•   
  •   
  •   

Politics Immigration provision in Democrats' reconciliation bill makes no sense

18:30  25 november  2021
18:30  25 november  2021 Source:   thehill.com

NDAA, debt ceiling, government funding: Here's what's left for Congress to address in 2021

  NDAA, debt ceiling, government funding: Here's what's left for Congress to address in 2021 Both chambers of Congress will be working to try to avoid a government shut and default, as well approve a must-pass national security package.Both chambers of Congress will be working in overdrive to try to avoid a government shut and default, both of which would be catastrophic for the economy, which has already been grappling with the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The House Democrats passed the Build Back Better Act, H.R. 5376, on Nov. 19, without a single Republican vote. Title VI of the bill would grant parole status to more than 7 million undocumented immigrants who have resided in the United States continuously for more than 10 years.

Speaker Pelosi © Associated Press Speaker Pelosi

This is not a good idea.

First, it makes no sense. Congress would be establishing a parole program that would make a blanket grant of parole to undocumented aliens solely on the basis of the fact they have resided in the United States illegally for more than a decade. And it would be doing this despite the fact that the statutory provision which authorizes parole explicitly prohibits such blanket grants.

Explainer: What is the U.S. Senate's 'budget reconciliation' process?

  Explainer: What is the U.S. Senate's 'budget reconciliation' process? Explainer: What is the U.S. Senate's 'budget reconciliation' process?WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Now that the U.S. House of Representatives has passed President Joe Biden's ambitious $1.75 trillion social policy and climate bill, the action moves to the Senate, where its fate is unclear.

Second, Congress knows - or should know - that the current administration wouldn't be able to handle such a large increase in immigration benefit applications.

Third, it potentially puts the immigrants themselves in jeopardy.

Restrictions on parole authority

Section1182(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides the DHS Secretary with broad, discretionary authority to allow aliens who may not otherwise be admissible to the country under our immigration laws to enter and remain in the United States temporarily: parole.

This authority has been delegated to USCIS, ICE, and CBP. But, with some exceptions, the applications for the proposed program would have to be processed by USCIS.

The pertinent part of the parole authority provision reads as follows:

84 mayors call for immigration to be included in reconciliation

  84 mayors call for immigration to be included in reconciliation A group of mayors from cities in 28 states called on President Biden, Vice President Harris and Democratic leaders in Congress to include immigration provisions in a budget package to be passed through reconciliation.The 84 mayors represent cities throughout the country, including the nation's four largest in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston.Mayors from smaller cities such as Boise, Idaho, and Grand Rapids, Mich., also signed the letter.

"The Attorney General [or DHS Secretary] may .... parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as he may prescribe only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit any alien applying for admission to the United States .... (Emphasis added.)."

USCIS grants parole on a case-by-case basis. Moreover, it requires applicants to establish that there are urgent humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons for them to be in the United States as required by the parole provision.

DHS bureaus generally have construed "humanitarian" parole as relating to urgent medical, family, and related needs; and "significant public benefit" usually has been limited to the admission of persons of interest to law enforcement.

Some administrations have made blanket grants, but those grants have been based on specific circumstances, such as refugee related programs and family reunification programs. And they have been very controversial.

Can Biden find the right balance on immigration?

  Can Biden find the right balance on immigration? WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats wielded demands to fix the nation’s broken immigration system as a cudgel against Republicans in the 2020 campaign. Elect us, went the argument, and we’ll stop the cruel treatment of migrants at the border, and put in place lasting and humane policies that work. A year into Joe Biden’s presidency, though, action on the issue has been hard to find and there is growing consternation privately among some in the party that the Biden administration can’t find the right balance on immigration. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File) © Provided by Associated Press FILE - Democrat Beto O'Rourke waits to speak during a campaign stop Nov.

Former President Donald Trump tried to end this practice. In Executive Order 13767, he directed his DHS Secretary to "take appropriate action to ensure that parole authority ... is exercised only on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the plain language of the statute."

Congress is not bound by executive orders, but Trump was right that the plain language of the parole provision requires parole determinations to be made on a case-by-case basis.

The parole program

The bill's parole program provisions can be found on pages H6456 and H6457 of the Congressional Record for Nov. 18; they state that the DHS Secretary "shall" make a blanket grant of parole status to undocumented aliens who have resided continuously in the United States since before Jan. 1, 2011.

Aliens who meet that requirement and want to participate in the program would have to pay an administrative fee in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of processing their applications, and complete security and law enforcement background checks.

Applicants are ineligible, however, if they are inadmissible under paragraphs (2), (3), (6)(E), (8), (10)(A), (10)(C), or (10)(D) in section 1182(a) of the INA.

What’s in the new infrastructure bill — and why it’s a big deal

  What’s in the new infrastructure bill — and why it’s a big deal The Senate-approved bill would genuinely impact many people’s lives.The bill, passed in a bipartisan 69-30 vote on Tuesday, includes a lot of measures that will help current and future generations: a major expansion of high-speed internet; spending for roads, bridges, and public transit; and funding for clean drinking water. It includes new measures to combat climate change, like money for electric vehicles and modernizing the power grid.

For the duration of the parole period, participants would be provided with employment and travel authorization and be deemed eligible for a driver's license. Extensions would be available from the date the initial parole period expires until Sept. 30, 2031.

Implementation isn't feasible

USCIS would have to processes most of the 7 million parole applications, and it hasn't been able to keep up with the cases it is already getting: 40 Members of Congress recently wrote a letter to USCIS Director Ur Jaddou expressing concern about the affirmative asylum backlog, which as of April 2021, had reached a record high - nearly 400,000 applications.

According to an August 2021 report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), although applications for immigration benefits such as humanitarian relief and naturalization remained between about 8 and 10 million a year from fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2019, the USCIS backlog grew approximately 85 percent during that period. It increased from 3.2 million cases in fiscal 2015 to 5.8 million in fiscal 2020.

USCIS officials told GAO that competing priorities were contributing to the agencies increasing caseload. For instance, an increase in the number of asylum seekers arriving at the southwest border was increasing the number of credible fear screenings USCIS has to perform, and prioritizing credible fear screenings was delaying USCIS's efforts to process applications for asylum and for Withholding of Removal.

Key senators to watch on Democrats' social spending bill

  Key senators to watch on Democrats' social spending bill All eyes will be on the Senate following the Thanksgiving break, as Democrats in the chamber seek to pass a massive social spending and climate package that is a key component of President Biden's economic agenda.The House passed a version of the package shortly before Thanksgiving and the Senate is expected to take up the legislation after the holiday break. Lawmakers are hoping to get a bill to Biden's desk by the end of the year. But SenateThe House passed a version of the package shortly before Thanksgiving and the Senate is expected to take up the legislation after the holiday break. Lawmakers are hoping to get a bill to Biden's desk by the end of the year.

USCIS has had to divert staff resources from other parts of the agency to assist in processing these screenings.

This would become a much greater problem if 7 million parole applications are added to USCIS's case load. It is unrealistic to expect USCIS to be able to process that many additional applications.

Frankly, I don't believe that the Democrats are serious about trying to establish this parole program. It's almost certain to be challenged in court - and the fact that it directly contradicts the plain language of the parole provision it is based on doesn't bode well.

Even if it holds up in court, the immigrants who participate have no guarantee that the whole thing won't be upended if Republicans take control of Congress. A Republican-controlled House won't fund the implementation of the program, and a strong enough Republican majority would be able to overcome a Biden veto and rescind the provision.

Worse yet, if the program is terminated, the next Republican president will be able to gather up and deport the aliens who participated in it. Participation establishes unlawful presence, which is sufficient for deportability purposes - and DHS will have the names, addresses, and fingerprints of all of the participants.

Nolan Rappaport was detailed to the House Judiciary Committee as an executive branch immigration law expert for three years. He subsequently served as an immigration counsel for the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims for four years. Prior to working on the Judiciary Committee, he wrote decisions for the Board of Immigration Appeals for 20 years. Follow his blog at https://nolanrappaport.blogspot.com.

What's in the House-passed Build Back Better bill? Paid leave, universal pre-K and more .
The roughly $2 trillion package includes an assortment of progressive priorities, such as prekindergarten expansion and climate change initiatives.The roughly $2 trillion package – passed with only Democratic support – includes an assortment of progressive priorities, such as prekindergarten expansion, subsidized child care, health care subsidies and major climate change initiatives.

usr: 2
This is interesting!