•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Is Merrick Garland letting Trump’s people off the hook?

02:20  22 november  2021
02:20  22 november  2021 Source:   vox.com

Conn. Judge Finds Alex Jones Liable in Sandy Hook Defamation Suits

  Conn. Judge Finds Alex Jones Liable in Sandy Hook Defamation Suits Jurors will now decide how much Alex Jones has to pay in damagesA Connecticut judge on Monday found Alex Jones liable for damages in a defamation lawsuit filed by the parents of victims of the Sandy Hook mass school shooting, which the conspiracy theorist and radio host has repeatedly claimed was a government-orchestrated hoax.

Trump critics’ anxiety over Attorney General Merrick Garland is mounting.

Merrick Garland wearing a suit and tie: US Attorney General Merrick Garland exits his aircraft at Midway International Airport on July 22, 2021, in Chicago. © Samuel Corum/Getty Images US Attorney General Merrick Garland exits his aircraft at Midway International Airport on July 22, 2021, in Chicago.

The former federal judge has promised to restore the independence of the Justice Department after years of Trump-related controversies. But a narrative has formed that Garland is too set on moving forward, and not focused enough on bringing wrongdoers associated with the Trump administration to justice.

For instance, Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin switched from praising Garland for putting “justice” back in the Justice Department in May to declaring him the “wrong man for the job” and saying he should spend “more time with his family” in June. Many in the liberal legal community have made similar critiques, as have government ethics advocates.

10 Things in Politics: Dems wants DOJ to be more aggressive

  10 Things in Politics: Dems wants DOJ to be more aggressive And the FDA seems ready to OK a booster shot for all adults this week.Here's what we're talking about:

The criticisms of Garland focus mainly on three different sets of issues.

First, his DOJ has made certain arguments in civil lawsuits originally aimed at President Trump and his appointees. Under Garland, for instance, the department has continued defending Trump against a defamation lawsuit from E. Jean Carroll, and they’re trying to keep Bill Barr’s deliberations over the Mueller report secret. DOJ officials argue that they’re looking out for the prerogatives of the presidency and the executive branch and correctly applying the law, but critics say they’re unreflectively defending malfeasance.

Second, Garland has taken a relatively hands-off approach to reviewing potential misconduct from Trump’s Justice Department. Rather than initiating a broad review himself, he’s left individual issues of concern to the department’s inspector general to handle.

Garland misleading on FISA used against Hunter Biden’s Chinese business associate, GOP senators say

  Garland misleading on FISA used against Hunter Biden’s Chinese business associate, GOP senators say Senate Republicans believe Attorney General Merrick Garland is misleading them about whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was used against Hunter Biden’s convicted Chinese business associate Patrick Ho. © Provided by Washington Examiner Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin have repeatedly asked the Justice Department and intelligence community to hand over to Congress any and all intelligence records tied to Chinese government-connected foreign nationals who had business dealings with Hunter Biden, and they say the DOJ is giving them the run-around.

Finally, there’s a fear that the department won’t aggressively pursue merited criminal investigations against Trump or his associates. This is the toughest to assess, since so much of this decision-making happens behind the scenes. Still, last week’s indictment of Trump campaign adviser Tom Barrack, and the raids of Rudy Giuliani’s home and office in April, does seem to make clear there’s no generalized amnesty for Trump-affiliated lawbreakers.

The common theme is a worry among Garland’s critics that the wrongs of the Trump administration are being unaddressed, out of a desire to move on. There may be some truth to that, but the fuller story is more complicated and nuanced.

The civil lawsuits

Because DOJ’s decision-making on criminal cases is opaque, much of the tea leaf reading about Garland’s priorities has focused on arguments DOJ has made in public — in civil lawsuits. In recent months, the department has:

Garland urges Abbott to undo executive order aimed at curbing migration

  Garland urges Abbott to undo executive order aimed at curbing migration The U.S. “intends to pursue all appropriate legal remedies" if the Texas order is not reversed.The attorney general called Abbott’s order “both dangerous and unlawful” in a Thursday letter to the governor. “The Order violates federal law in numerous respects, and Texas cannot lawfully enforce the Executive Order against any federal official or private parties working with the United States,” Garland wrote.

  • Continued defending Trump against a defamation lawsuit from E. Jean Carroll (while president, Trump had disparaged her and denied her allegation that he raped her years earlier)
  • Tried to keep Bill Barr’s deliberations over the Mueller report and government documents about Trump’s DC hotel lease secret
  • Argued that a lawsuit against Trump and Barr over the clearing of Lafayette Square during last summer’s protests should be tossed

As appalling as these arguments may seem to liberals, they’re actually quite normal as far as the Justice Department goes. That is: They’re being made in an effort to defend the powers and prerogatives of the president, the Justice Department, or the executive branch as institutions. (Keep in mind these are arguments the government has chosen to make in civil lawsuits before judges — in the end, each judge will make a call on whether those arguments are convincing.)

For instance, their intervention in Carroll’s defamation suit “concerns the purely legal question of whether a president may be subject to a private lawsuit for comments he made during an interview while in office,” George Washington University law professor Randall Eliason writes.

Liberals may end up liking much of Merrick Garland's Justice Department after all

  Liberals may end up liking much of Merrick Garland's Justice Department after all Attorney General Merrick Garland's effort to restore public trust in the Justice Department quietly may be turning into one progressive Democrats like, after months of handwringing among some critics on the left that he would block accountability for Trump-era abuses. © Mandel Ngan/AP In this April 26, 2021 photo, Attorney General Merrick Garland speaks at the Department of Justice in Washington. In a court filing Tuesday, the Justice Department rejected pro-Trump Republican Rep. Mo Brooks's request to be shielded from a lawsuit related to his incendiary comments before the January 6 Capitol attack.


Video: Attorney General Merrick Garland reverses Trump-era immigration policy (NBC News)

But Garland’s critics have been arguing that much of what happened during the Trump years was not normal. They also make the point that just because the Justice Department can and has traditionally made maximalist arguments for the executive branch, that doesn’t mean they have to do so, or should do so.

There are also signs, though, that the department is assessing each issue on its merits, rather than blindly defending everything the executive branch does. For instance, this week the department declined to argue that Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) should be protected from a civil lawsuit about his speech to Trump supporters on January 6 — those comments were not part of his official duties as a member of Congress, they said.

Justice officials also made clear this week that they would allow former Trump officials to give unrestricted testimony to the congressional committee investigating January 6. (In the past, they’ve often tried to set limits on such testimony, to protect executive branch deliberations.)

Potential misconduct in Trump’s Justice Department

Garland has also faced criticism over how he’s handled reviewing his predecessors’ actions at the Justice Department. During Bill Barr’s controversial attorney general tenure, he and his subordinates were often accused of acting to help Trump’s friends and target Trump’s enemies.

Justice Dept. to prioritize prosecuting violence on flights

  Justice Dept. to prioritize prosecuting violence on flights WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Merrick Garland directed U.S. attorneys across the country to swiftly prioritize prosecution of federal crimes that happen on commercial flights as federal officials face a historic number of investigations into passenger behavior. Garland's memo, issued Wednesday, emphasizes that the Justice Department is committed to aggressively prosecuting violent passengers who assault crew members or endanger the safety of other passengers. Federal law prohibits interfering with a flight crew, including assaulting, intimidating or threatening crew members.

But Garland has opted not to launch a broad review of Justice Department officials’ actions during the Trump presidency. Garland has also, as far as we know, shown no inclination to reexamine criminal investigations that were closed or declined during the Trump administration. (Though if the Justice Department were doing that, they’d hardly broadcast it.)

Instead, he’s opted to let Inspector General Michael Horowitz take the lead in reviewing misconduct. Before Garland was sworn in, Horowitz had already launched investigations of Trump Justice officials’ actions regarding the 2020 election. More recently, Garland tasked Horowitz with investigating whether the department had improperly obtained data from reporters or members of Congress.

Horowitz was confirmed to the Justice Department’s IG post (an internal watchdog role) in 2012, under the Obama administration. But he was a nonpartisan figure who had deep roots in the department and had worked under presidents of both parties. And during the Trump years, he came to some rather harsh findings about the conduct of top FBI officials like James Comey and Andrew McCabe.

The case-by-case nature of Horowitz’s reviews, though, means those hoping for a sweeping reckoning with the conduct of Trump’s Justice Department leaders will be disappointed. As the Washington Post’s David Montgomery recently wrote in a deeply reported profile, “Merrick Garland will not deliver your catharsis.”

Criminal investigations

But the biggest question about how Garland’s Justice Department handles Trumpworld is what will happen with criminal investigations.

Republicans point to number of times Garland has politicized the Justice Department

  Republicans point to number of times Garland has politicized the Justice Department Attorney General Merrick Garland is under fire from Republican lawmakers for allegedly politicizing the Justice Department. © Provided by Washington Examiner Rep. Jim Jordan spoke to the Washington Examiner about the Garland school boards memo controversy, saying: “My gut tells me that the main focus was this was politics. And that's what the Justice Department has been under Garland.” He added: “Joe Biden criticizes the Georgia election law, a few months later they sue Georgia. Joe Biden criticizes the Texas pro-life law. Eight days later, they sure Texas.

Here, there isn’t, and shouldn’t be, any one-size-fits-all answer — investigatory and charging decisions should be made based on the law and the facts in particular cases. It’s also just tough to say what is even going on here, because we don’t know what is and isn’t being criminally investigated (unless it leaks). Furthermore, it would arguably be inappropriate for Garland to try to micromanage such cases — Barr got a heap of criticism when he tried to do so.

Having said that, it’s certainly possible that Garland could appoint a politically cautious team more likely to shy away from bringing controversial cases, even if the facts merit them. But is that happening?

The main known federal investigation looming over Trumpworld has been the one into Rudy Giuliani’s foreign activities. This probe was launched back in 2019, but the searches of Giuliani’s home and office by federal agents this April make clear it’s very much alive.

Then, last week, another long-dormant investigation — one into Trump ally and former campaign adviser Tom Barrack — burst into public view when Barrack was charged with acting as an agent of the United Arab Emirates.

Notably, there were reports that both the Giuliani and Barrack investigations faced some resistance from Trump Justice Department appointees last year. But now both investigations are moving forward under Garland. And as Marcy Wheeler writes, this is an encouraging sign that Garland’s DOJ will not shy away from controversial cases due to fear of political backlash.

So there are some active investigations we do know about. The tricky thing, though, is that we don’t know what we don’t know. Officials could have opted against investigating some matters based on reasonable factual or legal judgments. There could be politics-driven hesitation. Or there could be other investigations that haven’t yet leaked out into public view.

Biden U.S. Attorney Picks Include First Black Lawyers to Hold Roles in 4 Districts

  Biden U.S. Attorney Picks Include First Black Lawyers to Hold Roles in 4 Districts The eight new nominees come amid a time when the Justice Department is continuing to round out its Leadership team under Attorney General Merrick Garland.Once the nominees are confirmed by the Senate, they would run offices in the District of Columbia, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York and Washington state. Some will even be the first female attorneys to lead their districts, according to the Biden Administration.

For instance, there is no known federal investigation that is currently believed to place Donald Trump at serious risk of criminal charges. There’s been much speculation that he could be investigated for either his business practices or his attempt to overturn the 2020 election result. New York state prosecutors have filed charges regarding the former, and Fulton County prosecutors in Georgia are investigating the latter, but there’s been no sign yet that the feds are investigating either.

There are also various investigations that Barr’s Justice Department closed or affirmatively declined to open in the first place — into Trump for obstruction of justice, into Trump regarding hush money payments, or into Cabinet officials like Elaine Chao or Wilbur Ross. So far, there has been no sign that Garland’s DOJ is revisiting those decisions (though if they were, they wouldn’t necessarily rush to tell the media). Arguably, it would be inappropriate to reopen those decisions without a very good reason.

Overall, the unsatisfying answer is that we don’t know what will happen here. Garland may have declared that he is “not going to look backward.” But his prosecutors could well feel differently.

Biden U.S. Attorney Picks Include First Black Lawyers to Hold Roles in 4 Districts .
The eight new nominees come amid a time when the Justice Department is continuing to round out its Leadership team under Attorney General Merrick Garland.Once the nominees are confirmed by the Senate, they would run offices in the District of Columbia, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York and Washington state. Some will even be the first female attorneys to lead their districts, according to the Biden Administration.

usr: 1
This is interesting!