Technology: LGBTQ+ creators file lawsuit charging YouTube with discrimination - PressFrom - US
  •   
  •   
  •   

TechnologyLGBTQ+ creators file lawsuit charging YouTube with discrimination

18:30  14 august  2019
18:30  14 august  2019 Source:   engadget.com

YouTube will soon let you try out makeup with AR

YouTube will soon let you try out makeup with AR If you’re obsessed with makeup tutorials on YouTube, we’ve good news for you. You can now try out makeup with your favorite YouTubers using augmented reality. 

The charge should be filed within 180 days from occurrence of the alleged violation. The time to file can be extended to 300 days under limited circumstances. In the event that the EEOC decides not to sue the employer on the individual’s behalf, the individual has 90 days to file a lawsuit on his or her

This video provides excellent interview tips on the topic " Charging the Employer with Discrimination ". Any prospective job seeker can get an idea about how to tackle this Therefore, if you are anxious for justice, you should request that the EEOC issue you a notice 180 days after you file your charge .

In a federal lawsuit filed yesterday, a group of LGBTQ+ video creators claims YouTube discriminates against their content. The group alleges that YouTube suppresses their videos, restricts their ability to monetize their channels and enforces its policies unevenly, giving more leeway to producers with large audiences. According to The Washington Post, the suit argues that YouTube deploys "unlawful content regulation, distribution, and monetization practices that stigmatize, restrict, block, demonetize, and financially harm the LGBT Plaintiffs and the greater LGBT Community."

LGBTQ+ creators file lawsuit charging YouTube with discrimination

As The Washington Post points out, YouTube's software is kept secret, so creators are often left wondering why their content is suppressed. The plaintiffs believe that YouTube's algorithms and human reviewers single out and remove content with words like "gay," "lesbian" or "bisexual." Bria Kam and Chrissy Chambers claim YouTube restricted some of their videos and caused their monthly revenue to drop from $3,500 to around $500. Other creators say YouTube's failure to address hateful comments forced them to turn comments off, which then limited their potential earnings.

U.S. psychoanalysts apologize for labeling homosexuality an illness

U.S. psychoanalysts apologize for labeling homosexuality an illness The American Psychoanalytic Association apologized on Friday for previously treating homosexuality as a mental illness, saying its past errors contributed to discrimination and trauma for LGBTQ people. require(["medianetNativeAdOnArticle"], function (medianetNativeAdOnArticle) { medianetNativeAdOnArticle.getMedianetNativeAds(true); }); It may be the first U.S. medical or mental health organization to issue such an apology.

You're viewing YouTube in Russian. You can change this preference below. In our last video, we discussed Google's response to Prager University's lawsuit charging it with discrimination in its To support the work of content creators who may not have access to legal help, Lior Leser started a

Strict time limits are involved in filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC or NERC and in filing a lawsuit . You're viewing YouTube in Russian. You can change this preference below.

While YouTube hasn't responded to the allegations, it doesn't have the best track record. In 2017, users noticed that its Restrict Mode was consistently blocking videos with LGBTQ+ content. It apologized and fixed the bug that supposedly caused the issue. More recently, the platform was criticized when it declined to pull racist and homophobic videos by the controversial conservative commentator Steven Crowder. Later, some moderators claimed they made exceptions for creators with larger audiences. In response, YouTube said it has two sets of standards for conduct -- one for creators who can benefit from advertising and somewhat looser guidelines for the general YouTube community.

World Cup: US women say gender discrimination lawsuit has not and will not be distraction

World Cup: US women say gender discrimination lawsuit has not and will not be distraction Entire US women's team sued US Soccer in March, alleging gender discrimination.

A group of YouTube creators is suing YouTube for allegedly discriminating against their LGBTQ -focused videos by suppressing “ YouTube really needs to start paying attention to this community I don’t feel like I belong on a platform that I and other LGBTQ+ individuals helped build.”

After the firing of James Damore, people are coming out to support him, or to attempt to suck some money out of Google themselves, using this controversy to

Some of the concerns raised in the lawsuit echo those circulating in Washington. Like some lawmakers, the plaintiffs say YouTube and Google have amassed too much power. "By controlling an estimated 95 percent of the public video communications that occur in the world, Google and YouTube wield unparallelled power and unfettered discretion to apply viewpoint-based content policies in a way that permits them to pick winners and losers," the plaintiffs' attorney Peter Obstler told The Washington Post.

Engadget has reached out to Google for comment.

The Washington Post

YouTube moderators say the site goes easy on its big stars.
YouTube just can't seem to get out of this hole it has dug itself into. According to a Washington Post report, the video giant has let top video creators get away more lightly with problematic content than those who bring in in fewer videos. The publication spoke with 11 current and former moderators for the platform, who have worked in teams that make decisions around this content, and they expressed that popular accounts "often get special treatment in the form of looser interpretations of YouTube's guidelines prohibiting demeaning speech, bullying and other forms of graphic content.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!