Technology States make their case to block T-Mobile-Sprint merger
T-Mobile's Sprint merger officially approved by FCC
But the carriers are still facing opposition from 18 state attorney generals."The largest wireless merger in history is now headed toward approval. If you own a mobile phone, as 96% of American adults do, that's bad news," Rosenworcel wrote. "Shrinking the number of national providers from four to three will hurt consumers, harm competition and eliminate thousands of jobs.
The states trying to stop the between T-Mobile and Sprint say their case is simple: Reducing the number of nationwide wireless carriers from four to three reduces competition and is "under well-established law, presumptively illegal." That's the gist of the 30-page court document filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra on Tuesday evening.
The, which will officially kick off before a federal judge in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on Dec. 9. The main argument the 13 states and the District of Columbia will make in court is that combining T-Mobile and Sprint will reduce competition and violate the federal Clayton Act. This will ultimately lead to higher prices for consumers and fewer choices.
Colorado backs out of lawsuit to stop $26 billion T-Mobile-Sprint deal
But New York's attorney general and 15 others vow to continue the fight.On Monday, the Colorado Attorney General's office announced it had struck a deal with T-Mobile and Dish Network, which has agreed to buy assets that will be divested as a condition of the merger. As part of the deal with Colorado, Dish also promised to add 2,000 jobs to the state, and T-Mobile pledged to deploy 5G service across much of the state, including rural areas, according to the press release.
Specifically, they argue that if the merger is allowed AT&T, Verizon and the new T-Mobile would be more likely to coordinate their behavior, leaving consumers worse off.
"Competition between these four rivals, and especially between Sprint and T-Mobile, has resulted in enormous benefits for consumers, including lower prices and innovative features like no-contract plans and unlimited data plans," the states say in their court filing. "Unsurprisingly, this 'four to three' merger would dramatically increase market concentration in an already highly concentrated industry."
The filing comes as T-Mobile and Sprint peel off some states that joined the AGs' lawsuit earlier in the year. On Monday, the wireless carriers . Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced he had "reached a settlement with T-Mobile resolving the state's antitrust claims against the proposed merger" and is no longer looking to block the deal. Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford also announced his own deal later Monday.
Best 5G phones: Galaxy S10, OnePlus 7 Pro, LG V50, Note 10 Plus and more
The 5G revolution is rolling forward. Here are the superfast 5G devices that are available now.5G is the next generation of mobile connectivity. Though it won't replace 4G in its entirety, it works incredibly fast, and many industries will benefit from the new network, including self-driving cars, drones and the internet of things. More and more 5G deployment will take place throughout this year and next, and it's currently live in select cities for Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprint users. (AT&T's 5G network is only available for businesses for now.) In Britain, UK carrier EE became the first 5G carrier in the country, followed by Vodafone and Three UK.
These states follow others, such as Colorado and Mississippi, that after agreeing to their own settlements. But representatives from the New York and California AG offices say that their fight will continue regardless of the number of states that remain as part of the litigation.
The and the have each signed off on the merger. But their approvals come with conditions.
As part of its deal with the FCC, the companies and to not raise prices on services for three years. The DOJ, like the states suing to stop the merger, also concluded the deal is anticompetitive. But in a separate settlement, , as well as get access to T-Mobile's network as part of a settlement with the wireless carriers. The deal would set up Dish to be the fourth nationwide wireless carrier, preserving the government's goal of having four competitors in the market.
T-Mobile dangles $15 plan, 5G gains, big freebies to get Sprint deal done
Scoop: It says these incentives, which include providing free home broadband to 10 million households with children, won't come without the merger with Sprint.In addition to announcing that its new 5G network will cover 200 million people nationwide on Dec. 6, the carrier on Thursday unveiled three new programs as part of its "New T-Mobile Un-carrier 1.0" event that will take advantage of the increased capacity created by the combination of T-Mobile's and Sprint's networks.
But the states,, say these remedies are not enough. They argue the DOJ's proposal to prop up Dish as a fourth competitor is too risky. The satellite TV provider has no network, no experience operating a wireless network and no retail stores.
"The court should not permit defendants to proceed with an anticompetitive merger based on the hope that Dish will one day grow into a viable wireless company equal to a competitor that already exists today," the states argue in their filing. "If that hope proves unfounded, the cost of failure will not be borne by Defendants -- who would stand to benefit from that failure -- but by consumers who will be left with less competition and higher prices."
In the end, the states argue the only thing that has proven to benefit consumers in terms of "lower prices and higher quality products" is competition.
For their part, T-Mobile and Sprint argue that combining the No. 3 and No. 4 national operators in the US will allow them to survive against competition from AT&T and Verizon, as well as competition from cable operators entertaining the wireless market and online platforms, like Google and Facebook, which are increasingly competing with telecom providers in new markets. The companies argue that the .
But the states say these arguments also "fall flat" as "they cannot defeat the presumption that this merger is anticompetitive."
Internal T-Mobile documents show the company considering a Comcast merger .
‘The only natural option,’ according to confidential 2015 reportTitled “Defining a winning position for the US business model,” the report was assembled at the request of T-Mobile board member Thorsten Langheim in December 2015, meant to give an overview of the company’s market position in advance of a workshop among senior members of leadership. The result is a candid behind-the-scenes look at the company’s strategic outlook, often cutting a sharp contrast to the company’s rebellious “uncarrier” image. (T-Mobile declined to comment.
States sue to stop Sprint-T-Mobile merger
(11 Jun 2019) A group of state attorneys general led by New York and California filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday to block T-Mobile's $26.5 billion bid for Sprint, ...
T-Mobile and Sprint Merger: Official FCC Clearance!
Do you appreciate what SMT offers and want to support your favorite wireless news creator? Consider a small or occasional PayPal donation: ...