Politics Which US state reps have the best records on climate policy?
The budget bill could be the last hope for climate action from Congress
After decades of inaction from the United States on climate, President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats face a reckoning. © Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer speaks to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi outside the Capitol in June. Biden has big climate ambitions, vowing in April to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. The world is watching closely to see whether the US will deliver on that promise, as the President's climate envoy, John Kerry, prepares to meet with global leaders in November for the United Nations climate summit.
Even as US presidents have set the tone for the US’s action onpolicy, much of the action happens in the states. What are these politicians doing to help—or hinder—climate policy?
The average American isn’t paying much attention. Fewer than 20% of US citizens can name their state legislators, while one-third don’t know their governor,. But state senators and representatives are often the ones making decisions about land use, extractive industries, energy efficiency, and more with the most immediate impact on constituents’ quality of life.
Advocates fear US weighing climate vs. human rights on China
U.S. envoy John Kerry’s diplomatic quest to stave off the worst scenarios of global warming is meeting resistance from China, the world's biggest climate polluter, which is adamant that the United States ease confrontation over other matters if it wants Beijing to speed up its climate efforts. Rights advocates and Republican lawmakers say they see signs, including softer language and talk of heated internal debate among Biden administration officials, that China’s pressure is leading the United States to back off on criticism of China’s mass detentions, forced sterilization and other abuses of its predominantly Muslim Uyghur minority in the Xinjiang region.
While opinion pollsa majority of Americans believe that climate change is a serious issue and demand more government action, most people remain focused on the federal government.
That disconnect is the target of the political advocacy organization. “The American public is on board with climate action and clean energy,” says Caroline Spears, the executive director of Climate Cabinet Action. “But there is that disconnect between the way state legislators are voting and how the folks that they’re representing actually feel.”
To bring this to light, Climate Cabinet Action set out toover the last six years. It evaluated more than 3,300 state legislators across 25 states representing more than 50% of the US population on everything from renewable energy sources to the rules for pipeline protests. It then scored state politicians between 0 and 100 based on their climate action.
A new UN climate architecture is emerging focused on need for speed
We need to move with lightning speed to develop our capabilities to fight climate change.And he is not wrong. In the U.S., this summer was the hottest in 126 years of records, tied with the Dust Bowl summer of 1936. Nearly one in three Americans experienced a weather disaster this summer. Climate change is accelerating and every additional increment of climate pollution is causing irreversible harm.
Armed with their representatives voting records, the organization hopes that local advocacy groups, and voters concerned about climate change can use this information (now available in one place for the first time) to hold elected officials accountable at the ballot box. “What this tool does is show who within each state is driving policies that address climate change, and who is making those policies impossible,” says Spears.
How state politicians measure up on climate action
For anyone passingly familiar with today’s politics,confirmed that partisanship drives policy. Climate Cabinet Action found Democratic legislators were much much more likely to support climate measures, while Republicans were more likely to oppose them. The gap in scores between Democrats and Republicans was stark: the average Democratic score was 91, the average Republican was 27.
Climate change tops agenda as Iceland heads to elections
REYKJAVIK , Iceland (AP) — Climate change is top of the agenda when voters in Iceland head to the polls for general elections on Saturday, following an exceptionally warm summer and an election campaign defined by a wide-reaching debate on global warming. All nine parties running for seats at the North Atlantic island nation’s Parliament, or Althing, acknowledge global warming as a force of change in a sub-Arctic landscape. But politicians disagree on whether Iceland should take more urgent action to help curb climate change, or capitalize on it as an opportunity for economic growth — as the melting of glaciers and warmer weather offer immediate gains for Iceland’s key
At the extremes, 335 Republican lawmakers received a zero score, while 699 politicians received scores of 100, nearly all of them Democrats, save for two Republicans and three independents. Among the states in the study, Connecticut had the most climate-friendly legislators (85% of its legislators scored 75 or above), while West Virginia had the least (just 11% with scores at or above 75).
Spears pointed out that this tool evaluates legislators' decisions on the bills that have been put in front of them, but no two policy proposals are the same—the level of ambition in pro-climate policy can vary from state to state. Earning a perfect score on the index doesn't guarantee that an individual legislator is a climate champion. "[A person's] score is limited by the strength of the votes that make it to the table," says Spears. "Really no state is doing enough on this issue right now, but what we can do is contextualize and point out ways that states can learn from each other and improve."
Polarization leads to paralysis
The primary predictor of whether a pro-climate policy would get passed was which party controlled the government. Swift action on climate was more likely to happen when one party had control of the entire state government, as is the case in Virginia. There, lawmakers passed legislation establishing the state's first clean energy standard, created an electric vehicle program, and joined a regional initiative to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, all within the span of a year, after Democrats gained control of both parts of the legislature as well as the governorship in a 2019 election.
Two Climate Activists on Hunger Strike Will Now Refuse Liquids Until Politician Meets Them
"We can still turn this around," Swedish activist Greta Thunberg told a crowd in Berlin. "We demand change, and we are the change."Among those protesting strong action against climate change are two activists who are on a hunger strike until politicians agree to make public comments on climate policy. Henning Jeschke, 21, has been fasting since August 30. He is now joined by Lea Bonasera. The pair vowed to escalate their strike and begin refusing liquids, the AP reported.
By contrast, ambitious climate policy stalled in highly polarized state legislatures where power was split. In Minnesota's legislature—where most Democrats scored between 90-100 on the researchers' scale, and Republicans tended to score between 0 and 20—few climate bills passed. This year's legislative session saw two climate-focused bill amendments introduced, and fail along party lines in the state Senate (one to reduce carbon emissions from electric utilities, and another for environmental justice effort for disenfranchised communities). The one climate-related legislation thatwas an energy conservation bill, after three years of negotiation and debate.
On some occasions, bipartisan consensus brought about substantive change. In South Carolina, legislators' climate voting records were less riven by party loyalties. State politicians in the Palmetto State received an average score of 73 (few scored below 50). The state House temporarily banned offshore drilling in 2019 (the measure was later), and the state passed the , which opened up avenues for more widespread solar energy adoption, including community solar options.
But Spears argues it was a unique set of circumstances, rather than a partisan realignment, that allowed South Carolina politicians to agree on climate efforts. The offshore drilling ban waseager to protect the state's beaches and tourism industry. South Carolina, which lacks a local oil and gas industry, had fewer lobbyists influencing legislators as well.
Climate change is 'a freight train' making some places too dangerous to live in, experts say
Climate change raises unavoidable questions about where it makes sense to live in the United States.“It was insanely gorgeous and very affordable,” the social worker said.
Testing if transparency leads to accountability
The next test will be if knowledge about elected officials' voting records applies pressure at the ballot box. Voters concerned about climate change will now have clear-cut data of who votes for their priorities.
So far, many people concerned about climate change don't participate in local political work like campaigning and phone banking because they don't see how important state elected officials are to enacting climatesays Eliza Nemser, co-founder of , an advocacy group.
Nemser sees a tool like this as a way to help voters overcome the deeply entrenched partisanship in American politics by clarifying which politician's record—not campaign promises or stump speeches—is aligned with their own priorities. And American voters agree with one another about climate change more than their representatives. In recent, 63% of Americans were concerned about climate change, and more than half wanted government officials to do more to take action.
"It's possible to do all of this political work through a climate lens in lieu of a partisan lens," Nemser says. "In every general election that boils down to two candidates, you're going to have a choice between a more impressive climate champion, and someone who's not. There's often a very clear-cut candidate to advocate for, and you can be blind to party affiliation."
Climate activist Nakate seeks immediate action in Glasgow .
MILAN (AP) — Ugandan climate activist Vanessa Nakate said Wednesday that youth delegates meeting in Milan want to see immediate action from leaders at the U.N. climate talks in Glasgow, Scotland — not cheap, last-ditch grasps at supporting polluting fuels before getting down to business. Nakate is among 400 activists invited to Italy’s financial capital for a three-day Youth4Climate meeting that will draft a document for the 26th Climate Change Conference of the Parties, which opens on Oct. 31.