Politics Supreme Court to revisit part of Native American land decision in Oklahoma

The US Supreme Court has ruled about half of Oklahoma belongs to Native Americans , in a landmark case that also quashed a child rape conviction. The justices decided 5-4 that an eastern chunk of the state, including its second-biggest city, Tulsa, should be recognised as part of a Thursday's decision in McGirt v Oklahoma is seen as one of the most far-reaching cases for Native Americans before the highest US court in decades. The ruling means some tribe members found guilty in state courts for offences committed on the land at issue can now challenge their convictions. www.bbc.com

The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider limiting a recent decision about Indian land in Oklahoma that the state says has produced chaos in its courts . The justices said they would take up a case to clarify whether the state can prosecute non-Indians for crimes committed against Native As a result of that ruling, Oklahoma lost the authority to prosecute American Indians for crimes committed in parts of Oklahoma that include most of Tulsa, the state's second-largest city. State courts have since extended the decision to apply to crimes committed by or against Native Americans on tribal www.cnbc.com

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that much of Eastern Oklahoma is tribal lands in a landmark decision that overturned a tribe member’s rape conviction because, they determined, it technically occurred outside the reach of state criminal law. The justices ruled five to four in favour of He does not dispute his guilt, but had argued the court did not have jurisdiction to convict him, as the crime occurred on Muscogee (Creek) tribal lands . McGirt is a member of the Seminole tribe. Federal law states when a crime is committed on a Native American reservation they must be tried in federal www.aljazeera.com

Much of Native American land in Oklahoma was originally lost through a process called an allotment — a federal act based on the misguided notion that Native American people would be better off if their lands were privatized and held by individuals rather than communally. The Supreme Court decision does not mean that land currently held by non-tribal, non- Native owners in the boundaries of the Muscogee Creek Reservation will be taken away from them and transferred to the tribes. But it does raise the question of how laws and regulations, such as environmental statutes, will now be applied

BREAKING: McGirt v. Oklahoma - Supreme Court majority rules that for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, the majority of eastern Oklahoma (including Tulsa) remains land reserved to the Creek Nation since the late 1800s. “The State, the Muscogee (Creek), Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole Nations have made substantial progress toward an agreement to present to Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice addressing and resolving any significant jurisdictional issues raised by the U.S. Supreme Court ’s decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma .

Land loss for Native Americans is framed as a historic phenomenon, but for tribes in Oklahoma , it never stopped. Through allotment, the Cherokee Nation lost 74 percent of our treaty territory. Today, we still lose land every time an acre is sold to a non-Indian, inherited by someone less than half blood quantum, or even when If the Supreme Court upholds the 10th Circuit’s decision , the ruling would result in the largest restoration of tribal jurisdiction over Native land in U.S. history. The undisputed fact of the case is that Oklahoma does not have jurisdiction if the murder occurred on reservation land .

The Supreme Court , the country's highest judicial tribunal, was to sit in the nation 's Capital and would initially be composed of a chief justice and five associate justices. The act also divided the country into judicial districts, which were in turn organized into circuits. Justices were required to "ride circuit" and resolutions are not legally binding but are an expression of Congress's views in the hope of guiding executive action.[88][89]. The Supreme Court 's 2014 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning limited the ability of the President to make recess appointments (including appointments

The decision : The Supreme Court held, 5-1, that the Cherokee Nation was a sovereign "distinct community." It struck down the Georgia law prohibiting white people living on Native American land . The case was important because it set out the relationship between tribes, states, and the federal government. The decision : In a unanimous decision , the Supreme Court held that the law was unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. Chief Justice Warren wrote, "Under our constitution the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be