Politics Milley and China — what the Senate really needs to know
Mark Milley Accused of Treason As Republicans Urge Joe Biden to Fire Him
Rep. Ronny Jackson has accused the chairman of the joint chiefs of "colluding with our enemies" as other GOP lawmakers call for General Milley to face a court-martial over phone calls to China.Calls for Milley's ouster stem from a Washington Post article on Tuesday about two phone calls the general reportedly made to General Li Zuocheng of China on October 30, 2020, and January 8, 2021.
When Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffand Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin testify before the at the end of the month, no doubt it will be standing room only in the Russell Senate Office Building. The revelations in the new book " , as reported in the press, are potential bombshells - if accurate and not taken out of context, distorted or overly dramatized.
As confirmed, the chairman had two conversations with his Chinese PLA military counterpart, General Li Zuocheng., Milley first called to reassure the general that the U.S. was not preparing for an attack on China no matter what intelligence China may have received. In the , Milley reportedly said that in the event an American attack was being contemplated, Milley would provide Beijing with advance warning. Secretary of Defense had also spoken with his Chinese opposite number shortly before Milley contacted Li.
Biden says he has ‘complete confidence’ in Milley amid book disclosures
The White House affirmed on Wednesday that it was standing by Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who according to a new book may have circumvented the military chain of command by reassuring a Chinese general he would warn Beijing if then-President Trump ordered a nuclear attack on the rival superpower. "The president has complete confidence in his leadership, his patriotism and his fidelity to our Constitution,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said during a press briefing. The president reiterated that message himself about an hour later as he met with business leaders at the White House. “I have great confidence in Gen.
While the Senate and/or House must investigate aspects of this story if only to clarify civil-military relations, namely that the chairman is not in the chain of command and has no command authority, there is a more crucial and relevant question both Milley and Austin must be asked to answer. The question is this: While the U.S. military is proficient at winning battles, why is the United StatesThe Afghan debacle is the latest in a long litany of failures dating back to the end of the Korean War.
Of course, this most important question will be the least likely one to be asked. Returning to the possible scoop of the year, Bob Woodward isable to winkle stories and reactions from presidents, members of Congress, Supreme Court justices and generals that virtually no other journalist has been able to duplicate.
Overnight Defense & National Security — Milley becomes lightning rod
It's Wednesday, welcome to Overnight Defense & National Security, your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Subscribe here: thehill.com/newsletter-signup.Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley has become a lightning rod for the Biden administration amid calls for him to resign over book excerpts revealing President Trump's final days in office.We'll break down what the issue is, who is angry, and what the Biden administration has to say.For The Hill, we're Ellen Mitchell and Rebecca Kheel. Write to us with tips: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. Let's get to it.
During the second Iraq War, Woodward invited me for a sandwich at his home in Georgetown to talk about the state of the conflict. Perhaps because I was not in government,to several sources of information and intelligence that would prove more accurate and credible than assertions of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. I had been one of the few commentators Saddam Hussein possessed those weapons.
Woodward's style was to be laidback and then present the interviewee with a piece of shocking or highly sensitive information to provoke a response. The effectiveness was reaffirmed years later when Woodward released several hours of interviews he had taped on the record with then-President Trump.
Almost apologetically, Woodward disclosed knowledge of an issue of which I personally knew only four or five other people were aware. Trying to mask my surprise, I innocently asked Woodward, "How did you learn that?"
Trump claims Biden won't fire Milley for fear of him 'spilling the dirty secrets' on Afghanistan
Former President Donald Trump said President Joe Biden has not taken action against Gen. Mark Milley because the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman may harbor "dirty secrets" about the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan. © Provided by Washington Examiner According to a forthcoming book, Milley promised to give his Chinese counterpart advance notice if Trump ordered a strike against China. The reporting ignited a maelstrom of calls from Republicans and military veterans for the top military official to resign or be fired.
His answer was eloquent, simple and all one needed to know. "Because I am a good reporter," he said. And he is.
Not having read the book, my sense is that Milley's conversations with his counterpart were not out of the ordinary; were coordinated across the national security community; and were approved or authorized by the defense secretary at the time. Since Milley does not speak Mandarin and Li does not speak English, the conversations would have been translated and transcribed and other people on both sides were on the call. Hence, an investigation should have no difficulty in getting to the facts with minimum ambiguity. If that is not the case, then the Woodward book may actually prove sensational.
In addition to asking Milley and Austin why the nation doeswhy were these calls necessitated in the first place? What led China to conclude that the president was considering an attack? Or was China gaming us? What lessons, if any, should be drawn from this incident?
If indeed the signals to China were perceived as "clear and present dangers," what role if any should Congress have in preventing a crisis from occurring or escalating? Given this unprecedented event, suppose a future president were considering a preemptive attack without full consultation within the executive or any with Congress: Would the 25th Amendment on presidential incapacitation or some other legal restraint apply?
"Peril," no matter its veracity, raises profound questions. But will any of them be why the nation loses all the wars it starts and what prevents a future president from starting a war on his own accord? The most likely answer is no.
Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is senior adviser at the Atlantic Council. His latest book, due out in December, is: How Massive Attacks of Disruption Became the Looming Danger to a Divided Nature and the World at Large."
Mark Milley Insists Calls to China Are 'Routine' Part of Job in First Public Comments .
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff came under fire amid reports that he'd twice called his Chinese counterpart with assurances that the U.S. would not attack or initiate a war with China. Speaking to the AP while traveling to Europe, Milley said that he made the calls "to reassure both allies and adversaries in this case in order to ensure strategic stability."Excerpts from the upcoming book Peril, authored by Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, contained descriptions of the calls Milley made. During the conversations, he told Li that he would provide him with a warning in the event of a U.S.