Politics Clarence Thomas: Judges wading into politics 'asking for trouble'
Supreme Court halts execution of inmate seeking pastor's touch, prayer during lethal injection
John Ramirez told the Supreme Court that a Texas policy prohibiting his pastor from placing his hands on him during his execution violated his rights.John Ramirez, convicted of a 2004 murder at a Corpus Christi convenience store, asserted that a Texas policy prohibiting his pastor from placing his hands on him during his execution violated his First Amendment right to practice his religion without government interference.
Justice Clarence Thomas hit back against recent politicization of the Supreme Court by politicians and the media, adding that the high court has become the 'most dangerous branch' of government.
'The court was thought to be the least dangerous branch and we may have become the most dangerous,' Thomas said. 'And I think that's problematic.'
Thomas, the court's most senior member who was nominated by George H.W. Bush, gave a rare public address at Notre Dame University.
He said that justices do not rule on their 'personal preferences' and the country's leaders 'should not allow others to manipulate our institutions when we don't get the outcome that we like.'
Should I draft Michael Thomas in 2021 fantasy football leagues?
Is Michael Thomas worth drafting in your fantasy football league this year? We break down his fantasy outlook, from the injury concerns to the trade worries.This year, Thomas has multiple issues already working against him. First, he'll be sidelined again because of the ankle after electing to get surgery very late in the offseason. His decision was reportedly the result of a rift with the team. While Thomas hasn't been public about his frustration, aside from a cryptic tweet, he has liked a few tweets on Twitter that seem to indicate he was upset with the Saints medical staff.
Thomas, 73, said of judges: 'When we begin to venture into the legislative or executive branch lanes, those of us, particularly in the federal judiciary with lifetime appointments, are asking for trouble.'
'I think the media makes it sound as though you are just always going right to your personal preference. So if they think you are antiabortion or something personally, they think that's the way you always will come out,' the justice said, per the. 'They think you're for this or for that. They think you become like a politician.'
'That's a problem. You're going to jeopardize any faith in the legal institutions.'
Thomas, himself a Catholic, was asked at the Catholic university whether his faith had ever conflicted with his legal rulings.
Indonesian court rules president negligent over pollution
JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) — An Indonesian court ruled Thursday that President Joko Widodo and six other top officials have neglected to fulfill citizens’ rights to clean air and ordered them to improve the poor air quality in the capital. The Central Jakarta District Court panel voted 3-0 in favor of the group of 32 residents who filed a lawsuit in July 2019 against Widodo and his three Cabinet ministers of home affairs, health and environment, as well as governors of Jakarta, Banten and West Java, in seeking a healthy living environment in the city.
'There are some things that conflict very strongly with my personal opinion, my policy preferences, and those were very, very hard, particularly early on.'
'I don't do a lot of hand wringing in my opinions and tell people, "oh, I'm really sad." That's not the role of a judge. You do your job and you go cry alone.'
'I think we should be careful destroying our institutions because they don't give us what we want, when we want it,' Thomas said, pushing back against recent pushes to pack the court.
Democrats have pushed to expand the bench from nine seats to 13 after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and hasty confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to replace her in the weeks before the 2020 election.
The high court now has six justices appointed by a Republican president, half from President Trump, and three appointed under Democrats.
Last week the court drew liberal ire when it denied and emergency request and allowed a Texas abortion law to move forward, but said it was not ruling on the constitutionality of the matter.
Clarence Thomas warns against 'destroying our institutions,' defends the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Thursday warned against "destroying our institutions because they don't give us what we want, when we want it," arguing that the high court must remain independent from political polarization. In an address to more than 800 students at the University of Notre Dame, Thomas said that the country has "gotten to the point where we're really good at finding something that separates us," according to TheIn an address to more than 800 students at the University of Notre Dame, Thomas said that the country has "gotten to the point where we're really good at finding something that separates us," according to The Washington Post.
Thomas has called on the court to overturn Roe v. Wade, and was one of four justices who would have done so in a 1992 decision. Thomas said he believed abortion had played a role in the Anita Hill controversy that shrouded his confirmation in 1991.
Hill accused him of sexually assaulting her, charges Thomas denied.the 'craziness' of his confirmation process was politically driven. 'It was absolutely about abortion, a matter I had not thought deeply about at the time.'
Thursday's address was a rare public foray for the typically reticent justice. Thomas has gone years on the bench without asking a question during arguments before the court, but asked a question at every one of the remote telephone arguments of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Thomas is the latest justice to push back against politicizing the court, as liberal Democrats have made a push for Justice Stephen Breyer, 83, to retire so that President Biden can replace him while he still has a Democratic majority in the Senate.
Barrett earlier this week said the court 'is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks' and that the court is separated by judicial philosophies, not political parties.
Breyer last week warned against packing the court, arguing: 'What goes around comes around - and if the Democrats can do it, the Republicans can do it.'
‘The Law Is Applied the Same to All Citizens’: Republican N.C. Appeals Court Judges Use Concurring Opinions to Slam Defendant’s Racial Bias Claims .
Two North Carolina Court of Appeals judges — both of whom are white and both of whom are Republicans — on Tuesday slammed a Black defendant's use of a speech by the state's former chief justice in an attempt to reverse a cocaine conviction after a legally deficient police search and a subsequent guilty plea. The appeals court judges handed the defendant a win on legal grounds alone and not because he raised issues concerning alleged disparate treatment against Black people by the state’s courts.