Inside the personal finances of Joe Biden's possible Supreme Court nominees
- President Joe Biden has pledged to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court.
- Insider obtained the most recent financial records for four potential Supreme Court nominees.
- Some of these potential nominees have held individual stocks or investment properties.
Justice Stephen Breyer's retirement announcement has prompted a speculative frenzy over who President Joe Biden will nominate to the Supreme Court. Biden has previously vowed to appoint a Black woman as his Supreme Court justice. His short list initially included at least a dozen people, and Biden since said he's done a "deep dive" on "abut four people."
Biden is expected to make a final decision by the end of February to replace Breyer and has already begun to reach out to potential candidates, according to CNN.
GOP Sen. Susan Collins says she'll vote to confirm Biden's Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson
Collins is the first Republican to support Jackson, ensuring Biden's Supreme Court nominee will get a bipartisan confirmation vote."I have decided to support the confirmation of Judge Jackson to be a member of the Supreme Court," Collins told The New York Times after meeting with Jackson a second time on Tuesday. Collins' move ensures that Jackson will get bipartisan support to serve on the Supreme Court.
![]()
Insider obtained the most recently available financial disclosure forms for four potential candidates: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger, US District Judge J. Michelle Childs of South Carolina, and US District Judge Leslie Abrams Gardner of Georgia.
The financial disclosures, obtained through the Free Law Project, provide a revealing, if incomplete, picture of their personal finances. The documents in part list salary information, outside income, past positions, travel reimbursements and perks, and details about their various financial investments, including stocks and rental properties.
Some of these investments could conceivably pose conflicts of interest at a time when the public's opinion of the Supreme Court is plummeting, according to recent polls.
The number of Americans who have favorable views of the Supreme Court declined to 54% in January 2022 from 70% in August 2020, according to a new survey by Pew Research Center. A recent Gallup poll painted an even bleaker picture for the high court.
All Senate Democrats and 3 Republicans advance Ketanji Brown Jackson's nomination, teeing up her final Supreme Court confirmation vote
Earlier on Monday, Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee tied 11-11 on Jackson's nomination.The committee earlier Monday voted 11-11 on Jackson's nomination, with all Democrats on the panel voting in favor and all Republicans voting against. The tie forced Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to hold another vote to push Jackson's nomination forward, filing what's called a motion to "discharge" the committee.
![]()
"The public is paying attention to the Supreme Court in a way that I don't think it has in the past because it has both the perception and the reality of being increasingly partisan," said Renee Knake Jefferson, a University of Houston law professor.
Jefferson told Insider that it's unclear what the recusal process would look like for any Supreme Court nominee who may have certain investments that could pose an ethical conflict. But it will be something that Biden will carefully have to monitor, Jefferson said.
Ethical conflicts of federal judges has been at the center of controversy since the Wall Street Journal published a report that found that more than 130 federal judges broke the law by overseeing cases in which they or their family members had a financial interest.
This Supreme Court nomination process also comes on the heels of Insider's "Conflicted Congress" project that found that dozens of lawmakers — including those in the US Senate who will vote on a Supreme Court nomination — had potential financial conflicts or violated the law by failing to properly disclose their own stock transactions. Congress is actively debating whether to strengthen these rules — including whether to require Supreme Court justices or all federal judges to disclose more information about their personal finances.
Jackson likely confirmed in a hurry. Getting on the Supreme Court? That'll take time.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's wait to take a Supreme Court seat is longer than previous nominees faced. Some were sworn in almost immediately.Assuming President Joe Biden's nominee to the nation's highest court is confirmed by the Senate this week, Jackson will have to sit tight for nearly three months for her spot on the bench to open up – an unusually long delay that may have implications for public perceptions of the court, her ascension to it and a number of high-profile cases.
![]()
Below are details about four leading Supreme Court nominee candidates' personal finances. This article will be updated as financial disclosures become available for other potential Supreme Court nominees.