•   
  •   
  •   

Politics FTC strays from fact-based enforcement and rule of law

12:10  17 november  2021
12:10  17 november  2021 Source:   thehill.com

Jurors have been selected in trial over Ahmaud Arbery's killing. What we know about them.

  Jurors have been selected in trial over Ahmaud Arbery's killing. What we know about them. A nearly all-white jury will be seated Friday ahead of opening statements in Brunswick, Georgia. Here's what we know about them.The final panel selected in the trial over Ahmaud Arbery's death consists of 12 jurors and three alternates: 11 white women, three white men and one Black man – a demographic makeup that has drawn scrutiny in a case several public figures have called a "lynching.

In a society governed by the rule of law, it is elementary that unelected regulators must act in a manner that is predictable, rests on sound reasoning, and is grounded in the letter and spirit of the authorizing statute. Over the past year, the leadership of the Federal Trade Commission has not acted consistently with this principle.

a sign in front of a building: The Federal Trade Commission building in Washington, D.C., is seen on June 18. © Greg Nash The Federal Trade Commission building in Washington, D.C., is seen on June 18.

FTC leadership has reversed decades-old elements of antitrust policy with little opportunity for public comment, little effort to engage impacted constituencies, and little factual inquiry that have been the hallmarks of modern antitrust policymaking. In the words of minority commissioners Noah Phillips and Christine Wilson, these changes have been made "with the minimum notice required by law, virtually no public input, and no analysis or guidance." The result has been the imposition of a once-defunct form of antitrust enforcement that is heavy on rhetoric and ideology and light on fact and analysis. To protect markets in the digital 21st century, the FTC has reverted to the discredited policies of the analog 1970s.

Giant joystick, hyena health, moose on loose: News from around our 50 states

  Giant joystick, hyena health, moose on loose: News from around our 50 states Chicago schools taking day off for kids to get shots, Kentucky bourbon industry raising glass to tariffs’ end, and moreStart the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

The FTC's actions exhibit a consistent intent to discard an analytical framework that has rooted agency policymaking in a singular focus on factually demonstrated harm to competition as the touchstone for safeguarding a market economy. Given the loosely worded language of the antitrust laws, this framework provides assurance that regulators are acting in conformity with the statutory mandate to preserve the integrity of the competitive process.

In short order, FTC leadership has rescinded a 2015 policy statement that had reaffirmed the consumer welfare standard that has guided antitrust policymaking (and still governs federal antitrust case law) since the 1980s and withdrawn revised vertical merger guidelines that had been issued in 2020 with the Department of Justice and enjoyed broad support in the scholarly and practitioner communities. It would be thought that these abrupt policy shifts, which now diverge from DOJ Antitrust, would have been accompanied by a clear statement of revised policy. Nothing of the sort has been forthcoming. The result: carefully tailored agency guidelines refined over decades have been replaced by agency discretion as to what methods of competition may now be deemed after-the-fact as "unfair."

Police violence ‘enforced white supremacy’ during 1960s protests. Similar tactics are still used today.

  Police violence ‘enforced white supremacy’ during 1960s protests. Similar tactics are still used today. Police used some of the same tactics to stop 1960s protests and Black Lives Matter demonstrations: violence and arrests.A crowd of young Black men and women peacefully marched through downtown Jackson, Mississippi, demanding the same rights as white Americans. It was March 1961. They stood in solidarity with nine Black students from Tougaloo College arrested for attempting to check out books from the city’s public library for white residents.

The FTC's changes to merger review policy most clearly substitute regulatory fiat for statutory constraint.

In 1976, Congress enacted the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act to replace disruptive post-transaction litigation with a pre-transaction clearance process that provides regulators with the opportunity to challenge a transaction but without unduly delaying the bulk of transactions that pose no antitrust risk. The agency has now upset a legislative balance that has been honored for almost 50 years.

In February 2021, the FTC "temporarily" suspended (but has not restored) the practice of granting early termination of the 30-day waiting period in the case of transactions that raise no antitrust issues. In August 2021, the FTC announced that it would send "warning letters" to parties that consummate a transaction after the waiting period has expired but before the agency believes it has had an opportunity to investigate fully. While the agency has always retained the right to challenge consummated mergers, this policy of indefinite delay cannot be reconciled with the intent behind the HSR Act since it reinstates much of the uncertainty merging parties had faced prior to passage of the statute.

Judge Tanya Chutkan's Ruling Against Donald Trump: Full Transcript

  Judge Tanya Chutkan's Ruling Against Donald Trump: Full Transcript The U.S. district judge wrote in her ruling against Trump that "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President."Trump had sued Representative Bennie Thompson in his capacity as chair of the committee in order to prevent the committee from accessing documents in the National Archives.

In another apparent deviation from legislative design, the agency has reportedly been using its investigative powers in the merger review process to demand information that lacks a clear relationship to competition policy.

This unilateral rewrite of the HSR Act is not only legally contestable but casts doubt upon whether the agency remains committed to its statutory mandate to preserve the free play of competitive forces that drive a market economy.

That mandate requires that the agency act as an enforcer that vigorously intervenes on a case-specific basis to correct periodic threats to the competitive process. But the FTC appears to be moving toward a model in which it continuously regulates markets to achieve policy goals that extend substantially beyond preserving competition. (Tellingly, FTC leadership has removed language in its "Rules of Practice" that had defined the mission of the agency's Bureau of Competition as seeking "to ensure price competition.") This incipient conversion of antitrust policy into industrial and social policy threatens to convert free markets to managed markets in which firms must constantly seek regulatory clearance to avoid exposure to sanctions imposed by agency discretion untethered to any transparent policy framework.

Cannabis bust on Indigenous land highlights legal divide

  Cannabis bust on Indigenous land highlights legal divide SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A federal raid on a household marijuana garden on tribal land in northern New Mexico is sowing uncertainty and resentment about U.S. drug enforcement priorities on Native American reservations, as more states roll out legal marketplaces for recreational pot sales. In late September, Bureau of Indian Affairs officers confiscated nine cannabis plants from a home garden at Picuris Pueblo that was tended by Charles Farden, a local resident since childhood who is not Native American. The 54-year-old is enrolled in the state’s medical marijuana program to ease post-traumatic stress and anxiety.

This emergent shift is evident in the agency's announcement in October 2021 that any company that enters into a consent order to settle an agency investigation of an acquisition - or merely abandons an acquisition in response to an investigation - would be subject to a "prior approval" order. The consequence: The company could not undertake any acquisition in the relevant market, or possibly other markets, without FTC approval, including acquisitions that would not meet the reporting thresholds under the HSR Act. This constraint would last for at least 10 years. Contrary to the agency's characterization, this policy does not restore, but goes beyond, the past use of prior approval orders - so far, in fact, that it too departs from the statutory objective to facilitate, rather than suppress, M&A activity.

Only seven months ago, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, in which it unanimously admonished the FTC for having exceeded its statutory authority in seeking monetary relief in certain circumstances. Rather than taking account of the court's ruling, the FTC has challenged the judiciary to the equivalent of an interbranch duel. An administrative agency is free to adopt new policies to promote its statutory mission; however, it is not free to venture beyond the ambit set by elected legislators. In a democracy, that principle should never be ignored.

Jonathan M. Barnett is a professor at the University of Southern California, Gould School of Law. He recently published "Innovators, Firms, and Markets: The Organizational Logic of Intellectual Property" (Oxford University Press 2021), a political and economic history of U.S. innovation policy and technology markets.

Doggie dupe, toxic Tahoe cables, semiconductor plant: News from around our 50 states .
Rare first printing of US Constitution bound for Arkansas, highway’s neighborhood impact may get fix in Michigan, and moreStart the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

usr: 1
This is interesting!