•   
  •   
  •   

Politics White House's Supreme Court commission leaves liberals wanting

10:35  16 october  2021
10:35  16 october  2021 Source:   cnn.com

Why Latinos need Supreme Court reform

  Why Latinos need Supreme Court reform The recent decisions by the court’s conservative majority have demonstrated a trend of partisanship that does not serve Latinos. If there is to be true justice for Latinos, the country's largest minority group since 2003, the court needs to be reformed. The current conservative majority cannot be trusted to protect the civil and constitutional rights of Latinos.One problem with the court is that it is not reflective of the public. Although Democratic candidates have won the popular vote in seven of the last eight presidential elections, Republicans have placed six justices on the court in lifetime appointments.

As the Biden administration's commission on the Supreme Court continues to meet, roll out pages of draft documents and engage in deep philosophical conversations about the past and future of the court, one thing is clear: No one is satisfied.

a large white building: WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: A view of the Supreme Court, January 16, 2015 in Washington, DC. On Friday, the Supreme Court is meeting in closed conference to decide whether it will take up cases on the issues of same sex-marriage and marriage recognition from several states. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images) © Drew Angerer/Getty Images North America/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 16: A view of the Supreme Court, January 16, 2015 in Washington, DC. On Friday, the Supreme Court is meeting in closed conference to decide whether it will take up cases on the issues of same sex-marriage and marriage recognition from several states. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Conservatives, who currently enjoy a 6-3 majority on the court, think in large part it is unnecessary. Two conservatives, Jack Goldsmith and Caleb Nelson, quit the panel this week.

Two women sue Nebraska in order to be recognized as legal parents of sons they had as a couple

  Two women sue Nebraska in order to be recognized as legal parents of sons they had as a couple Two women are suing Nebraska after being denied parental rights over sons they had when they were a couple. Each woman gave birth to one son.Erin Porterfield and Kristen Williams started their family in 2002 using assisted reproductive technology. Each woman gave birth to one of their sons, now 16 and 18, and both are considered a “person that has put themselves in the position of a parent,” for both sons, but with no legal parental right.

And liberals, stung over three successive appointees by former President Donald Trump after Republicans blocked the confirmation of a Barack Obama nominee in 2016, believe reform is desperately needed but know the commission has no real teeth. In its final report, which will be submitted to Biden in mid-November, it is charged with appraising various reform proposals, but it won't issue firm, actionable recommendations.

Biden brought up the idea of creating the commission while campaigning for president, as he was being pressured by fellow Democrats to take a stand on court expansion to try to bring greater balance to the bench. While draft materials created by working groups released Thursday appeared to find consensus in favor of term limits, Biden on Friday evening flatly objected to the idea. (The commission appeared divided over adding more seats to the bench.)

Supreme Court signals willingness to allow Kentucky attorney general to defend state's abortion law

  Supreme Court signals willingness to allow Kentucky attorney general to defend state's abortion law The case comes to the high court as advocates on both sides of the abortion debate are questioning the court's commitment to its Roe v. Wade decision.Most of the justices Tuesday appeared to be leaning toward allowing Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron to defend a 2018 law banning dilation and evacuation abortions, a procedure commonly performed in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Asked at the White House whether he supported term limits for justices, who currently enjoy life tenure, the President said, "No."

The comment came after Democrats and court reform advocates criticized the report itself.

"This report is a disappointment to anyone who'd hoped for a hard-hitting effort to address the Supreme Court's deep troubles," Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said in a statement.

And Brian Fallon, the executive director of Demand Justice, a group dedicated to court reform -- and convincing Justice Stephen Breyer to retire in favor of a younger liberal nominee -- did not mince his words.

"This was not even close to being worth the wait," Fallon said in a statement.


Video: 'Words matter': Psaki on watchdog complaint against her (CNN)

"The paralysis-by-analysis reflected here is exactly what you would expect from a commission made up mostly of academics, including several diehard conservatives who are fully content with the status quo," he added. He claimed Biden's efforts were simply an effort to buy time while the President fights other legislative battles.

White House commission on Supreme Court releases draft materials that punt on major issues, but calls for more transparency

  White House commission on Supreme Court releases draft materials that punt on major issues, but calls for more transparency A commission set up by President Joe Biden to explore potential changes to the US Supreme Court released draft materials Thursday addressing a number of topics related to the court, punting on the big-ticket issues but calling for further transparency. © Robert Alexander/Getty Images WASHINGTON, D.C. - APRIL 19, 2018: The U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C., is the seat of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Judicial Branch of government.

On Friday, the commission members met to take part in a sprawling Zoom call and discuss draft materials. Members spoke about term limits and court expansion. Many seemed deeply engaged in the intellectual feast of the subject matter and delighted to dig deep into the third branch. Others were ready with critiques of the report, and recommendations for future drafts.

Progressives spoke out during Friday's session as well. Sherrilyn Ifill, the president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, was critical of one chapter of the report dealing with adding members to the court. She said a reader might be left with the impression that the working group did not think it was a good idea, even though the full commission hadn't weighed in.

Harvard University Professor Andrew Crespo said he hoped commission members would go back to the drawing board to make "substantial revisions."

But retired Judge Thomas B. Griffith, a George W. Bush appointee, said he thought the commission had to move very carefully.

He rejected any insinuation that the court is irretrievably broken and said, "the Supreme Court has played well its vital role."

Two conservatives quit

Two conservative commissioners quit the panel, the White House said Friday.

Goldsmith, a conservative who worked in the George W. Bush administration, and Nelson, a University of Virginia professor and former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, left the commission. The reasons for their departures were not immediately clear.

"These two commissioners have chosen to bring their involvement to a close. We respect their decision and very much appreciate the significant contributions that they made during the last 5 months in terms of preparing for these deliberations," said White House spokesman Andrew Bates.

In an email to CNN, Nelson wrote, "I can confirm that I resigned from the Commission, but I don't have any further comment (other than to say that it was an honor for me to be part of it)."

CNN has reached out to Goldsmith for comment.

This story was updated with additional reporting.

Texas' six-week abortion ban: Biden administration takes case back to Supreme Court .
Supreme Court justices are expected to move swiftly to address Texas' abortion law after an emergency appeal by the Biden administration.The appeal gives the high court a chance to temporarily block enforcement of the most restrictive abortion law in the country for the second time in as many months and represents the latest development in a whirlwind of litigation around the Texas ban.

usr: 0
This is interesting!