•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Biden’s big attempt at equity in agriculture hits dead end

12:23  03 august  2021
12:23  03 august  2021 Source:   politico.com

Biden, Congress and student loan forgiveness: What is the federal government doing to address the issue?

  Biden, Congress and student loan forgiveness: What is the federal government doing to address the issue? Biden has relieved some student loan debt, but Democrats want to go bigger to undo some of the nation's $1.7 trillion in student loan debt.Now, as the deadline approaches, Democrats are not only calling on the White House to extend the forgiveness once again, but to take lasting action towards forgiving student loans — which reached record high numbers in 2020.

Agriculture Department officials say that in the meantime they’re trying to provide relief through other programs already authorized by Congress. “The ARP also directs us to do more than debt relief,” a USDA spokesperson told POLITICO, adding that the pandemic relief package also allocated billion to address equity issues, though the department hasn’t rolled out a plan for spending the money. Some of the funds may be used as grants and loans for land access, addressing heirs' property issues, establishing an equity commission, research and provisioning financial assistance to former loan

Biden originally aimed to administer at least one vaccine dose to 70 percent of Americans 18 and older by July 4. But widespread vaccine hesitancy — particularly in conservative parts of the country — prevented the U. S . from meeting his deadline. And best of all these gains have been concentrated in the undervaccinated states that Delta is hitting the hardest — strongly suggesting the variant’ s ravages are the reason former holdouts are finally taking COVID seriously and deciding to protect themselves and others with a safe and effective vaccine.

A string of legal defeats for a groundbreaking program to forgive the debts of minority farmers is presenting the Biden administration with a stark choice. It can continue the fight and risk further setbacks or give up and disappoint activists and lawmakers who have championed the cause.

a man standing next to a cow: The debt relief program would cover the USDA loans of an estimated 16,000 farmers and ranchers who have been identified as Black, Native American, Alaskan Native, Asian American, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic and Latino in the Farm Service Agency’s records. © Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images The debt relief program would cover the USDA loans of an estimated 16,000 farmers and ranchers who have been identified as Black, Native American, Alaskan Native, Asian American, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic and Latino in the Farm Service Agency’s records.

The estimated $4 billion program is under siege by conservative legal groups — including one founded by close aides to former President Donald Trump — who have filed at least 13 lawsuits arguing the debt relief effort unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of race.

Biden Defends New Vaccine Requirement for Federal Workers

  Biden Defends New Vaccine Requirement for Federal Workers Before President Joe Biden took office, he said he didn’t think vaccines should be mandatory. And he said in May that he didn’t think masks should be required for vaccinated people either. But with the delta variant of coronavirus continuing to spread, and more than 40 percent of Republicans refusing to get vaccinated, Biden is now preaching a different message. On Thursday, Biden announced that vaccines would be mandatory for nearly all federal employees, and he said the Justice Department was looking into whether the government could mandate vaccines for the whole country.

President Joe Biden has called on U. S . farmers to lead the way in offsetting greenhouse gas emissions to battle climate change — a goal fourth generation cattle rancher Loren Poncia set out to achieve over a decade ago. Despite working in the beef sector, a big contributor to global warming, Poncia has transformed his Northern California ranch into one of the few carbon-positive livestock operations in the country. Experts estimate that farmers across the world can sequester a large enough portion of carbon through regenerative agriculture practices to avert the worst impacts of climate change.

Biden ’ s demeanor and apparent confusion raised eyebrows online, particularly among American conservatives, who have claimed since last year’s campaign that Biden was showing signs of cognitive decline. Video footage of Biden ’ s verbal gaffes and blunders since becoming president – like forgetting the names of his own officials and losing his train of thought at his single solo press conference – have only lent weight to their claims. The video then shows Johnson apparently attempting to stop Biden talking to the group of world leaders at a meeting. Like this story? Share it with a friend!

So far, three different judges have issued preliminary injunctions blocking the program nationwide as litigation proceeds. The Justice Department could appeal, but hasn’t yet.

DOJ rarely gives up without a fight in such cases, but legal experts say the Biden administration’s best move at the moment might be to huddle with congressional allies and come up with a program more likely to pass muster. Otherwise, they say, there’s a danger of provoking court rulings that might undermine other programs aimed at remedying past discrimination.

One legal expert said he would be shocked if the administration allowed the fights over the debt relief program to reach the Supreme Court or even pressed forward with appeals.

“Obviously with this cluster of cases… they’re not going to blindly go before a federal court of appeals and run the risk of that kind of defeat, setting the stage for a Supreme Court defeat,” William & Mary Law School professor Neal Devins said. “Probably better hope that Congress will clean up the statute.”

Biden’s fight to de-Trumpify the courts, explained

  Biden’s fight to de-Trumpify the courts, explained Biden is the president liberal court watchers have been waiting for, but he may be five years too late.A longtime member and former chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden oversaw hundreds of judicial confirmations. He chaired the 1987 hearing that successfully convinced the Senate to reject Judge Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court; then presided over a far less successful hearing that preceded Justice Clarence Thomas’s confirmation in 1991.

The Biden administration' s climate change policy faces a big challenge in making energy transition work for local coal and fossil fuel economies. Green energy advocates, including major companies like Ford and Amazon, are talking massive job climate jobs creation. In between these opposing views, one of the biggest climate change policy challenges for the Biden administration is how to support rural areas like coal mining and power plant towns where fossil fuels have long powered local economies.

Biden was identified as “Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC,” an apparent reference to the former Shanghai-based conglomerate CEFC China Energy Co. In addition, the email outlined a “provisional agreement” under which 80 percent of the “ equity ,” or shares in the new company, would be split equally among four people whose initials correspond to the sender and three recipients, with “H” apparently referring to Biden . The deal also listed “10 Jim” and “10 held by H for the big guy?”

Another lawyer involved in crafting affirmative action programs said the minority farmers debt relief law — in the form passed in March — would be a sure loser given the present make-up of the Supreme Court.

“I don’t think they have a chance in hell of prevailing with the current court,” said the attorney, who asked not to be named, citing sensitivities due to ongoing work with groups active on the issue.

Several lawyers said they believe that if the program reached the Supreme Court in its current form, the justices would reject it, perhaps by as much as an 8-1 margin.

Congressional remedy: The debt relief program — also known as section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan — would cover the USDA loans of an estimated 16,000 farmers and ranchers who have been identified as Black, Native American, Alaskan Native, Asian American, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic and Latino in the Farm Service Agency’s records.

5 Reasons Biden Got His Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

  5 Reasons Biden Got His Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal Mitch McConnell is poised to hand the president a big win. Here’s why.Biden had campaigned on his (putative) gifts for brokering compromise. But savvy observers knew that the candidate was singing paeans to a long-dead deity: The God of Bipartisanship had forsaken Congress shortly after Barack Obama took office. As the ideological gap between the parties widened, the scope for common cause narrowed. Meanwhile, McConnell had discerned that the voting public blames the president’s party for government dysfunction, even if that dysfunction emanates from the opposition.

Big Tech servers? Environmentalist groups and schools whose teacher unions backed the Biden -Harris-AOC Deal? Or innocent hospitals, factories, workers and families? A similar action was done in the 1970 s ’ attempt to ban and spread fear from electricity production with nuclear power. (No thanks to nuclear power) This insanely simple, emotional and ignorant statement became the driver for a whole movement. People bought these round yellow batches in massive numbers.

President Joe Biden has painted a grim picture of what’ s in store for the US as the pandemic continues, enacting travel restrictions and suggesting half a million Americans will have died with the virus by the end of next month. International travelers arriving in the US will not only have to be tested for the virus before embarking on their journey, but must quarantine upon arrival, Biden said. He also announced an “executive action” mandating masks for interstate travel – a requirement that is already in place – and referred to Wednesday’ s executive order mandating masks on federal property.

The debt relief, according to supporters and activists, is key to bringing justice to farmers of color who were left out of USDA programs and assistance as a result of abusive lending practices and outright discrimination over the last century and into the present.

To dole out the payments, the Treasury was set to pay 100 percent of the farmers’ outstanding debt and an additional 20 percent to cover tax liabilities, fees and other loan costs. While the payout process was set to start in June, a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctions issued have stopped the payment process — but USDA is still allowed to continue readying the payments and notifying farmers of eligibility in case the program is ever deemed constitutional.

The legislation is one of several follow-on measures to a major legal agreement struck in 1999, known as the Pigford settlement. The deal, which settled class-action litigation alleging long-standing discrimination against Black farmers by USDA, led to about $1 billion in payments or other relief. A cumbersome application process in that deal that left many farmers without a payout led to a second settlement struck in 2010 and backed by about $1.2 billion in congressional funding. But many activists call Pigford a failure and hoped the Biden administration, and the debt relief, would provide a long-sought remedy.

Surprising The Walking Dead Return: The worst season finally makes sense

 Surprising The Walking Dead Return: The worst season finally makes sense in the final 11th Season of The Walking Dead we can make ourselves on some surprises. One hides in the recent trailer and finally gives the most crazy TWD season. fans expect some changes in the 11th Season The Walking Dead . Not only is the final chapter of the Zombiesaga change the streaming home , also the characters are confronted around Daryl, Carol, Negan, Maggie and Co. with a completely new community as well as probably ruthless counterparts.

The provision Congress passed in March sought to address complaints that the earlier rounds of payments and debt relief did not reach enough farmers or go far enough to remedy discrimination. In the new legislation, lawmakers used a definition of “socially disadvantaged” — which came from the 1990 Farm Bill — that first drew backlash from Republicans for excluding white women. The department and advocates maintain that the program is already tailored narrowly enough to address specific discrimination — an argument that has recieved skepticism from judges and legal scholars.

Several legal experts said the minority farmers statute seems to suffer from exactly the same problem the Supreme Court seized on in 1989 to torpedo an affirmative action program in Richmond, Va., that sought to give minority-owned firms a 30 percent set-aside of city construction contracts.

“I found it sort of weird that Congress, when it enacted the [farmers’ debt relief] statute seemed to maybe make the same mistake,” Devins said. “You have sort of a poorly drafted statute ... I’m reading this and thinking, ‘This is just the same stuff.’”

In City of Richmond v. Croson, the Supreme Court faulted the affirmative action program at issue for sweeping in Latinos, Asians, Eskimos and Aleuts despite a lack of evidence of discrimination against those groups in the city — or that some had ever sought contracts there at all.

The Racialized ‘Equity’ Agenda in Biden’s Infrastructure Bill

  The Racialized ‘Equity’ Agenda in Biden’s Infrastructure Bill The deal’s plan to spend hard-earned tax dollars in the name of equity undermines America’s foundational principle of equality. More on National ReviewEmergencies Need an Expiration DateBring Back the Tea PartyBiden Must Act as Beijing Targets U.S.

“Under Richmond's scheme, a successful Black, Hispanic, or Oriental entrepreneur from anywhere in the country enjoys an absolute preference over other citizens based solely on their race. We think it obvious that such a program is not narrowly tailored to remedy the effects of prior discrimination,” Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote.

“I don’t know where they got the definition of who was included,” Devins said of the farmer debt program. “It’s really what happened in Croson. It’s really irresponsible.”

The sentiment was shared by U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Morales Howard, who issued the first preliminary injunction on the debt relief.

“It appears that in adopting Section 1005’s strict race-based debt relief remedy Congress moved with great speed to address the history of discrimination, but did not move with great care. Indeed, the remedy chosen...appears to fall well short of the delicate balance accomplished when a legislative enactment employs race in a narrowly tailored manner to address a specific compelling governmental interest,” wrote Morales Howard. “The Court has carefully balanced the equities and is convinced that they favor the halting of a program that is significantly likely to violate the constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law.”


Video: Department of Justice rules Trump's tax returns must be given to Congress (CNBC)

Howard and the other two judges who issued preliminary injunctions against the program are appointees of President George W. Bush, as is a federal judge in Wisconsin who issued a temporary restraining order last month.

'The roadmap is firmly in place at this point': 'The Walking Dead' showrunner knows how the show will end

  'The roadmap is firmly in place at this point': 'The Walking Dead' showrunner knows how the show will end "TWD" showrunner Angela Kang confirms to Insider she knows how AMC's long-running zombie drama will come to an end and hopes they stick the landing.When asked if she knows how "TWD" will end, Kang told Insider via phone Monday morning, "Yes, I believe I know how 'The Walking Dead' ends.

A narrower program targeted to only African-American farmers might pass muster with the current Supreme Court, some legal experts said, but they warned that the Biden administration would still be endangering all affirmative action programs by taking such a dispute to the justices.

“That’s the risk factor if the court gets its hands on this,” Devins said. “That would be devastating for affirmative action programs.”

While Chief Justice John Roberts has proven to be a swing vote on some issues in recent years, questions of race are not among them. Indeed, he’s one of the court’s most vocal conservatives on cases that involve race-conscious government action.

“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” Roberts famously wrote in a 2007 case about Seattle’s use of race in public school assignments.

“When people talk about, ‘What are the issues the chief justice cares about?’ This is one of them,” Devins said.

Murky legal vetting: Although many politicians took credit for the debt relief provisions when they were passed and signed into law, their offices declined repeated requests to explain whether the measure was legally vetted and by whom.

The White House, which conducted direct outreach to farmers about the program, has declined to comment on specific questions surrounding next steps and the way the provisions were drafted. However, Chris Meagher, a White House spokesperson, noted that Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and “White House leadership are engaged on this issue.”

A White House official also emphasized that farmers of color were disproportionately excluded from earlier rounds of aid during the coronavirus pandemic.

Vilsack has previously noted that more than 99 percent of the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program, meant to aid producers as supply chains crumbled, went to white farmers, even though farmers of color account for about 5 percent of all producers.

Biden’s Eviction Moratorium Extension Is Executive Overreach

  Biden’s Eviction Moratorium Extension Is Executive Overreach Presidents do have broad authority to deal with emergencies. But what Biden has done exceeds any such justification.Yet that is exactly what President Joseph Biden has just done.

“That disparity is due to the long-term, cumulative effects of discrimination and systemic barriers that have existed in USDA programs and lending,” a White House spokesperson said in email comments to POLITICO. “The (American Rescue Plan) addresses these systemic issues in light of the economic damage done by Covid to the socially disadvantaged borrowers.”

Several lawmakers who championed the cause have been silent on the issue as the aid program was stalled by legal challenges.

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who introduced the first bill this session to address discrimination at USDA and provide debt relief, declined through a spokesperson to comment on next steps or other options. House Agriculture Committee Chair David Scott (D-Ga.), who included the debt relief in the House version of the pandemic relief bill, also declined to comment on the drafting process and potential solutions.

Only Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), who introduced the bill whose provisions were later adopted by Scott, addressed part of the issue.

“The Justice Department has indicated that they will defend the law,” Warnock told POLITICO. “In the meantime, I am supportive of Sen. (Kirsten) Gillibrand’s bill that would provide debt relief to farmers who make under $250,000.”

Gillibrand’s bill, the Relief for America’s Small Farmers Act, was introduced in May 2020 in an attempt to stem the growth of USDA debt held by small farmers and combat the rise of farm bankruptcies. While the bill isn’t aimed directly at providing redress for historical discrimination, benefits based on economic critera raise fewer legal issues.

And most farms operated by people of color are small. The average size of a Black-run farm is 132 acres, according to the 2017 Agricultural Census, compared with 431 acres for white farmers.

The goal, according to Gillibrand, is to pass the bill within reconciliation.

Agriculture Department officials say that in the meantime they’re trying to provide relief through other programs already authorized by Congress.

“The ARP also directs us to do more than debt relief,” a USDA spokesperson told POLITICO, adding that the pandemic relief package also allocated $1 billion to address equity issues, though the department hasn’t rolled out a plan for spending the money.

Some of the funds may be used as grants and loans for land access, addressing heirs' property issues, establishing an equity commission, research and provisioning financial assistance to former loan borrowers.

“USDA is a very large, very old department. It's different from HUD or DOT, because it dates back to Lincoln,” the USDA spokesperson said. “So when we are making these changes, it's huge. This is a big, historic shift in attitude at USDA and it's going to be hard work.”

Last week, USDA made multiple announcements of funding that is a part of the larger equity push, including money for a program that provides outreach and technical assistance for underserved and veteran producers, funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the land-grant system and the implementation of another long-stalled program to help heirs to family farms hang on to their land.

Conspicuously mum: Vilsack said in a statement that his agency is standing behind the current minority farmer debt-relief program despite the grim legal picture.

“USDA remains committed to implementing the program in accordance with congressional direction and also in compliance with direction from the court. Working in partnership, USDA and DOJ are litigating the cases aggressively in all of the district courts where the debt relief program is being challenged,” Vilsack said.

A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on the string of court losses or on the claims that the DOJ is committed to pressing on with the legal fight for the program.

However, there is one notable sign that some in the administration may be skittish about soldiering on.

When a judge issued a ruling last month striking down the program protecting and giving work permits to so-called Dreamers, the White House wasted no time in announcing that the administration would appeal. Before 9 a.m. the following morning, Biden issued a statement calling the ruling “deeply disappointing” and saying that the Justice Department would pursue an appeal to “fortify” the initiative, known as DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.

The first preliminary injunction blocking the minority farmer relief program was handed down by a judge in Jacksonville, Fla. on June 23. In the more than a month since that decision, the Justice Department and White House have been conspicuously silent about whether an appeal is planned. The deadline for an appeal is now about three weeks away.

With the legal picture looking bleak, farmers of color are still pressing aggressively for the debt relief they say they were promised, and they are calling on Biden to take action.

"This is a bad situation here,” said John Boyd, president of the National Black Farmers Association. “That’s why I am urging the president to come to the table here and let's find a resolve for it. It could be a new legislative fix with a new definition, some sort of executive order, but I don’t see the fix coming from the secretary.”

Biden’s Eviction Moratorium Extension Is Executive Overreach .
Presidents do have broad authority to deal with emergencies. But what Biden has done exceeds any such justification.Yet that is exactly what President Joseph Biden has just done.

usr: 9
This is interesting!