Politics Justice Amy Coney Barrett argues Supreme Court isn't 'a bunch of partisan hacks'
Biden vaccine plan for employers raises longstanding legal questions over mandates, experts say
Some supporters of vaccine mandates point to a 116-year-old Supreme Court decision allowing such requirements, but experts question its relevance.Legal experts say the new policies will be challenged in court almost immediately – Republican officials have already vowed to sue over the requirements – and that those disputes will quickly wind up at the Supreme Court, raising thorny questions about the federal government's power to mandate a response to a public health crisis.
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — In the wake of a, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett told a crowd of more than 100 here that she doesn't believe the highest court in the land is politically driven.
“My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks,” she told the guests at a Sunday celebration of the 30th anniversary of the opening of the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville.
Barrett, who was, spent much of her talk at the Seelbach Hilton Hotel arguing the court is defined by "judicial philosophies" rather than personal political views.
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court
Justices must be “hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions, since judges are people, too,” she said.Justices must be “hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions, since judges are people, too,” Barrett said at a lecture hosted by the University of Louisville’s McConnell Center.
"Judicial philosophies are not the same as political parties," she said, noting that she identifies as an "originalist" and citing fellow Justice Stephen Breyer as an example of the other main school of thought, "pragmatism."
Barrett cited a number of cases in which the nine justices on the court did not rule along "party lines" — meaning each justice appointed by Republican voting together and each justice appointed by a Democrat doing the same.
"The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions. … That makes the decision seem results-oriented. It leaves the reader to judge whether the court was right or wrong, based on whether she liked the results of the decision," Barrett said.
Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court justices aren't "partisan hacks"
Barrett delivered a lecture hosted by the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville.Barrett told an audience at a lecture hosted by the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville that her goal in the speech "is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks," the Courier Journal reported.
"And here's the thing: Sometimes, I don't like the results of my decisions. But it's not my job to decide cases based on the outcome I want."
Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was in attendance at the event — in addition to Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams, U of L President Neeli Bendapudi and others — and introduced Barrett.
He praised the court's most junior justice for not trying to "legislate from the bench" and for being from "Middle America," noting the Indiana native is the only current justice to not attend Harvard or Yale.
Kentucky's senior senator was, the third time Republican President Donald Trump filled a seat on the Supreme Court.
Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court justices aren't 'partisan hacks' amid Dem court-packing threats: report
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett insisted Sunday that the court isn't as partisan an institution as many outside observers make it out to be, as Democrats continue to direct their ire at the tribunal after multiple favorable decisions for Republicans in recent weeks. "My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks," Barrett said, according to the Louisville Courier Journal. "The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions… That makes the decision seem results-oriented," Barrett added, according to the Courier Journal.
McConnellduring his time running the Senate, and that was a focus of many of the protesters who gathered outside Sunday's event.
"I'm aware that they stay in power through unethical and unscrupulous means. … I'm just tired of it," said a woman dressed like a handmaiden from "The Handmaid's Tale" series, who declined to give her name.
Thebanning abortion after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, virtually outlawing the procedure because most don't know they're pregnant before that point, was another point of contention with the group of about 30 protesters outside the event.
"With what's been happening in Texas, I don't want it to spread to Kentucky. … And so, we're just coming to let Mitch know how a lot of citizens feel about this issue," Jane Martin Buckley, of Louisville, said.
Barrett was asked about the decision and the so-calledby a group of students in the McConnell Scholars program during the event but said "emergency" decisions such as this one can come before the court again, so it would be "inappropriate" for her to comment on the case.
McConnell founded the center bearing his name in 1991. It gives U of L scholarships to students around Kentucky, hosts a public speaker series and houses the archives of McConnell and his wife, Elaine Chao, the former U.S. transportation secretary.
Follow Mary Ramsey on Twitter
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal:
Democratic support for Supreme Court plummets after decision in Texas abortion case, poll finds .
Democrats' displeasure with the court comes after a series of high-profile decisions have come down against President Biden and liberal interests.Nationwide approval of the high court fell to 49% in September, down from 60% two months earlier, according to the Marquette University Law School poll. That decline was driven largely by Democrats, whose support for the court nosedived 22 points.