•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Why one key Democrat doesn't want the federal government picking up the tab for Medicaid expansion

14:00  28 october  2021
14:00  28 october  2021 Source:   usatoday.com

Nationalizing Medicaid might restrain its soaring costs

  Nationalizing Medicaid might restrain its soaring costs Congressional Democrats are considering establishing a nationally administered Medicaid benefit to fund healthcare services for low-income people in states that opted not to expand the program under the Affordable Care Act. © Provided by Washington Examiner Though the proposal is most immediately appealing to the Left, by making benefits more standardized and administered at the national level, the reform might, in the long run, make it possible to rein in the program’s rapidly growing costs.

WASHINGTON – One Senate Democrat could block an effort by his colleagues to extend health care to millions of poor people in a dozen states.

For West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, his opposition is a matter of fairness.

Taxpayers in his state – and in the 37 other states that have expanded Medicaid eligibility under the 2010 Affordable Care Act – pick up 10% of the cost to cover low-income residents who are covered by the law.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

Why then, he argues, should the federal government now pay for 100% of the cost in the states that have refused the 90-10 split – as Democrats are proposing to do in the massive social spending bill pending in Congress.

We must protect and support our health care safety net

  We must protect and support our health care safety net Despite the proven success of Medicaid expansion, 12 states still refuse to expand their Medicaid programs.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that in 2020, the population of uninsured Americans declined by about 1.6 million as Medicaid and other public health programs helped offset declines in employer-sponsored insurance.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. © J. Scott Applewhite, AP Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.

“For states that held out, to be rewarded 100% is not fair,” Manchin told reporters Monday.

Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock, who represents one of the holdout states, counters that it’s not fair that Georgians’ federal tax dollars go toward Medicaid programs in other states when low-income Georgians are barred from the program.

“People of Georgia are paying taxes for health care that they cannot access while subsidizing health care in West Virginia and in other states,” he said Tuesday.

Seniors vs. the poor?: Democrats stare down stark tradeoffs in trying to fund health care expansion

The dispute over Medicaid is one of the final issues Democrats need to resolve before voting on the budget legislation. Because Democrats have no votes to spare in the Senate, Manchin could single-handedly scuttle the effort to expand Medicaid in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

The Biden Administration’s Medicaid-Expansion Scheme

  The Biden Administration’s Medicaid-Expansion Scheme Focusing on merely expanding ‘health coverage’ will do nothing to address the inadequate supply of health care in states such as North Carolina.Ever since the passage of the Affordable Care Act allowed for states to add able-bodied adults up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level to Medicaid programs, such organizations as the John Locke Foundation — where I work on health-care policy and other free-market initiatives — have repeatedly argued that expanding Medicaid is the wrong policy prescription for North Carolina.

That’s frustrating for policy advocates like Judy Solomon, an expert at the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, who argues extending Medicaid to all states is the single most important action Congress could take this year to advance equity in coverage and care.

“Small funding differences between states may not be ideal,” Solomon tweeted, “but the far larger inequity facing policymakers is whether to provide health coverage to millions of people with incomes below the poverty line who lack it because of the state where they live.”

Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., peers at a chart while Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., right, tells reporters they want Democrats' economic package to address the Medicaid coverage gap. © J. Scott Applewhite, AP Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., peers at a chart while Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., right, tells reporters they want Democrats' economic package to address the Medicaid coverage gap.

How we got here on Medicaid expansion

When lawmakers wrote the Affordable Care Act, often referred to as Obamacare, they attempted to both expand eligibility and even out the coverage disparities in Medicaid, which is jointly financed by states and the federal government.

To save child credit expansion, Democrats ready shorter renewal

  To save child credit expansion, Democrats ready shorter renewal Democrats are facing the possibility of a much shorter extension of an expanded child tax credit they’ve touted than many had hoped, which could ultimately stave off cuts to other aspects of the benefit they are fiercely defending. As negotiators work to trim the House’s budget reconciliation bill from a $3.5 trillion-plus package to somewhere closer to […] The post To save child credit expansion, Democrats ready shorter renewal appeared first on Roll Call.

Most states would have to provide Medicaid to adults without dependent children for the first time and increase income eligibility to 138% of federal poverty – now about $17,774 for a single person.

Before the law passed, the typical state Medicaid program covered working parents who made less than 63% of the poverty line and nonworking parents with incomes below 37% of the poverty line.

In Texas, for example, a parent in a family of three must make less than $3,734 a year to qualify. Adults without kids are not eligible at any income level.

But after the law's enactment, the Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that states did not have to go along with the changes.

"Some states may indeed decline to participate, either because they are unsure they will be able to afford their share of the new funding obligations, or because they are unwilling to commit the administrative resources necessary to support the expansion," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote. "Other states, however, may voluntarily sign up, finding the idea of expanding Medicaid coverage attractive, particularly given the level of federal funding the act offers at the offset."

The search for creative solutions to the thorniest issues in Biden's agenda as deadline pressure kicks into high gear

  The search for creative solutions to the thorniest issues in Biden's agenda as deadline pressure kicks into high gear There comes a point in every major legislative negotiation when a deal is in sight, but not close enough to be a sure thing. © Evan Vucci/AP President Joe Biden delivers remarks at NJ Transit Meadowlands Maintenance Complex to promote his "Build Back Better" agenda, Monday, Oct. 25, 2021, in Kearny, N.J. Significant portions are agreed to, even drafted into the text, but the outstanding issues are the most complex and in need of not just hardline negotiations, but often quite creative staff-driven legislative solutions. This is, for lack of a more eloquent term, the grind-it-out stage of the process.

The federal government paid 100% of the expansion cost for the first two years. The states’ share gradually increased to 10%, a much lower portion than the 22% to 50% that states pick up for other Medicaid enrollees.

States’ costs can also be offset by savings in other areas, particularly from reduced payments to hospitals for uncompensated care.

Still, a dozen states have held firm in their opposition to expansion, offering both ideological and fiscal arguments against it.

Democrats tried to counter the latter objections by including in the March pandemic relief package billions of dollars in new incentives for the holdout states. None has bit.

Thanks but no thanks: States are wary of President Joe Biden’s offer to help them expand Medicaid

That prompted lawmakers to propose in the pending spending package a federally funded program for non-expansion states. States that have already expanded would be penalized if they try to push their enrollees onto the federal program.

Medicaid expansion and people of color

If it passes, Medicaid enrollment would increase by 4 million at a cost of $323 billion between 2022 and 2031, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Most of those who would become newly eligible are in the South, are people of color and live in poverty, even though most are in a family with at least one worker, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health research organization.

Biden reconciliation framework includes Medicaid workaround, no Medicare dental or vision benefits

  Biden reconciliation framework includes Medicaid workaround, no Medicare dental or vision benefits The White House-backed social spending framework will feature a pared-down expansion of both Medicare and Medicaid coverage as President Biden seeks to secure enough support to advance the legislation.The framework, previewed for reporters Thursday morning ahead of Biden's meeting with House Democrats, would offer four years of subsidized private health insurance on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges for people with lower incomes living in states that did not expand Medicaid under the health care law.

Biden at CNN town hall: Medicare expansion, free community college likely out of social safety-net package

a man wearing a suit and tie standing in front of a building: Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., left, and Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., leave the chamber just after the Senate narrowly approved a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill, at the Capitol in Washington, March 6, 2021. © J. Scott Applewhite, AP Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., left, and Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., leave the chamber just after the Senate narrowly approved a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill, at the Capitol in Washington, March 6, 2021.

Warnock blamed GOP leaders in Georgia for blocking expansion, saying the uninsured are “being held hostage in a political game being played by cynical politicians at the state level.”

But he needs Manchin, his fellow Democrat, if he wants to get around that opposition.

Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., said he and Warnock are in constant communication with Manchin.

“I think that we are making progress,” Ossoff told reporters Tuesday. “The negotiations are ongoing. And we’re continuing to push forward.”

For his part, Manchin likewise said the talks are constructive and everyone is “trying to work and find that pathway forward.”

But, he added Tuesday, “right now, it’s just so tenuous. Everything is so tenuous.”

Here's where we are: Child care, climate change and $1.2 trillion worth of other initiatives face deadline

Maureen Groppe has covered Washington for nearly three decades and is now a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. Follow her on Twitter @mgroppe.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why one key Democrat doesn't want the federal government picking up the tab for Medicaid expansion

What's in and out of the Biden spending framework .
President Joe Biden has unveiled a framework for legislation he hoped would unite the Democratic Party — but which quickly became snarled in the same intraparty fights that have held Democrats back from passing a spending plan for months. © Provided by Washington Examiner Biden on Thursday touted the proposal as a “historic economic framework” behind which he was confident the centrist and progressive wings of his party would line up before he left for Europe later in the day.

usr: 7
This is interesting!