Politics January 6 investigators are talking about criminal contempt charges for ignored subpoenas. Here's what that means.
Bannon will be held in contempt. What does that mean, and what powers does Congress have?
The committee on the Capitol riot scheduled a Tuesday hearing to vote on holding Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Trump, in congressional contempt.The committee scheduled a Tuesday hearing to vote on holding Bannon in congressional contempt.
Members of the House select committee investigatinghave floated the idea of seeking a referral for criminal contempt as the next step for anyone who defies a subpoena from the panel.
But what does that mean?
is one of the three options the congressional panel can pursue to enforce its subpoenas, along with civil and inherent contempt. While lawmakers have said publicly that the committee is prepared to pursue criminal charges for , members are now making it clear they are ready to move quickly if they don't get the level of cooperation they are looking for.
Former Trump Aides Could Face Contempt Charges as Jan 6 Committee Deadline Passes
Committee Chair Bennie Thompson has previously said he would go to court to ensure former Trump officials' testimony.In a letter, a lawyer for Trump instructed the four men—former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Defense Department official Kash Patel, White House adviser Steve Bannon and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications Dan Scavino—to ignore subpoenas from the committee.
"I think we are completely of one mind that if people refuse to respond to questions, refuse to produce documents without justification, that we will hold them in criminal contempt and refer them to the Justice Department," Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat and committee member, told CNN on Tuesday.
Here's what criminal contempt is and how it compares with civil and inherent contempt:
To pursue criminal contempt charges, Congress would vote on criminal contempt, then make a referral to the executive branch -- headed by the president -- to try to get the person criminally prosecuted.
A jail sentence of a month or more is possible if a witness won't comply, under the law.
It's unclear how quickly this route would move, and how the Biden Justice Department would respond to a contempt referral from the Democrats in the House. The process would leave it up to Attorney General Merrick Garland to decide on involving the Justice Department in pursuing charges, putting the department in the middle of what many Republicans view as a partisan effort.
Democrats Are Ready to Send Steve Bannon to Jail
If Democrats want answers, they’ll need to enforce their subpoenas in the face of Trump allies’ defiance. They say that’s just what they plan to do.What has Carville itching to put former President Donald Trump’s ex-adviser behind bars? Defiance. The special congressional committee charged with investigating the January 6 insurrection gave former Trump White House officials Steve Bannon, Mark Meadows, Kash Patel, and Dan Scavino until the end of this week to comply with its subpoenas for testimony and records. Bannon has so far refused to cooperate.
But Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming,, told CNN that "the committee is completely in solidarity" on the decision to move quickly on pursuing criminal contempt charges for those who evade subpoena deadlines.
"People will have the opportunity to cooperate. They will have the opportunity to come in and work with us as they should," Cheney said. "If they fail to do so, then we'll enforce our subpoenas."
Unlike with criminal contempt, civil contempt would see Congress ask the judicial branch to enforce a congressional subpoena.
In other words, Congress would seek a federal court's civil judgment saying the person is legally obligated to comply with the subpoena.
During Donald Trump's presidency, the House tried this approach many times, but the court process moved so slowly it took months or even years for standoffs to resolve. Some, like a, still linger before a trial judge.
The third option the panel could use to enforce its subpoenas would be inherent contempt, which involves telling the House or Senate sergeant-at-arms to detain or imprison the person in contempt until he or she honors congressional demands.
This is anand hasn't happened in modern times.
Trump's use of executive privilege will test congressional power to enforce subpoenas .
Congress could try to convince the Justice Dept. to file criminal charges against those who ignore their demands.But under current law, lawmakers have few options. The committee's best hope may be a change of heart at the Justice Department on whether to prosecute those who refuse to cooperate.