Politics New SEC climate rule leaves progressives wanting more
Murphy’s first-term climate goals turn to second-term worries for New Jersey green groups
Murphy’s relative silence on climate has unnerved environmentalists. Just last fall, they were rejoicing at the reelection of a progressive Democratic governor who had Al Gore’s backing during his first campaign and was talking regularly about extreme weather and climate change in the weeks before he won a second term. Days after he won, Murphy seemed like he would stay focused on climate. He said the state wasn’t moving quickly enough on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took a long-sought step this week bythat publicly traded companies disclose their direct and indirect climate change contributions, but advocates are pointing to loopholes they say the firms could exploit.
While thea company to disclose all of its direct emissions, it only required them to disclose indirect emissions - those from its supply chains and the use of its products - when they are "material" to investors.
Progressives expressed concerns that the rules could leave it up to companies to decide whether to reveal these emissions, which, depending on the industry, can make up a major proportion, or even a vast majority, of their climate contributions.
Equilibrium/Sustainability — Venom harvesting raises fears over toads' survival
Today is Monday. Welcome to Equilibrium, a newsletter that tracks the growing global battle over the future of sustainability. Subscribe here.People in search of treatments for certain ailments are putting increasing pressure on populations of the Sonoran desert toad - a Southwestern species whose venom is harvested for its psychedelic properties, The New York Times reported."I saw why they call this the 'God molecule' after I got a fullPeople in search of treatments for certain ailments are putting increasing pressure on populations of the Sonoran desert toad - a Southwestern species whose venom is harvested for its psychedelic properties, The New York Times reported.
Lena Moffitt, chief of staff at environmental group Evergreen Action, said that without clearer requirements on who needs to disclose this type of emissions, "you run the risk of that essentially being a backdoor way to make this rule voluntary."
"We know that voluntary initiatives don't work. This needs to be clear, consistent and mandatory," Moffitt said.
If finalized,would establish requirements for publicly traded companies to tell their investors how climate change impacts their financial stability, and how much they emit.
It would mandate that firms disclose emissions from both their direct operations, called Scope 1, and emissions from energy they purchase, Scope 2.
In certain cases, it would also make them disclose emissions that they indirectly cause, such as those stemming from the products they sell, known as Scope 3 emissions.
New corporate climate change disclosures proposed by SEC
WASHINGTON (AP) — Companies would be required to disclose the greenhouse gas emissions they produce and how climate risk affects their business under new rules proposed Monday by the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of a drive across the government to address climate change. Under the proposals adopted on a 3-1 SEC vote, public companies would have to report on their climate risks, including the costs of moving away from fossil fuels, as well as risks related to the physical impact of storms, drought and higher temperatures caused by global warming.
The rule explicitly requires companies that have pledged to reduce their Scope 3 emissions to disclose them to investors.
It also requires Scope 3 emissions to be disclosed when they are "material," referring to information that would influence investors' decisions to buy or sell - which has become a flashpoint in the past year's debate over what form of climate disclosure the government should require.
- held by SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce (R), who voted against the new rule, as well as by former Commissioner Elad Roisman (R) - is that any climate disclosures that are material are already legally required, and that no further mandate is necessary.
On Monday, the SEC rejected this view, as well as calls to limit disclosure requirements to just Scope 1 and Scope 2. It's a significant step, because for some industries, such as producers of fossil fuels and automobiles, the emissions that come from their products - Scope 3 -are the greatest source of their contributions to climate change.
First football, now men's basketball: SEC's big spending is changing the landscape of college hoops
The SEC could soon enter a different stratosphere when it comes to spending on coaching thanks in part to lucrative media-rights deals.Two interrelated factors threatened to overshadow Arkansas' postseason run.
And climate and financial transparency advocates say that for such industries, these emissions can be the most important to disclose to get a complete picture, giving the example of makers of gas-powered and electric vehicles, whose operations may look similar, but whose products have vastly differing climate impacts.
"If you take two auto companies - Tesla and General Motors - and you look at the Scope 1 and 2 emissions from building automobiles, you're going to find relatively comparable results," Ivan Frishberg, the chief sustainability officer at Amalgamated Bank, said during a briefing for reporters last week.
"It's really when you come to Scope 3 that you understand what the associated emissions are," he added.
While the rule doesn't explicitly require any industry to reveal these indirect emissions, it does highlight the auto industry, saying that its Scope 3 emissions can help determine how much it will be affected by regulations and initiatives supporting a switch to electric vehicles.
The SEC goes even further with "oil and gas product manufacturers," saying these types of emissions "are likely to be material and thus necessary to an understanding of a registrant's climate-related risks."
Energy & Environment — Green groups say SEC rule needs teeth
Welcome to Wednesday's Overnight Energy & Environment, your source for the latest news focused on energy, the environment and beyond. Subscribe here.Today we're looking at how progressives are reacting to the SEC's rule on climate risk disclosure, the UN's prescription for natural disasters and the Fish and Wildlife Service backing down on bats. For The Hill, we're Rachel Frazin and Zack Budryk. Write to us with tips: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com.Let's jump in.
Outside experts, however, are calling for a universal Scope 3 requirement, saying that the current language leaves companies with too much leeway.
"I'm quite worried that there'll be companies trying to make arguments that they don't think it's material for them, or it's outside of their control," said Alex Martin, a senior climate and finance policy analyst at Americans for Financial Reform.
Martin also raised concerns that the SEC will be reluctant to enforce inaccurate reporting since the Scope 3 standard comes with a "safe harbor" that would prevent errors and misstatements from being considered fraud unless they were made in bad faith.
"The fact there's a safe harbor...means that there'll just be a lower-level scrutiny from both the SEC [and] a lower level of liability concerns for shareholder-brought action," he said. "I still think that there could be options for accountability, but it's quite lower-level."
Another element of disclosure that some groups asked for, but did not receive, concerned political spending, particularly to dark money groups.
"We believe disclosure of corporate political spending needs to be included as part of climate change disclosures," the Association of Federal, State, County and Municipal Employees, a trade union of public workers,.
Clarence Thomas' wife told Mark Meadows that 'the Biden crime family' and 'ballot fraud co-conspirators' would be 'living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,' texts show
Ginni Thomas pushed QAnon-adjacent conspiracy theories and strategized about ways to overturn the 2020 election 'Heist' in texts with Mark Meadows.Virginia "Ginni" Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, texted Meadows in the days after the 2020 election, according to the messages obtained by the House Committee investigating January 6 and reported on by the Washington Post's Bob Woodward and CBS News' Robert Costa.
The association pointed to "multiple examples of the energy industry's involvement in campaigns that solicit criticism from outside groups, some of which it finances or staffs, to create the impression of broad-based support for positions."
The question of how much to make companies disclose - and how legally binding those disclosures should be - have been the most controversial elements of the SEC proposal, with investor groups, fossil fuel companies and progressive regulators all staking out different positions in recent months.
Groups representing fossil fuel interests have said they didn't want any type of Scope 3 disclosure requirements.
"Many climate-related risks cannot be quantified, or, if the risk were to be quantified, many assumptions and speculations would be required," wrote the National Mining Association, which represents the coal industry. "Quantitative metrics should be limited to the company and should not extend upstream or downstream."
But supporters of Scope 3 disclosure have pushed back on this notion, pointing out that some companies are already doing it.
"It takes some work to get your systems together, but that's work that every company should be doing anyway," Frishberg told The Hill. "Apple has been doing this and BlackRock did it...there's data quality improvements that we all look for, but there's a lot of companies already doing it,"
Meanwhile, large investor and corporate groups such as BlackRock - a major lobbyist for climate disclosure rules in general - have requested more or less what the SEC delivered: a "phased" Scope 3 reporting requirement with a generous "safe harbor" to protect companies from liability while their "data and methodologies are still emerging."
Progressive groups such as Public Citizen and legislators including Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) have lobbied for highly stringent Scope 3 emissions, including "greenhouse gas emissions resulting from real economy activities that issuers finance or underwrite," as- what are known as "financed emissions."
SEC Commissioner Allison Herren Lee described what they ultimately came up with as "measured and balanced" for all parties involved.
"It takes a measured and balanced approach to climate disclosure, building upon current market practices, including proposed accommodations for smaller companies, balancing principles-based requirements with the need for climate-related metrics, phasing in certain requirements over time, and even providing a safe harbor for the disclosure of Scope 3 emissions," she said in a statement.
The SEC tries its hand at climate policy .
Foisting a structurally misleading disclosure regime onto financial markets by labelling it an indicator of climate transition risk runs contrary to the SEC’s mandate.No one should be fooled.