•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Supreme Court Commission Seems to Favor Term Limits for Justices but Not Court Packing

11:05  16 october  2021
11:05  16 october  2021 Source:   newsweek.com

Why Latinos need Supreme Court reform

  Why Latinos need Supreme Court reform The recent decisions by the court’s conservative majority have demonstrated a trend of partisanship that does not serve Latinos. If there is to be true justice for Latinos, the country's largest minority group since 2003, the court needs to be reformed. The current conservative majority cannot be trusted to protect the civil and constitutional rights of Latinos.One problem with the court is that it is not reflective of the public. Although Democratic candidates have won the popular vote in seven of the last eight presidential elections, Republicans have placed six justices on the court in lifetime appointments.

A commission tasked with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court seems to be in favor of implementing term limits for justices, but not court packing.

A commission tasked with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court seems to be in favor of imposing term limits on the justices. The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on Oct. 5, 2021 in Washington. © Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images A commission tasked with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court seems to be in favor of imposing term limits on the justices. The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on Oct. 5, 2021 in Washington.

Under the Constitution, Supreme Court justices have life tenure, but the commission described term limits as the proposal that appears to have "the most widespread and bipartisan support."

Three current justices, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Elena Kagan, "have noted the potential benefits of term limits," the commission said. It cited experts recommending an 18-year term limit for justices, although it was divided over whether Congress has the ability to create a term limit for justices by statute or if a constitutional amendment would be required.

Supreme Court justices can look each other in the eye again

  Supreme Court justices can look each other in the eye again Supreme Court justices are talking to each other again. © Bill Hennessy Supreme Court hears oral arguments on October 6, 2021. For the first time since March 2020, they held oral arguments in person this week. As the justices sat elbow-to-elbow on the elevated bench, shed of the telephonic constraints, their interactions were more pointed, their hypothetical scenarios more vivid. Justices exchanged glances, gestured in support and grimaced in disagreement. Oral argument sessions offer an obvious forum for dueling lawyers to present their cases.

Progressives called upon President Joe Biden to make reforms to the Supreme Court, including term limits and demanding he pack the court to potentially strike down challenges to voting rights, abortion rights and civil liberties. However, both the commission and Biden were against expanding the court and appointing more justices.

For more reporting from the Associated Press, see below.

The 36-member bipartisan commission, largely composed of academics, has been studying court reform and holding hearings, but it was not charged with making recommendations under the White House order that created it. As a result, much of the some 200 pages of materials the commission released Thursday night are history and context for reform proposals.

Supreme Court signals willingness to allow Kentucky attorney general to defend state's abortion law

  Supreme Court signals willingness to allow Kentucky attorney general to defend state's abortion law The case comes to the high court as advocates on both sides of the abortion debate are questioning the court's commitment to its Roe v. Wade decision.Most of the justices Tuesday appeared to be leaning toward allowing Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron to defend a 2018 law banning dilation and evacuation abortions, a procedure commonly performed in the second trimester of pregnancy.

A final report from the committee, which was meeting Friday, is expected in about a month and would go to the president then. Even when the commission does finish its work, however, any proposals for change would be met with serious political headwinds particularly with midterm elections looming and the chance that Democrats could lose control of Congress.

The current makeup of the Supreme Court, with a conservative majority, and key issues that are likely to be addressed by the court could shape the conversation in upcoming midterm elections. There are two growing pressure points: abortion and voting rights. The court's decision last month not to block a Texas abortion law from going into effect has left the state with the nation's most restrictive measures. Challenges to the law are ongoing and the court is already hearing a major abortion case in December that could reshape abortion rights nationwide. There also stand to be legal challenges to GOP efforts to restrict access to the ballot in several battleground states.

Joe Biden's Supreme Court Commission Report Could Outline Path to Court Packing

  Joe Biden's Supreme Court Commission Report Could Outline Path to Court Packing A group of Democratic lawmakers has introduced a bill that would expand the number of justices from nine to 13.The 36-person commission was established by the president amid criticism of the court from progressive Democrats and calls for new justices to be added due to the current 6-3 conservative majority.

The commission's review was a campaign promise Biden made amid pressure from activists and Democrats to react after the court's composition tilted sharply to the right during President Donald Trump's term.

Trump nominated three justices to the high court, giving it a 6–3 conservative majority. Democrats were especially frustrated that the Republican-led Senate kept former President Barack Obama from filling the seat left empty for months by the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016. Then, with Trump in office, the Senate pushed to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the court following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg weeks before the election.

The commission's report was cautious in addressing proposals for increasing the size of the court. It noted increasing the court's size could create a more diverse court that could handle more cases. But it also noted that the "risks of Court expansion are considerable," including to the court's legitimacy.

The commission said most state high courts have fewer seats than the Supreme Court but that by global standards the Supreme Court is small, with France, Spain and Britain among the countries with larger high courts.

Biden's commission on Supreme Court reforms examines adding more justices and setting term limits

  Biden's commission on Supreme Court reforms examines adding more justices and setting term limits The commissioners "are divided on whether court expansion would be wise," they wrote in their draft report.The commissioners wrote they are "divided" on whether a reform proposal that has sparked national debate, adding more justices to the nine-member bench, "would be wise.

"Other countries have found ways to make a larger court workable," the commission said, while noting that: "We should be cautious about assuming, however, that the U.S. Supreme Court could easily follow the lead of its international analogues."

Congress originally set the size of the court at six members. The size has been nine since 1869.

With the commission wrapping up its work, calls for action from Congress and the president could increase. During the presidential campaign Biden repeatedly sidestepped questions on expanding the court, and he hasn't said if he supports adding seats or making other changes including imposing term limits. White House press secretary Jen Psaki had said he would not weigh in about the size of the court until the commission finished its work.

A number of groups are closely watching what the committee produces. Brian Fallon, executive director of the progressive court group Demand Justice, called the draft report "not even close to being worth the wait," arguing that the "paralysis-by-analysis reflected here is exactly what you would expect from a commission made up mostly of academics." He said the commission's purpose was simply to "buy time for the Biden administration while it fights other legislative battles."

Supreme Court commission talks positively of shorter terms

  Supreme Court commission talks positively of shorter terms WASHINGTON (AP) — A commission tasked with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court released a first look Thursday night at its review, a draft report that is cautious in discussing proposals for expanding the court but also speaks approvingly of term limits for justices. The 36-member bipartisan commission, largely composed of academics, has been studying court reform and holding hearings, but it was not charged with making recommendations under the White House order that created it. As a result, much of the some 200 pages of materials the commission released are history and context for reform proposals.

But Alliance for Justice President Rakim Brooks said in a statement that the "report will help raise awareness that reform is not only possible, but necessary." And Gabe Roth of the group Fix the Court said in a statement that the "draft highlights the benefits of several popular Supreme Court reforms, including term limits, that would rebuild trust in an institution whose public esteem has recently cratered."

The panel is being led by Bob Bauer, who served as White House counsel for former President Barack Obama, and Cristina Rodriguez, a Yale Law School professor who served in the Office of Legal Counsel for Obama.

A commission tasked with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court seems to be in favor of imposing term limits on the justices. The Supreme Court is seen on the first day of the new term, in Washington, Monday, Oct. 4, 2021. J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo © J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo A commission tasked with studying potential changes to the Supreme Court seems to be in favor of imposing term limits on the justices. The Supreme Court is seen on the first day of the new term, in Washington, Monday, Oct. 4, 2021. J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo

Related Articles

  • SCOTUS Asked to Weigh in On Texas Abortion Law by DOJ After Appeals Court Defeat
  • Texas Anti-Abortion Law Upheld By Federal Court, Setting Up Potential SCOTUS Case
  • DOJ Explains to SCOTUS Why It's Fighting to Reinstate Death Sentence for Boston Bomber
  • Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's Supreme Court Case May Help Derek Chauvin
  • SCOTUS Seems Poised to Back Kentucky AG in Unblocking State's Abortion Law
  • New York Unveils Gun Violence Memorial as SCOTUS Prepares to Take Up Second Amendment Case

Start your unlimited Newsweek trial

Biden’s own Supreme Court commission undercuts court-packing ambitions .
Joe Biden sparked controversy during the 2020 presidential campaign when he refused to rule out “packing” the Supreme Court with additional justices to change its ideological composition. Caught between a progressive flank clamoring for the move and a deeply skeptical population, the president copped out by saying he would form a commission to study the idea. Now, eight months into Biden’s presidency, that commission has begun its work — and the results undercut the Left’s push to pack the court.

usr: 0
This is interesting!