much of the proposal is designed to replicate the reporting regime imposed when people sell stocks in companies like Apple or Ford.

Brokers would be required to report people’s so-called basis, or the price at which they bought cryptocurrencies, as well as their gross proceeds — which would make calculating their tax bills much easier. Studies have long shown that when people know someone else is independently reporting their income to the IRS, they are far less likely to skirt tax obligations.

Lawmakers also want to include anti-money laundering provisions sought by the Treasury Department that would require transactions worth more than $10,000 to be reported to the government.

Behind the scenes, lawmakers have debated language that would expand the definition of broker to include decentralized exchanges, without traditional middle men, and peer-to-peer transactions, though some say the language of the proposal is broad enough to sweep in others like cryptocurrency miners.

AOC, Progressives Slam Moderate Dems' Concerns About $3.5T Bill: 'Bipartisan Doesn't Mean It's Good'

  AOC, Progressives Slam Moderate Dems' Concerns About $3.5T Bill: 'Bipartisan Doesn't Mean It's Good' "War was bipartisan. Tax cuts for the rich were bipartisan. Wall St bailouts were bipartisan," Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted.Moderate Democrats wrote a letter addressed to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, urging her to swiftly bring the bipartisan roughly $1 trillion infrastructure deal, which is nearing passage in the Senate, for a vote in the House, CNN reported on Saturday evening. They also raised concerns about the cost of the larger $3.5 trillion proposal that Democrats hope to pass through the budget reconciliation process without the need for any Republican votes.

“The extension of the definition of ‘broker’ is a surprise,” said Lisa Zarlenga, a partner at the firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP who works on cryptocurrency tax issues.

Another source of contention: provisions that could potentially go beyond cryptocurrencies to other types of digital assets like non-fungible tokens.

The Treasury Department had already been working on rules to tighten reporting requirements on brokers like Coinbase, but having Congress’s imprimatur would help head off any potential legal challenges to the agency’s authority to issue new regulations.

Industry officials are vowing a fight.

Blockchain Association Executive Director Kristin Smith expressed frustration with the last-minute scramble to write the legislation, saying it could impose new requirements on “all sorts of different actors in the ecosystem.”

“We think it would have the effect of potentially driving a lot of these actors and businesses and individuals involved in crypto overseas and really stifling the innovation in this space here in the United States,” she said.

Though the plan is said to raise $28 billion, that’s highly uncertain and the estimate immediately raised some eyebrows.

While Congress’s budget forecasters can predict with confidence the cost of tax changes that are similar to ones lawmakers have made before — such as expanding the child tax credit — they invariably have a harder time for more novel policy proposals.

Cryptocurrencies present a particularly difficult challenge because their valuations can fluctuate wildly, it’s hard to know how many people are buying and selling the assets, and forecasters have to make guesstimates about the tax rates they likely pay.

CORRECTION: This story has been corrected to say that the Chamber of Digital Commerce is pushing for the exclusion of cryptocurrency miners and operators of decentralized finance services in the legislation.

It's official: Cryptocurrency is infrastructure .
Senate negotiators -- not always known for their tech savvy -- made a breakthrough Monday over regulations on online transactions known as cryptocurrency. © Shutterstock Cryptocurrency golden bitcoin coin on black stone background, electronic virtual money for web banking and international network payment, Currency Technology Business Internet Concept. The breakthrough is significant for two reasons: 1) Negotiators were able to reach a bipartisan consensus. 2) It deals with a largely new industry, which uses blockchain technology for online transactions. A lead negotiator, Sen.

usr: 5
This is interesting!