Politics Biden 'Concerned' Over Abortion Ruling, But Will It Motivate Him To Expand Supreme Court?
Dobbs abortion case threatens Democrats' house of cards
There is one thing that every serious legal scholar, regardless of his or her opinion on abortion, can agree on: The 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade is a goofy ad hoc abomination of a legal decision. Don't take our word for it — take the word of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who called it a "heavy-handed judicial intervention" and "difficult to justify."Roe removed the issue of abortion from the democratic process. It also created a new right to kill one's baby in utero. In deciding Roe, Justice Harry Blackmun and the Roe court set out to create a new version of women's equality that the original suffragists would have soundly rejected.
The administration of Democratic Presidenthas expressed concern at a recent decision allowing Texas' (S.B. 8) to stand. However, it's unclear whether that decision may influence him to try and expand the number of justices on the court.
"The President is very concerned by the Supreme Court's decision allowing S.B. 8 to remain in effect," White House Press Secretarytold reporters during a Friday press briefing.
Abortion debate epicenter: Mississippi clinic stays open
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — As the U.S. Supreme Court hears a Mississippi case that could topple abortion rights nationwide, the state’s only abortion clinic is busier than ever: Volunteers continue to escort patients into the bright pink building while protesters outside beseech women not to end their pregnancies. In recent years, Jackson Women's Health Organization saw patients two or three days a week. It recently doubled its hours to treat women from Texas, where a law took effect in early September banning most abortions at about six weeks, and from Louisiana, where clinics are filling with Texas patients.
Psaki added, "The President is deeply committed to the constitutional right recognizing Roe v. Wade," the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide. "The ruling this morning is a reminder of how much these rights are at risk."
The court. Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
The Texas lawany person who "aids or abets" an abortion. These aiders and abetters could include any healthcare workers, drivers or funders who'd assist a pregnant person with getting an abortion. Any private citizen who successfully sues such an assistant is then from the person being sued.
Abortion advocates worry that the court's 6-to-3 conservative majority will continue to erode reproductive rights and endanger Roe v. Wade in future rulings.
Abortion: Challenge to Mississippi law could provide answer to Roe v. Wade's fate
At stake in the case is a Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy as well as the Supreme Court's commitment to Roe v. Wade.In the most closely watched dispute the high court has tackled in years, the justices will consider not only whether to uphold the Mississippi law but whether to overturn its 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade that established a constitutional right to abortion.
But Biden hasn't yet indicated whether the Friday ruling will push him to expand the court.
Progressive activists and politicians have long. However, Biden has previously opposed the idea. A recently released report from a commission he formed to examine the issue didn't make a suggestion either for or against the idea.
The issue became especially prominent followingof liberal Supreme Court Justice . Immediately after her death, then-President pledged to quickly nominate a replacement, .
Her nomination and rushed confirmation contradicted the reasoning behind then-Senate Majority Leader's 2016 refusal to let then-Democratic President seat his Supreme Court nominee . McConnell refused to do so because it was an election year, he said, and felt that voters should have a say.
Midterm elections loom over Supreme Court abortion fight
Both sides of the abortion debate are gearing up for oral arguments in a Mississippi abortion case before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, marking one of the greatest threats to the legalization of the procedure in the U.S. While a decision in the high-profile case is not expected until June of next year, the potential decision's proximity to November's midterm elections has galvanized political figures and groups on both sides of the debate.On Tuesday, former Vice President Mike Pence, who has been viewed as a potential 2024 presidential hopeful, delivered remarks on the case with the Susan B.
During the 2020 presidential campaign, Biden refused to say whether or not he supported expanding the court. He promised to reveal his position before Election Day. However, he eventually settled on forming a commission to study the issue.
On April 9, Biden signed an executive order creating the commission. The commission approved its final report this last Tuesday. However, its report didn't make a concrete recommendation on the issue.
The report said, "a significant reform such as Court expansion may be needed to calm the controversy surrounding the Court" and suggested consequences if a futuretakes future actions to install justices of a particular politcal bent. However, the report also said that manipulating the court's composition could come off as "a worrying sign of democratic backsliding" and increase public perception of the court's politicization.
Biden has previously opposed court-packing. In July 2019, during the Democratic presidential primaries, Biden said he opposed expanding the nation's highest court, and he also opposed it during a primary debate in October 2019. In a 2005 speech discussing former President Franklin D. Roosevelt's attempt to expand the court to 15 justices in 1937, Biden called the move a "power grab."
5 takeaways from the Supreme Court showdown over abortion
Many players during Wednesday's arguments appeared concerned that this case could exacerbate the public‘s perception that the court is politically motivated. Liberal justices said the court ignoring abortion precedent based almost entirely on a change in its ideological makeup would severely damage its standing in American society, while conservative justices said the best way for the court to maintain its credibility with Americans of varying views on abortion was to return the issue to the states.
The number of justices on the court changed six times before 1869 when it settled on its current total of nine. But changing the number again would require a majority of votes in the House and 60 Senate votes to overcome the Senate filibuster.
The latter is unlikely to happen because the current Senate is split between 50 Democratic caucus members and 50. Senate are unlikely to persuade 10 Republican Senators to support diluting the court's conservative power.
Democrats could force the issue by abolishing the filibuster, but that would require all 50 Senate Democratic caucus members to vote in favor of abolishing it, with Democratic Vice Presidentcasting a deciding majority vote.
However, considering that Democratic moderates, such as Arizona Senatorand West Virginia Senator , have opposed voting in line with other Democratic legislation, securing their votes on this issue might not prove easy.
What Is Biden’s Plan if the Supreme Court Kills Roe v. Wade? He’s Not Saying .
Despite the potential for constitutional chaos—and the federal government’s assumed role in detangling it—the White House has kept almost entirely mum about President Joe Biden’s plans to protect abortion access if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, as nearly all abortion advocates and legal scholars expect it to do next spring. Beyond a public policy statement backing the passage of the Women’s Health Protection Act, the White House has not indicated what the administration’s plans are for a post-Dobbs v.