•   
  •   
  •   

Technology Apple Loses Latest Legal Fight With VirnetX Over VPN Patents

22:20  10 february  2020
22:20  10 february  2020 Source:   bloomberg.com

Evidence suggests Apple is ready to get rid of the iPhone’s notch

  Evidence suggests Apple is ready to get rid of the iPhone’s notch The iPhone is expected to get the most significant design change since the iPhone X next year, and that rumor makes a lot of sense, especially considering that the 2020 iPhones will likely come with 5G support out of the box. The iPhone 12, as we’ve been calling the 2020 iPhone series, will have a design inspired by the iconic iPhone 4. Although we’ve yet to see any leaks, that would mean the phone would feature a new metal frame, although we still expect the iPhone 12 to retain the iPhone 11’s all-screen-with-notch display.

(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. lost another round in its decadelong legal battle over hundreds of millions of dollars in royalty claims by VirnetX Holding Corp. for patents used in virtual private networks including FaceTime.

a close up of a sign: Apple signage outside of a store.© Bloomberg Apple signage outside of a store.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had already barred Apple from arguing the VirnetX patents are invalid, because such claims have failed in other cases. The full court on Monday refused to reconsider the November ruling.

Apple and VirnetX have been battling for years over technology related to secure communications, and Apple is trying to throw out two jury verdicts for almost $1 billion in combined damages. The iPhone maker asked the appeals court to reconsider whether VirnetX’s patents should have been issued and claims the awards are excessive, especially considering VirnetX reports less than $2 million in annual revenue.

Apple Strikes New Deal with U.K. Chipmaker It Sidelined in 2017

  Apple Strikes New Deal with U.K. Chipmaker It Sidelined in 2017 U.K. chip designer Imagination Technologies Group Plc said it’s struck a new license agreement with Apple Inc., reviving a business relationship that had all but ended in recent years. © Bloomberg An Apple Inc. logo is displayed outside the company's store at Yorkdale mall in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Thursday, Aug. 22, 2019. Statistics Canada (STCA) is scheduled to release consumer price index data on September 18.

VirnetX rose 10% to $4.66 at 2:38 p.m. in New York trading, after jumping as much as 18% earlier Monday.

In November, the appellate panel ruled that there was “substantial evidence” that Apple’s virtual private network service infringed two VirnetX patents, but said Apple’s redesigned version of FaceTime didn’t use two other VirnetX patents. The court said that the $503 million in damages would have to be recalculated.

Apple argued in its petition for reconsideration that the panel was wrong to preclude it from renewing its invalidity arguments, saying it wanted to raise different legal issues. It also sought to have the court reconsider the infringement finding that was upheld.

At a separate trial, Apple lost a $439 million judgment over earlier versions of VPN on Demand and FaceTime, and the Federal Circuit upheld the verdict. Apple is asking the Supreme Court to consider the case, particularly how damages are calculated.

The next Apple Pencil could come with more gestures, and even a camera

  The next Apple Pencil could come with more gestures, and even a camera A new patent outlines some of the improvements we might see in the next generation of the Apple Pencil.A new patent spotted by AppleInsider details how a future Apple Pencil could come with support for more gestures beyond the double-tap input that the 2nd-gen Apple Pencil offers.

In the meantime, the patent office has found all but one aspect of one of the four patents to be invalid. Apple contends that it shouldn’t be forced to pay royalties on patents that shouldn’t have been issued. VirnetX has said that there is no final decision to cancel those patents, so Apple’s argument is premature and part of an ongoing effort to avoid paying for the use of another company’s inventions.

The case is VirnetX Inc. v Apple Inc., 19-1050, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Washington).

(Updates with Apple arguments, VirnetX stock movement)

To contact the reporter on this story: Susan Decker in Washington at sdecker1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at jmorgan97@bloomberg.net, Steve Stroth, Joe Schneider

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

Sharp sues Vizio over display tech in 70-inch TVs .
Sharp, the Japanese electronics company behind the world's largest 8K LCD TV, is suing Vizio and two other companies over alleged patent infringement. Sharp claims that the companies infringed 12 patents related to panel technologies, like liquid crystal displays (LCD). In particular, Sharp says one of Vizio's 70-inch TVs is an offender. Sharp is seeking an injunction, as well as compensation for lost profits and the use of its technology. SharpSharp filed the lawsuit in a US District Court in California yesterday, but says it tried to settle the issue through negotiations with one of the other companies named, Xianyang CaiHong Optoelectronics Technology Co (CHOT).

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!