Technology We Would Rather Lose Our Jobs To Robots Than Humans, A Study Shows
Toyota is using VR to train robots as in-home helpers
Home robots could make all of our lives easier, and perhaps most importantly, they could allow seniors to live more independently. But training robots to operate in homes is difficult because each home is unique and filled with so many objects in different combinations and layouts. Toyota Research Institute (TRI) may have a solution: using virtual reality to change the way we train robots. The VR training system allows human teachers to see what the robot is seeing live, in 3D, from its sensors. The teacher can instruct the robot and annotate the 3D scene, for instance adding a note on how to grasp a handle.
Losing a job can be stressful and demoralizing. Seeing your role replaced by automation is an additional stressor that more workers will have to contend with and worry about in the future.
Robots are already replacing people in some jobs.take orders in chain restaurants, and some supermarkets use to replace checkers. This is the new reality. The Brookings Institution that 36 million Americans face a “high exposure to automation” in the coming decades, meaning they will have more than 70% of their role at risk of being substituted by artificial intelligence.
Toyota Research Institute developing robots to assist the elderly at home
As many countries across the world are experiencing surges in the proportion of elderly persons in their populations, ensuring that all people are properly attended to becomes increasingly difficult. To address this challenge, Toyota's Research Institute announced late last week that an at-home assistant robot is in development, one that has the capacity to continuously learn how to do new tasks in all types of homes. With the primary goal toWith the primary goal to assist the increasing ratio of older persons across the world, Toyota recently announced that their Research Institute is developing an at-home robot assistant whose intelligence continuously evolves.
If you had to choose between getting replaced in your job by a robot or by another human, which would you pick? That’s the hard choice that researchers at the Technical University of Munich and Erasmus University in Rotterdam posed to almost 2,000 respondents in apublished in the journal Nature Human Behavior.
Turns out, thanks to our egos, we take job loss harder when it’s our fellow human replacing us, not robots. Most of us would actually rather lose our jobs to robots than other humans if we were forced to choose.
Our egos prefer getting replaced by a bot we can’t be compared to.
In a series of studies, researchers Armin Granulo, Christoph Fuchs and Stefano Puntoni asked participants to imagine scenarios in which they were employees being replaced by modern software.
Workers trust AI more than human managers
The latest AI at Work study from Oracle and Future Workplace highlights how AI is changing the relationship between people and technology at work.To compile the study, the two firms surveyed 8,370 employees, managers and HR leaders across 10 countries to find that AI has changed the relationship between people and technology in the workplace and is reshaping the role HR teams and managers need to play when it comes to attracting, retaining and developing talent.
In one study scenario, a large manufacturing firm was reorganizing and some of the existing employees were going to lose their jobs. To achieve the reorganization goals, participants were told, the company had two options: Replace existing employees either with new employees or by robots that could do the tasks automatically.
When they were observers of this scenario, 67% of participants preferred to see the employees replaced by fellow humans rather than by robots. But when participants were told that their own job was at risk, the stakes got more personal. The majority (60%) said they would prefer getting replaced by a robot rather than a fellow human.
In another exercise, researchers measured how sad, frustrated or angry participants felt about the replacement scenario. People losing jobs to robots got a more negative reaction when participants were observers, but when it was their own fictional job on the line, participants said they were more upset about getting replaced by a human.
Amazon to open new robotics hub outside Boston in 2021
WESTBOROUGH, Mass. (AP) — Amazon says it plans to open a $40 million robotics innovation hub west of Boston. The technology giant said Wednesday the complex will open in 2021 in Westborough, Massachusetts. Amazon says the expansion will create about 200 tech and advanced manufacturing jobs. Amazon says it has created more than 4,000 full-time jobs in Massachusetts and has invested over $3 billion in the state since 2011. Tye Brady is AmazonThe technology giant said Wednesday the complex will open in 2021 in Westborough, Massachusetts. Amazon says the expansion will create about 200 tech and advanced manufacturing jobs.
Why does getting replaced by a fellow colleague seemingly upset us more than getting replaced by a robot? The researchers suggest this contradiction makes sense once you consider human egos.
“It’s much harder to compare yourself to a robot than to another person,” Granulo, the study’s lead author, told HuffPost. “Your identity is really threatened if you are replaced by somebody else, because it’s easy to compare yourself to another person and think, ‘Hey, why is he better?’” In other words, when a colleague with similar human skills is picked to replace you, you may question your own abilities in a way that you would not if replaced by software.
Fuchs said we may have different motives when we are given the opportunity to give someone else employment over a robot, without risking our own role. From a safe observational distance, we tend to think, “Well, it’s better that humans have jobs,” Fuchs said.
“The technological replacement of human labor has unique psychological consequences, and these consequences should be taken into account,” Granulo said. “The psychological effects of people’s self-worth, how they think about their future and their skills... it matters why people lose their jobs.”
Robots 'not evil' says Boston Dynamics as humanoids go viral
As videos of robot-like dogs made by Boston Dynamics go viral on the internet, the humanoids' uncanny abilities have also sparked worries that they could become a threat to humans. Police going to a hazmat hazardous environment situation or bomb threat or just something where there's an unknown package and rather than have a human going to poke at it they're using the robots to poke at it."Not so, says their creator Marc Raibert in an interview with AFP at the Lisbon Web Summit, claiming that the Spot robots aren't evil and won't be turned into weapons.
It’s important to remember that automation is not a faceless robot coming for your job.
Losing your job sucks. But research shows that we can handle hard business decisions like layoffs when we know that theand we could give input into the process and had ample notice. If you want to change someone’s job with automation, it shouldn’t just happen out of nowhere.
But, unfortunately, that’s what some workers who are actually experiencing automation feel is happening. A Novemberfrom the think tank New America was based on 40 in-depth interviews with grocery, food, retail and administrative workers on the frontlines of automation. For them, automation was not a faceless inevitability but a conscious decision made by human managers.
“We heard, over and over, that employees felt that the companies they worked for were looking for ways to cut costs, that they were putting shareholder value over the wellbeing of their workers,” said Molly Kinder, the lead author of the report and a David M. Rubenstein Fellow at the Brookings Institution. “A lot of them, when they talked about a decision to put in a self-checkout lane, this was not inevitable. They felt there was a choice their employer made, and what was driving this choice was this emphasis on profits.”
Security robots are mobile surveillance devices, not human replacements
They’re scooping up data, from facial scans to license platesA new report from OneZero sheds some light on the scope of the data collection, featuring marketing material and contracts between Knightscope and various city councils. Both show that the main purpose of these robots is gathering data, including license plates, facial recognition scans, and the presence of nearby mobile devices. It’s the sort of constant low-level surveillance that only a machine can perform.
We don’t necessarily have a beef with robots, in other words, but we do have one with managers who make us feel like our contributions don’t matter. “The technology itself is not the issue; it’s the extent to which workers are involved in the process and how it ultimately impacts their job satisfaction, their job quality and their job security,” Kinder said.
Take it from Naomi, an assistant manager of an apartment complex who was interviewed in the New America report. She felt a lack of agency over software changes at her job. “[New employees] won’t come to me for benefit questions anymore because it’s all there through ADP,” a human resources software program, she said. “They could get rid of me and eliminate my job. The most annoying thing is that your fate is in someone else’s hands.”
This article originally appeared on.
Related video: What is work EQ? (provided by CNBC)
This test will show you if you lose your job to a robot in the futureThrough technological change and artificial intelligence, the world of work will change dramatically. With a new online tool you can now calculate how endangered your job is.
New techniques have always changed people's lives. Often it has made our lives easier: If you used to scrub your clothes by hand, you simply put them in the washing machine today and press "Start".More on MSN
Robots on the ice: Swiss scientists have missed him skates!
However, the technological change also affected the world of work. Many professions such as Müller, Wagner, Schuster, Weber or Schneider, which used to be as numerous as the surnames suggest, are today almost only in the niche.information from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) According to
, about 14 percent of jobs in the member states are replaceable by automation. Another 32 percent could experience significant changes.
Above all, routine jobs that require little prior knowledge and are therefore often poorly paid are at risk. In particular, jobs in industry and agriculture are affected, but also in the service sector, many jobs could be eliminated. Even young people may have problems, as typical student and entry-level jobs are at a higher risk of being automated than the activities of older, more experienced employees.However, with the development of artificial intelligence, more and more complex activities
can be done by the computer. Studies suggest that occupations that involve creative work or social interaction will remain relevant. A taxi driver or a messenger is more at risk than a hairdresser or a geriatric nurse.Artificial Intelligence Can Also Create More Jobs Than Eliminate
However, this does not necessarily happen with all jobs that could be replaced by a machine. Thus, in addition to cash registers, where customers have to scan their goods themselves, there are still cash registers with sellers - in Germany, this is still widespread compared to other countries. In addition to online bookings and vending machines, railway customers also still have the option of purchasing train tickets at the counter. And who would get on a plane without human pilots? After all, humans have a great advantage: they can carry out new and very different activities over and over again -robots can not do this in the foreseeable future
. Moreover, they are not always cheaper to buy and maintain than wages and salaries paid to workers.
In addition, new occupations are constantly arising as a result of technical change. According to the OECD, even the bottom lineA test shows you how endangered your job is . In general, the better you are, the smaller the risk of being replaced by a robot.
How big the risk really is that you will be replaced by a robot in your job in the future, you can now calculate with an online tool from the OECD. You can find him.
The test is divided into four sections. In the first part you have to assess the practical aspects of your job, how often you have to solve complex problems or have new ideas while working. Your craftsmanship skills are also queried. The second part focuses on social aspects: do you have to instruct people? How often do you interact with others? The third part is about whether there have already been changes in your work and which are already apparent. Finally, the last part asks for statistical data, such as your age and gender.
Unfortunately, the test is currently only available in English. Another shortcoming is that it is fairly abstract. After all, there are still tips and advice on what professionals can do to continue to be in demand in the labor market, andbetter assess their chances in times of artificial intelligence
You may also be interested in this:
study shows that robots could be dangerous to us - but not as intended
Deutsche Post tests robots to help postmen carry
Automation: Whether robots do their job also depends on where you are lives
Alphabet's rebooted robotics program starts with trash-sorting machines .
For all the advances made by robot companies like Boston Dynamics, we're still a long way from having robots living among humans and performing assistive tasks in our day-to-day lives. Google's parent company, Alphabet, is taking on the this challenge through its experimental X Lab, where engineers are working on The Everyday Robot Project. Alphabet's previous robotics venture was Boston Dynamics, famous for its humanoid bipeds and scary metal dogs. However, the company sold the division to Softbank in 2017.
The big debate about the future of work, explained
Why economists and futurists disagree about the future of the labor market. Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO Sources: ...
Will Robots Take Our Jobs?
In short, yes they will, continuing the trend of humans working less. This video was sponsored by "Robot-Proof" written by Northeastern University's President, ...